Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Noxville
Dec 7, 2003

WhatEvil posted:

I see your point on this and also the rest of your post (genuinely, it's well-argued) but also I'm not going to vote for a party that is literally trying to outflank the Tories from the right on a lot of issues, and that tolerates open transphobia, and that doesn't give a poo poo about rampant Islamophobia, and that supports Israel, and that is willing to let migrants drown to court the gammon vote, and [1001 other issues with the awful fuckers].


BTW thread, if you thought I was being harsh on Monbiot the other day:

https://twitter.com/GeorgeMonbiot/status/1468892008022433797?s=20

He's still loving on about the problem with The Left.

And:

https://twitter.com/GeorgeMonbiot/status/1468892680415494144?s=20

Lol, he's morphed into loving Oz Katerji, calling everybody he doesn't like an Assadist.

|

We need to spend time to consider the nuance of people's stances

|

Everyone disagrees with me is an Assadist

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro


WhatEvil posted:

I see your point on this and also the rest of your post (genuinely, it's well-argued) but also I'm not going to vote for a party that is literally trying to outflank the Tories from the right on a lot of issues, and that tolerates open transphobia, and that doesn't give a poo poo about rampant Islamophobia, and that supports Israel, and that is willing to let migrants drown to court the gammon vote, and [1001 other issues with the awful fuckers].


BTW thread, if you thought I was being harsh on Monbiot the other day:

https://twitter.com/GeorgeMonbiot/status/1468892008022433797?s=20

He's still loving on about the problem with The Left.

And:

https://twitter.com/GeorgeMonbiot/status/1468892680415494144?s=20

Lol, he's morphed into loving Oz Katerji, calling everybody he doesn't like an Assadist.

Like, he's not wrong. There absolutely is a segment of the left, who are popularly called Tankies, who believe all that poo poo.

The thing is, it's 8 people & they aren't really worth talking about.

Borrovan posted:

Just gonna set out my difficulties with the "let Labour die" argument - as I understand it, it's:

Step one: socialists leave Labour
Step two: ???
Step three: Labour dies
Step four: ???
Step five: profit new socialist party

The problem with step 2 is that the reason why Labour is dying (imo) is because of irreconcilable differences between the left & right of the party. The left leaving just means that the right win, Labour becomes the Tory-lite liberal party of the middle classes. They will eventually find corporate backers, most of the unions will stick around to preserve their influence (don't forget that the trade unions nowadays overwhelmingly represent middle class professionals, & the bigger unions have developed perverse incentives to not actually change much in order to preserve their own existence). The party doesn't die, it just sucks harder.

The problem with step 4 is that the formation of every major party in UK history has been a major seismic shift. Tories (& Whigs) are (/were) as old as Parliamentary democracy. Liberals were born from the industrial revolution. The Labour Party was born from the foundation of the unions (themselves born from a century of violence). There is literally no example of a major party growing from grass roots (e: forgot about the nationalist parties here, but national independence movements are pretty clearly their own thing). Imo the best that can be hoped for is like a left-UKIP, exerting pressure on the Labour Party. Which, like, cool, I guess, but the Labour Party dying, or going more right wing, directly contradicts that.

Personally, I'm still a member, because imo in order for there to be a major left party it has to be the legitimate political wing of the labour movement, which Labour still is, sadly. Right now, Labour happy to kill itself fighting left wing Labour members like me, and if it does that, cool, the unions will need to form a new party I guess, there's our new socialist (or at least unambiguously pro-union) party.

I'm not voting for them though lmao.

OK, let's take the counterpoint in equally reductive terms

Step one: Stay in a Labour Party that hates socialists.
Step two: The Labour Right stay in charge & learn nothing because why would they?
Step three: Somehow this equals a socialist government?

The right have already won. They won when the Labour membership that backed Corbyn gave up in 2021 & elected a liberal as leader. Well, an economic liberal, certainly not a civil libertarian. At this point I just want to see the Labour Party burn for the sheer schadenfreude of it. I hate them.

forkboy84 fucked around with this message at 15:22 on Dec 9, 2021

ThomasPaine
Feb 4, 2009

We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.
I mean he is right on the point that the left's greatest enemy is the left, and there are a lot of weirdoes online who will excommunicate each other based on their respective takes on the USSR's 1928 agricultural policy, which probably seems a far bigger issue than it is if you live on Twitter

Bobby Deluxe
May 9, 2004

Most leftist discourse is that simpsons meme of Groundskeeper Willie talking about the scots being natural enemies with etc etc

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
Even the biggest orthodox ML tank commander I know was basically in the "Assad is like Saddam, probably not a great guy but what are you going to do, regime change him? Support the turbo-Islamists? The Western backed insurgents? That all worked well lol" which sure there's bits you can strongly disagree with in that but equivocating it to the handful of "Assad is the Lion of Syria and the only true light of Ba'ath Arab Liberation" weirdoes is really stupid and can only come from spending too much time online and not actually talking to people.

goddamnedtwisto
Dec 31, 2004

If you ask me about the mole people in the London Underground, I WILL be forced to kill you
Fun Shoe
This is possibly the niche online equivalent of that Onion "Marilyn Manson just going door to door to shock people" story, but the bloke that writes Scarfolk seems to be very specifically targeting his terrifying dystopian vision:

https://twitter.com/richard_littler/status/1468901818398879748

Mugsbaloney
Jul 11, 2012

We prefer your extinction to the loss of our job

VideoGames posted:

Yeah, 2019 and (and to a lesser extent 2017) the way the country's media and Labour MPs treated the party broke me a little. I will not vote for Labour again unless there is serious change. Labour have gone back on every pledge from Starmer's election and are continuing to go rightwards. This party does not represent me. Maybe they would not go as far right as the tories but I have not one ounce of trust that the people in charge who wrecked everything and continue to remain will not get worse. I do not wish to endorse that with my vote.

A while back but +1

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

goddamnedtwisto posted:

This is possibly the niche online equivalent of that Onion "Marilyn Manson just going door to door to shock people" story, but the bloke that writes Scarfolk seems to be very specifically targeting his terrifying dystopian vision:

https://twitter.com/richard_littler/status/1468901818398879748

I was reading the new Kim Stanley Robinson novel and there's detailed descriptions of how one of the main characters loves orange slices dipped in chocolate, and I thought of this thread and chuckled sensibly

keep punching joe
Jan 22, 2006

Die Satan!
Can confirm that orange flavoured Yorkie bars are good.

Borrovan
Aug 15, 2013

IT IS ME.
🧑‍💼
I AM THERESA MAY


forkboy84 posted:

OK, let's take the counterpoint in equally reductive terms

Step one: Stay in a Labour Party that hates socialists.
Step two: The Labour Right stay in charge & learn nothing because why would they?
Step three: Somehow this equals a socialist government?

The right have already won. They won when the Labour membership that backed Corbyn gave up in 2021 & elected a liberal as leader. Well, an economic liberal, certainly not a civil libertarian. At this point I just want to see the Labour Party burn for the sheer schadenfreude of it. I hate them.
The Labour right are currently killing the party fighting a war against the Labour left, so no, your analysis breaks down right after step 1. My whole argument (well, the first part) is that all the lefties leaving does not kill the Labour Party, it is lefties staying in that is doing that.

e: also, like, the SCG has as many MPs as literally every party in Parliament apart from the top 3 put together, including all independents. So, "Labour Party that hates socialists" is a bit of an overstatement, that's mainly just the leadership. Not to mention the very many good eggs left in the membership.

Borrovan fucked around with this message at 15:47 on Dec 9, 2021

Andoman
Nov 7, 2021

Mae hen wlad fy nhadau yn annwyl i mi

therattle posted:

.

The Xmas party being the thing that possibly brings Johnson down is a bit like Al Capone ultimately being jailed for tax evasion.

I can't see that happening, the guy if teflon and realistically the only real danger to him is his own party. Now a few of them are pretty hacked off on the backbenches but there doesn't seem to be any political heavy weights wading in against him so no real challenge to his authority.

DesperateDan
Dec 10, 2005

Where's my cow?

Is that my cow?

No it isn't, but it still tramples my bloody lavender.
Labour could have still earned my vote after I quit the party.

They didnt.

Actually they did the exact opposite.

gently caress em.

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro


Borrovan posted:

The Labour right are currently killing the party fighting a war against the Labour left, so no, your analysis breaks down right after step 1. My whole argument (well, the first part) is that all the lefties leaving does not kill the Labour Party, it is lefties staying in that is doing that.

e: also, like, the SCG has as many MPs as literally every party in Parliament apart from the top 3 put together, including all independents. So, "Labour Party that hates socialists" is a bit of an overstatement, that's mainly just the leadership. Not to mention the very many good eggs left in the membership.

Yes, if the SCG MPs left the Labour Party they'd be the 4th largest party in the country instantly, with potential financial support from a few of the largest unions, & hundreds of thousands of people who joined Labour in 2015 to vote for an SCG member as leader. Unfortunately they aren't going to do that because of some misplaced loyalty to a party thats MPs, staff & pretty much anyone else outwith the membership hates them.

If I lived in one of the 35 constituencies that had an SCG MP, I'd probably vote for them. But like the overwhelming majority in this country I don't.

Like, the best argument for Labour is inertia? And frankly schadenfreude beats inertia.

Jakabite
Jul 31, 2010

Borrovan posted:

Hey comrades everyone loves RP group drama right? Got a situation I could use some validation on:

Just got a group email from a friend, saying that a very old friend of his (who used to play with us, & then subsequently got into posting a bunch of nazi poo poo on Facebook) is dying or something, misses roleplaying, & would like to join us again. I said he can gently caress right off & there's no way I'm sitting round a table with a loving nazi.

Funny thing is the guy who emailed is married to a first gen non white immigrant & finds the nazi poo poo more upsetting than anyone, but he's also got serious anxiety issues & hates conflict & they go way back so ugh whatever I guess. Also seems a bit off since nazi guy (before anyone had ever heard any nazi poo poo from him) is the one who introduced me to most of the group a decade back. But, nonetheless, gently caress that, I'm not doing it.

I did right, right?

You did indeed. gently caress that dying fascist, if he misses games so much maybe he shouldn’t have become a hateful monster.

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

DesperateDan posted:

Labour could have still earned my vote after I quit the party.

They didnt.

Actually they did the exact opposite.

gently caress em.

Wow you don't like Kenny labours policies! I mean we got rid of Corbyn what else could you possibly want?????

Regarde Aduck
Oct 19, 2012

c l o u d k i t t e n
Grimey Drawer
on one hand dying sucks and you have to be careful not to be cruel but on the other that sounds awkward as heck and i don't know just how bad the nazi stuff got but i'm going to assume from the reaction that it was pretty vile so yeah, don't do anything you're not comfortable doing.

Noxville
Dec 7, 2003

Borrovan posted:

The Labour right are currently killing the party fighting a war against the Labour left, so no, your analysis breaks down right after step 1. My whole argument (well, the first part) is that all the lefties leaving does not kill the Labour Party, it is lefties staying in that is doing that.

IMHO the Labour party only has a long-term future is if it can meaningfully improve people's lives. If it can expel the left and regain power but change absolutely nothing, it'll just be out again at the next election - look at the current state of Democratic party, elected on a platform of 'at least we're not the other guy' and now on track for a huge loss next year that will stop them doing anything at all before they lose the presidency to Trump again in three years time. Leftism are the only thing that can save Labour by pushing things that actually help people rather than just catering to prejudices, except that the party apparatus is now rigged to completely exclude anyone to the left of David Cameron

goddamnedtwisto
Dec 31, 2004

If you ask me about the mole people in the London Underground, I WILL be forced to kill you
Fun Shoe

forkboy84 posted:

Yes, if the SCG MPs left the Labour Party they'd be the 4th largest party in the country instantly, with potential financial support from a few of the largest unions, & hundreds of thousands of people who joined Labour in 2015 to vote for an SCG member as leader. Unfortunately they aren't going to do that because of some misplaced loyalty to a party thats MPs, staff & pretty much anyone else outwith the membership hates them.

If I lived in one of the 35 constituencies that had an SCG MP, I'd probably vote for them. But like the overwhelming majority in this country I don't.

Like, the best argument for Labour is inertia? And frankly schadenfreude beats inertia.

I can completely understand why people want to stay and fight. They feel (with some justification) that Labour belongs to them far more than it does to the briefcase wankers. Like Michael Bolton in Office Space - "Why should we leave? They're the ones that suck". It's not for me though, and even though I have an SCG MP (Apsana Begum) I'm not 100% sure I can turn out even to vote for her just because there's no way of marking my vote "in spite of, not because". If it came to it I'm not 100% sure at this point I could turn out to campaign for her in an alternative universe where the national party were good, just because it would involve interacting with the toxic shitbags of my CLP who have completely abandoned her.

I just wish we could somehow slip a history of the last 6 years back in time to 2015 Corbyn and Big John and tell them that they might as well be hung for a sheep as a lamb and should have actually gone full Stalinist on the right. They'd have probably still lost in 2019 - I genuinely don't think there was a path to victory for them even without the dead weight of the Blairfuckers dragging them down in that particular election - but at least that loss would have been a sacrifice for a greater good rather than just a punchline.

(Incidentally that lovely local party is why I'd have actually had to leave before the next locals anyway, because there's no loving way I'm voting for any of that nest of loving vipers)

goddamnedtwisto fucked around with this message at 16:30 on Dec 9, 2021

NotJustANumber99
Feb 15, 2012

somehow that last av was even worse than your posting

Bobby Deluxe posted:

If you're using someone else's ideas generally you credit them. It'd be the easiest thing in the world to say "As a recent academic piece put it "blah blah blah."

Not citing the people who's ideas you're nicking is lovely practice.

I don't think she took any of his ideas. Later in the article she directly quotes and attributes ideas to some other professor dude. The stuff that was the same as Jones's were background facts.

Jedit
Dec 10, 2011

Proudly supporting vanilla legends 1994-2014

goddamnedtwisto posted:

I can completely understand why people want to stay and fight. They feel (with some justification) that Labour belongs to them far more than it does to the briefcase wankers. Like Michael Bolton in Office Space - "Why should we leave? They're the ones that suck". It's not for me though, and even though I have an SCG MP (Apsana Begum) I'm not 100% sure I can turn out even to vote for her just because there's no way of marking my vote "in spite of, not because". If it came to it I'm not 100% sure at this point I could turn out to campaign for her in an alternative universe where the national party were good, just because it would involve interacting with the toxic shitbags of my CLP who have completely abandoned her.

I just wish we could somehow slip a history of the last 6 years back in time to 2015 Corbyn and Big John and tell them that they might as well be hung for a sheep as a lamb and should have actually gone full Stalinist on the right. They'd have probably still lost in 2019 - I genuinely don't think there was a path to victory for them even without the dead weight of the Blairfuckers dragging them down in that particular election - but at least that loss would have been a sacrifice for a greater good rather than just a punchline.

You should absolutely vote the person if your MP is SCG. If the Labour right get decimated while all the SCG hold on, it will send a stronger message even than complete electoral collapse: we want the left, we don't want the right. It will also leave the SCG stronger within the party and potentially in a position to push back.

Zalakwe
Jun 4, 2007
Likes Cake, Hates Hamsters



goddamnedtwisto posted:

(Incidentally that lovely local party is why I'd have actually had to leave before the next locals anyway, because there's no loving way I'm voting for any of that nest of loving vipers)

It's a moral thing in a similar vein for me. I just can't be part of or vote for an organisation that does things like suppress reports into institutional racism because it's convenient for the leadership, or for that matter who's leader will just lie to your face to scrounge a few votes. Fair play to people who want to stay and fight but I can't have my name associated with it.

WhatEvil
Jun 6, 2004

Can't get no luck.

Yeah I can see the argument of voting if your local MP is SCG.

Apraxin
Feb 22, 2006

General-Admiral
am i misreading that, or on top of everything else did she misunderstand the original quote and think that Sylvia Pankhurst's nickname was 'The Spirit of Petrograd'? :laffo:

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



https://twitter.com/GNev2/status/1468838487499673603?t=FIyPCyQ4dbNW5L5t_E551A&s=19

Add this guy to the list of people doing more opposition than the actual opposition.

Disproportionation
Feb 20, 2011

Oh god it's the Clone Saga all over again.
I think that if Labour, even in its current form, won a general things would be slightly better - however I don't think that is really enough for me to vote for them unconditionally - a Starmer gov would be merely less bad. So I probably wouldn't vote for them unless I felt I had a good MP.

That said as well - I don't think the current ideas of burning the party to the ground/having the SCG defect would really help either - I can't see anything other than a slightly redder libdems replacing labour if it collapses, and I'm extremely sceptical of "let's do CUKTIG, but left wing and it'll work this time because ???".

TACD
Oct 27, 2000

I'm not going to vote for a party just because it's supposed to be left-wing. That seems like a deluded and self-defeating strategy.

The fact is that no major party represents left-wing values at this point, and voting for Labour just because it's the lesser evil or because it *should* be left-wing or *used* to be is just wishful thinking and avoiding the fact that the path to a better government is going to be much more difficult than that.

biglads
Feb 21, 2007

I could've gone to Blatherwycke



stev posted:

https://twitter.com/GNev2/status/1468838487499673603?t=FIyPCyQ4dbNW5L5t_E551A&s=19

Add this guy to the list of people doing more opposition than the actual opposition.

I welcome the Gary Nevolution.

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

Apraxin posted:

am i misreading that, or on top of everything else did she misunderstand the original quote and think that Sylvia Pankhurst's nickname was 'The Spirit of Petrograd'? :laffo:

“A spectre is haunting Europe— Sylvia Pankhurst"

E: lol?

https://twitter.com/PoliticsForAlI/status/1468935279738331146?t=-17rVod1BvIuvGdpmdTPvA&s=19

Failed Imagineer fucked around with this message at 18:22 on Dec 9, 2021

Convex
Aug 19, 2010

Is this a parody account

edit: gently caress me, it isn't

Dabir
Nov 10, 2012

Disproportionation posted:

I think that if Labour, even in its current form, won a general things would be slightly better - however I don't think that is really enough for me to vote for them unconditionally - a Starmer gov would be merely less bad. So I probably wouldn't vote for them unless I felt I had a good MP.

That said as well - I don't think the current ideas of burning the party to the ground/having the SCG defect would really help either - I can't see anything other than a slightly redder libdems replacing labour if it collapses, and I'm extremely sceptical of "let's do CUKTIG, but left wing and it'll work this time because ???".

For ??? insert "we have at least one principle between us".

NotJustANumber99
Feb 15, 2012

somehow that last av was even worse than your posting
do people watching musicals join in?

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
Depends on the musical.

Isomermaid
Dec 3, 2019

Swish swish, like a fish
That'd get you an elbow in the ribs at just about anything except Mamma Mia

But it's poo poo advice anyway. Theatre performers got nothing throughout the lockdown despite shows being mandated closed. You might agree or disagree if they should've got relief money. But they're opening now, in the pandemic, because financially they have to if they're going to continue. This means people whose livelihood depends on taking exceptionally good care of their breathing are performing in a room of 1000, 2000 people all breathing the same air, pointed their way. A lot of them are begging audiences to stay masked throughout.

Absolutely poo poo for the government to be saying "oh yeah, take your masks off and join in", and I'm betting they talked to nobody in the theatre business

ThomasPaine
Feb 4, 2009

We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.

goddamnedtwisto posted:

I can completely understand why people want to stay and fight. They feel (with some justification) that Labour belongs to them far more than it does to the briefcase wankers. Like Michael Bolton in Office Space - "Why should we leave? They're the ones that suck". It's not for me though, and even though I have an SCG MP (Apsana Begum) I'm not 100% sure I can turn out even to vote for her just because there's no way of marking my vote "in spite of, not because". If it came to it I'm not 100% sure at this point I could turn out to campaign for her in an alternative universe where the national party were good, just because it would involve interacting with the toxic shitbags of my CLP who have completely abandoned her.

I just wish we could somehow slip a history of the last 6 years back in time to 2015 Corbyn and Big John and tell them that they might as well be hung for a sheep as a lamb and should have actually gone full Stalinist on the right. They'd have probably still lost in 2019 - I genuinely don't think there was a path to victory for them even without the dead weight of the Blairfuckers dragging them down in that particular election - but at least that loss would have been a sacrifice for a greater good rather than just a punchline.

(Incidentally that lovely local party is why I'd have actually had to leave before the next locals anyway, because there's no loving way I'm voting for any of that nest of loving vipers)

I genuinely believe Labour would have won in 2019 if it hadn't completely shat the bed on its Brexit strategy. That was the issue of the moment, and they literally couldn't have hosed it up worse. Some of the blame obviously goes to the FBPE brigade for pushing them to argue for a second referendum, but Corbyn et al should rightly be criticised for capitulating to it, and even before that their position was nonsensical and contradictory where it wasn't incomprehensible.

ThomasPaine fucked around with this message at 19:15 on Dec 9, 2021

domhal
Dec 30, 2008


0.000% of Communism has been built. Evil child-murdering billionaires still rule the world with a shit-eating grin. All he has managed to do is make himself *sad*. It has, however, made him into a very, very smart boy with something like a university degree in Truth. Instead of building Communism, he now builds a precise model of this grotesque, duplicitous world.

goddamnedtwisto posted:

I can completely understand why people want to stay and fight. They feel (with some justification) that Labour belongs to them far more than it does to the briefcase wankers. Like Michael Bolton in Office Space - "Why should we leave? They're the ones that suck". It's not for me though, and even though I have an SCG MP (Apsana Begum) I'm not 100% sure I can turn out even to vote for her just because there's no way of marking my vote "in spite of, not because". If it came to it I'm not 100% sure at this point I could turn out to campaign for her in an alternative universe where the national party were good, just because it would involve interacting with the toxic shitbags of my CLP who have completely abandoned her.

I just wish we could somehow slip a history of the last 6 years back in time to 2015 Corbyn and Big John and tell them that they might as well be hung for a sheep as a lamb and should have actually gone full Stalinist on the right. They'd have probably still lost in 2019 - I genuinely don't think there was a path to victory for them even without the dead weight of the Blairfuckers dragging them down in that particular election - but at least that loss would have been a sacrifice for a greater good rather than just a punchline.

(Incidentally that lovely local party is why I'd have actually had to leave before the next locals anyway, because there's no loving way I'm voting for any of that nest of loving vipers)

Is constituency work worth considering? Don't know about Begum in particular, but if an MP is providing great surgery service helping lots of people navigate hell-island bureaucracy, the replacement of that MP with someone useless would be detrimental to people in the constituency.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

ThomasPaine posted:

I genuinely believe Labour would have won in 2019 if it hadn't completely shat the bed on its Brexit strategy.
Fortunately the shadow brexit minister left the party and was never heard from again.

TACD
Oct 27, 2000

ThomasPaine posted:

I genuinely believe Labour would have won in 2019 if it hadn't completely shat the bed on its Brexit strategy. That was the issue of the moment, and they literally couldn't have hosed it up worse. Some of the blame obviously goes to the FBPE brigade for pushing them to argue for a second referendum, but Corbyn et al should rightly be criticised for capitulating to it, and even before that their position was nonsensical and contradictory where it wasn't incomprehensible.
If we’re relitigating the past, 2019 wouldn’t have even happened if the entire Labour right hadn’t been sabotaging the 2017 election to keep Corbyn out.

Just Another Lurker
May 1, 2009

UK is pretty much hosed until proportional representation is implemented, sooo.......... good luck with that.

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

Convex posted:

Is this a parody account

edit: gently caress me, it isn't

It's factual reporting of a parody country

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Convex
Aug 19, 2010

Guavanaut posted:

Depends on the musical.

does anyone have a link to that anti-mask protest vid that someone dubbed over with "we're a bunch of cunts" please

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply