Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
wilderthanmild
Jun 21, 2010

Posting shit




Grimey Drawer
See I thought it was really bad when I worked at a moving company and we had these gems:

A few "servers" that were just like old XP(and sometimes even older Win98 and Win2000) machines running old vb apps. Like just winforms apps that would have a timer going that would repeatedly do some thing on the timer. There was a big problem with people randomly turning these machines off or closing the apps.
A crazy email based API which was basically one of the above, except also needed outlook running so it could keep checking the mailbox to either do updates/inserts/deletes operations based on incoming email or send responses to retrieval requests.
An actual server running as the domain controller/fax server/file sharing server on Windows 2000 Server edition.
A main application that was a winforms app running off an access db file on a file share.

But like dos applications and win3.1 apps seems like just next level poo poo.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

TotalLossBrain
Oct 20, 2010

Hier graben!

goatface posted:

Industrial 486s are beautiful things.

I still see plenty of these in RTUs and other SCADA equipment currently in use.

goatface
Dec 5, 2007

I had a video of that when I was about 6.

I remember it being shit.


Grimey Drawer
They will outlive us all.

TotalLossBrain
Oct 20, 2010

Hier graben!
A particular GE RTU I sometimes deal with uses a Motorola 68000 as main processor. I think GE finally retired it after ~30 or so years, but it was only recently.
Electronic devices (all devices, really) in electric infrastructure are expected to be used for a long rear end time. 10-20 service years are common.
Additionally, it seems that many electric utilities/generators/transmission operators will consider new technology only once it has a proven track record of 20+ trouble-free years of service in industry.
Unsurprisingly, a lot of boomers are involved.

CitizenKain
May 27, 2001

That was Gary Cooper, asshole.

Nap Ghost

StrangersInTheNight posted:

Lol this is rich considering half the time these giant PDFs are an effort from IT to avoid doing their jobs and foisting it off onto the user instead.

IT is a support role, but it's full of people who work their hardest to not do any support.

Another name for users is the workers, the people who do that actual loving work, who grind out the product that is sold, and none of us would even have jobs if not for them.

We are the computer touchers whose roles are to be loving humble and support the workers, not spit in their faces and mock them because we couldn't offload a portion of our own tasks off to these folks.

So your workers are dumb as poo poo and lazy.

Cthulu Carl
Apr 16, 2006

StrangersInTheNight posted:

Lol this is rich considering half the time these giant PDFs are an effort from IT to avoid doing their jobs and foisting it off onto the user instead.

IT is a support role, but it's full of people who work their hardest to not do any support.

Another name for users is the workers, the people who do that actual loving work, who grind out the product that is sold, and none of us would even have jobs if not for them.

We are the computer touchers whose roles are to be loving humble and support the workers, not spit in their faces and mock them because we couldn't offload a portion of our own tasks off to these folks.

A critical part of IT support is to educate users, so they can prevent or fix issues themselves, freeing up IT to handle other, more important break-fix issues or projects.

If users don't want to be educated to prevent downtime due to simple issues like "I lost my post-it with my password" or "I made everything on my screen big" then they're poo poo-rear end workers.

wilderthanmild
Jun 21, 2010

Posting shit




Grimey Drawer
My favorite thing is when users teach themselves wrong things.

Like maybe you have a load balancer, but to test an issue with a user you give them a direct address to an individual host that's usually behind the load balancer. Well that works fine for them, and you go to research further why. Then, they start telling their coworkers that IT fixed their problem by sending them to OurWebAppVM1 instead of OurWebApp so the load balancing slowly becomes very unbalanced as more and more users find out about this one quick trick.

A Festivus Miracle
Dec 19, 2012

I have come to discourse on the profound inequities of the American political system.

Cthulu Carl posted:

A critical part of IT support is to educate users, so they can prevent or fix issues themselves, freeing up IT to handle other, more important break-fix issues or projects.

If users don't want to be educated to prevent downtime due to simple issues like "I lost my post-it with my password" or "I made everything on my screen big" then they're poo poo-rear end workers.
:allears:

Imagine every user as a boomer or gen xer who Will.Not.Learn. anything that isn't forced on them at gunpoint. I had a woman who was probably fifty six, tops, ask me for a paper version of a document "because I'm not good with computers". I was going to email her an attachment and the act of opening this was beyond her ken.

The mistake here is assuming people are rational and reasonable, and not actually the files scene from Zoolander where they smash a computer because 'the files are IN the computer!'.

vyst
Aug 25, 2009



wilderthanmild posted:

My favorite thing is when users teach themselves wrong things.

Like maybe you have a load balancer, but to test an issue with a user you give them a direct address to an individual host that's usually behind the load balancer. Well that works fine for them, and you go to research further why. Then, they start telling their coworkers that IT fixed their problem by sending them to OurWebAppVM1 instead of OurWebApp so the load balancing slowly becomes very unbalanced as more and more users find out about this one quick trick.

You're technically load balancing....just uhh manually lol

Cthulu Carl
Apr 16, 2006

A Festivus Miracle posted:

:allears:

Imagine every user as a boomer or gen xer who Will.Not.Learn. anything that isn't forced on them at gunpoint. I had a woman who was probably fifty six, tops, ask me for a paper version of a document "because I'm not good with computers". I was going to email her an attachment and the act of opening this was beyond her ken.

The mistake here is assuming people are rational and reasonable, and not actually the files scene from Zoolander where they smash a computer because 'the files are IN the computer!'.

Oh no, users are dumb as poo poo, especially here. But it's still useful to educate people because someone will have it stick and that'll be one less future ticket. They'll probably still blow up batteries and mash feces into the keyboard, but by God they'll know how to fix the screen resolution.

It also helps when you're the one with the gun. We just completed a domain migration and there's definitely at least a hundred users who haven't migrated. Guess who aren't going to be able to log in after Friday because we're killing the old domain. Adapt or die, fuckers.

wilderthanmild
Jun 21, 2010

Posting shit




Grimey Drawer

vyst posted:

You're technically load balancing....just uhh manually lol

Manual load misbalancing

Outrail
Jan 4, 2009

www.sapphicrobotica.com
:roboluv: :love: :roboluv:
'That ticket never would have happened if IT had a gun.'

zedprime
Jun 9, 2007

yospos

TotalLossBrain posted:

A particular GE RTU I sometimes deal with uses a Motorola 68000 as main processor. I think GE finally retired it after ~30 or so years, but it was only recently.
Electronic devices (all devices, really) in electric infrastructure are expected to be used for a long rear end time. 10-20 service years are common.
Additionally, it seems that many electric utilities/generators/transmission operators will consider new technology only once it has a proven track record of 20+ trouble-free years of service in industry.
Unsurprisingly, a lot of boomers are involved.
Any sort of critical piece or part needs Failure Mode and Effect Analysis completed to basically assemble the bible of what can go wrong, what happens when it goes wrong, and what can you do about it for anything that might happen in it's service life.

You can do so in a forward looking way. Things like analyzing fundamentals to predict what goes wrong, or stuff like simulating 20 years wear and tear by hitting it with a mallet every 30 seconds for a week.

This all remains predictive. Great stuff to insure a consumer warranty program and write the manuals. But still just a guess at what happens during the service life.

The only way to really know what happens over 20 years of service is to watch it for 20 years. So the conservative approach is to wait for 20 years of X number consumer users making Y warranty claims and suddenly your FMEA is subsidized and full of a shitload of data.

Trainee PornStar
Jul 20, 2006

I'm just an inbetweener

Samuel L. Hacksaw posted:


E: dumb poo poo my work does, I'm now the most senior team lead in our group after 3 years.

lol.. sounds like me.

I work in a uni & agreed to help our network guy out with the simple stuff to take the pressure off him.
A few weeks later he got knocked off his push bike & was off for about 6 months.
He came back & a couple weeks later resigned as he'd got another job.

Now a few years & a couple changes of management later, I'm somehow lead network guy....

Ah well, as long as I can blag it out for a couple more years I can retire :)

Powered Descent
Jul 13, 2008

We haven't had that spirit here since 1969.

These are probably the two most important skills I've developed in my career.

HenryJLittlefinger
Jan 31, 2010

stomp clap


A Festivus Miracle posted:

:allears:

Imagine every user as a boomer or gen xer who Will.Not.Learn. anything that isn't forced on them at gunpoint. I had a woman who was probably fifty six, tops, ask me for a paper version of a document "because I'm not good with computers". I was going to email her an attachment and the act of opening this was beyond her ken.

The mistake here is assuming people are rational and reasonable, and not actually the files scene from Zoolander where they smash a computer because 'the files are IN the computer!'.

I'm extremely far removed from IT, but every now and then I have to explain Computer Things to a person in my office. They are older, but perfectly capable of learning how to use a computer to do their job, but completely unwilling to do so. Here is an example: every year, central IT requires password resets. It's all automated. This person ignores the emails until they get locked out of their computer. So I have to log in to the server and open a browser so they can log into their email, which involves two-fingered typing IF they remember their email password (they don't). Then they look for the latest password reset email by scrolling slowly through the 3,000 unopened emails in the inbox while I say "Just search for it. Look, click on this search bar. Type in 'password reset. No not the address bar, the search bar." [peck...peck...peck] "Wait, this is your personal email, not your work email? It was sent to your work email which you can't log into because you ignored the password reset emails." So then someone has to go back to their computer and forward a password reset link to their personal email because talking them through navigating the IT website to the password reset is just not worth the trouble. OK, we're at the password reset finally. "Now enter your old password. Ok, go find your post-it note while I fix my lunch." -later- "No, look, it's 15 characters now, both upper and lowercase, a number, and one of these symbols. You good?" About half the time it works out.

This same person was due for a safety training a couple months back, for which I am a supervisor and responsible for making sure everyone in the office is current on. It's a standard slideshow followed by a quiz at the end. The old supervisor for this used to just give them printed out answers because making it all the way through the training was such a hassle. This time, I conveniently couldn't find the answer sheet and told them to take the entire training like they're supposed to and take the quiz at the end like all the rest of us. At the quiz portion (which you should be able to pass without even taking the training because you've been here for 20 YEARS TAKING THIS EVERY YEAR) the entire training slideshow is in a side pane, which is searchable, so you can literally ctrl+f every one of the 30 answers. I went and hid from them and came back to find that another coworker took pity and found a printed out copy of the safety handbook for this training so they could look for the answers in a paper copy of it.

When they print anything, they always have to reconnect to the office printer, which involves at least 5 test pages printed out.

The department IT guy was just down in their office a little while ago today, so it seems like I'm off the hook for a while now.

Outrail
Jan 4, 2009

www.sapphicrobotica.com
:roboluv: :love: :roboluv:

HenryJLittlefinger posted:

I'm extremely far removed from IT, but every now and then I have to explain Computer Things to a person in my office. They are older, but perfectly capable of learning how to use a computer to do their job, but completely unwilling to do so. Here is an example: every year, central IT requires password resets. It's all automated. This person ignores the emails until they get locked out of their computer. So I have to log in to the server and open a browser so they can log into their email, which involves two-fingered typing IF they remember their email password (they don't). Then they look for the latest password reset email by scrolling slowly through the 3,000 unopened emails in the inbox while I say "Just search for it. Look, click on this search bar. Type in 'password reset. No not the address bar, the search bar." [peck...peck...peck] "Wait, this is your personal email, not your work email? It was sent to your work email which you can't log into because you ignored the password reset emails." So then someone has to go back to their computer and forward a password reset link to their personal email because talking them through navigating the IT website to the password reset is just not worth the trouble. OK, we're at the password reset finally. "Now enter your old password. Ok, go find your post-it note while I fix my lunch." -later- "No, look, it's 15 characters now, both upper and lowercase, a number, and one of these symbols. You good?" About half the time it works out.

This same person was due for a safety training a couple months back, for which I am a supervisor and responsible for making sure everyone in the office is current on. It's a standard slideshow followed by a quiz at the end. The old supervisor for this used to just give them printed out answers because making it all the way through the training was such a hassle. This time, I conveniently couldn't find the answer sheet and told them to take the entire training like they're supposed to and take the quiz at the end like all the rest of us. At the quiz portion (which you should be able to pass without even taking the training because you've been here for 20 YEARS TAKING THIS EVERY YEAR) the entire training slideshow is in a side pane, which is searchable, so you can literally ctrl+f every one of the 30 answers. I went and hid from them and came back to find that another coworker took pity and found a printed out copy of the safety handbook for this training so they could look for the answers in a paper copy of it.

When they print anything, they always have to reconnect to the office printer, which involves at least 5 test pages printed out.

The department IT guy was just down in their office a little while ago today, so it seems like I'm off the hook for a while now.

These people should not have these jobs. It's a stupid comment, but these are people who should be digging holes or stocking shelves and working toll booths. Something simple while younger people with some initiative get poo poo done.

InsertPotPun
Apr 16, 2018

Pissy Bitch stan
my email is now hidden behind two party authentication. to check emails i have to request they text my boss and wait for my boss to get back to me with the pass code to log in.
and i can't send emails now.
he blames me for "clicking emails".
the last time something hosed up he took away my administrative privileges so i can't even update my computer let alone download something.
i have no idea who he gets computer advice from but the only thing i can do on the computer now is surf online.

ElHuevoGrande
May 21, 2006

Oh. . .

InsertPotPun posted:


he blames me for "clicking emails".


So what malware did you get infected with?

Helpimscared
Jun 16, 2014

Cthulu Carl posted:

A critical part of IT support is to educate users, so they can prevent or fix issues themselves, freeing up IT to handle other, more important break-fix issues or projects.

If users don't want to be educated to prevent downtime due to simple issues like "I lost my post-it with my password" or "I made everything on my screen big" then they're poo poo-rear end workers.

In my IT support role, there are so many users who don’t even want to learn. Doctors will straight up call in and get me on remote support then just walk away, hang up, and expect me to fix it. Also they love to submit tickets bitching about how things work, that aren’t even errors, they just don’t like it.

Barry Bluejeans
Feb 2, 2017

ATTENTHUN THITIZENTH
for the past couple months I've been in the routine of going into the office, staying for the morning stand-up meeting and then leaving to work at home once certain that my boss would be doing the same that day (which has been about 90% of the time as of late)

apparently somebody told on me because my boss mentioned my "disappearances" during our 1:1 today, though he was at last smart enough to realize that he couldn't discipline me for anything given that I'd only been WFH when he had

bad news is that he's going to start coming into the office much more often. good news is that this is the last straw I needed (after suffering through a pitiful raise and my company's refusal to consider any sort of ongoing WFH policy) to start searching for a new gig, a search that I will be conducting entirely while stuck in the office

Xaintrailles
Aug 14, 2015

:hellyeah::histdowns:

InsertPotPun posted:

my email is now hidden behind two party authentication. to check emails i have to request they text my boss and wait for my boss to get back to me with the pass code to log in.
and i can't send emails now.
he blames me for "clicking emails".
the last time something hosed up he took away my administrative privileges so i can't even update my computer let alone download something.
i have no idea who he gets computer advice from but the only thing i can do on the computer now is surf online.

Just want to say I appreciate this rare and correct use of "two party authentication."

Also lol at many of these posts.

ArbitraryC
Jan 28, 2009
Pick a number, any number
Pillbug

HenryJLittlefinger posted:

This same person was due for a safety training a couple months back, for which I am a supervisor and responsible for making sure everyone in the office is current on. It's a standard slideshow followed by a quiz at the end. The old supervisor for this used to just give them printed out answers because making it all the way through the training was such a hassle. This time, I conveniently couldn't find the answer sheet and told them to take the entire training like they're supposed to and take the quiz at the end like all the rest of us. At the quiz portion (which you should be able to pass without even taking the training because you've been here for 20 YEARS TAKING THIS EVERY YEAR) the entire training slideshow is in a side pane, which is searchable, so you can literally ctrl+f every one of the 30 answers. I went and hid from them and came back to find that another coworker took pity and found a printed out copy of the safety handbook for this training so they could look for the answers in a paper copy of it.

When they print anything, they always have to reconnect to the office printer, which involves at least 5 test pages printed out.

The department IT guy was just down in their office a little while ago today, so it seems like I'm off the hook for a while now.
Not to pin this on you personally because I'm well aware you have nothing to do with the policy or implementation but at the end of the day isn't this more the fault of your lovely work environment than the individual? I go through these sorts of trainings all the time because I work at sensitive sites and the reality is you can just mash through all the slides of things you're allegedly supposed to learn and do well enough at guessing after you eliminate the majority of clearly wrong answers to pass whatever pulse sensing benchmark exists as the end of chapter quiz. It's literally just safety training theater designed to kick liability cans down the road. The people supposed to learn stuff from these never learn things from them because they never were designed to teach anyone anything, it's all just administrative checkboxes that pay out a salary to do nothing safety officials. If there was any real intent to educate you'd have at bare minimum live classes and proctored exams for the material, but that never has been and never will be the actual goal. It's hard to fault people for failing at system that was never intended to work.

Kibayasu
Mar 28, 2010

Powered Descent posted:

These are probably the two most important skills I've developed in my career.



I've worked for a long time for a single business, 2 other office staff besides me (one of which is the owner) in a trucking company, and they're well aware this is a ton of what I do. But their eyes also glaze over the second I even mention words like "Excel functions" or "network printer/storage" so unless they suddenly take an interest in data entry and management I'm fairly safe.

TotalLossBrain
Oct 20, 2010

Hier graben!

ArbitraryC posted:

at bare minimum live classes and proctored exams .

The place I work at does this for electrical training, LOTO, and probably some other stuff I'm not aware of.

Otoh, Annual refreshers, ethics in research and government contracting? Lol that's for CBT with bullshit multiple choice at the end

Skanky Burns
Jan 9, 2009
Our latest training course gave you the option to skip straight to the test. If you got anything wrong though, you were forced to read through the whole training before trying the test again.

Barudak
May 7, 2007

Skanky Burns posted:

Our latest training course gave you the option to skip straight to the test. If you got anything wrong though, you were forced to read through the whole training before trying the test again.

I had this but it was for every attempt at the test, the test was 50 questions long, randomized from a set of 100, not easy, did not tell you what you got wrong, and less than a 90 was failing.

Unsurprisingly they had a 0% completion rate until some low level person was assigned to sit there for a week and copy down every single question and answer they could verify until they could pass the test every time.

~Coxy
Dec 9, 2003

R.I.P. Inter-OS Sass - b.2000AD d.2003AD

zedprime posted:

Slack auto responses are trying to tell me to live my best life.

HR: So and so cancelled their interview
Slack auto response's one and only option: Great!

This is how we know that "AI" is basically bullshit. Slack, MS and Google have analysed billions of messages and responses and still can't come up with a suggestion that I'd ever want to actually use and probably wouldn't save me any time anyway.

HenryJLittlefinger
Jan 31, 2010

stomp clap


ArbitraryC posted:

Not to pin this on you personally because I'm well aware you have nothing to do with the policy or implementation but at the end of the day isn't this more the fault of your lovely work environment than the individual? I go through these sorts of trainings all the time because I work at sensitive sites and the reality is you can just mash through all the slides of things you're allegedly supposed to learn and do well enough at guessing after you eliminate the majority of clearly wrong answers to pass whatever pulse sensing benchmark exists as the end of chapter quiz. It's literally just safety training theater designed to kick liability cans down the road. The people supposed to learn stuff from these never learn things from them because they never were designed to teach anyone anything, it's all just administrative checkboxes that pay out a salary to do nothing safety officials. If there was any real intent to educate you'd have at bare minimum live classes and proctored exams for the material, but that never has been and never will be the actual goal. It's hard to fault people for failing at system that was never intended to work.

Oh yeah, it’s absolutely a poorly implemented system. The training is hazardous materials stuff and it’s for the whole company. Everyone who has any contact with anything classified as hazardous has to stay current with the training, and each unit has one person who coordinates it for the employees in that unit. That coordinator is on the hook for everyones training in their unit. So this whole training fiasco is just me keeping the hazmat department from coming down on me for noncompliance. Fortunately my unit only works with two hazardous chemicals, both of them pretty low priority. I pay careful attention to everybody who uses them, make sure they have PPE and use it when necessary, keep them working under good fume hoods, and really do take the time to keep everyone educated and responsible. Even this one employee is fine with the chemical safety stuff in practice. I really do care about their safety and do everything I can to make it easy for everyone to stay safe.

The funny thing is the hazardous materials department is also great to work with for the most part. They understand what’s going on in our unit, they respond to emails and phone calls immediately, and the actual acquisition, use, and disposal of chemicals is pretty rigorously controlled and smooth. But their culture of training and education is just bare bones and typical begrudging red tape. That bugs the poo poo out of me because any one person who is just doing the bare minimum training and certification with no real oversight from their supervisor could easily get their unit and maybe even the whole company into some deep poo poo. Like EPA coming in and just wrecking you deep poo poo.

Improbable Lobster
Jan 6, 2012

"From each according to his ability" said Ares. It sounded like a quotation.
Buglord

Outrail posted:

These people should not have these jobs. It's a stupid comment, but these are people who should be digging holes or stocking shelves and working toll booths. Something simple while younger people with some initiative get poo poo done.

If they're too old to use "magic boxes" like my coworker calls them then they should loving retire or get another job. loving boggles the mind that these people that refuse to actually do their job don't find something else to do.

Agoat
Dec 4, 2012

I AM BAD AT GAMES
Lipstick Apathy
My work is having a staffing shortage (tons of auto claims came in), and they're also trying to fire a ton of people.

Like, what

blackmet
Aug 5, 2006

I believe there is a universal Truth to the process of doing things right (Not that I have any idea what that actually means).

Extra row of tits posted:

Can I tell a story that is more “Stupid poo poo my workmate did”?


One of my contractors that I'm playing acting manager to did this.

His job mostly consists of entering data from spreadsheets into two systems. He is fine at that. If there's not enough of that to do, he can pull cases and work them, albeit at a speed and accuracy that wouldn't allow us to keep him if it was his only job.

He mentioned that his job can probably be done with an excel macro. We know this. My manager has even mentioned doing it. But nobody has the time, energy, or will to make it happen.

I pretty much told him that it was a great idea, and to never mention it again. I think he understood.

bee
Dec 17, 2008


Do you often sing or whistle just for fun?

Agoat posted:

My work is having a staffing shortage (tons of auto claims came in), and they're also trying to fire a ton of people.

Like, what

Oooo one of my ex employers did this. They were short about thirty part time & casual staff, but were firing existing staff members at a rate of about one per fortnight. To make it more fun, they refused to allow new or existing staff any flexibility when it came to what shifts/hours they could work, it was basically "you will work these shifts, you cannot swap them, or you can quit". So staff were jumping ship for other organisations that had flexible shifts.

I was in charge of recruiting, but then I got fired because I failed to magic thirty new employees out of my arse during a nationwide labour shortage. Good times!

Marmaduke!
May 19, 2009

Why would it do that!?
My company has a plan to double the workforce, and hire another 60 new staff within a year. If people weren't quitting and the new starters were staying on, it'd almost be doable. Also no lockers for anyone while they try and implement a uniform for us to change into...

Dongsturm
Feb 17, 2012

Agoat posted:

My work is having a staffing shortage (tons of auto claims came in), and they're also trying to fire a ton of people.

Like, what

bee posted:

Oooo one of my ex employers did this. They were short about thirty part time & casual staff, but were firing existing staff members at a rate of about one per fortnight. To make it more fun, they refused to allow new or existing staff any flexibility when it came to what shifts/hours they could work, it was basically "you will work these shifts, you cannot swap them, or you can quit". So staff were jumping ship for other organisations that had flexible shifts.

I was in charge of recruiting, but then I got fired because I failed to magic thirty new employees out of my arse during a nationwide labour shortage. Good times!

I'm getting the feeling a lot of places are doing this because they think that nobody can start a competing business, and they might be right.

Everyone is in debt, and people in debt can't put together the 30-50k to start a (simple) new business. There's basically zero chance of all the fired employees getting together and going "hey, we're basically an entire company, all we need is a business name and some startup funds"

Which is a shame, because it needs to happen a lot more than it does.

bee
Dec 17, 2008


Do you often sing or whistle just for fun?
^^^ in my scenario, there are lots of service providers in this particular sector and all of them are screaming out for more staff. My ex employer didn't even do reference checks. The employees can pick and choose where they want to work and they know it. Good luck to them, I say.

MagusofStars
Mar 31, 2012



Dongsturm posted:

I'm getting the feeling a lot of places are doing this because they think that nobody can start a competing business, and they might be right.
Anybody who’s evaluating the business market in that much detail would recognize how tight the labor market is right now and understand that firing an existing productive employee isn’t a great idea right now. Everybody is trying to hire; no need to start competing firms because the existing place across the street is also hiring.

Instead, I’m betting that it’s plain stupidity. They still have an outdated mindset of “go ahead and leave, don’t let the door hit you in the rear end, plenty more employees where you came from!” when that’s not the current reality.

goatface
Dec 5, 2007

I had a video of that when I was about 6.

I remember it being shit.


Grimey Drawer
They're fighting off migrants at the border because of how full up the country is, there must be an excess of workers desperate for jobs. The press wouldn't lie about such things.

StrangersInTheNight
Dec 31, 2007
ABSOLUTE FUCKING GUDGEON

Cthulu Carl posted:

A critical part of IT support is to educate users, so they can prevent or fix issues themselves, freeing up IT to handle other, more important break-fix issues or projects.

If users don't want to be educated to prevent downtime due to simple issues like "I lost my post-it with my password" or "I made everything on my screen big" then they're poo poo-rear end workers.

Of course, but there's knowing what the best way to educate someone is and adapting to that, instead of getting upset when they won't read your incredibly long pdf while on a deadline crunch.

If you're going to take it upon yourselves to be educators, then you must also be as flexible as educators are and understand that each person learns differently and some people need hands-on guidance. That doesn't make them stupid, it makes them human.

It also helps if you don't view the people you're teaching as scum.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

vyst
Aug 25, 2009



goatface posted:

They're fighting off migrants at the border because of how full up the country is, there must be an excess of workers desperate for jobs. The press wouldn't lie about such things.

BUT HER EMAILS THE CARAVANS

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply