Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: fart simpson)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
genericnick
Dec 26, 2012

i say swears online posted:

if the US is invading china, i don't think china would have any concerns about collateral damage vis a vis taiwan since it'd by necessity be a logistics point well-known beforehand. do you think the US would launch a war from okinawa

Don't think it matters in that case. If there's fighting on the Chinese mainland we're one half-step from nukes. I was more thinking of a sniping each other's shipping situation.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Maximo Roboto
Feb 4, 2012

Fine; as compromise, the PRC may launch a separatist movement on Vancouver Island and make that a "neutral" nation under Chinese influence.

Ardennes
May 12, 2002
Yeah, neither the PRC or the US is going to give up over the issue. It is also why there is pressure being placed on SK and the Philippines.

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005

Maximo Roboto posted:

Wait a second, this discussion is absolutely mad. Why would the U.S. try to launch attacks on the Chinese mainland in the event of war? The U.S. isn't even willing to bomb Iran, you think they would really try to invade China? How does that make any logistical sense? It would be like Japan thinking they could conquer the continental U.S. during WWII.

And why wouldn't both sides just launch conventional non-nuke ICBMs at each other?

iunno the dude asked, i thought it was absurd too

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005

Ardennes posted:

Yeah, neither the PRC or the US is going to give up over the issue. It is also why there is pressure being placed on SK and the Philippines.

i in fact think the US is going to give up on this. the PRC's time horizon is way more mature than the US on literally any given issue

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

i say swears online posted:

i in fact think the US is going to give up on this. the PRC's time horizon is way more mature than the US on literally any given issue

We'll see, the US by giving up sea lanes (in any direction), also gives up pretty much any actual mechanism to contain China. In the long-term, I think this point is moot since China's economy is a sufficient size it could build a navy to take out the USN. However, DC will not give it up easily, and they could very well drag it on for decades if they can do so.

It makes sense, the only way the Washington Consensus really works is if there are no options others in town, and if you can't eliminate/suppress other options, then you are the one that now has to compromise. They don't want to compromise, they want "no other alternative."

It is also why this could get messy, because I could see Washington becoming more desperate to keep control as China gains more of advantage. This includes eventually "cashing out" the US Dollar for a massive military build-up not to mention information warfare and clandestine activities.

Ardennes has issued a correction as of 10:24 on Oct 13, 2021

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005

Ardennes posted:

We'll see, the US by giving up sea lanes (in any direction), also gives up pretty much any actual mechanism to contain China. In the long-term, I think this point is moot since China's economy is a sufficient size it could build a navy to take out the USN. However, DC will not give it up easily, and could very well drag it on for decades if it can do so.

this is my issue with any potential war. in 2040 we'll eventually shut up; our MIC can't produce effective military operations anymore and reality will catch up with rhetoric faster than you think. taiwan's death knell was 1971 whatever else anyone wants to believe

Centrist Committee
Aug 6, 2019
the white house is publicly warning of shortages going into christmas but sure let’s keep pretending war with the world’s most advanced economy would end in anything other than disaster

gonna be funny to watch the cpc calmly shrug off whatever cheap veneer the us tries to slap on the umbrella movement for taiwan tho

lollontee
Nov 4, 2014
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!

Al-Saqr posted:

you’re right it’s important to put people in concentration camps en masse no matter what they did or didn’t do. it’s awesome that you would be on the same side as the colonialists and such if you were given the chance back then.

also caring about human beings no matter who they are and wishing for their fair treatment no matter what their religion or race is kinda what separates real socialists like me from red fash tankies like you, sorry to break the news for you.

I’m praising the CCP for dialing it back and coming somewhat to their senses a little, if they continue I will praise them for it but if they continue their abuse I will condemn them for it.

how do you stop a global network of jihadists supported by the most powerful empire on earth from doing an insurgency in a border region with ethnic tensions without repressive measures?

Ardennes
May 12, 2002
I would say at least the narratives about Chinese blackouts are pretty interesting where you have articles both crowing about the impact of blackouts on the Chinese economy and condemning China for increasing coal production coming out simultaneously. It also interesting considering other countries like India are facing the same situation.

It is almost like nothing matters.

----------------

Granted, I expect the political battle for Taiwan if not the geopolitical contest between China and the US is going to get a lot dirtier especially if one side gets an honest advantage over the other. It may go into directions not even the first Cold War did since the US never really had its economic primacy threatened.

Kassad
Nov 12, 2005

It's about time.
The blackouts are also likely making the supply chain issues and shortages in the US even worse, aren't they?

Agrajag
Jan 21, 2006

gat dang thats hot

Raskolnikov38 posted:

AP: genocide over. everybody go home

d&d:
That is an incredibly bleak article, holy gently caress.

So they've moved from "put them all into concentration camps" to "turn their homes and towns into concentration camps".

the entirety of america is a concentration camp if you really think about it

Agrajag
Jan 21, 2006

gat dang thats hot

Ardennes posted:

We'll see, the US by giving up sea lanes (in any direction), also gives up pretty much any actual mechanism to contain China. In the long-term, I think this point is moot since China's economy is a sufficient size it could build a navy to take out the USN. However, DC will not give it up easily, and they could very well drag it on for decades if they can do so.

It makes sense, the only way the Washington Consensus really works is if there are no options others in town, and if you can't eliminate/suppress other options, then you are the one that now has to compromise. They don't want to compromise, they want "no other alternative."

It is also why this could get messy, because I could see Washington becoming more desperate to keep control as China gains more of advantage. This includes eventually "cashing out" the US Dollar for a massive military build-up not to mention information warfare and clandestine activities.

washington's policies and decision making basically operates on election cycles now whereas china doesnt

just putting that out there in terms of the ability of washington to make any kind of coherent policy or planning and my evidence is literally the last shitshow of a decade

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

Agrajag posted:

washington's policies and decision making basically operates on election cycles now whereas china doesnt

just putting that out there in terms of the ability of washington to make any kind of coherent policy or planning and my evidence is literally the last shitshow of a decade

There is continuity on the major points, it is short-term planning is a mess and that isn't really up to election cycles as much as DC has no clue what it is doing and how to do it if it did.

I do think there was an attempt under Trump to send some feelers to the Russians to try to turn them against China, but it clearly didn't go anywhere as the results of Russia gate showed. That said, Trump is way out of his league in terms of international negotiation and I doubt he had much to give the Russians anyway. Either way, US relations with Russia never improved and still haven't.

Kassad posted:

The blackouts are also likely making the supply chain issues and shortages in the US even worse, aren't they?

I mean they can't help, but considering there are continual blockages in the ports, I don't know if is a core reason. Also, inflation is coming from energy prices which continue to climb. Admittedly, the only way China can move forward (if not most developing states) is to push more coal production/importation in the short-term.

sullat
Jan 9, 2012

lollontee posted:

how do you stop a global network of jihadists supported by the most powerful empire on earth from doing an insurgency in a border region with ethnic tensions without repressive measures?

China is a long way away from being able to stir up separatists in Texas.

Feldegast42
Oct 29, 2011

COMMENCE THE RITE OF SHITPOSTING


Now that's a name I haven't heard in a long time, guess some gamergate folks are still carrying the torch out there

Slider
Jun 6, 2004

POINTS

Southpaugh
May 26, 2007

Smokey Bacon


Ardennes posted:

----------------
Granted, I expect the political battle for Taiwan if not the geopolitical contest between China and the US is going to get a lot dirtier especially if one side gets an honest advantage over the other. It may go into directions not even the first Cold War did since the US never really had its economic primacy threatened.

I'd argue that China already has all of the economic advantages it needs and it can basically just sit and wait as the american ruling class murders/drives into penury its own population/powerbase. I am interested in seeing where america will decide needs an "intervention" between now and the next election cycle.

I always view Neo-Liberalism as being the economic equivalent of pulling the copper wires out of the walls and its basically been going on for too long now.

stephenthinkpad
Jan 2, 2020

Feldegast42 posted:

Now that's a name I haven't heard in a long time, guess some gamergate folks are still carrying the torch out there

Yeah I would gladly go back to the old reddit where you can actually page down to posts older than 28 days.

Now its endless reddit gamer buck achievement bullshit.

Al-Saqr
Nov 11, 2007

One Day I Will Return To Your Side.

lollontee posted:

how do you stop a global network of jihadists supported by the most powerful empire on earth from doing an insurgency in a border region with ethnic tensions without repressive measures?

no you’re right all Muslims are guilty until proven innocent great to see you’re a supporter of Guantanamo and surveillance and entrapment of millions of innocent people based on nothing but their religion and race and taking the ol’ french and British colonialist playbook of rounding them all up what a cool leftist you are.

it’s impossible that doing things like ‘starving and seperatist or radical cause of support by treating the citizens well, investing in them, protecting their rights and leaving them alone to live dignified lives and be equal citizens in your country and dealing with crime case-by-case” could ever be an option nope never let’s do the same things america and Israel do and worse instead.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Al-Saqr posted:

no you’re right all Muslims are guilty until proven innocent great to see you’re a supporter of Guantanamo and surveillance and entrapment of millions of innocent people based on nothing but their religion and race and taking the ol’ french and British colonialist playbook of rounding them all up what a cool leftist you are.

it’s impossible that doing things like ‘starving and seperatist or radical cause of support by treating the citizens well, investing in them, protecting their rights and leaving them alone to live dignified lives and be equal citizens in your country and dealing with crime case-by-case” could ever be an option nope never let’s do the same things america and Israel do and worse instead.

what exactly do you think is happening

Agrajag
Jan 21, 2006

gat dang thats hot

Al-Saqr posted:

no you’re right all Muslims are guilty until proven innocent great to see you’re a supporter of Guantanamo and surveillance and entrapment of millions of innocent people based on nothing but their religion and race and taking the ol’ french and British colonialist playbook of rounding them all up what a cool leftist you are.

it’s impossible that doing things like ‘starving and seperatist or radical cause of support by treating the citizens well, investing in them, protecting their rights and leaving them alone to live dignified lives and be equal citizens in your country and dealing with crime case-by-case” could ever be an option nope never let’s do the same things america and Israel do and worse instead.

and worse?

worse than america and israel? :thunk:

im not saying china is not doing anything wrong but cmon

lollontee
Nov 4, 2014
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!

Al-Saqr posted:

no you’re right all Muslims are guilty until proven innocent great to see you’re a supporter of Guantanamo and surveillance and entrapment of millions of innocent people based on nothing but their religion and race and taking the ol’ french and British colonialist playbook of rounding them all up what a cool leftist you are.

it’s impossible that doing things like ‘starving and seperatist or radical cause of support by treating the citizens well, investing in them, protecting their rights and leaving them alone to live dignified lives and be equal citizens in your country and dealing with crime case-by-case” could ever be an option nope never let’s do the same things america and Israel do and worse instead.

thats not what i asked though. ETIM built its networks of jihadists and radical madrassas before the most repressive measures were adopted by the Xinjiang administration. how do you see the situation wouldve developed without the concentration camps?

Grapplejack
Nov 27, 2007

Maximo Roboto posted:

Wait a second, this discussion is absolutely mad. Why would the U.S. try to launch attacks on the Chinese mainland in the event of war? The U.S. isn't even willing to bomb Iran, you think they would really try to invade China? How does that make any logistical sense? It would be like Japan thinking they could conquer the continental U.S. during WWII.

And why wouldn't both sides just launch conventional non-nuke ICBMs at each other?

No, it would be nuclear ICBMs, an invasion of China would be an existential threat to the state and they would respond accordingly.

Judakel
Jul 29, 2004
Probation
Can't post for 9 years!
do you enjoy extreme martial arts performances?

https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1448237735844667393

Maximo Roboto
Feb 4, 2012

Centrist Committee posted:

gonna be funny to watch the cpc calmly shrug off whatever cheap veneer the us tries to slap on the umbrella movement for taiwan tho

People itt really don't know anything about Taiwan other than its utility as a pawn in the new great game, do they. A youth movement already existed

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunflower_Student_Movement

Centrist Committee
Aug 6, 2019
lol, hollywood really is out of ideas

Wraith of J.O.I.
Jan 25, 2012


they're not out of ideas they just want to play safe with the IP cash stream, and it's been working pretty well for a while now........ hope it crashes soon tho

30.5 Days
Nov 19, 2006

Al-Saqr posted:

no you’re right all Muslims are guilty until proven innocent great to see you’re a supporter of Guantanamo and surveillance and entrapment of millions of innocent people based on nothing but their religion and race and taking the ol’ french and British colonialist playbook of rounding them all up what a cool leftist you are.

it’s impossible that doing things like ‘starving and seperatist or radical cause of support by treating the citizens well, investing in them, protecting their rights and leaving them alone to live dignified lives and be equal citizens in your country and dealing with crime case-by-case” could ever be an option nope never let’s do the same things america and Israel do and worse instead.

How do you square this opinion with the knowledge that the incarceration rate of uyghurs in xinjiang is lower than the incarceration rate of black people in america? Your position here seems to be that, ok, sure, it turns out all the stuff about forced abortion and murders and slavery and eliminating islam from public life turned out to be false, but there's still a police state in xinjiang! And, sure, but according to neutral third party estimates it is less intense than the one we have here in america. That's why those insane obviously-false accusations existed in the first place. If you boil the accusations down to stuff that you can make apples-to-apples comparisons on, america is way worse.

ded redd
Aug 1, 2010

by Fluffdaddy
to be fair 'country has lower incarceration rates than america' isn't really much of a bar to clear

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Office Pig posted:

to be fair 'country has lower incarceration rates than america' isn't really much of a bar to clear

well when your stance is literally 'it's worse than america' it is but I agree it was a pretty sad peg to use to begin with

30.5 Days
Nov 19, 2006
I will say that I do not think that xinjiang should be a police state, but surely at this point it must be clear to anyone with a brain that our intelligence apparatus MUST escalate all human rights abuses to Human Meat Farm type poo poo BECAUSE in the realm of real human rights abuses real states really commit, the US does not have standing to comment.

Grapplejack
Nov 27, 2007

The big issue with china waiting on Taiwan is that there's an actual cohesive national identity that's forming and they might have waited too long at this point to be able to smoothly retake the island

Fleetwood
Mar 26, 2010


biggest hochul head in china

lol I just started season 2 last night and dang, Cooper is dying on the floor and all he can think about is that he wishes Tibet "could get their country back" and that "the Dalai Lama could return," but yeah, he's a commie-hating fed so it makes sense. I guess now I know a little about why David Lynch has a film program named after him at Maharishi U in Iowa

Maximo Roboto
Feb 4, 2012

Grapplejack posted:

The big issue with china waiting on Taiwan is that there's an actual cohesive national identity that's forming and they might have waited too long at this point to be able to smoothly retake the island

China would need to actually offer substantive material benefits. Yes Taiwan is a succ liberal democracy comprador regime, but it was an Asian Tiger that saw spectacular increases to quality of life that coincided with the transition to democracy. Those glory days are firmly a decade or two in the past now. So, what can China do to bring those days back, and ensure there won't be crackdowns on existing civil liberties as seen in Hong Kong? Maybe that's where the place they should start with.

Fleetwood posted:

lol I just started season 2 last night and dang, Cooper is dying on the floor and all he can think about is that he wishes Tibet "could get their country back" and that "the Dalai Lama could return," but yeah, he's a commie-hating fed so it makes sense. I guess now I know a little about why David Lynch has a film program named after him at Maharishi U in Iowa

That was the early '90s. "Free Tibet" was a very common liberal meme then. That was the era where New Agey beliefs made a comeback, the Dalai Lama was in the news, lots of self-help mysticism like The Celestine Prophecy, Wicca was big too. Free Tibet was a pop cultural meme more than an actual political demand. It fits Cooper's character as being a quirky mystic.

Looks like the actual Free Tibet NGO was founded in '87, three years before Twin Peaks, so there you go: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Tibet

Maximo Roboto has issued a correction as of 18:48 on Oct 13, 2021

Some Guy TT
Aug 30, 2011
Probation
Can't post for 2 hours!

the whole premise of this confused the hell out of me at first since i would think an article about the british violating chinese sovereignity would be considered prochinese propaganda designed to make the british look bad yes i am aware that china doesnt actually own the south china sea but the headline doesnt make that clear at all lol

Lightningproof
Feb 23, 2011

Judakel posted:

do you enjoy extreme martial arts performances?

https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1448237735844667393

what the gently caress

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005

kim jong un would have loved the power team

spacemang_spliff
Nov 29, 2014

wide pickle
mf runs through a brick

https://twitter.com/martyn_williams/status/1447982723176484871

efb

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Judakel
Jul 29, 2004
Probation
Can't post for 9 years!
groverhouse doesn't stand a chance

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply