|
Khorne posted:Mining cards are fine generally. Especially now that most underclock. from what i hear, this is technically most optimal but most cryptobros are dumbasses and will run their cards at full throttle 24/7 because they don't care
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2022 23:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 23:24 |
|
|
Three Olives posted:But they aren't selling you the album art, they are selling you a link to an image on Spotify's CDN, an image that Spotify almost certainly has a license to host and make publicly accessible. I can go to the Disney website and see a publicly accessible image of Mickey Mouse, doesn’t mean it’s legal for me to link to that public Mickey and “sell” it on my own website. I’m using a trademarked likeness that belongs to someone else to hock my poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2022 23:56
|
|
|
CaptainSarcastic posted:I'm surprised I couldn't just search this up and had to use a generator instead: I made an nft out of your post instead, so the image is yours but I own the post it’s in. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 00:25
|
|
|
Darth TNT posted:I made an nft out of your post instead, so the image is yours but I own the post it’s in. Drat! I was counting on the royalties from that post to cover my rent!
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 00:34
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/CoinDesk/status/1489007664063524867
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 00:44
|
|
|
This is how stablecoins are created, right?
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 00:46
|
|
|
the interesting thing about crypto is how it validates and justifies the tedious security, uncool manual processes and (comparatively low) fees of modern banks
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 00:49
|
|
|
It's easy to find replacement funds when they never actually existed in the first place.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 00:54
|
|
|
There Bias Two posted:It's easy to find replacement funds when they never actually existed in the first place. If they never existed what exactly did the hacker take here
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 01:00
|
|
|
novamute posted:If they never existed what exactly did the hacker take here hopes and dreams
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 01:01
|
|
|
quote:coindesk wrote: Oh no, guys I'm hearing news that these crypto coins might now be unbacked and valueless!!!
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 01:14
|
|
|
JammyB posted:Oh no, guys I'm hearing news that these crypto coins might now be unbacked and valueless!!! whoa what!! my shithead cousin-in-law loved bitcoin 3 years ago and is so mad now, he's lost thousands but still hodling. I'd laugh at him but he and my cousin do have a 2 year old, so I just feel bad for the kid
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 01:28
|
|
|
we lost 326 millino dollars but don't worry, we've got another 326 just lying around to fix this
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 01:32
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/KenPenders/status/1488619322012749824?t=tT-jIe0215lJg_EVlTSpPQ&s=19 If you don't know who Ken Penders is then I thoroughly recommend googling the story of the man who ran the Archie Sonic comics into the ground while trying to use it as a platform for his own super special OCs. He is weird and insane and I am not surprised that he thinks his third-rate Sonic OCs are worth a cool hundo grand each.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 01:50
|
|
|
Gutcruncher posted:I can go to the Disney website and see a publicly accessible image of Mickey Mouse, doesn’t mean it’s legal for me to link to that public Mickey and “sell” it on my own website. I’m using a trademarked likeness that belongs to someone else to hock my poo poo. But they aren't selling the image, they are selling an NFT of the image and an NFT is not a real thing, no matter how dumb people are. It's more like me selling a booklet titled "Fun Websites for Kids" that includes disney.com. "Are you looking to see a picture of Mickey Mouse? Go here: https://lumiere-a.akamaihd.net/v1/images/r_mickeymousefranchise_mickeymouse_ddt-16970_f7867c2d.jpeg?region=0,0,1536,450 This has actually come up several times in court cases and it's been repeatedly ruled that as long as your linking (including deep linking) is not an attempt to circumvent DRM (Linking to a public URL offered by someone licensed to display that content), you are in the clear legally. Now, it appears that they were doing some inline embedding, which is murkier, but generally understood to be less clear, but they were using the official Spotify API which does allow some use of embedding material licensed by Spotify in other services. What they are doing is clearly scummy, I just don't think anyone considered that something as loving idiotic as an NFT would sell for actual fake money.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 01:51
|
|
|
chaosbreather posted:the interesting thing about crypto is how it validates and justifies the tedious security, uncool manual processes and (comparatively low) fees of modern banks Can confirm. I've done work for a small bank where the fraud team literally check every single outbound transaction before each transactions file goes out (multiple times a day, via SFTP... lol loving running a bank  ). Still at least they won't get their entire reserves drained just because someone put -9999999999 in the amount <input> on their HTML form.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 01:56
|
|
|
Doctor_Fruitbat posted:https://twitter.com/KenPenders/status/1488619322012749824?t=tT-jIe0215lJg_EVlTSpPQ&s=19 Lmao. Sonic OCs are perfect NFT fodder.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 02:10
|
|
|
Original NFT, do not steal!
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 02:36
|
|
|
Doctor_Fruitbat posted:https://twitter.com/KenPenders/status/1488619322012749824?t=tT-jIe0215lJg_EVlTSpPQ&s=19 I am still crying, I laughed so goddamn hard at this Ken Penders is in a class of his own, the dumb little poo poo
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 02:50
|
|
|
Paladinus posted:Lmao. Sonic OCs are perfect NFT fodder. Sonichu NFTs are bound to be a reality sooner rather than later.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 04:02
|
|
|
Can you mint NFTs from forever jail?
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 04:08
|
|
|
Virginia Slams posted:Sonichu NFTs are bound to be a reality sooner rather than later. Oh, they already exist, don't you worry. Dabir posted:Can you mint NFTs from forever jail? No, but you can't file a copyright claim (lol) on OpenSea from prison either.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 04:13
|
|
|
Virginia Slams posted:Sonichu NFTs are bound to be a reality sooner rather than later. It exists already https://opensea.io/assets/0x495f947...031600767008769
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 04:14
|
|
|
very long thread about the most recent hack on "wormbridge" https://twitter.com/kelvinfichter/status/1489041221947375616 TL:DR: this contract transferred between 2 coins, eth and solano. a function in solano itself which was suppose to verify transaction addresses... did not verify transaction addresses. solano found this out and patched it by adding another function that actually checked addresses. this was released in october 2021 wormbridge continues to use older function that did not check addresses hacker figures this out and is able to create an exploit that takes advantage. bye bye $326 million dollars (120,000 ETH)
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 06:47
|
|
|
Strong Sauce posted:very long thread about the most recent hack on "wormbridge" the best part is the way the hacker figured it out https://twitter.com/kelvinfichter/status/1489050921938132996 https://twitter.com/kelvinfichter/status/1489088927751360515 after a fix for the issue was added to the public code repository, the code that was actually running on the marketplace wasn't immediately updated to the new version the running theory is that the attacker was watching the public repository, saw an unusual commit, dug into what the changes did, and realized the changes were fixing a bug that was on the currently-live marketplace so with the patch for the bug as their guide, they were quickly able to figure out how to exploit the bug, and went to go hit the marketplace right away before the patch went live
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 07:27
|
|
|
Main Paineframe posted:after a fix for the issue was added to the public code repository, the code that was actually running on the marketplace wasn't immediately updated to the new version Yeah https://twitter.com/mjg59/status/1489065444635938819 the absolute dumbest way to do anything but hey that's bitcoin
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 07:43
|
|
|
Doctor_Fruitbat posted:If you don't know who Ken Penders is then I thoroughly recommend googling the story of the man who ran the Archie Sonic comics into the ground while trying to use it as a platform for his own super special OCs. He is weird and insane and I am not surprised that he thinks his third-rate Sonic OCs are worth a cool hundo grand each. Lol quote:After this initial tweet blew up, Ken dug himself into a very deep hole. His arguments ranged from “the age of consent on Mobius is actually 16” e: so is this guy the origin of "OC don't steal" or did he just decide to act out that meme all on his own? Juul-Whip fucked around with this message at 08:41 on Feb 3, 2022 |
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 08:22
|
|
|
so definitely lying to cover it up and the person who was keeping tabs on it noticed that it wasn't a minor version bump and crafted something to exploit it. lol 11K line changes.. just a simple version bump edit: ooh i see now it was the wormhole codebase not solano's. so yeah they updated it back in october. wormhole just updated with a fix now and the hacker realized what was going on. edit 2: that's really dumb that you push security changes like this to your code and it doesn't just automatically deploy, or that you deploy first then update the repo afterwards.. just the best brains. Strong Sauce fucked around with this message at 08:34 on Feb 3, 2022 |
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 08:30
|
|
|
Juul-Whip posted:Lol Countdown to him drawing terrible, horrifying porn of his OCs if that hasn't already happened
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 09:04
|
|
|
Strong Sauce posted:i honestly don't think troy baker was trying to make some grift. seemed like the company told him about their idea and he was interested, and oh let's append this new NFT onto it. but who knows maybe he's just backpedaling from some previous statements. I agree that it wasn't likely intentionally malicious, but it was definitely greedy and profoundly loving stupid. If you wanna split hairs on that go for it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 09:55
|
|
|
I really need news outlets to stop quoting all these various crypto poo poo in USD. If all these various "currencies" are intended to stand on their own, then they need to do so. And it's all worse than cop math when they quote the value of some drug bust at the highest reported price per gram when it's some wholesale deal at a small fraction of that number. At least all those drugs can theoretically be sold at that price; there is no chance at all that there is $326B in market depth for any of these currencies. None of it has any relation at all to real or achievable numbers in actual government sponsored currency. Responsible outlets need to just start quoting NFT values in their native "currencies", and those only in relation to other dumb cryptocurrencies so people stop thinking any of it is actually worth anything.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 10:09
|
|
|
I'm salty about dumb made up poo poo. Thanks a lot NFT dickwads
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 10:11
|
|
|
Here, maybe this will make you feel better. https://twitter.com/FoldableHuman/status/1488963186048995328 The linked tweet by Dan Olson posted:I have found it fascinating watching a substantial number of web3/crypto pushers come to the dawning realization that they're not misunderstood, they're loathed. Realize that they had no idea the degree of ad spam, bots, and over-hyped shilling that everyone else is dealing with. The thread is mostly about his Line Go Up video, but that specific tweet made me happy.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 11:01
|
|
|
gently caress.. you know what's ironic? Inflation is likely going to force some of the more gullible, middle income hodlers to cash out of crypto to, you know.. eat. Once that's apparent, the big question is whether or not anyone will buy from them at that point. Are there any, even semi-reliable statistics over the demographics of say, bitcoin holders? Surely it skews to young adults?
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 11:05
|
|
|
MechaCrash posted:Here, maybe this will make you feel better. Lol, that Coindesk response is basically a very long winded way of saying: "What he's saying is true, but." and then there's no but. Except a few references to other people's wrong responses.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 11:37
|
|
|
Ghost Leviathan posted:Countdown to him drawing terrible, horrifying porn of his OCs if that hasn't already happened https://twitter.com/kenpenders/status/803521132519301120?lang=en
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 12:09
|
|
|
yeah ok, works for me! https://twitter.com/FoldableHuman/status/1488970444921192448?s=20&t=IKHz1fXACXJQ9IBPYYUx6Q
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 12:52
|
|
|
Main Paineframe posted:the running theory is that the attacker was watching the public repository, saw an unusual commit, dug into what the changes did, and realized the changes were fixing a bug that was on the currently-live marketplace That's a lot of extra steps compared to my theory: The person who fixed the bug realized it could be anonymously exploited for millions of dollars, and did so immediately after fixing it and before the fix was live.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 13:01
|
|
|
Since it's "the iron will of unstoppable code" of a smart contract, there is no such thing as hacking or exploits. They simply decided to give away all the money due to carelessness and the first person to realise that fact happily received it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 13:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 23:24 |
|
|
Your Daily Moment of Zen, post titles curated from the top 10 posts on /r/cryptocurrency. An ostensibly pro-butt community:quote:Crypto isn’t going to magically make you rich, get a job. This is all just fine. coelomate fucked around with this message at 13:57 on Feb 3, 2022 |
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2022 13:43
|
|