|
Silmerias posted:
There are some choice quotes in that compilation video.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 16:17 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 19:53 |
|
https://i.imgur.com/c7VhDcc.mp4
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 17:11 |
|
about once a year or so i'll stumble across a short video of some star citizen gameplay that actually doesn't look too bad and i'll think maybe this game is finally getting developed and then i'll dig a little deeper and everything still looks super janky and lovely and even basic stuff like "walking" and "interacting with things" still doesn't really work right and i'll find another video of someone touring the latest spaceship and it's just filled with placeholder terminals and crew seats that don't really do anything yet but absolutely definitely for sure will be filled with engaging gameplay at some point in the future! and like, who even wants an in-depth scanning or tractor beam or whatever minigame that requires a dedicated crew member to operate at all times? why even promise that?
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 17:12 |
|
Scruffpuff posted:Those were my bigtime gaming years, I put an incredible numbers of hours into all those C64 games, almost all of which were practically unplayable. That's IF they loaded, since all I had were cracked versions of them all, which could take anywhere from 15 minutes to half an hour to load, and had a 50% chance of failing at the end, meaning you rebooted and tried again. If you stuck with it and followed through with the Amiga, you were treated to even WORSE games because all the focus was suddenly on graphics, to the immeasurable detriment to gameplay. It took me a few years to pivot to PC which was a graphical downgrade at first, but hey, look where we are now. One of the biggest offenders of looks vs gameplay was, if I recall, Psygnosis. They made some amazing amazing looking games and I remember struggling to play them because, like star citizen, how could something that looks so darn good be so unplayable. They weren't broken though and crashed often, they worked great. Just the actual gameplay was super complex or difficult to the point where getting through level 1 was almost impossible. PC games definitely started worse. I remember one of the big ones was the Battletech rpg game. It looked fantastic on Commodore and terrible on PC. Also Pirates! Looked great on commodores and terrible on PC. How the mighty have fallen.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 17:37 |
|
I have never played ED, but I can imagine someone experiencing "WARNING: Capital Class Signature Detected" for the first time in VR to be an incredible experience.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 17:39 |
|
Silmerias posted:We'll start by talking about the word griefing, only pubbies complain about griefing in a PvP sandbox game. I don't know what world we live in, but this new generation of fragile irritates me to the highest degree. We do really play the game since April 2020 and we are a PvP focused organization and because of that, we're one of the most hated groups in the game, even the CIG community management seem to dislike us for that reason. We're called griefers, stalkers, toxic, and we don't seem to belong in the Star Citizen community, etc. blah blah blah. So this is all great but you forgot one thing: Cig sold this as also a non PvP game. In fact they sold it and told players they could even have a PvP slider to indicate how much or how little PvP they wanted to engage in. Cig sold that promise to people and, as usual, never delivered. So I can't say the people bitching shouldn't complain... the real problem is they were lied to about the product they were getting. They shouldn't be complaining about griefers, they should be complaining to CR to deliver what he told them the experience was going to be.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 17:49 |
|
Regarde Aduck posted:What the gently caress is this French native speaker. Why do you think he has this outrageous accent? Now go away, or he shall taunt you a second time.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 18:21 |
|
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 18:50 |
|
The Titanic posted:So this is all great but you forgot one thing: But I mean anyone should figure out that something like a PvP slider is nonsense.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 18:56 |
|
Kikas posted:Wait is any of the Hull ships in the game? The first Hull variant (Hull-A) is scheduled to release in about a month in version 3.17. The second (Hull-C) is scheduled for 3.18. The Hull-A has a decent chance of actually making it into the game as scheduled, but the Hull-C relies on a major feature that CIG likes to push back, so its state is a little bit more nebulous.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 19:04 |
|
WHAT DID YOU DO TO GARY
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 19:06 |
|
my favorite yoga move, if you can't hear your spine distending you're doing it wrong
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 19:06 |
|
Lammasu posted:But I mean anyone should figure out that something like a PvP slider is nonsense. I agree. However that did not seem to stop cig or CR from saying that was how it was going to work and selling it. This is just one of many many things that logically make no sense but cig still sold, so I feel the responsibility for delivery is still on cig.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 19:28 |
|
Play posted:my favorite yoga move, if you can't hear your spine distending you're doing it wrong Stimpire yoga?
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 19:34 |
Pixelate posted:Chris conjures the Hull C I just realized there's no reason at all for this to fold up. It's mass doesn't change when folded and there's no drag in space. The mechanicals to have the thing fold up and maintain rigidity would add a poo poo ton of mass and complexity and therefore maintenance and cost of ownership versus just having a rigid structure. The fact that it does it's transformer bit would make it an aggressively worse space ship in every way that matters for a space ship with no perceived benefits, only significant disadvantages It's like taking a useful thing and asking how we can make it dumber and less functional. BitBasher fucked around with this message at 20:17 on Feb 1, 2022 |
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 19:37 |
|
BitBasher posted:I just realized there's no reason at all for this to fold up. It's mass doesn't change when folded and there's no drag in space. The mechanicals to have the thing fold up and maintain rigidity would add a poo poo ton of mass and complexity and therefor maintenance and cost of ownership versus just having a rigid structure. The fact that it does it's transformer bit would make it an aggressively worse space ship in every way that matters for a space ship with no perceived benefits, only significant disadvantages what you've just described is basically their entire design philosophy
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 19:39 |
|
BitBasher posted:I just realized there's no reason at all for this to fold up. It's mass doesn't change when folded and there's no drag in space. Well, how do you explain the bulldozer in the Wing Commander movie? Check mate, fudster.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 19:45 |
|
BitBasher posted:I just realized there's no reason at all for this to fold up. Don't worry, it won't fold up. Both the aurora starter ship and that new Argo one are supposed to hold containers and CIG hasn't been able to implement even that. There will be a little update saying all the things you said (how it didn't make sense, etc) and the backers will be "of course *sluuurpppp* where can I buy more?!" So everybody will be happy.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 19:47 |
|
DigitalPenny posted:
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 19:55 |
|
BitBasher posted:I just realized there's no reason at all for this to fold up. It's mass doesn't change when folded and there's no drag in space. The mechanicals to have the thing fold up and maintain rigidity would add a poo poo ton of mass and complexity and therefor maintenance and cost of ownership versus just having a rigid structure. The fact that it does it's transformer bit would make it an aggressively worse space ship in every way that matters for a space ship with no perceived benefits, only significant disadvantages Counterpoint: how can the one rotating gun on top shoot things in front if the cargo frame is always fully extended? Not really thinking this stuff through, are you?
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 20:00 |
|
I know everyone dogs on it but I like the Hull C. not enough to pay $350 (or any amount of money because lol C!IG). My head canon is that the arms are spindly holders for cargo containers and it drops off the cargo in orbit and can retract the whole business for atmospheric flight lest they snap off. i mean, the entire premise of ww2 dogfighting in space is kind of unrealistic to begin with so it's not like its any worse than any other CIG design.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 20:01 |
|
Even a fairly small container ship carries vastly more than all these dumbass spaceships a thousand years in the future.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 20:03 |
|
DaysBefore posted:Even a fairly small container ship carries vastly more than all these dumbass spaceships a thousand years in the future. This is also a solved problem even in scifi. Remember the Nostromo from Alien? (Sorry, yes, that's a Lego model, but it's the clearest picture I found on Google images.) See that little ship on the bottom right? THAT'S the Nostromo. It's a tug. All the stuff it's attached to is the cargo (which in this case is an entire refinery). That makes so much more sense and is so much more efficient than all this crazy greebly ship CIG is coming up with.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 20:13 |
|
Rotten Red Rod posted:This is also a solved problem even in scifi. Remember the Nostromo from Alien? There is but one kind of tug in SC and it's not that one
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 20:32 |
|
Rotten Red Rod posted:See that little ship on the bottom right? THAT'S the Nostromo. It's a tug. All the stuff it's attached to is the cargo (which in this case is an entire refinery). That makes so much more sense and is so much more efficient than all this crazy greebly ship CIG is coming up with. There's also the fundamental concept hidden behind that bit: why create all the complexity of special storage and/or transfer mechanisms needed to attach some haulage ship — just keep refining until the whole thing is filled to be brim with product (and largely worn out) and bring the entire sucker home. That's a whole lot of greebles and moving parts you're missing out on while also conveying a narrative theme of throw-away use and abuse that feeds into how the Nostromo crew is being viewed by the company.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 20:59 |
|
BitBasher posted:I just realized there's no reason at all for this to fold up.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 21:03 |
|
You have all this dumb space tech yet the literal Coruscant planet doesn't have a single space elevator attached to a mass cargo port that can handle deliveries without all that atmosphere and gravity getting in the way. Even Halo makes for better sci-fi than this nonsense
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 21:05 |
|
Dwesa posted:I guess it can fold for atmospheric flight, but then why bother flying cargo ship in atmosphere with no cargo and pay for all unnecessary folding greebles But then they'd have to make two ships — one for large-capacity vacuum haulage and one for atmo delivery and then they'd have to sell those two sep… …hey, you're right. Why did they bother to make a cargo ship with folding greebles? 🤔
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 21:06 |
|
cmdrk posted:My head canon is that the arms are spindly holders for cargo containers and it drops off the cargo in orbit and can retract the whole business for atmospheric flight lest they snap off. i thought they are giant coathangers to dry the captain's pajamas?!?
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 21:07 |
|
I remember playing Wing Commander 3 back in the day and it was super loving cool and goofy. Literally playing Luke Skywalker in a space game with amazing graphics fighting a long side tigers and poo poo. Then I was hyped for the Wing Commander movie when I was like 14, and it sucked so much major rear end, and I loved everything sci-fi when I was 14, and I still couldn't force myself to like it. It does seem weird and risky to give 400 million dollars to the director of Wing Commander the movie for his project that is essentially the spiritual sequal to Wing Commander 3, Heart of the space tigers.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 21:14 |
|
Bumble He posted:i thought they are giant coathangers to dry the captain's pajamas?!? Seems excessive. Not all captains are Ben.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 21:21 |
|
Tippis posted:Seems excessive. Not all captains are Ben. Touché
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 21:36 |
|
Shameful.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 21:41 |
|
Play posted:my favorite yoga move, if you can't hear your spine distending you're doing it wrong This is literally Dhalsim's standing hard punch in Street Fighter 5 (the first picture).
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 21:43 |
|
The Titanic posted:So this is all great but you forgot one thing: lol lmao dot jif
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 21:45 |
|
Erulisse posted:And after playing for several days, after seeing how meticulously they did most of the things, how thought through most of the stuff is and then seeing what they actually are trying to accomplish I started to believe. Not in crobear, to believe that this tech they are trying to deliver for so long is worth the wait. I'd throw some more $ at them if I had some. If they accomplish the scale of interaction they are trying to do, this will help move gaming industry years forward. lol lmao dot jif
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 21:59 |
|
Pixelate posted:lol lmao dot jif Such a powerful own. *yawn* I'll go steal another ship. Who knew NPC ships can be boarded and stolen! drat!
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 22:02 |
|
Bumble He posted:i thought they are giant coathangers to dry the captain's pajamas?!? Dennis?? Dennis where are my pajamas???!
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 22:07 |
|
Erulisse posted:Such a powerful own. You seem to have self owned Erulisse posted:I'll go steal another ship. Who knew NPC ships can be boarded and stolen! drat! Great! I hear salvage is coming soon so you can actually do something with them
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 22:12 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 19:53 |
|
Erulisse posted:lol lmao dot jif Not sure what this means or if you think I'm making it up? I guess this is a clip of CR talking about the various ramifications of how the PvP slider is going to work: https://youtu.be/QvmeGoQFLlg This is literally Chris Roberts telling you what kind of experience to expect from the game he's making. I'm not sure what more you can ask for.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2022 22:12 |