Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
value-brand cereal
May 2, 2008

I didn't think you could do a The Shining remake in an open concept hotel. But I am intrigued. Maybe they can do the iconic elevator door blood gushing scene with the six stacked washing machines, image #45

edit OH GOD. STAR WARS OUTTA NO WHERE? Wow, crossover event of the century!*
*until the next one, just like the First Gay Character, etc etc.




Aww Glup Shitto <3 At least he isn't Contained like the lady is.

value-brand cereal fucked around with this message at 20:05 on Oct 18, 2021

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

DaveSauce
Feb 15, 2004

Oh, how awkward.

If a house could jump the shark...

For a while there I thought it was just some new money "oh and I want this, and I want that, and this would be cool too!" thing going on. Then... well, you know.

What I can't figure out is :wtf: is with the Vader hallway with the beanbag chairs? Are there like TVs with video game consoles hidden behind the walls or something?

edit:

brugroffil posted:

That's just a boutique hotel

From the listing:

quote:

PROPERTY IS IN THE REUNION RESORT rental program which is reporting a gross income of almost $800,000. Contact for more details on this unique opportunity.

So, I mean, you're not wrong.

edit again:

Here she is: https://vacationrentals.reunionresort.com/452729/

$4,500/day off-season, $6,500/day peak season.

one last edit:

So $800k at $6,500 is minimum 33% occupancy rate. I don't know what typical vacation rental occupancy rates are, but that seems pretty high considering the cost. Says it sleeps 36 people, so let's say that's 9 families of 4. That's still over $700/night per family (or $500/night off season).

DaveSauce fucked around with this message at 20:27 on Oct 18, 2021

Warmachine
Jan 30, 2012



There's definitely a market somewhere for authentic "bunk on a Star Destroyer" experience. I don't know if designing them all for children is the right call though. In my experience, it's adult nerds with disposable income who'll pay out the nose for that.

Residency Evil
Jul 28, 2003

4/5 godo... Schumi

quote:

The fun doesn’t end there, this house is specially equipped with a whole house LASER TAG for everyone to play!! This custom private home is built for the most discerning of buyers who are looking for that WOW home filled with character that is suited for the whole family.

Whenever I see "discerning buyer" in a listing, I never imagine this.

Residency Evil
Jul 28, 2003

4/5 godo... Schumi

Warmachine posted:

There's definitely a market somewhere for authentic "bunk on a Star Destroyer" experience. I don't know if designing them all for children is the right call though. In my experience, it's adult nerds with disposable income who'll pay out the nose for that.

Didn't Disney come out with exactly this at their parks recently? Didn't we post about it here?

Warmachine
Jan 30, 2012



Residency Evil posted:

Didn't Disney come out with exactly this at their parks recently? Didn't we post about it here?

I only came back to Brimming With Midichlorians recently, so I think I missed the Star Wars land launch.

BonerGhost
Mar 9, 2007

Y'all are gonna tell me this is not being sold by YouTube Mormons?

It was actually some sort of VRBO?

Residency Evil
Jul 28, 2003

4/5 godo... Schumi

Warmachine posted:

I only came back to Brimming With Midichlorians recently, so I think I missed the Star Wars land launch.

Found it! https://disneyworld.disney.go.com/star-wars-galactic-starcruiser/overview/

Starting at only $5k for you and your wife that hates you!

withak
Jan 15, 2003


Fun Shoe
They should offer vaccines marketed as a midichlorian shot.

knox_harrington
Feb 18, 2011

Running no point.

withak posted:

They should offer vaccines marketed as a midichlorian shot.

genius

Elephanthead
Sep 11, 2008


Toilet Rascal
Baby Woda Midichlorian: Now with 500X more spousal disdain.

OctaMurk
Jun 21, 2013
Midichlorian shots are a ploy by Palpatine to to control you. Do you people even know what midichlorians are? If you check out the MAERS database you will find that midichlorian shots carry a significant risk of force choking, this is untested technology

dpkg chopra
Jun 9, 2007

Fast Food Fight

Grimey Drawer
My cousin in the Death Star won't get midichlorians cause his friend got them and his limbs fell off despite him having the high ground. He was weeks away from being a father, now the girl is dead and the twins hate him. So just pray on it & make sure you’re comfortable with ur decision, not bullied

dpkg chopra fucked around with this message at 23:51 on Oct 18, 2021

Powerful Two-Hander
Mar 10, 2004

Mods please change my name to "Tooter Skeleton" TIA.


OctaMurk posted:

Midichlorian shots are a ploy by Palpatine to to control you. Do you people even know what midichlorians are? If you check out the MAERS database you will find that midichlorian shots carry a significant risk of force choking, this is untested technology

Ben Kenobi is using them to spy on you for The Republic!

HelloIAmYourHeart
Dec 29, 2008
Fallen Rib

Residency Evil posted:

Found it! https://disneyworld.disney.go.com/star-wars-galactic-starcruiser/overview/

Starting at only $5k for you and your wife that hates you!

You know Blue Story was there opening day.

Proposition Castle
Aug 9, 2004
Witty message goes here.

Now I want to see a Parks & Rec thing where Andy loses his poo poo about someone starting a Mouse Rat restraunt.

Ghost Leviathan
Mar 2, 2017

Exploration is ill-advised.

Residency Evil posted:

Didn't Disney come out with exactly this at their parks recently? Didn't we post about it here?

There's a Sonic the Hedgehog suite at a theme park in Britain. We probably don't need to speculate what's gone on in there.

Blue Moonlight
Apr 28, 2005
Bitter and Sarcastic

Ghost Leviathan posted:

There's a Sonic the Hedgehog suite at a theme park in Britain. We probably don't need to speculate what's gone on in there.

https://twitter.com/bronzeswords/status/1449345948019134467?s=20

William Bear
Oct 26, 2012

"That's what they all say!"

"How was that for you? I'm part of a sexual archetype that prioritizes speed, baby!"

therobit
Aug 19, 2008

I've been tryin' to speak with you for a long time
If you treat every sexual encounter as if it’s a race, then instead of coming too early you are just winning.

SpelledBackwards
Jan 7, 2001

I found this image on the Internet, perhaps you've heard of it? It's been around for a while I hear.

Race is often a factor in sexual selection. Wait a sec.

Vahakyla
May 3, 2013
What’s the link to security clearance denial narratives?

Pekinduck
May 10, 2008

Vahakyla posted:

What’s the link to security clearance denial narratives?

https://doha.ogc.osd.mil/Industrial-Security-Program/Industrial-Security-Clearance-Decisions/

lmao I'm reading one where the guy used to smoke weed for anxiety (often legally with a medical card) then quit voluntarily two years ago and pledged to never touch drugs again. Applied for a clearance and was approved by a judge. The government appealed the decision and the appeals court went "yeah, this guy is tainted forever, don't know what the first judge was smoking lol" :911:

https://doha.ogc.osd.mil/Industrial.../FileId/159865/

quote:

Over time, Applicant shifted away from the use of drugs, legal or otherwise, due to the
influence of his religious beliefs. In April 2019, on Easter Sunday, he made a commitment to
develop strategies for controlling his anxiety without the use of drugs. He now pursues a regimen
of exercise and good diet and has been meeting with a psychologist. He also attended Narcotics
Anonymous (NA) in mid-to-late 2020, and it has been two years since he has used marijuana.
Applicant completed his security clearance application (SCA) in October 2017, disclosing
his past marijuana use. He had no prior experience with the security clearance process.

In November 2018 Applicant underwent a clearance interview, admitting his marijuana use up until that
date. His use of marijuana continued for about six months thereafter. He does not associate with
persons who use marijuana, and he understands that the use of illegal drugs is not tolerated at his
place of employment and/or while he holds a clearance.

Applicant’s psychologist has extensive experience in evaluating security clearance applicants.
This provider did not diagnosis Applicant with a drug use disorder but, rather, with Social Anxiety
Disorder. He concluded that Applicant does not meet any of the criteria for substance use disorder
and that Applicant “‘is free from any problems of drug or alcohol use and pose[s] no risk to the
national security as a result of his prior usage.’”
Applicant is considered to be diligent and a person of integrity. His most recent work
performance review rated him as exceeding expectations.

DENIED

Pekinduck fucked around with this message at 00:04 on Oct 21, 2021

Haifisch
Nov 13, 2010

Objection! I object! That was... objectionable!



Taco Defender
A lot of those are boring because you just get generic credit card debt/etc without further details, but some paint detailed pictures of a fuckup:

https://doha.ogc.osd.mil/Industrial-Security-Program/Industrial-Security-Clearance-Decisions/ISCR-Hearing-Decisions/2021-ISCR-Hearing-Decisions/FileId/160768/ posted:

Findings of Fact
Applicant is a 40-year-old married man. He graduated from college in 2003, earning
a degree in criminal justice. He has been working as a background investigator since 2005,
and has held a security clearance since 2010. (Tr. 14) He completed his most recent
security clearance application in 2015, and failed to disclose any derogatory information.
The background investigation revealed that Applicant experienced a series of financial
problems and multiple work-related disciplinary actions. These issues as well as
Applicant’s failure to disclose them on his security clearance application form the basis of
the SOR allegations.

Financial Concerns
Applicant purchased a home in 2009. (GE 1 at 7) He was not particularly
knowledgeable about financial management. (Tr. 18) Consequently, he fell behind on his
mortgage payments. Ultimately, he began to fall behind on both consumer debts and
federal income tax debts for tax years 2011 to 2013. (GE 5 at 2; GE 13 at 9)
Subsequently, Applicant obtained a mortgage loan modification. As of July 2019, his
mortgage payments were current. (GE 8) The SOR alleged Applicant owes $2,785 on four delinquent accounts. Applicant
owes $1,067 for the account alleged in SOR ¶ 1.a. In March 2021, he negotiated payment
plan with the creditor and made the first payment on March 23, 2021. Applicant owes $867
on a store credit card alleged in SOR ¶ 1.b. He paid the debt and the account has since
been removed from his credit report. The SOR alleged in ¶ 1.c. that Applicant owed $417
on a delinquent credit card. He satisfied this debt in March 2021. The SOR also alleges
that Applicant owed $434 on another store credit card account. In addition to the consumer credit accounts, Applicant also owes $15,288 in federal
income taxes. He fell behind because he incorrectly filed his tax return as a 1099
contractor. (Tr. 24; GE 13 at 7) In July 2018, the IRS garnished Applicant’s wages to
collect this income tax delinquency, which is from tax years 2011 to 2013, as alleged in
subparagraph 1.e. (GE 5 at 2; AE 9) After reaching a payment agreement with the IRS,
the Agency agreed to terminate the garnishment. (Tr. 24; AE 9) Applicant has been paying
the delinquency through an installment agreement since then. (AE 9) The current balance
of the Applicant’s federal tax liability is unknown from the record. However, as of March
2021, Applicant was one month behind on payments. (AE 9)

Work Performance Issues
Applicant has worked for federal contracting companies since 2005. Between 2008
and 2010, Applicant was employed by Company A, as a background investigator. In 2010,
Applicant started a business doing security clearance background investigations. From
2010 to 2016, he worked as an independent contractor to Companies B, C, and D, on
contracts with OPM and other federal agencies. Applicant closed his business in 2016 and
went to work for Company E as a personnel security specialist from 2017 to 2018.
During the two years that Applicant worked with Company A, he, received four
written warnings about his poor work performance. He signed one of the warnings in
February 2009, certifying that he received it, and he prepared a response that was
incorporated into his personnel file with the warning. (GE 3 at 6) Similarly, he signed a
warning that he received in May 2009. (GE 3 at 6) In or around August 2010, he was fired
from a company for unsatisfactory performance, as alleged in subparagraph 2.e.
Applicant’s multiple reprimands at Company A led to his dismissal in 2010.
After being dismissed from Company A in 2010, he began working with Company B
as an independent contractor. (GE 6 at 1) He was fired in November 2011 “because of
poor performance/timeliness/quality and communication issues,” as alleged in
subparagraph 2.f. (GE 6 at 1)

Applicant began working in an independent contractor status with Company C in
2011. In or around February 2012, Company C reprimanded Applicant for failing to protect
personally identifiable information (PII) after leaving sensitive materials at a courthouse, as
alleged in subparagraph 2.g. (GE 7 at 3; Tr. 38) In 2015, Company C suspended him and
moved to terminate his contract for transmitting case reports without making requested
revisions, failing to obtain and report issue information, neglecting to follow up on
information supplied in case papers, failing to report items pertaining to subject re-contacts,
and falsely reporting that he had contacted a subject when he had not, as alleged in
subparagraph 2.p. (Answer at 5; GE 7 at 8) After Applicant’s suspension, he failed to
cooperate with efforts to retrieve his work materials, prompting his employer to contact the
U.S. Office of Personnel Management’s Integrity Assurance branch (OPM). (GE 7 at 8)
Ultimately, Applicant’s mishandling of his case load prompted OPM to conduct an audit of
his cases. (Tr. 95) Applicant began working with as an independent contractor with Company D in
2011. (GE 4 at 1). In or around 2014, Company D terminated Applicant’s services, as
alleged in subparagraph 2.h because the quality of his work was poor and not completed
on time. (Answer at 4)

In 2017, Applicant began working for Company E as a personal security specialist.
(Tr. 40; GE 5) Subparagraph 2.s alleges that Applicant’s then-employer issued him a
written warning for failing to comply with requests for information relating to income tax
issues he was having at the time. The record contains evidence of e-mail between
Applicant and his employer regarding a request for documentation. (GE 5 at 16) The e-mail
correspondence does not specify the documentation sought, nor does it contain any
warnings. Applicant’s stint at this company was troubled. According to Company E’s
president, “the functions [Applicant was] asked to perform [were] very basic and that [he]
still struggled[d] with them, both in terms of speed and accuracy.” (GE 5 at 16) Ultimately,
In November 2018, Applicant’s employer dismissed him, as alleged in subparagraph 2.t.
Applicant began performing contract work for Company B again in August 2017.
(GE 6 at 1) In May 2018, Company B terminated his contract for failing to complete
required training. (GE 6 at 1) as alleged in subparagraph 2.r. (GE 12 at 5) There is no
record evidence setting forth the reason for the termination.



2015 Security Clearance Application Omissions
Applicant completed a security clearance application in 2015. (GE 1) He did not
disclose the written warning, while working for Company C, for failing to protect PII that
he received in February 2012 on his security clearance, as required. The SOR alleges
that this omission constitutes a falsification, as alleged in subparagraph 2.i, and that
subsequent failures to disclose this information during subject interviews in 2015 and
2020 constitute intentional omissions, as alleged in subparagraphs 2.n and 2.u,
respectively. Applicant contends that these omissions were unintentional oversights.

Applicant failed to list on the 2015 security clearance application the company where
he worked between 2010 and 2011. SOR subparagraph 2.j alleges that this omission
constituted an intentional falsification. SOR subparagraphs 2.m and 2.u allege that
Applicant’s subsequent omission of this job during subject interviews in 2015 and 2020
constitute intentional omissions. Applicant contends that although he worked for this
company in 2018, he did not work for it before completing the security clearance
application, contrary to the SOR allegation. (Answer at 4) The facility security officer
confirmed that Applicant worked at this company for two periods. The first period was
before the completion of the security clearance application. (GE 6 at 1) Applicant’s second
stint with this employer in 2018 led to his termination for failing to complete training, as
alleged in subparagraph 2.r. (GE 6 at 1)

In addition to alleging that Applicant intentionally omitted the job where he worked
between 2010 and 2011, SOR subparagraph 2.j alleges that Applicant intentionally failed
to disclose the company that fired him in 2014 on his 2015 security clearance application.
Applicant contends in his answer that this omission was an unintentional oversight.
SOR subparagraphs 2.m and 2.o allege that Applicant did not disclose the jobs
where he was terminated, respectively in 2011 and 2014, during successive subject
interviews in 2015 and 2020. Applicant received copies of both subject interviews after
completing them. He had the opportunity to review both investigator summaries, and make
any additions. Applicant certified that he read both investigator summaries. (GE 14 at 4;
GE 15 at 4) Neither report indicates that he disclosed these terminations.

(report just goes on and on like this for A While)

quote:

Whole-Person Concept
I considered the whole-person concept factors in my analysis of the disqualifying
and mitigating conditions under the alleged guidelines, and it does not warrant a favorable
conclusion.

drk
Jan 16, 2005

Haifisch posted:

I considered the whole-person concept

:350:

ranbo das
Oct 16, 2013


Pekinduck posted:

https://doha.ogc.osd.mil/Industrial-Security-Program/Industrial-Security-Clearance-Decisions/

lmao I'm reading one where the guy used to smoke weed for anxiety (often legally with a medical card) then quit voluntarily two years ago and pledged to never touch drugs again. Applied for a clearance and was approved by a judge. The government appealed the decision and the appeals court went "yeah, this guy is tainted forever, don't know what the first judge was smoking lol" :911:

https://doha.ogc.osd.mil/Industrial.../FileId/159865/

DENIED

That dude got a clearance and then kept smoking weed and lying about it for six months, I'm actually surprised the first judge let it go. They really, really don't like being lied to.

e: I knew a guy who sent an email with ~bad words~ in it on accident. That's usually a verbal warning, maybe a written one depending on the words, but he tried to cover it up. That escalated it from "boss says be more careful" to "escorted out of the office by armed guards".

ranbo das fucked around with this message at 07:09 on Oct 21, 2021

pentyne
Nov 7, 2012

ranbo das posted:

That dude got a clearance and then kept smoking weed and lying about it for six months, I'm actually surprised the first judge let it go. They really, really don't like being lied to.

e: I knew a guy who sent an email with ~bad words~ in it on accident. That's usually a verbal warning, maybe a written one depending on the words, but he tried to cover it up. That escalated it from "boss says be more careful" to "escorted out of the office by armed guards".

"Cover it up" by what, breaking into the Boss' office to log on and delete the email?

DaveSauce
Feb 15, 2004

Oh, how awkward.

pentyne posted:

"Cover it up" by what, breaking into the Boss' office to log on and delete the email?

Obviously you send a follow-up e-mail threatening violence towards anyone who reports you to management. If your threats are explicit enough, they'll forget all about the "bad words!"

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
What kind of kids can drop nearly a grand on a greasy paper bag from McDonald's that was freely available for several months?

And why?

njsykora
Jan 23, 2012

Robots confuse squirrels.


I'm assuming it's either a stupidly rich kid or some idiot speculator who thinks anyone is going to care about the big popular boy band of the moment in 2 years time. Or a Mcdonalds collector, those exist but I expect those guys would've gotten the bag as an extra so it wouldn't be creased while it was still in stores.

ranbo das
Oct 16, 2013


pentyne posted:

"Cover it up" by what, breaking into the Boss' office to log on and delete the email?

He sent it to a junior employee, so he went to their desk and told them they would get in a ton of trouble and/or fired if they didn't delete it right now, then told them since it was a data spill they legally couldn't tell anyone.

This clever plan of just threatening the kid right out of college did not work.

e: bad meaning classified, not mean or inappropriate

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

quote:

Buying a new iPhone can be equivalent to giving up $17,000 in retirement savings or 2,500 cups of coffee. Yet one in five people surveyed by WalletHub thought upgrading from an iPhone 12 to an iPhone 13 was worth going into debt for.

quote:

Forty-two percent of respondents said they would rather have a free upgrade from an iPhone 12 to the iPhone 13 than the maximum annual contribution to a retirement account.

quote:

Fifty-seven percent of respondents agreed that "it is better to trade in your new car as soon as possible to avoid the diminishing trade-in value over time."

Nocheez
Sep 5, 2000

Can you spare a little cheddar?
Nap Ghost

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

What kind of kids can drop nearly a grand on a greasy paper bag from McDonald's that was freely available for several months?

And why?



McDonalds collectors are just as crazy as any other. My mother-in-law used to work there and has bags of old poo poo that they would get rid of (plus lots of stuff she's found through flea markets). It's crazy how much some of those old toys and boxes go for. And the McDonald branded ash-trays are always getting bought up.

Everett False
Sep 28, 2006

Mopsy, I'm starting to question your medical credentials.

My boss drinks his Faygo at lunch out of a Maid In Manhattan promotional McDonald's cup. It's a regular plastic McDonald's cup with the Maid In Manhattan poster on it.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

ranbo das posted:

That dude got a clearance and then kept smoking weed and lying about it for six months, I'm actually surprised the first judge let it go. They really, really don't like being lied to.

Yeah he clearly stuck himself between a rock and a hard place. Either his use was out of control in which case 'lol denied' or it was as quoted "strategic and deliberate" in which case he absolutely knew that continuing to smoke would result in rejection and decided to do it anyway hoping not to get caught.

Cyrano4747
Sep 25, 2006

Yes, I know I'm old, get off my fucking lawn so I can yell at these clouds.

Yeah clearance poo poo is one of those things where if you lie you’re just fuuuuucked. If you gently caress up and report it there’s a chance you could lose your status but there is also a good chance you get some punishment below that.

But if you lie about it you are creating a situation where anyone who finds out about your lie has leverage over you which is a huge no no.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

quote:

State National

Does anyone have anything on the validity of David Straight and his advice to relinquish your citizenship so you don’t have to pay any federal or state taxes? I know it would be a lot to learn, but would it be within their jurisdiction to arrest you once you’ve become a State National?

quote:

There’s no validity to this. At all.

quote:

quote:

You can relinquish your citizenship, but you won't be welcome in the U.S. afterwards.

What would they be able to do? They can't send me someone else?

quote:

You can relinquish your US citizenship in front of a Consular Officer after paying a fee. This must be done overseas.

Anything else you've heard is complete and utter foolishness.

quote:

quote:

This might be helpful in understanding why these claims are nonsensical: https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/ideology/sovereign-citizens-movement

drat that sucks, I really thought I was gonna get out of paying taxes legally 😭

Pekinduck
May 10, 2008

ranbo das posted:

That dude got a clearance and then kept smoking weed and lying about it for six months, I'm actually surprised the first judge let it go. They really, really don't like being lied to.

e: I knew a guy who sent an email with ~bad words~ in it on accident. That's usually a verbal warning, maybe a written one depending on the words, but he tried to cover it up. That escalated it from "boss says be more careful" to "escorted out of the office by armed guards".

Ah I re-read it, so I guess they tell you during the process to never smoke weed again and he went against that?

Phanatic
Mar 13, 2007

Please don't forget that I am an extremely racist idiot who also has terrible opinions about the Culture series.

Pekinduck posted:

Ah I re-read it, so I guess they tell you during the process to never smoke weed again and he went against that?

They don’t tell you to do anything during the process. They ask you questions. Some of those questions are about your history of drug use going back x years. If you lie to them, that is very bad. If you tell them “I was at a party and I wound up getting drunk and smoking a joint,” they don’t give a poo poo. If you lie to them about smoking a joint and they find out they will be upset with you.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

totalnewbie
Nov 13, 2005

I was born and raised in China, lived in Japan, and now hold a US passport.

I am wrong in every way, all the damn time.

Ask me about my tattoos.
I've never gone through the interview but I suspect they probably also try to give you chances to redeem/help yourself in case you simply forgot what might have happened at a party 8 years ago (and were probably inebriated in some way).

When I had my interview for global entry (which is obviously much lower stakes), I was asked whether I took a trip to Mexico 5 years ago (from the time of the interview). I was really confused and said, "Uhh, no?" and went back and forth with the guy a couple times until he mentioned San Diego and I remember that I had a business trip to a supplier in San Diego and crossed the border to visit another supplier for a day. Hell I probably slept through the border crossing or just barely woke up enough to hand over my passport.

But I imagine if I swore up and down that I never went to Mexico, even when there was clear record of me (or at least my passport) crossing the border, that it could have ended differently.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply