Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Willa Rogers
Mar 11, 2005

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

This seems like a very minor thing to die on a hill for.

lol, I'm participating in the same convos about it as you & everyone else itt.

Why do you use gender-loaded hyperbole such as "melting down" or "dying on a hill" when describing my posts? I'm not saying anything different that anyone else isn't saying, and it's often in milder terms.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

VitalSigns posted:

Socialism is when public goods are operated by private capitalists for private profit. The more capitalists profit the more socialism it is.

“Socialize the costs, Privatize the profits” has been a saying for a long time. Beto literally lifted his specific line from Bernie, who himself lifted it from a famous NYT article in the 70's.

If you are legitimately reading that as him complimenting Greg Abbott for doctrinaire implementation of socialist economic policy in Texas, then that is a very strange. It seems like people are just being obtuse because they don't like Beto.

Nobody thought that Bernie Sanders was complimenting the ideological purity of Republicans or banks when he said the same thing.

It's such a bizarre thing to claim you can't understand to own Beto, when he is both A) Not here and B) Fully capable of being owned by people online in many other ways.

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



yronic heroism posted:

Texas Governor candidate running as not a socialist? It’s more common than you think!

Who’s to say it’s ineffective though, in a world of slogans and simple messaging?

I mean in the actual race the main thing remains Beto being the guy who said he was gonna go door to door to take your guns. I don't see this registering compared to that. Their best hope was absolutely McConaughey

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

This seems like a very minor thing to die on a hill for.

Aren't we all rolling around in the same mud here?

Gumball Gumption
Jan 7, 2012

Devor posted:

My opponent, who thinks good thing is a bad thing, is himself that GOOD THING (which he says is a bad thing)

It's either too cute by half, or tone deaf. Either way it sucks.

Yeah, I get the appeal of trying to use the right wing mangling of the definition of socialist to your advantage but this attempt feels like a mess because it just makes it further.

Lib and let die
Aug 26, 2004

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

“Socialize the costs, Privatize the profits” has been a saying for a long time. Beto literally lifted his specific line from Bernie, who himself lifted it from a famous NYT article in the 70's.

If you are legitimately reading that as him complimenting Greg Abbott for doctrinaire implementation of socialist economic policy in Texas, then that is a very strange. It seems like people are just being obtuse because they don't like Beto.

Nobody thought that Bernie Sanders was complimenting the ideological purity of Republicans or banks when he said the same thing.

It's such a bizarre thing to claim you can't understand to own Beto, when he is both A) Not here and B) Fully capable of being owned by people online in many other ways.

What probably complicates this for you is that there is a non-zero number of (probably more vocal than our numbers would suggest) former bernie supporters that, if given the chance, would at this point tell Bernie to shut the gently caress up too.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Devor posted:

My opponent, who thinks good thing is a bad thing, is himself that GOOD THING (which he says is a bad thing)

It's either too cute by half, or tone deaf. Either way it sucks.

Yeah, it's not really a good zinger. But, it is obviously not him legitimately arguing that Greg Abbott is a doctrinaire socialist or complimenting him.

Willa Rogers posted:

lol, I'm participating in the same convos about it as you & everyone else itt.

Why do you use gender-loaded hyperbole such as "melting down" or "dying on a hill" when describing my posts? I'm not saying anything different that anyone else isn't saying, and it's often in milder terms.

I'm not intending to use gender loaded terms, but I have never heard the term "dying on a hill" considered a sexist term and I can't find a single example on Google either.

Discendo Vox
Mar 21, 2013

This does not make sense when, again, aggregate indicia also indicate improvements. The belief that things are worse is false. It remains false.

CommieGIR posted:

At this point I'm going to agree to disagree and drop it, as I don't see how your claim is true.

That's just parting shots. Which part would you like me to support with additional direct evidence? The relative lack of American companies in the Panama Papers, or IRS audit decisionmaking allocation policy?

Willa Rogers
Mar 11, 2005

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Yeah, it's not really a good zinger. But, it is obviously not him legitimately arguing that Greg Abbott is a doctrinaire socialist or complimenting him.

I'm not intending to use gender loaded terms, but I have never heard the term "dying on a hill" considered a sexist term and I can't find a single example on Google either.

I didn't mean the term was gender-loaded; I said that your constant exhortations about my posting being some extreme, and no one else's posting, are.

"Melting down" isn't gender-related, either, but when it's used only toward a female poster it certainly comes off as loaded (or dismissive).

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

“Socialize the costs, Privatize the profits” has been a saying for a long time. Beto literally lifted his specific line from Bernie, who himself lifted it from a famous NYT article in the 70's.

If you are legitimately reading that as him complimenting Greg Abbott for doctrinaire implementation of socialist economic policy in Texas, then that is a very strange. It seems like people are just being obtuse because they don't like Beto.

Nobody thought that Bernie Sanders was complimenting the ideological purity of Republicans or banks when he said the same thing.

It's such a bizarre thing to claim you can't understand to own Beto, when he is both A) Not here and B) Fully capable of being owned by people online in many other ways.

I don't think that Beto is complimenting Abbott

There's two ways to interpret his statement. One way is he thinks socialism is good and is joking that Abbott wants it only for the rich and not for all of us. Although I don't see how that works here, the issue isn't corporate welfare I thought, Abbott isn't "socializing" the losses by having the government pay them. He's just letting companies price gouge individuals, what is socialist about that even as a rhetorical zing. Like at least a bank bailout you can say well it's sorta like the government giving poor people money which isn't technically socialism either but it's something socialists usually support. This is just when the government lets the company screw you to make a buck.

The other interpretation is he thinks socialism is bad, and is calling Abbott a socialist to discredit him by associating him with a bad thing. And apparently either doesn't know or doesn't care what socialism is since letting private capitalists enclose the commons and price gouge everyone for necessities in a natural disaster is capitalist as gently caress.

I lean toward the latter, but I'd be happy to be shown Beto endorsing socialism by name like Bernie does.

VitalSigns fucked around with this message at 20:03 on Jan 28, 2022

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Willa Rogers posted:

I didn't say the term was gender-loaded; I said that your constant exhortations about my posting being some extreme, and no one else's posting, are.

"Melting down" isn't gender-related, either, but when it's used only toward a female poster it certainly comes off as loaded (or dismissive).

I didn't use the term melted down, though.

And if "dying on a hill" isn't sexist, then why did you specifically say it was "gender-loaded hyperbole." I also don't think Vitalsigns is a female.

I'm just not sure what the point of your post was?

Willa Rogers
Mar 11, 2005

The "melting down" was used in your prior posts toward me (plenty of them, even after I asked you not to continue using it inaccurately). You know this; we've talked about it.

If you want, PM me links to other posts in which you've called out others for "melting down."

The point of my post was that you tend to use loaded terms when responding to my posts but not to others.

eta: I'll take the issue to mods from hereon, since pointing this out to you hasn't been sufficient in getting you to modify your behavior, and seems to only entrench it.

Willa Rogers fucked around with this message at 20:08 on Jan 28, 2022

Bishyaler
Dec 30, 2009
Megamarm

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

“Socialize the costs, Privatize the profits” has been a saying for a long time. Beto literally lifted his specific line from Bernie, who himself lifted it from a famous NYT article in the 70's.

If you are legitimately reading that as him complimenting Greg Abbott for doctrinaire implementation of socialist economic policy in Texas, then that is a very strange. It seems like people are just being obtuse because they don't like Beto.

Nobody thought that Bernie Sanders was complimenting the ideological purity of Republicans or banks when he said the same thing.

It's such a bizarre thing to claim you can't understand to own Beto, when he is both A) Not here and B) Fully capable of being owned by people online in many other ways.

Pretty sure that Bernie has never referred to corporations as corrupt socialists. What Beto, a self-avowed capitalist, is trying to do here is punch the left and the right at the same time.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Willa Rogers posted:

The "melting down" was used in your prior posts toward me (plenty of them, even after I asked you not to continue using it inaccurately). You know this; we've talked about it.

If you want, PM me links to other posts in which you've called out others for "melting down."

The point of my post was that you tend to use loaded terms when responding to my posts but not to others.

I'm very confused.

I did not say you were melting down, I was quoting VitalSigns in my last post and not you, and I don't think the phrase "dying on a hill" has any sexist implications that I was directing at you.

Apparently, I have said that to you at some point and it stuck with you. But, I didn't intend it to be something that bothered you that much.

I don't see it in search for this thread or in anything I have posted in the last three weeks.

quote:

Text contains the term 'username'
Text contains the phrase 'Leon Trotsky 2012'
Text contains the term 'meltdown'
Showing results 1 to 0 of 0 results.

Text contains the term 'username'
Text contains the phrase 'Leon Trotsky 2012'
Text contains the term 'melt down'
Showing results 1 to 0 of 0 results.

Searching the entire forums, I have used the phrase "melt down" or "meltdown" only once in D&D in the last 2 years. And it was 4 months ago. I have only used the phrase twice in 13 years in D&D.

Leon Trotsky 2012 fucked around with this message at 20:18 on Jan 28, 2022

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

With some of what eg Bush did it works. Here he is giving government money to his friends, but when you need it he says no that's socialism.

How does this argument work for Abbott.

Here he is letting his friends price gouge you on contracts for heat when you're freezing to death, but when you want to price gouge people who need your natural gas he says no that's socialism :confused:

Bishyaler
Dec 30, 2009
Megamarm

VitalSigns posted:

With some of what eg Bush did it works. Here he is giving government money to his friends, but when you need it he says no that's socialism.

How does this argument work for Abbott.

Here he is letting his friends price gouge you on contracts for heat when you're freezing to death, but when you want to price gouge people who need your natural gas he says no that's socialism :confused:

Maybe he's using the Republican definition that socialism is when bad things happen.

Srice
Sep 11, 2011

Even assuming the best of intentions Beto calling Abbott a socialist sends a mixed message. Abbott could just turn around and say "Actually Beto is a socialist" and it would be a billion times more effective for his base.

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



Leon and Willa, please take this to PMs, be it among yourselves or with a mod, or report any posts that could be considered to be in violation of rules against personal attacks and gendered insults so we may review the evidence directly. I don't think any offense was meant but I am not all knowing.

Willa Rogers
Mar 11, 2005

edit: following mod orders

Push El Burrito
May 9, 2006

Soiled Meat

VitalSigns posted:

I don't think that Beto is complimenting Abbott

There's two ways to interpret his statement. One way is he thinks socialism is good and is joking that Abbott wants it only for the rich and not for all of us. Although I don't see how that works here, the issue isn't corporate welfare I thought, Abbott isn't "socializing" the losses by having the government pay them. He's just letting companies price gouge individuals, what is socialist about that even as a rhetorical zing. Like at least a bank bailout you can say well it's sorta like the government giving poor people money which isn't technically socialism either but it's something socialists usually support. This is just when the government lets the company screw you to make a buck.

The other interpretation is he thinks socialism is bad, and is calling Abbott a socialist to discredit him by associating him with a bad thing. And apparently either doesn't know or doesn't care what socialism is since letting private capitalists enclose the commons and price gouge everyone for necessities in a natural disaster is capitalist as gently caress.

I lean toward the latter, but I'd be happy to be shown Beto endorsing socialism by name like Bernie does.

Have you ever considered the Third Way?

selec
Sep 6, 2003

Srice posted:

Even assuming the best of intentions Beto calling Abbott a socialist sends a mixed message. Abbott could just turn around and say "Actually Beto is a socialist" and it would be a billion times more effective for his base.

Right? There are so many ways to Americanize socialism. Biggest grocery chain in the Midwest is employee owned (whatever that means) but you can point to it and ask, “hy vee is owned by the workers, is that socialist? Because if so sign me up, I love the deli” to “get the man off your back” to “if you work for a plumbing supply company that spends way too much on management,instead of the people who actually do the work? Socialism is for you.”

Point socialist critiques at the easy targets—after all its not like those people being targeted are going to vote Republican if they aren’t already. Use material critiques against groups whose politics are aesthetic, and you have very little to lose and a lot to gain, imo.

Terminal autist
May 17, 2018

by vyelkin

VideoGameVet posted:

I don’t see it as a negative comment on socialism, more like painting Abbot as a corporate socialist.

I initially read it as a negative or at least being used pejoratively but I think your reading is probably correct, twitters awful at conveying nuance

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.
The only thing that calling Abbot a socialist does is hurt the left.

You're never going to convince conservatives of their own hypocrisy, they absolutely do not care at all. You can't "own" people who have no shame.

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

The youths clutch their Twitters and TikToks, and furiously type:

“Friendship ended with SOCIALISM. Now BETO is my best friend.”

yronic heroism fucked around with this message at 20:49 on Jan 28, 2022

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
Maybe I'm cynical, but I can't even think of a political zinger/rhetorical argument that would really motivate or change a significant amount of votes anymore.

Outside of just bringing up something horrible the other candidate did and doesn't actually deny, like Roy Moore or Christine O'Donnell.

I guess you gotta fill those scheduled tweets with something, though. It feels like a lost of wasted typing just going into the aether.

Edit:

John Fetterman is a confirmed Goon.

Meeting the President, at a disaster site, in the snow, and wearing gray cargo shorts, a hoodie, and slip-on dress shoes.

https://twitter.com/PopulismUpdates/status/1487149491643838464

Leon Trotsky 2012 fucked around with this message at 20:56 on Jan 28, 2022

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Maybe I'm cynical, but I can't even think of a political zinger that would really motivate or change a significant amount of votes anymore.

Outside of just bringing up something horrible the other candidate did and doesn't actually deny, like Roy Moore or Christine O'Donnell.

I guess you gotta fill those scheduled tweets with something, though. It feels like a lost of wasted typing just going into the aether.

Edit:

John Fetterman is a confirmed Goon.

Meeting the President, at a disaster site, in the snow, and wearing gray cargo shorts, a hoodie, and slip-on dress shoes.

https://twitter.com/PopulismUpdates/status/1487149491643838464
King

Can we just let him take over for Biden

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

FlamingLiberal posted:

King

Can we just let him take over for Biden

Bold move suggesting the dude who's even more explictly racist.

Or are we doing the conservative thing where someone pretending to be a Big Effective Man is preferable because it addresses our own insecurities?

Gatts
Jan 2, 2001

Goodnight Moon

Nap Ghost

Bishyaler posted:

Pretty sure that Bernie has never referred to corporations as corrupt socialists. What Beto, a self-avowed capitalist, is trying to do here is punch the left and the right at the same time.

The only thing Beto is good for is punching himself in his own dick.

Push El Burrito
May 9, 2006

Soiled Meat
Had to drive around a lot so figured I would pick up some free masks. 3 Walgreens, two of which just aren't participating, and one CVS. No masks at any, even for sale.

Heck of a job, Bidie.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
We've got some breaking 2022 news. It turns out that Chris Brown may actually be a bad person!

And all of the fans and sponsors who kept his career alive and kept him out of jail after he beat Rihanna half to death enabled him to drug and rape another woman and she was too afraid to come out for a year because she saw what happened to Rihanna.

Also, Diddy apparently lets Chris Brown park a rape yacht at his house so Brown doesn't have to take people back to his house.

https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1487152005734932485

quote:

Chris Brown accused in lawsuit of drugging and raping a woman in Miami

R&B singer Chris Brown is accused of drugging and raping a woman on a yacht in 2020, according to a lawsuit filed Thursday in a Los Angeles County court.

The suit, seen by NBC News, alleges that Brown met the woman, identified as Jane Doe, in Miami in late December of that year. The lawsuit says the woman, a professional choreographer and music artist from Los Angeles, was talking on FaceTime with a friend when Brown took the friend’s phone and “told her that he had heard about her music and urged her to head over to Diddy’s home on Star Island as soon as possible.”

After arriving at Diddy’s home the woman boarded a yacht and Brown offered her a drink, according to the lawsuit. While the suit says the yacht was on Diddy’s estate, it is unclear who owned the vessel.

She accepted the drink from Brown while they talked about her music career, the suit states. After giving her a second drink, the woman started to “feel a sudden, unexplained change in consciousness,” the lawsuit says.

It accuses the singer of acting “with the intent to cause harmful or offensive contact when he drugged Plaintiff Jane Doe’s drink.”

“Plaintiff Jane Doe felt disoriented, physically unstable, and started to fall in and out of sleep,” the suit alleges. “Defendant Chris Brown then led a drugged, half-sleep Plaintiff Jane Doe down a corridor and into a bedroom.”

Bown, according to the lawsuit, closed the door and “barred Plaintiff Jane Doe’s attempt to leave, threw Plaintiff Jane Doe on a bed, removed her bikini bottoms, started kissing her.”

The suit says the woman, who was still half-asleep, mumbled for Brown to stop but he “ignored” her.

The suit alleges that Brown raped the woman and then “jumped up and announced he was ‘done.’” He allegedly then told the woman to contact him so they could talk about her music career.

The woman texted a friend for help, who helped her leave the home.

In the weeks following the alleged incident, Brown continued to reach out to the woman, according to the lawsuit. In one message, the singer allegedly “demanded” she take a pill to keep her from getting pregnant, which she took, the suit says.

Last January, after Brown contacted her again, the woman went to his house in California to listen to some music with him, his producer, and another girl.

She went to his house a second time in August while Brown was recording a song, the suit says. During that encounter, Brown became “became loud and irate” when she rejected his request to go upstairs to his bedroom, the lawsuit alleges.

The woman is suing for sexual battery and rape, false imprisonment, emotional distress, and violation of the gender violence statute. She is seeking $20 million.

A representative for Brown could not immediately be reached for comment on Friday.

A representative for Diddy, who is not named as a defendant in the lawsuit, also could not immediately be reached.

Brown addressed the allegations in an Instagram Story early Friday morning.

“I HOPE YALL SEE THIS PATTERN OF [cap] whenever im releasing music or projects,” he wrote, referencing a slang word that describes a person who is lying.

“‘THEY’ try to pull” something, he added without clarifying who he was referring to.

Jane Doe’s attorney, George Vrabeck, said he does not know who Brown was referring to when he said “they.”

“Ariel Mitchell and I are attorneys representing a young woman that was raped. Come on, we’re not the Illuminati. We intend to hold ALL parties accountable so that we might begin to eradicate this behavior from our society,” he said in a statement.

Vrabeck and Mitchell are also representing Jauhara Jeffries, who accused singer Trey Songz of assault. A spokesperson for Songz denied the allegations and declined to comment on Jeffries’ lawsuit.

christmas boots
Oct 15, 2012

To these sing-alongs 🎤of siren 🧜🏻‍♀️songs
To oohs😮 to ahhs😱 to 👏big👏applause👏
With all of my 😡anger I scream🤬 and shout📢
🇺🇸America🦅, I love you 🥰but you're freaking 💦me 😳out
Biscuit Hider

Jaxyon posted:

Bold move suggesting the dude who's even more explictly racist.

Or are we doing the conservative thing where someone pretending to be a Big Effective Man is preferable because it addresses our own insecurities?

I've never heard of the guy so I did a quick Wikipedia and this paragraph was a wild ride

quote:

In January 2013, while mayor, Fetterman came under fire for allegedly pointing a shotgun at an unarmed black man in Braddock. After hearing what he and others thought was gunfire, Fetterman got in his truck and followed a jogger, Chris Miyares. Fetterman said he believed, he "did the right thing".[26] The incident was given renewed attention when Fetterman announced his campaign to replace retiring U.S. Senator Pat Toomey in 2022, with the jogger's ethnicity igniting questions over the possible discriminatory nature of the event.[27][28] A Republican candidate for Toomey's seat, writer Sean Parnell, tweeted about the incident, and Parnell's attack was retweeted by Donald Trump, Jr. In response to an inquiry launched by The New York Times, Fetterman defended himself and claimed Miyares was running in the direction of an elementary school, and that he made the decision to approach him with the firearm due to the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting occurring the month prior.[27] Fetterman's campaign also said that when initiated the pursuit, and because the jogger was wearing a black sweatsuit and mask, he did not know the jogger's race or gender at the time of the incident.[27][28] Miyares, who is serving prison time for armed assault and kidnap, said what sounded like gunshots were bottle rockets set off by kids, though Fetterman said no fireworks debris had been found.[27] He added that Fetterman had "done far more good than that one bad act" and, "should not be defined by it," and hoped he would win the senate race.[29][27]

Gumball Gumption
Jan 7, 2012

Jaxyon posted:

Bold move suggesting the dude who's even more explictly racist.

Or are we doing the conservative thing where someone pretending to be a Big Effective Man is preferable because it addresses our own insecurities?

I'm not as high on Fetterman as most people and think he's a lot of image over substance but lmao at calling him more explicitly racist than Joe who's used his position in government for tough on crime laws.

Honestly as you can see from above you're repeating Republican propaganda without even realizing it. Propaganda works on everyone, even you

Terminal autist
May 17, 2018

by vyelkin

christmas boots posted:

I've never heard of the guy so I did a quick Wikipedia and this paragraph was a wild ride

Thats the incident and its pretty bad even if he has good politics.

nine-gear crow
Aug 10, 2013

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Maybe I'm cynical, but I can't even think of a political zinger/rhetorical argument that would really motivate or change a significant amount of votes anymore.

Outside of just bringing up something horrible the other candidate did and doesn't actually deny, like Roy Moore or Christine O'Donnell.

I guess you gotta fill those scheduled tweets with something, though. It feels like a lost of wasted typing just going into the aether.

Edit:

John Fetterman is a confirmed Goon.

Meeting the President, at a disaster site, in the snow, and wearing gray cargo shorts, a hoodie, and slip-on dress shoes.

https://twitter.com/PopulismUpdates/status/1487149491643838464

He looks like the rural version of Kingpin from Into the Spider-Verse.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Terminal autist posted:

Thats the incident and its pretty bad even if he has good politics.

The wildest parts are:

1) Fetterman thought an unarmed man dressed in a black suit wearing a black mask was running towards a school to shoot some kids, but decided to let out a few practice shots first.

2) The guy actually did end up going to prison for kidnapping and assault and has become a Fetterman supporter.

Mendrian
Jan 6, 2013

Cranappleberry posted:

yea sure white collar crime happens mostly on the balance sheet or by controlling the paper money (occasionally by hiding assets, perhaps in trucks, and driving them around to increase the value) and dividing it illegally so it doesn't make for compelling, hard-hitting news as the thrust of a new crime wave committed by a class of ultra predators, spawn of the super predators. But it still hurts more and worse.

One important difference is that the stores expect some degree of breakage and are insured against that, just obviously not to the scale of being cleaned out. Also obviously insurance companies will try to screw them out of collecting. If one location/franchise goes down because their premiums kept increasing to the point they were uninsurable and were taking huge losses restocking then that means some people lose jobs and the franchisee takes a bath on it, which does suck for them.

Employees don't have insurance against wage theft.

I wanted to focus on this for a second because it's yet a other way capital fucks the poor.

People- including shoplifters or vandals themselves - often justify shoplifting or property damage as "whatever, they're insured against it" and that is true for someone somewhere in the Starbucks or Walmart hierarchy. But being someone who has looked at balance sheets for several box stores, it isn't true for individual locations.

Stores and restaurants in chains have under over reports or something like it. Your facilities costs and your shrink are part of that profit calculation. Locations can function at a loss, but not for long, and if your location is in the red it will be closed and all the people you employ will be up in the air.

I do not say this again, to justify why property damage is a major crime; in fact, it is a crime of capital because they are insured against these things but they do not share that surety with the people they employ.

christmas boots
Oct 15, 2012

To these sing-alongs 🎤of siren 🧜🏻‍♀️songs
To oohs😮 to ahhs😱 to 👏big👏applause👏
With all of my 😡anger I scream🤬 and shout📢
🇺🇸America🦅, I love you 🥰but you're freaking 💦me 😳out
Biscuit Hider

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

The wildest parts are:

1) Fetterman thought an unarmed man dressed in a black suit wearing a black mask was running towards a school to shoot some kids, but decided to let out a few practice shots first.

2) The guy actually did end up going to prison for kidnapping and assault and has become a Fetterman supporter.

Yeah, the second one did it for me. I mean, that he ultimately ended up in prison for an unrelated assault and kidnapping really has no bearing on the incident itself and Fetterman's actions but it's still nuts, as the fact that he still supports the guy :psyduck:

cr0y
Mar 24, 2005



Speaking nothing to his political or moral acumen, I just wanted to say that I've met fetterman in real life and the dude is absolutely enormous.

DeadlyMuffin
Jul 3, 2007

Lib and let die posted:

drat, that sounds cool. All my friends are just like "why not move back to New England and abandon your senile, in-poor-health in-laws to die in Florida alone, we primaried someone and won up here!" and then they just kind of zone out as I regale them with insider tales of how the rhode island state house actually works because my aunt is next in line for the speaker role lmao.

and other posters wonder why I hold so much emnity for liberals

It's funny, I get leftist folks from red states who tell me I should leave a state that has some sort of legal protections for trans people and move to Kansas, and that when I don't do so it's my fault it remains red.

Edit: removed items that seem to be escalated to mods

DeadlyMuffin fucked around with this message at 21:38 on Jan 28, 2022

Terminal autist
May 17, 2018

by vyelkin

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

The wildest parts are:

1) Fetterman thought an unarmed man dressed in a black suit wearing a black mask was running towards a school to shoot some kids, but decided to let out a few practice shots first.

2) The guy actually did end up going to prison for kidnapping and assault and has become a Fetterman supporter.

My main issue with the whole thing is from my understanding there was a lot of premeditation that went into the situation. The adrenaline rush or whatever should have wore off well before hes rolling up on the dude with a shotgun. The second bit is just wild gonna look into thag sounds funny.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
BBB Status Update: They have made a preliminary list of things they think they can pass.

Other than that, nothing has changed in the last month.

https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1487157241719529473

One other interesting thing Pelosi said: She wouldn't commit to finishing out a full term if she is re-elected this year.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply