|
Nenonen posted:Make a movie about a tank's journey through a war, but the vehicle's actually possessed like Stephen King's Christine and her crews keep inexclicably dying one after another because they don't live to the tank's expectations. wikipedia posted:Haunted Tank was created by writer and editor Robert Kanigher and artist Russ Heath in G.I. Combat #87 (May 1961).[2] The feature centers on the ghost of 19th-century Confederate general J. E. B. Stuart, who is sent by the spirit of Alexander the Great to act as a guardian over his two namesakes, Lieutenant Jeb Stuart (named Jeb Stuart Smith in the early stories, eventually shortened to Jeb Stuart) and the M3 Stuart he commands.[3]
|
# ? Dec 16, 2021 16:58 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 15:58 |
|
You're missing the best part, the sequel series set in the Gulf War. Though it does have some, uh, unfortunate implications:
|
# ? Dec 16, 2021 17:15 |
|
TooMuchAbstraction posted:But if it's recoilless, how am I supposed to fly backwards? Attach the propeller backwards, idiot!
|
# ? Dec 16, 2021 17:22 |
|
PeterCat posted:You're missing the best part, the sequel series set in the Gulf War. Though it does have some, uh, unfortunate implications: I'm glad none of the tanks in my platoon got saddled with an old racist ghost.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2021 18:03 |
|
PeterCat posted:You're missing the best part, the sequel series set in the Gulf War. Though it does have some, uh, unfortunate implications: Hahahah I thought I was the only one who remembered that, a read a few issues, it was pretty funny. Also the other half of the issue had the US and North Koreans fighting dinosaurs.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2021 18:13 |
|
Ensign Expendable posted:Gun Motor Carriage T12/M3
|
# ? Dec 16, 2021 18:21 |
|
The Haunted Tank and it's ghost is one of those things writers for DC occasionally bust out for some WTF.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2021 18:24 |
|
Thomamelas posted:The Haunted Tank and it's ghost is one of those things writers for DC occasionally bust out for some WTF. Yeah, honestly I thought it was a great idea, granted it’s kind of tough to balance humor and ensuring you not making Jeb Stuart look like a decent person… well least without a ton of character development that I doubt DC would give in terms of a number of issues. For the other end of the spectrum, Garth Ennis did some really really nice comics on war, he was apparently a huge fan of old British war comics when he was growing up and truthfully they don’t really exist as a genre that much anymore, so he made his own. I actually have a hardback of some of the ones done by Marvel around the Korean War.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2021 18:28 |
|
Marshal Prolapse posted:Yeah, honestly I thought it was a great idea, granted it’s kind of tough to balance humor and ensuring you not making Jeb Stuart look like a decent person… well least without a ton of character development that I doubt DC would give in terms of a number of issues. Larry Hama's run on GI Joe is surprisingly great. I know that sounds weird, license tie in comics in the 80's is not something that brings to mind people doing great work. But no one else wanted to do and Marvel really wanted the money so it gave him a lot more freedom than one might expect. And he did such a great job that Hasbro released him from the draconian rules license based comics tend to have. Like the ones preventing Joes from dying in combat. And he brought in some of his experience serving in Vietnam.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2021 18:43 |
|
Don't forget Tank 666 from Ghost Rider
|
# ? Dec 16, 2021 19:08 |
Tanker skeletons on fire inside the tank. Truly unstoppable.
|
|
# ? Dec 16, 2021 19:12 |
|
Scratch Monkey posted:Don't forget Tank 666 from Ghost Rider In the same area: Yes, I’m still irrationally annoyed by the placement of the M16 magazines on the front of that thing.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2021 19:20 |
|
Bruce Dickinson's Twilight:2000 game.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2021 19:24 |
|
Scratch Monkey posted:Don't forget Tank 666 from Ghost Rider I very much appreciate the attention to detail the artist showed. Most of them would've skipped the machine guns in the sponsons. Unless the sponson machine gun mounts were never used in combat, in which case the artist is a lazy hack who couldn't be bothered to look up more than one reference photo.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2021 19:42 |
|
Bruce Dickinson owns
|
# ? Dec 16, 2021 20:02 |
|
What colors did the Soviet military use to denote friendly and enemy forces on maps and wargames?
|
# ? Dec 16, 2021 21:20 |
|
VostokProgram posted:What colors did the Soviet military use to denote friendly and enemy forces on maps and wargames? https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028&context=dodmilintel (PDF) The opposite of the US and I believe NATO, so red for friendly and blue for enemy.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2021 21:31 |
|
VostokProgram posted:What colors did the Soviet military use to denote friendly and enemy forces on maps and wargames? China's OPFOR at their CTC's is "BLUEFOR" which tickles me to no end. The current BLUEFOR commander is also a real trip, its like he's an actor playing the part of what the Chinese think a US Army officer acts like.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2021 21:42 |
|
bewbies posted:China's OPFOR at their CTC's is "BLUEFOR" which tickles me to no end.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2021 21:46 |
|
bewbies posted:China's OPFOR at their CTC's is "BLUEFOR" which tickles me to no end. We need video.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2021 21:46 |
|
standard.deviant posted:How are you going to say that and not give links? Thomamelas posted:We need video. fair points I'll see if I can dig up something better when I'm not cockblocked by the DOD's network, but: this was the guy I was thinking of, walking around and pointing like patton: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmDv2Mx1o3Y&t=461s Here's a more recent video, you can actually see their blue "OPFOR" badge and all the crap they bolt onto type 59s or something to make them look like abramses or challengers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zJ1geBTg3s&t=155s you can also compare that first guy to a more traditional PLA officer's interview style (standing there looking terribly awkward and giving very proper answers) sidenote: the little blue light bulbs on their helmets are smoke cans that go off if you're "killed"
|
# ? Dec 16, 2021 22:16 |
|
Tbf he does a pretty spot on impression
|
# ? Dec 16, 2021 22:21 |
|
Marshal Prolapse posted:For the other end of the spectrum, Garth Ennis did some really really nice comics on war, he was apparently a huge fan of old British war comics when he was growing up and truthfully they don’t really exist as a genre that much anymore, so he made his own. I actually have a hardback of some of the ones done by Marvel around the Korean War. They're really quite nice: the shortness and simplicity of the war comic with Ennis' passion for the stuff and some nice, updated material. It's clear in places that Ennis' still believes in a bunch of myths about materiel and Germans, but there's something absolutely delightful about seeing a Panther having transmission trouble or the Wehrmacht soldier who realises the evil system he's part of and decides to do good getting knifed in the kidney by a Night Witch because his regret and humanity is worthless in the face of the evil he's been part of.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2021 22:36 |
|
ChubbyChecker posted:recoilles rifles were later used on jeeps Jeeps don't have a lot of armor so I would assume they were quite effective.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2021 23:44 |
|
Gargamel Gibson posted:Jeeps don't have a lot of armor so I would assume they were quite effective. ayy
|
# ? Dec 16, 2021 23:49 |
|
Marshal Prolapse posted:Hahahah I thought I was the only one who remembered that, a read a few issues, it was pretty funny. Also the other half of the issue had the US and North Koreans fighting dinosaurs. Speaking of Korean War veterans fighting dinosaurs and also Garth Ennis
|
# ? Dec 16, 2021 23:50 |
|
RocknRollaAyatollah posted:
I mean literally called the Red Army officially at one point so not too surprising.
|
# ? Dec 17, 2021 00:12 |
|
bewbies posted:China's OPFOR at their CTC's is "BLUEFOR" which tickles me to no end. Do any other countries look at US doctrine and think "Yes, this is something we should emulate?" I always here about good things other countries do that the US should adopt, does it ever work the other way round?
|
# ? Dec 17, 2021 04:03 |
|
PeterCat posted:Do any other countries look at US doctrine and think "Yes, this is something we should emulate?" this would logically make sense because you can't exactly adopt ideas from your own doctrine
|
# ? Dec 17, 2021 04:18 |
|
KYOON GRIFFEY JR posted:this would logically make sense because you can't exactly adopt ideas from your own doctrine Well yes, but you can also just not adopt another country's doctrine as well. I'll ask it another way. What aspects of US doctrine, if any, have other countries found fit to emulate? Not counting countries that the US was molding like Korea, Iraq, Vietnam, or Afghanistan.
|
# ? Dec 17, 2021 04:39 |
|
Fire-control, I assume. You guys pretty much wrote the manual for integrating artillery into squad-level operations.
|
# ? Dec 17, 2021 04:45 |
|
PeterCat posted:Well yes, but you can also just not adopt another country's doctrine as well. an nco corps and professionalized logistics for more details you can look at all the stuff china put out 10 years ago when they started to reform their military, explicitly basing much of what they wanted to do on the us hypnophant fucked around with this message at 05:59 on Dec 17, 2021 |
# ? Dec 17, 2021 05:56 |
|
feedmegin posted:I mean literally called the Red Army officially at one point so not too surprising. I have some kind of muddleheaded recollection that this convention dates back to Imperial army days, though I could be wrong. But red has a special significance in Russian culture, as it used to be synonymous for beautiful (now krasnii vs. krasivyi). See also: the Red Square. Fake edit: just as a quick inconclusive case that I could find just now, here's a contemporary print of the battle of Port Arthur in which Russian positions are printed with red. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipe..._1904%D0%B3.jpg
|
# ? Dec 17, 2021 06:53 |
|
Are OPFOR dedicated wholly to being OPFOR, or do they have regular armed forces jobs when there aren't war games?
|
# ? Dec 17, 2021 09:56 |
|
Nenonen posted:I have some kind of muddleheaded recollection that this convention dates back to Imperial army days, though I could be wrong. But red has a special significance in Russian culture, as it used to be synonymous for beautiful (now krasnii vs. krasivyi). See also: the Red Square. Not just a Russian thing. The Royal Navy is historically always red, and I think a whole bunch of countries copied that from them, to the point where the desired color for squiggly lines on map that denote their own units is red. Blue for friendlies is, if anything, a historical aberration that the US rammed down the throats of everyone in NATO, just because they could.
|
# ? Dec 17, 2021 11:24 |
|
PeterCat posted:Do any other countries look at US doctrine and think "Yes, this is something we should emulate?" PLAA is a good example of this, as they were modernizing they studied pretty much everything and everyone and tried to adopt best practices everywhere they could. They decided the US approach to maneuver warfare was the best, and so now their maneuver doctrine and systems look an awful lot like their US equivalents. A recent example that is kind of amusing was most of the world following the US lead in making the brigade the primary tactical echelon...which the US is currently moving back away from (back towards the division). And so now are several other militaries (Russia, France, etc). Another good example is US air doctrine -- specifically DCA -- was copied by pretty much everyone in the years after WWII. The USN was really the big driver of this; the Big Blue Blanket looks an awful like a modern DCA approach, just with much shorter ranges and engagement distances. Elissimpark posted:Are OPFOR dedicated wholly to being OPFOR, or do they have regular armed forces jobs when there aren't war games? In the US (eg, 11th ACR) and China (eg, 195th CA-BDE) they have dedicated brigade sized units that do nothing but OPFOR at the combat training centers. They're still "regular" units and are equipped to deploy and fight but their main mission is as OPFOR. You also have dedicated professional "threat actors" that replicate opponents in sims and experiments. At the unit level you just have some portion of the unit that gets so designated and they play bad guy for a while, but it isn't like a full time job. bewbies fucked around with this message at 16:00 on Dec 17, 2021 |
# ? Dec 17, 2021 15:55 |
|
The US Naval War College in the inter-war era had a whole color system for navies in their exercises. From the book The Blue Sword: Blue = USA Black = Germany Orange = Japan Red = Great Britain Crimson = Canada Scarlet = Australia Garnet = New Zealand Ruby = India Gold = France Silver = Italy Olive = Spain Green = Mexico Brown = Netherlands Purple = USSR Lemon = Portugal Citron = Brazil Yellow = China Indigo = Iceland Emerald = Eire Gray = Azores Tan = Cuba
|
# ? Dec 17, 2021 15:56 |
|
Cessna posted:The US Naval War College in the inter-war era had a whole color system for navies in their exercises. From the book The Blue Sword: Let's not forget the War Plans too. War Plan Crimson to War Plan White. I remember using ILL back in the 00s to get copies of the plans. I bet their probably all online somewhere now. For a listen to those interested in our plans to crush Canada as part of War against the British. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zd-u92R04bc Marshal Prolapse fucked around with this message at 16:13 on Dec 17, 2021 |
# ? Dec 17, 2021 16:05 |
|
Cessna posted:The US Naval War College in the inter-war era had a whole color system for navies in their exercises. From the book The Blue Sword: Coloring the Netherlands as brown instead of orange is a beautiful way of insulting the house of Orange.
|
# ? Dec 17, 2021 16:16 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 15:58 |
|
War Plan Crimson was hilarious because it was the study of a potential invasion of Canada. The Northern Menace must be countered!
|
# ? Dec 17, 2021 16:17 |