|
gradenko_2000 posted:let's not kid ourselves that's just an excuse to post some more GMax cleavage media rehabilitating the pedo sex trafficker through parasocial horny on the line
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 15:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 06:56 |
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:let's not kid ourselves that's just an excuse to post some more GMax cleavage I give the thread what it wants. Anyway, StashAugustine, yes it is a way to conflate real concerns of child sex trafficking with QAnon conspiracy theorism. If the author wasn't trying to taint non-Q-believers in this way then they would've pointed out the hypocrisy of the Q-Crowd, who are very mum about Church sexual abuse (as one example of many). Kind of hard to swallow the conceit of the article if you're someone who followed the Milwaukee story last year.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 15:41
|
|
|
StashAugustine posted:Not defending the Atlantic but the article is a bit more reasonable than that, it's mostly talking about the right-wing conspiracy stuff Do you think they are wrong about the podestas being child traffickers
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 16:05
|
|
|
StashAugustine posted:Not defending the Atlantic but the article is a bit more reasonable than that, it's mostly talking about the right-wing conspiracy stuff IMO the qanon/pizzagate thing is a deliberate effort to preemptively discredit actual pedophilia conspiracies in the eyes of normies who will reflexively go "what, like the pizzagate stuff? sure, alright"
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 16:14
|
|
|
cagliostr0 posted:Do you think they are wrong about the podestas being child traffickers The allusion to their involvement with kidnappings in Portugal is freaky to say the least.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 16:28
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHd2O_KuCxA it may have been camelot for jack and jacqueline but on the chguevara highway filling up with gasoline
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 16:42
|
|
|
SKULL.GIF posted:IMO the qanon/pizzagate thing is a deliberate effort to preemptively discredit actual pedophilia conspiracies in the eyes of normies who will reflexively go "what, like the pizzagate stuff? sure, alright" yup. its probably not an accident that michael flynn was one of the early pushers of it too. former DIA head trying to muddy the waters around a pedo blackmail ring. totally normal poo poo
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 16:53
|
|
|
Spergin Morlock posted:yup. its probably not an accident that michael flynn was one of the early pushers of it too. former DIA head trying to muddy the waters around a pedo blackmail ring. totally normal poo poo Flynn being a deep state double agent would be the best poo poo and I totally believe it
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 16:55
|
|
|
amazing hypothesis that has never been conjectured forty times before in this threadSKULL.GIF posted:IMO the qanon/pizzagate thing is a deliberate effort to preemptively discredit actual pedophilia conspiracies in the eyes of normies who will reflexively go "what, like the pizzagate stuff? sure, alright"
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 16:56
|
|
|
my bony fealty posted:heres a fun read i couldn't stomach this article im not upset at you, my bony fealty, but... just... gently caress
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 17:03
|
|
|
child sex trafficking!? sounds like fake news...
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 17:05
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/MusicManVA/status/1462859059804188675 https://twitter.com/MusicManVA/status/1462859071518908418
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 17:08
|
|
|
smarxist posted:https://twitter.com/MusicManVA/status/1462859059804188675 This seems pretty schizo, but I want to draw attention to: https://twitter.com/MusicManVA/status/1462859071518908418 This is the most explicit way I've seen Rittenhouse victims characterized as black, although it's very routine it's usually left up to the reader's inference. Very odd that a major publication would oopsie on this. Not a single victim was black...
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 17:14
|
|
|
yeah, Rittenhouse is a really bizarre case for the spin doctors out there, and part of me feels like they're testing some upper boundaries on how much bullshit they can shovel past people
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 17:24
|
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:i couldn't stomach this article yeah its bad m8 that the one of the most celebrated French literary figures is an open pedo who appears to write books exclusively about his own pedophile exploits and a thinly fictionalized version of himself doing child rapes is just uhh who reads this poo poo! what the gently caress
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 17:31
|
|
|
you skipped the best part https://twitter.com/musicmanva/status/1462878141387620357
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 17:35
|
|
|
smarxist posted:yeah, Rittenhouse is a really bizarre case for the spin doctors out there, and part of me feels like they're testing some upper boundaries on how much bullshit they can shovel past people The snag in the case is particularly relevant for splintering dissident groups. That is, the shootings in and of themselves were pretty clear cut self defense*. Any anti-racist, pro-protestor, antifa, et al., stating this plain fact invites pillory, exclusion, derision from their cohorts. It's almost perfect in its design to this end of division. Because of course it's true that there was premeditation - absolutely there was, it's not as if he didn't have a gun before crossing state lines with the express intent of being a white supremacist enforcer of property rights. But how can a court deliberate on this sort of premeditation, which requires inference? Per the court's limit and capacity no other possible ruling could have been made, inference does not meet the 'reasonable doubt' standard. Then Rittenhouse goes on TV to say that he supports #BlackLivesMatter. Hah! Well maybe it's true, after all he didn't kill any black men, right? There is something remarkably pernicious in the entire affair from start to finish and something which will leave racists and anti-racists both unsatisfied. Muddy waters. *If you haven't seen the videos themselves: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpTW2AJE9MQ&t=1054s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpTW2AJE9MQ&t=1165s The entire NYT video there is worth your time if you're unfamiliar with the case. Importantly, and mentioned in the video, the police had funneled protestors towards the armed vigilantes. Some of the protestors were themselves armed. Violent, fatal happenings were an inevitability.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 18:00
|
|
|
longposts about anything but the trial right on time lol. there are at least 5 threads to rant about rittenhouse stuff hth
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 18:15
|
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:let's not kid ourselves that's just an excuse to post some more GMax cleavage ghislaine innocent
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 18:17
|
|
|
mastershakeman posted:ghislaine innocent as is your wont
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 18:22
|
|
|
mastershakeman posted:ghislaine innocent extremely on brand, though I was definitely expecting "I can fix her"
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 18:23
|
|
|
Perry Mason Jar posted:This seems pretty schizo, but I want to draw attention to: you mean music man VA would post edited screenshots and fake poo poo from the Babylon bee?? https://twitter.com/MusicManVA/status/1465056458324721664?t=KIpwG5JB1Lv44i2OUbYUMQ&s=19 https://twitter.com/MusicManVA/status/1469295048147800064?t=0HyLMjobxEy6KFBpUH-dQQ&s=19 Ah ahahaha Smollett really did fake it. Wasabi the J has issued a correction as of 18:35 on Dec 10, 2021 |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 18:23
|
|
|
Torpor posted:what makes you guys think there’s no cannibalism? A bunch of them did Spirit Cooking with Marina Abramović
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 18:27
|
|
|
Wasabi the J posted:WOW It's a curious edit. I just went looking for the same over on The Independent (searching for undoctored something or else that they did run it) and came up with nothing. The edit requires explicit intent to foment a race war but why would that be MusicManVA's intention? He came up with this intention on his own, some random guy said let me do some media edits to make it seem (more) racial? That's... odd but could be true, maybe? I'd expect that he's got a handler, if he's posting Pepe and meme edits this degree of subterfuge is... hard to swallow. In any case it's not particularly material whether The Independent ran a false line or if certain parties edited it to seem that way since the intentions match in either case - just that the latter would absolve The Independent of wrong doing which, okay, no problem, it's not my point.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 18:33
|
|
|
the punisher logo with big headphones is insanely on brand
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 18:35
|
|
|
Wasabi the J posted:Remember when Jesse Smollett was attacked and people were gaslit by Chappelle and the police PR into saying it was a fake attack, and then the evidence was suppressed until after the trial that he was actually loving attacked. The Jussie Smollett trial just closed and he was convicted of staging an attack ("fake attack" as you say)... are you saying there's evidence of an actual attack that was suppressed until the verdict of [checks notes] 17 or 18 hours ago? Can you post it? For what it's worth I don't think Smollett staged an attack. Edit: Just seen your edit. Still curious about the evidence you mentioned though...
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 18:36
|
|
|
Perry Mason Jar posted:It's a curious edit. I just went looking for the same over on The Independent (searching for undoctored something or else that they did run it) and came up with nothing. The edit requires explicit intent to foment a race war but why would that be MusicManVA's intention? He came up with this intention on his own, some random guy said let me do some media edits to make it seem (more) racial? That's... odd but could be true, maybe? I'd expect that he's got a handler, if he's posting Pepe and meme edits this degree of subterfuge is... hard to swallow. In any case it's not particularly material whether The Independent ran a false line or if certain parties edited it to seem that way since the intentions match in either case - just that the latter would absolve The Independent of wrong doing which, okay, no problem, it's not my point. The only person I knew FROM Virginia called a baseball bat a n____ knocker so I'm sure I'm biased. And yeah I just re-looked Jussie up cus I misremembered some of the dismissals earlier this year.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 18:38
|
|
|
Everyone's biased my guy.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 18:40
|
|
|
everyone’s based 🙏
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 18:42
|
|
|
endocriminologist posted:everyone’s based 🙏 Yikes, even Maxwell and Epstein? Big yikes. That's a hgue yikers my guy. Mods? Ban??
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 18:46
|
|
|
it's pronounced JIZZ-lane but they keep calling her jillian on npr
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 18:47
|
|
|
tbh im not really sure if the government actually cares about distracting people from the maxwell trial- probably best to not have it getting 24/7 coverage but the cat's already out of the bag and i don't think they're actually gonna present evidence beyond what's mostly public knowledge. chuds already assume it's all a 100% clinton op and none of The Good Guys were involved, libs think it's just a lone aberration that the justice system will clearly punish, everyone goes about their day
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 18:47
|
|
|
Son of Man posted:it's pronounced JIZZ-lane but they keep calling her jillian on npr enough about her cleavage
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 18:49
|
|
|
"This is an op to distract from this other important thing" rarely rings true for me. One of the recent times it did was whatever scandal Trump doctored up that coincided with the release of court papers where a Jane named, in lurid detail, him and Epstein as tag-team rapists. I don't remember what was being run at the time but it was pretty obvious in that instance. The Rittenhouse trial was certainly Spectacle but spectacle does not have a one-and-only end of distraction or anything like that. Moreover I'm sure there's a few things you could point to that aren't the Maxwell Trial which one might reasonably say is being covered up by some other news item or what have you. For example: "The Rittenhouse trial was used so people wouldn't notice that the ARAMCO IPO has coincided with media reports of Peak Oil." This is really simple to do. Perry Mason Jar has issued a correction as of 18:53 on Dec 10, 2021 |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 18:50
|
|
|
shut up idiot
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 19:15
|
|
|
Perry Mason Jar posted:The snag in the case is particularly relevant for splintering dissident groups. That is, the shootings in and of themselves were pretty clear cut self defense*. Any anti-racist, pro-protestor, antifa, et al., stating this plain fact invites pillory, exclusion, derision from their cohorts. It's almost perfect in its design to this end of division. Because of course it's true that there was premeditation - absolutely there was, it's not as if he didn't have a gun before crossing state lines with the express intent of being a white supremacist enforcer of property rights. But how can a court deliberate on this sort of premeditation, which requires inference? Per the court's limit and capacity no other possible ruling could have been made, inference does not meet the 'reasonable doubt' standard. Then Rittenhouse goes on TV to say that he supports #BlackLivesMatter. Hah! Well maybe it's true, after all he didn't kill any black men, right? There is something remarkably pernicious in the entire affair from start to finish and something which will leave racists and anti-racists both unsatisfied. Muddy waters. good take pmj I'm glad they didnt disappear you for subversion back there
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 19:20
|
|
|
Plank Walker posted:enough about her cleavage ugh gross unlike her I only like women my own age, no english leather for me
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 19:22
|
|
|
hilary is obviously involved with pedos, there's like 100 pics of her hanging with known diddlers itt q anon spreads obviously fake rumors about clinton which appear baseless, deranged, and politically motivated q anon started on reddit, a website that's entangled with intelligence, engages in disinformation campaigns, and was heavily influenced by maxwell ... nah you conspiracy guys are nuts, I'm with her
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 19:27
|
|
|
So all that "superpredator" business was merely projection all along...
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 19:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 06:56 |
|
|
also imho the prosecution is refraining from naming other involved parties for evidentiary reasons and to avoid biasing the jurors (might implicate a fave) basically if they want a solid conviction they don't want the trial to be a name dropping exercise now I'm sure the faithful public servants at the prosecutors office will follow up on the evidence and prosecute those rich white people in fact the prosecution is just acting like they're covering up the client list to lull hilary into a false sense of security so when trump assumes office (january 6 2022, you have to go by the real calendar they used before the pope shut it down) and rounds up the swamp it will be a clean sweep, sleep tight patriots Son of Man has issued a correction as of 20:18 on Dec 10, 2021 |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2021 19:31
|
|