|
The aliens sure are gonna be weirded out by our records on evolutionary history.Inexplicable Humblebrag posted:ditto seals, actually
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 00:27 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 06:49 |
|
Mauser posted:hey could I get a link to the american comedian trying to explain what he's seeing in a cricket match? I can't figure out how to search for this on youtube It's "Reg Explains Cricket" and as far as I can tell it's been scrubbed from the internet. Here's some you can use with the new twitter developments
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 00:39 |
|
I'm not cool enough to post on twitter. what is the connotation of a hexagon avatar?
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 00:42 |
|
projecthalaxy posted:I'm not cool enough to post on twitter. what is the connotation of a hexagon avatar? It's a new thing where non flushable turds can get their ape jpeg as a verified profile picture and it has a hexagonal border to indicate that.
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 00:45 |
|
theflyingexecutive posted:non flushable turds I just laughed hard enough to scare my cat away
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 00:55 |
|
theflyingexecutive posted:non flushable turds
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 00:59 |
|
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 01:05 |
|
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 01:17 |
|
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 01:19 |
|
So besides being able to use any image as hexagonal profile pic by minting your own NFT (which is apparently very easy), what's stopping people from just putting up a non-NFT image with a border that makes it look hexagonal?
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 01:25 |
Steve Holt! posted:So besides being able to use any image as hexagonal profile pic by minting your own NFT (which is apparently very easy), what's stopping people from just putting up a non-NFT image with a border that makes it look hexagonal? A sense of not wanting to be associated with the dumbest people on the planet
|
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 01:27 |
|
Steve Holt! posted:So besides being able to use any image as hexagonal profile pic by minting your own NFT (which is apparently very easy), what's stopping people from just putting up a non-NFT image with a border that makes it look hexagonal? It's not going to look right with the top image on your main page! That's it.
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 01:27 |
|
Put up a heptagon. That'll drive the qanon people bonkers.
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 01:34 |
|
Make a Pentagon one and claim extra exclusivity
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 01:42 |
What would be the reason TO do it?
|
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 01:48 |
|
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 01:58 |
|
Data Graham posted:What would be the reason TO do it? advertise that you're part of the club, I guess? All it does for me is indicates the person is either an idiot or a grifter or an idiot grifter
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 01:58 |
|
Steve Holt! posted:So besides being able to use any image as hexagonal profile pic by minting your own NFT (which is apparently very easy), what's stopping people from just putting up a non-NFT image with a border that makes it look hexagonal? Nothing at all. Someone immediately put up a tool to generate the hexagons for you. https://noiob.github.io/hexagon.html Hihohe posted:A sense of not wanting to be associated with the dumbest people on the planet Also this.
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 02:03 |
|
Steve Holt! posted:So besides being able to use any image as hexagonal profile pic by minting your own NFT (which is apparently very easy), what's stopping people from just putting up a non-NFT image with a border that makes it look hexagonal? It is actually trivially easy to mint an NFT, but assuming that Twitter is associated with the Etherium blockchain your minimum cost in transaction fees to create an NFT will be around 75-100 bucks. The price is not fixed and totally variable, because crypto is the world's stupidest idea. Fun fact: You can just mint an NFT of any image you like, so you could copy some lazy lion or bored ape guy's NFT, mint your own NFT with that image, and then get in their replies and piss them off. It might be funny, but not worth 70 bucks funny.
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 02:06 |
|
theflyingexecutive posted:non flushable turds lol
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 02:09 |
|
Data Graham posted:What would be the reason TO do it?
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 02:50 |
|
Inexplicable Humblebrag posted:not even close. That's the capybara equivelent of two drunk guys outside a bar that aren't ever going to really get into it but also whose egos won't let them walk away contrast that with Angry Death Catto
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 02:59 |
|
What do you have against hugs? look, they're smiling
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 03:12 |
|
Jestery posted:Yeah that frog cartoon was significantly better than expected How would you know that they were cis?
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 03:51 |
|
cult_hero posted:It's some kind of fish? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nqWECQz-GY
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 04:25 |
|
Platystemon posted:How would you know that they were cis? As a musician, I can tell by how they're posed
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 04:29 |
|
Some parental venting via meme:
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 04:47 |
|
Platystemon posted:How would you know that they were cis? Fair cop, that is a bit of projection/bias on my end , and with the inability enter the video and ask the frogs I am having to lean on visual shorthand that could ultimately reinforce trad gender iconography. Point stands that if this is the quibble that we can be pulled from it it's a far cry from the, one note , strawman wojacks you might expect from something heavily featuring Pepe the frog
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 05:02 |
|
Jestery posted:Fair cop, that is a bit of projection/bias on my end , and with the inability enter the video and ask the frogs I am having to lean on visual shorthand that could ultimately reinforce trad gender iconography. Didn't you hear about the chemicals they put into the water, and what it did to the frogs?
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 05:13 |
We can check the skeletons after they've been dissolved and see if there are boob bones
|
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 05:23 |
|
Scholtz posted:Didn't you hear about the chemicals they put into the water, and what it did to the frogs? Thats-bait.webm
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 05:25 |
|
Brawnfire posted:As a musician, I can tell by how they're posed Because I'm familiar with transpositions
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 05:31 |
|
Jestery posted:Fair cop, that is a bit of projection/bias on my end , and with the inability enter the video and ask the frogs I am having to lean on visual shorthand that could ultimately reinforce trad gender iconography. I mean, also it's by the original author, who is on record as being pissed off that it got co-opted by nazis.
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 05:35 |
|
Hyperlynx posted:I mean, also it's by the original author, who is on record as being pissed off that it got co-opted by nazis. For sure I'm not disputing that And that makes absolute sense given the content of the video
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 05:37 |
|
Was there even a single animation of Pepe pulling his pants all the way down to go pee in that video?
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 05:38 |
|
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 05:52 |
|
And if having external testes contributes to your dysphoria, talk to your healthcare provider about undergoing a procedure to
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 05:58 |
|
Busket Posket posted:And if having external testes contributes to your dysphoria, talk to your healthcare provider about undergoing a procedure to
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 06:03 |
|
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 06:42 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 06:49 |
|
|
# ? Jan 22, 2022 06:48 |