Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: fart simpson)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
thatfatkid
Feb 20, 2011

by Azathoth

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

Some of these posters are still trying to claim Libya was worth it.

Lol yep, thanks for reminding me. Squalid was the absolute worst of the lot what with him consistently holding up Libya as some sort of success story of military intervention. All the while also insisting Syria would be better off with a Libyan style "no fly zone". Just complete and utter lib brained delusion.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Zohar
Jul 14, 2013

Good kitty

Atrocious Joe posted:

https://twitter.com/ForeignAffairs/status/1477179213463621635?s=20

edit: this article is a year old, why are they reposting it now

Cai xia is interesting in that when you've read around it's q obvious that all the stuff she writes is just by-the-numbers invocation of whatever the current favoured China watcher memes are, no matter how incoherent or implausible they are when brought together. there's literally nothing in it, even the anecdotes, which you can't also find in generic natsec China scare books with red dragon covers.

The fact that that's the best a supposed insider can bring to the table really helps demonstrate a. the China grift in general and b. how little knowledge of China anyone in western policy circles actually now has in the 2020s (the obliteration of the US intel network didn't help!)

Zedhe Khoja
Nov 10, 2017

sürgünden selamlar
yıkıcılar ulusuna

Zohar posted:

The fact that that's the best a supposed insider can bring to the table really helps demonstrate a. the China grift in general and b. how little knowledge of China anyone in western policy circles actually now has in the 2020s (the obliteration of the US intel network didn't help!)

Western policy circles have rarely had a grasp on any of the regions they've meddled in. A group of scholars figured out in the 2010s that the American government generally, and the CIA specifically, had no repository of Taliban primary sources (newspapers legal rulings memoirs poetry etc) despite their wide availability within Afghanistan, and not a single one of the former agents and "Taliban experts" they interviewed had ever read any.

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005

lol i wanted to be one of those anthropological analysts when i was in high school

Lostconfused
Oct 1, 2008

You could have been the first one.

Zohar
Jul 14, 2013

Good kitty

Zedhe Khoja posted:

Western policy circles have rarely had a grasp on any of the regions they've meddled in. A group of scholars figured out in the 2010s that the American government generally, and the CIA specifically, had no repository of Taliban primary sources (newspapers legal rulings memoirs poetry etc) despite their wide availability within Afghanistan, and not a single one of the former agents and "Taliban experts" they interviewed had ever read any.

yeah you have a point. I do think the situation with china is particularly bad, there's definitely been a generational change when you compare people like Chas Freeman (who worked for Nixon) with the Matt Pottinger types ruling the roost today who are basically morons

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007


https://twitter.com/yeongno3/status/1477301729565855744?s=20

didn’t know this was a thing lol

Maximo Roboto
Feb 4, 2012

https://danwang.co/2021-letter/

Judakel
Jul 29, 2004
Probation
Can't post for 9 years!

Orange Devil
Oct 1, 2010

Wullie's reign cannae smother the flames o' equality!

Zohar posted:

yeah you have a point. I do think the situation with china is particularly bad, there's definitely been a generational change when you compare people like Chas Freeman (who worked for Nixon) with the Matt Pottinger types ruling the roost today who are basically morons

It's not like the Nixon white house had even the faintest idea of what was going on in Vietnam.

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

lee carter spending all his time yelling about tankies on twitter somehow didn't translate into electoral success

Danann
Aug 4, 2013

Goast posted:

hey pyf guys every single post you see demonizing china are the same assholes that convinced you the iraq war was a good idea just doing the same thing, again, almost two decades later

you loving rubes

:emptyquote:

brugroffil
Nov 30, 2015


thatfatkid posted:

Lol yep, thanks for reminding me. Squalid was the absolute worst of the lot what with him consistently holding up Libya as some sort of success story of military intervention. All the while also insisting Syria would be better off with a Libyan style "no fly zone". Just complete and utter lib brained delusion.

Squalid was hilarious* with Venezuela and Bolivia in recent years as well




*awful

AnimeIsTrash
Jun 30, 2018

John Charity Spring posted:

lee carter spending all his time yelling about tankies on twitter somehow didn't translate into electoral success

Not about tankies, he kept on getting into fights with the epic irony "leftists" on Twitter. Also the DSA completely abandoned him because of some Twitter drama. Just a big lol all around.

Fat-Lip-Sum-41.mp3
Nov 15, 2003

John Charity Spring posted:

lee carter spending all his time yelling about tankies on twitter somehow didn't translate into electoral success

what a thing to complain about. how many tankies have threatened to kill him?

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

lee carter was unable to master being online and it consumed him

FrancisFukyomama
Feb 4, 2019

AnimeIsTrash posted:

Not about tankies, he kept on getting into fights with the epic irony "leftists" on Twitter. Also the DSA completely abandoned him because of some Twitter drama. Just a big lol all around.

didn’t he actually not do anything with the local dsa chapter? i remember hearing that he basically ignored their organizers this time around

KomradeX
Oct 29, 2011

FrancisFukyomama posted:

didn’t he actually not do anything with the local dsa chapter? i remember hearing that he basically ignored their organizers this time around

Local DSA got mad at him for actually trying to do Left wing things so they joined in the sabotaging efforts

Second Hand Meat Mouth
Sep 12, 2001
I love the dramatic interpretations but Lee just burned out after dealing with the realities of being part of an actual state legislature, and he tried throwing a random hail mary in the process (in the form of running for governor without actually putting in any of the legwork that won him his previous seat, ostensibly due to a combination of that same burnout and COVID).

Agrajag
Jan 21, 2006

gat dang thats hot

how about start with fixing poo poo at home in america first you dumb loving shits

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Fat-Lip-Sum-41.mp3 posted:

what a thing to complain about. how many tankies have threatened to kill him?

not enough

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

Kim Jong-un looking strong and coiffed.

Zohar
Jul 14, 2013

Good kitty

Dan wang is a mixed bag imo but his yearly letters are still leagues ahead of anything you'll see in the economist or whatever so they're worth reading through.

some of my gripes:

the dead hand of socialist Beijing vs. liberal free-thinking Shanghai/Guangdong stuff -- "Shanghai and Shenzhen are creating wealth and leisure; Beijing is trying to lift their gaze towards its banner of utopia" etc. -- is to a large extent just a lazy stereotype, and the Beijing/DC comparison is off the mark -- DC isn't a combo political / manufacturing / high tech centre like the Beijing area is, it was never intended to be and doesn't have the feedback effects of Beijing where government administrators are directly in touch with industry and tech on a day-to-day basis.

just based on personal experience the contrast between liberal southerners and authoritarian northerners seems to have been scrambled to a large extent -- a lot of the hardcore nationalists I've spoken to are in places like Zhejiang and Guangdong, most of the pro-west liberal types are from Beijing. also don't think the Pearl River area and shanghai can be conflated in the way he does. Shanghai is a financial centre, not of real production in the way Shenzhen is, and Shanghai's cultural scene is also increasingly financialised much like HK's has been. there are contrasts between Beijing, Shanghai and SZ/the Delta which are worth drawing out but they don't really correspond to the picture that Wang sketches here.

his comments about global hostility to china betray a sort of liberal status anxiety I think -- china psychosis is primarily an anglo thing, to a lesser extent a western and european thing, and barely visible in the global south. plenty of people in SE Asia don't like china, eg, but the reasons are generally grounded in specific long-running political issues rather than the general anxiety and anger in the anglophone world. in other places that never feature in the rising hostility to China stories (like the Arab world according to polls from last year) China's public image remains much better than the West's. I don't think at all that "the party-state really seems to believe that the rest of the world must love China because of its economic growth". my impression is instead that most of the people dealing with stuff think with varying degrees of explicitness that Anglos will ultimately hate a China that challenges their status no matter what and it's better to be feared than seen with contempt. from that perspective there are other people that China can focus on being "lovable" to.

I generally disagree with the culture stuff. again, I think his comments there say more about his own personal commitments and the sorts of people he knows than the country itself -- a kind of River Elegy perspective that if it's not churning out cultural products that specifically appeal to the West (or just America) then it must be "stagnant". if it's just a complaint about China lacking a global cultural industrial policy with big economic rewards like south korea's that's one thing, but in the context of the huge ferment of writing on the chinese internet, the booming art scenes in beijing xiamen etc.. talking about "cultural stunting" or how the government "ground down the country’s creative capacity" just seems insulting and ignorant. and if we are reducing culture to profit, the fact that something obvious but foreign to the boomer-liberal mindset like Genshin Impact doesn't feature on the list of successful Chinese cultural products seems quite telling

Buck Wildman
Mar 30, 2010

I am Metango, Galactic Governor



IT'S HAPPY HOLIDAYS YOU COMMIE SCUM *let's rip with heavy machine gun*

Zohar
Jul 14, 2013

Good kitty

the stilted english name + chinese surname combo is a cherished hk tradition

Throatwarbler
Nov 17, 2008

by vyelkin
Back in the day it would have been more common for Hong kongers to romanize the last name as "Lee" instead of the pinyin "Li", but it's not like there aren't lots of shithead mainlanders willing to shill for the West too.

exmarx
Feb 18, 2012


The experience over the years
of nothing getting better
only worse.

Julius CSAR posted:

So…. I know we shouldn’t post other posters from here, so I’m just posting an image with the username stripped out, and no link to the thread, and I get where this is coming from, but it is also one of the most dogshit CSPAMiest takes I have ever loving read:



We were fighting the Nazis, gently caress this bullshit

what being in the dsa does to a mf

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold
the allied air campaign was literally based around terror bombing but sure go off

RedneckwithGuns
Mar 28, 2007

Up Next:
Fifteen Inches of
SHEER DYNAMITE

Nonsense posted:

lee carter was unable to master being online and it consumed him

I think Lee Carter won't be online much either after this past week

https://twitter.com/SeanRMoorhead/status/1475660038286942209?s=20

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold
like close air support was never really a thing for the US or UK, everything was centered around strategic bombing

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

exmarx posted:

what being in the dsa does to a mf

3. Almost all of the “war crimes” committed by the allies were isolated incidents, not actually war crimes due to the standards and technology of the era (ie area bombing), or committed against populations as part of an imperial project that weren’t axis populations (mass executions in Poland or starvation in India).

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

a real WW2 pedant would say the terror bombings extended the war, not ended it

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth
'it wasn't a war crime because nobody had done it before us' is such cool logic

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth
I sure hope 'but show me in the rule book where what we did was EXPLICITLY illegal at the time' wasn't a major part of Nazi defenses or that'd be super revealing of the kind of people who say poo poo like that!

Feldegast42
Oct 29, 2011

COMMENCE THE RITE OF SHITPOSTING

Zedhe Khoja posted:

Western policy circles have rarely had a grasp on any of the regions they've meddled in. A group of scholars figured out in the 2010s that the American government generally, and the CIA specifically, had no repository of Taliban primary sources (newspapers legal rulings memoirs poetry etc) despite their wide availability within Afghanistan, and not a single one of the former agents and "Taliban experts" they interviewed had ever read any.

Didn't the Bush Administration not know about the split between shia and sunni and how it would affect the situation within the country when they invaded Iraq

thatfatkid
Feb 20, 2011

by Azathoth
I like how before ww2 kicked off, Winston Churchill was going around wanking about how fascism and nazism was a good thing because they'll get rid of the communists in europe.

The only thing that got Nazi Germany in their bad books was that they were doing colonialism wrong (on white people and not against the lesser brown peoples). Plus the nazis were a threat to the still then British and French empires. Deadshit libs always go on about how ww2 was all about the Western allies defending freedom when in actual reality it was just old colonial powers trying to preserve their empires. The USSR was the only faction that was actually fighting a noble war.

brugroffil
Nov 30, 2015


I didn't think I'd see worse than the dnd or gbs thread, but then I was made aware of the pyf thread

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth
they think the tank hit that dude

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005

Feldegast42 posted:

Didn't the Bush Administration not know about the split between shia and sunni and how it would affect the situation within the country when they invaded Iraq

i thought they knew it was vast majority shia which is where we got 'greeted as liberators' from

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

sexpig by night posted:

'it wasn't a war crime because nobody had done it before us' is such cool logic

also everyone at the time regarded bombing of (white, European) civilian populations as horrific, it's why events like the bombings of Guernica or Granollers in the Spanish Civil War were seen as atrocities, although e.g. the RAF did it against Indians and Arabs as a matter of routine and no-one back home gave a poo poo if they ever heard about it

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply