(Thread IKs:
fart simpson)
|
yeah 500 nukes is more than enough to destroy the top three cities of every country on earth and guarantee a nuclear winter that would kill off the rest
|
# ? Nov 3, 2021 19:11 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 19:47 |
|
Al-Saqr posted:yeah 500 nukes is more than enough to destroy the top three cities of every country on earth and guarantee a nuclear winter that would kill off the rest Mineshafts though
|
# ? Nov 3, 2021 19:15 |
|
mila kunis posted:Now, it is on the Yemeni island of Socotra, which overlooks the strategic Bab-el-Mandeb strait, that the UAE and Israel have created an intelligence-gathering base. The UAE has deployed hundreds of troops on the strategic island since May 2018, disregarding the protests by the Yemeni government.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2021 19:24 |
|
Grapplejack posted:You only really need, at most, 500 nuclear weapons; at that point you can destroy all life on earth, nevermind beating your enemy or whatever.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2021 19:32 |
|
I only have a couple of nukes so I’m not sure what the right strategy is
|
# ? Nov 3, 2021 19:34 |
|
investing my nukes into a low-risk accrual fund so I can instigate an extinction event by my mid-60s
|
# ? Nov 3, 2021 19:36 |
|
Al-Saqr posted:yeah 500 nukes is more than enough to destroy the top three cities of every country on earth and guarantee a nuclear winter that would kill off the rest you're really overestimating both the scientific evidence that nuclear winter is even real, how devastating it would be and for how long
|
# ? Nov 3, 2021 19:41 |
|
Buck Wildman posted:investing my nukes into a low-risk accrual fund so I can instigate an extinction event by my mid-60s I put two m-80s in NFTs this morning so by next week I should be the world's premier nuclear power.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2021 19:41 |
|
Pretty solid bet those nukes haven’t worked since the 90s
|
# ? Nov 3, 2021 19:50 |
|
gradenko_2000 posted:https://twitter.com/BBCNews/status/1455621996495114246 america runs on performative lib delusions
|
# ? Nov 3, 2021 19:59 |
|
I hope they get up to Quad-4
|
# ? Nov 3, 2021 20:02 |
|
could I interest you in a non fungible nuke investment?
|
# ? Nov 3, 2021 20:39 |
|
Atrocious Joe posted:I hope they get up to Quad-4 Quad damage is important but so is the red armour and the megahealth.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2021 20:54 |
|
Jose posted:i wish pangzai would make more videos but they probably weren't healthy for him this guy is the hardest man on the goddamn planet, holy poo poo
|
# ? Nov 3, 2021 21:01 |
|
500 nukes wouldn’t do poo poo to the earth and not endanger humanity. most of them being set to air burst and minimize fall out and or would be shot at military targets away from cities. sure it would cause tremendous damage and death, but not exactly cause anything remotely approaching human extinction or omnicide. hell, you might fend off climate change and save the global south. we set off hundreds of them in Nevada at ground level, spread the maximum amount of fallout and gave people downwind a slightly higher risk of cancer. edit: also nuclear weapons work tremendously well as a threat but suck tremendously if you fire them off because you are either dead, or you survived and everyone is mad at you. Torpor has issued a correction as of 22:15 on Nov 3, 2021 |
# ? Nov 3, 2021 21:44 |
|
Palladium posted:When viewed from the lenses of materialism my friend i haev much to learn
|
# ? Nov 3, 2021 22:14 |
|
Jose posted:i wish pangzai would make more videos but they probably weren't healthy for him This guy's poo poo always brighten up my day. Also pouring can fish sauce into baijiu? Maybe i ll try that.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2021 23:00 |
|
Atrocious Joe posted:I hope they get up to Quad-4 Its going to be hard for India since they are running out of far away allies after Quad-2.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2021 23:09 |
|
Torpor posted:most of them being set to air burst and minimize fall out and or would be shot at military targets away from cities. lol
|
# ? Nov 3, 2021 23:25 |
|
https://mobile.twitter.com/ShellenbergerMD/status/1455909280217923593 i mean sure but xi didnt go to the climate summit so does that really count as leadership
|
# ? Nov 3, 2021 23:35 |
|
Airburst against non hardened targets (ie cities) is not just to minimize fallout but to maximize damage
|
# ? Nov 3, 2021 23:37 |
|
is china building more nukes just because their nuclear energy plan makes doing it extremely cheap because lol if so
|
# ? Nov 3, 2021 23:39 |
|
Some Guy TT posted:is china building more nukes just because their nuclear energy plan makes doing it extremely cheap because lol if so No, because when containment fails the US will become too unpredictable and they cant discount the possibility of an extremely unhinged president deciding to first strike their silos. Even if they increase the amount of visible silos by 5x they dont all have to have ICBMs in them. It just means the US has to expend 5x the resources to make sure they knock them out. Whats funny is that the Soviet Union killed itself with their military buildup and it doesn't look like the communists are going to be losing the build up this time around because the US is just that less efficient at it. The amount of resources taken to counter China's increased capabilities is significantly higher than what they put into it. You can even see it on their orbital missile, countering it means we have to deploy extremely expensive and manpower intensive anti icbm systems to the east coast of the country, upending decades of build up on the western side of the country. Cao Ni Ma has issued a correction as of 00:25 on Nov 4, 2021 |
# ? Nov 4, 2021 00:08 |
|
Some Guy TT posted:is china building more nukes just because their nuclear energy plan makes doing it extremely cheap because lol if so Not necessarily you can make reactors that use natural uranium (CANDU type design) instead of enriched uranium.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2021 00:16 |
|
Al-Saqr posted:has america cleaned the water in flint Michigan yet? asking for a friend ( the friend is Xi Jinping) just pops up in other cities, look up Benton harbor Michigan
|
# ? Nov 4, 2021 00:26 |
|
xi-pilled
|
# ? Nov 4, 2021 00:44 |
|
Cao Ni Ma posted:No, because when containment fails the US will become too unpredictable and they cant discount the possibility of an extremely unhinged president deciding to first strike their silos. Even if they increase the amount of visible silos by 5x they dont all have to have ICBMs in them. It just means the US has to expend 5x the resources to make sure they knock them out. all of this is meaningless, ICBMS are in the air for maybe less than 30m, and a counterlaunch would happen in that time. Also in the event of a nuclear strike there wouldn't be any warning, and it's extremely difficult to know who is shooting rockets at who, so at minimum russia, china, and the us would launch the entirety of their stockpiles.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2021 00:50 |
|
C-SPAN Caller posted:yeah i don't really see a problem lmao, the real crime is the bitcoin portion, and he's probably not even looking at them for that Because of the laws against public non-government air-monitoring services, and the... unreliable nature of government statistics regarding this sort of thing, it's difficult to say for sure. Anecdotally, things got significantly better 2015-2017, then improvement sort of stalled. But anecdotes are not data.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2021 01:03 |
|
mila kunis posted:new quad dropped. One of the leaders of NAM to bouncing on America's dick. Absolutely shameful, gently caress Modi.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2021 01:08 |
|
wolf warriors, engage! https://twitter.com/joshrogin/status/1455834135931486212
|
# ? Nov 4, 2021 02:24 |
|
remember when there were lawsuits to prevent trump from blocking people on twitter i mean good grief who loving cares its a tool to prevent your poo poo from being unreadable because theres too drat much of it if people didnt have access to blocking they just wouldnt read anything
|
# ? Nov 4, 2021 03:01 |
|
Doctor Jeep posted:wolf warriors, engage! click on this to read how criticizing the US for white flight is racist on China's part
|
# ? Nov 4, 2021 03:19 |
|
C-SPAN Caller posted:yeah i don't really see a problem lmao, the real crime is the bitcoin portion, and he's probably not even looking at them for that we've had a couple bad days this week but previous to that air quality had been excellent or good for six months straight. smog is now the exception rather than the rule, at least in beijing
|
# ? Nov 4, 2021 04:35 |
|
R. Guyovich posted:we've had a couple bad days this week but previous to that air quality had been excellent or good for six months straight. smog is now the exception rather than the rule, at least in beijing I wonder what China's doing CCS-wise. I know they have a few projects up and running and some being constructed but I don't recall anything talking about it specifically
|
# ? Nov 4, 2021 04:39 |
|
R. Guyovich posted:smog is now the exception rather than the rule, at least in beijing same in shenzhen
|
# ? Nov 4, 2021 04:48 |
|
https://twitter.com/cremnob/status/1456108006727430154?s=21 Crusader has issued a correction as of 05:26 on Nov 4, 2021 |
# ? Nov 4, 2021 05:13 |
|
i say swears online posted:but it says MAD do not cum
|
# ? Nov 4, 2021 05:33 |
|
C-SPAN Caller posted:anyone been in china recently? I remember the smog in 2011 being already way better but I'm curious how its getting now as they keep reducing emissions posted this a few pages ago https://twitter.com/izak_novak/status/1454008688021286913?t=0n4txxHM1aO5FpcKsIXdhg&s=19 when I was in Shanghai ~4 years ago, it seemed fine, even in comparison to living in a windy coastal Australian city
|
# ? Nov 4, 2021 05:34 |
|
I was there 5 years ago and there was definitely a haze but it wasn't too bad. Beijing was much worse. I don't have many points of comparison though, since I haven't been to many large cities in the US.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2021 05:38 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 19:47 |
|
i was in beijing for a week in 2017 and the first few days were fairly smoggy, then wind blew it out and the rest of the time was blue skies
|
# ? Nov 4, 2021 05:41 |