Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
GABA ghoul
Oct 29, 2011

https://twitter.com/KyleJGlen/status/1494372156112879619?t=28ji7xk6zswVQIwvI2-XFg&s=19

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

Economic instability is magnified with artillery rounds hitting Ukrainian paintings.


I would say the conflict will be exacerbated. Especially if Putin pulls out. The capital isn't going to just decide to come back.

""
Blinken: Russia says it is drawing down those forces. We don't see that happening on the ground. Our information indicates clearly that these forces including ground troops, aircraft, ships are preparing to launch an attack against Ukraine in the coming DAYS
""

""
British Minister of State for Europe and North America: Russia has fabricated a dispute in the Donbass and continues to fuel it
""



The Brits posted a map of the conflict. I'm phone posting so I can't post it without great effort. But basically they see the Russian plan is blow up Kiev with a major force and then walk to lviv from dniper.

I don't see why they'd need to do this if Kiev gets head shotted the resistance will dry up fast as hell. I mean I know we say this with the Fall of Afghanistan where the govt over exaggerated their idea of how long they'd survive.

WAR CRIME GIGOLO fucked around with this message at 20:53 on Feb 17, 2022

Owling Howl
Jul 17, 2019

Tuna-Fish posted:

Russia has a huge air force and Ukraine has little capacity to do more than harass it after about a day of SEAD work.

Fallujah part 2 took a month and a half, cost the US 600 dead and wounded and 1/5 of the city was destroyed.

If Ukrainian forces or militias fortify in the cities Russian airpower is useless for anything but demolishing buildings live on TV.

Paladinus
Jan 11, 2014

heyHEYYYY!!!
Haven't watched it myself yet, but promises to be an interesting debate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZ_kmAEk0fw

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

A Buttery Pastry posted:

How do you determine that they didn't want to be part of Ukraine?

Ideally? Demilitarization by both governments and a League of Nations peacekeeping force of nonaligned nations to administer a referendum to determine the status of the region

Obviously my ideal world is not going to happen

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

Tuna-Fish posted:

Russia has a huge air force and Ukraine has little capacity to do more than harass it after about a day of SEAD work.

The largest question about this whole thing is "just how good is the VVS at CAS"? If they are even halfway competent, this will go very bad very quickly for the Ukrainians. On one hand, they really haven't done particularly well in Syria. On the other, it didn't really look like they were trying that hard.

The one kind of military aid that would absolutely flip the strategic calculus is substantial quantity of effective AA. The sad part is that that's the one thing that the west doesn't really have to give. Most western armies have been built under the assumption that they will always hold air superiority (which was not a bad assumption for most of the cold war), and so investment into land-based AA outside of navies has been kind of an afterthought.

Why not just buy Russian stuff lol. Doesn't Turkey have some of their AA?

E: we could pay them i Liras

mobby_6kl fucked around with this message at 20:56 on Feb 17, 2022

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

mobby_6kl posted:

Why not just buy Russian stuff lol. Doesn't Turkey have some of their AA?

IIRC Turkey is now pissed because apparently they are duds. Gotta find the article.

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

Owling Howl posted:

Fallujah part 2 took a month and a half, cost the US 600 dead and wounded and 1/5 of the city was destroyed.

If Ukrainian forces or militias fortify in the cities Russian airpower is useless for anything but demolishing buildings live on TV.

Shhhh I don't think that Ukraine is going to lock down the cities in a final city state hurrah. Id think the overwhelming force would cause most people's sanity to weigh weiwring a Russian armband over being killed and starved to death in a terror bombing campaign.

Koos Group
Mar 6, 2013

A Buttery Pastry posted:

How do you determine that they didn't want to be part of Ukraine?

So we're clear: You're talking about Crimea here, is that correct?

Budzilla
Oct 14, 2007

We can all learn from our past mistakes.

CommieGIR posted:

IIRC Turkey is now pissed because apparently they are duds. Gotta find the article.
There was a side discussion of AA and SAM tech a while back in the ME thread with Warbadger during the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict. He pointed out Armenia has near the highest concentration of air defense in the region and Turkish drones just clowned on them. Also the latest short range 'Pantsir' air defence system from Russia has been ineffective in the Libyan civil war. As for Israeli jets over Libya, they are probably not getting fired upon for political reasons.

Russia likes to talk big about the S-400 but there hasn't been any test of combat effectiveness.

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011

Delicious and Informative!
:3:

VitalSigns posted:

Ideally? Demilitarization by both governments and a League of Nations peacekeeping force of nonaligned nations to administer a referendum to determine the status of the region

Obviously my ideal world is not going to happen
My point is that you assumed that the Ukrainian military was about to crush a secessionist movement with popular support, but we don't actually know that these "states" have that. If they don't, then what the Ukrainian government was doing was crushing what was essentially just a major bandit gang, not undermining the right of self-determination of the locals.

Koos Group posted:

So we're clear: You're talking about Crimea here, is that correct?
Donetsk/Luhansk People's Republic

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

Budzilla posted:

There was a side discussion of AA and SAM tech a while back in the ME thread with Warbadger during the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict. He pointed out Armenia has near the highest concentration of air defense in the region and Turkish drones just clowned on them. Also the latest short range 'Pantsir' air defence system from Russia has been ineffective in the Libyan civil war. As for Israeli jets over Libya, they are probably not getting fired upon for political reasons.

Russia likes to talk big about the S-400 but there hasn't been any test of combat effectiveness.

Yeah I think that was the premise: The S-400 was unable to engage the actual targets Turkey needed to engage.

Koos Group
Mar 6, 2013

VitalSigns posted:

Isn't deligitimizing the concept of secession Putin's argument for why Ukraine is part of Russia

I would be interested to hear if that is indeed the argument Putin is making (it would certainly accord with how the phrase "the Ukraine" is used). Lenin's Declaration of the Rights of the Peoples of Russia which allowed Ukraine to secede was one of the best things the Bolsheviks did in my opinion, so it would be very dark if Putin were rhetorically implying that it was wrong or void.

Koos Group
Mar 6, 2013

A Buttery Pastry posted:

Donetsk/Luhansk People's Republic

Thank you for clarifying. That would be a much more difficult question to answer, then.

Sekenr
Dec 12, 2013




Tuna-Fish posted:

Russia has a huge air force and Ukraine has little capacity to do more than harass it after about a day of SEAD work.

The largest question about this whole thing is "just how good is the VVS at CAS"? If they are even halfway competent, this will go very bad very quickly for the Ukrainians. On one hand, they really haven't done particularly well in Syria. On the other, it didn't really look like they were trying that hard.

The one kind of military aid that would absolutely flip the strategic calculus is substantial quantity of effective AA. The sad part is that that's the one thing that the west doesn't really have to give. Most western armies have been built under the assumption that they will always hold air superiority (which was not a bad assumption for most of the cold war), and so investment into land-based AA outside of navies has been kind of an afterthought.

What I am saying its not a walk to Kiev like some think with very unclear goals too which is not a help to Russian military, who will also be blamed when corpses come back home. Under a KGB man starting the biggest war Russia has seen since Afghanistan.

Even bigger considering the forces involved

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

Koos Group posted:

I would be interested to hear if that is indeed the argument Putin is making (it would certainly accord with how the phrase "the Ukraine" is used). Lenin's Declaration of the Rights of the Peoples of Russia which allowed Ukraine to secede was one of the best things the Bolsheviks did in my opinion, so it would be very dark if Putin were rhetorically implying that it was wrong or void.

Putin and Putin's Government has openly argued Ukraine is not a real country. Putin both told Bush this and his Diplomats have said as much:

quote:

Surkov is not the first Russian official to make such a claim. The notion that Ukraine is not a country in its own right, but a historical part of Russia, appears to be deeply ingrained in the minds of many in the Russian leadership. Already long before the Ukraine crisis, at an April 2008 NATO summit in Bucharest, Vladimir Putin reportedly claimed that “Ukraine is not even a state! What is Ukraine? A part of its territory is [in] Eastern Europe, but a[nother] part, a considerable one, was a gift from us!” In his March 18, 2014 speech marking the annexation of Crimea, Putin declared that Russians and Ukrainians “are one people. Kiev is the mother of Russian cities. Ancient Rus’ is our common source and we cannot live without each other.” Since then, Putin has repeated similar claims on many occasions. As recently as February 2020, he once again stated in an interview that Ukrainians and Russians “are one and the same people”, and he insinuated that Ukrainian national identity had emerged as a product of foreign interference. Similarly, Russia’s then-Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev told a perplexed apparatchik in April 2016 that there has been “no state” in Ukraine, neither before nor after the 2014 crisis.
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lseih/2020/07/01/there-is-no-ukraine-fact-checking-the-kremlins-version-of-ukrainian-history/

quote:

The eastern borders of Ukraine were formally drawn in 1919-1924 as the boundaries of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic (UkrSSR). Vladimir Putin made a reference to this in his March 18, 2014 address to the Russian parliament, when he claimed that “after the revolution, the Bolsheviks, for a number of reasons – may God judge them – added large sections of the historical South of Russia to the Republic of Ukraine. This was done with no consideration for the ethnic make-up of the population, and today these areas form the southeast of Ukraine.” Putin made similar claims on various other occasions. At a January 2016 speech he lamented that the Soviet Union’s internal borders had been “established arbitrarily, without much reason” and called the inclusion of the Donets Basin in the UkrSSR “pure nonsense”. As recently as December 2019, during his annual end-of-year press conference, Putin complained that, “when the Soviet Union was created, primordially Russian territories that never had anything to do with Ukraine (the entire Black Sea region and Russia’s western lands) were turned over to Ukraine”

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

Koos Group posted:

I would be interested to hear if that is indeed the argument Putin is making (it would certainly accord with how the phrase "the Ukraine" is used). Lenin's Declaration of the Rights of the Peoples of Russia which allowed Ukraine to secede was one of the best things the Bolsheviks did in my opinion, so it would be very dark if Putin were rhetorically implying that it was wrong or void.

That's quite the spin there, given Ukraine was independent (when not controlled by German puppet military dictatorships) both by self-proclamation and by treaty signed by Bolshevik government until it was invaded by troops shipped in by Lenin from Petrograd, and the instituted regime completely sidelined domestic communist movements.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




Koos Group posted:

I would be interested to hear if that is indeed the argument Putin is making (it would certainly accord with how the phrase "the Ukraine" is used). Lenin's Declaration of the Rights of the Peoples of Russia which allowed Ukraine to secede was one of the best things the Bolsheviks did in my opinion, so it would be very dark if Putin were rhetorically implying that it was wrong or void.

Putin's released this giant essay the other year, where he denounces Ukrainian culture/language/etcetera as being fictional. With that, he laid claim of Ukrainians being "basically Russians", and, you see, he's the president of Russia, therefore...

Koos Group
Mar 6, 2013

OddObserver posted:

That's quite the spin there, given Ukraine was independent (when not controlled by German puppet military dictatorships) both by self-proclamation and by treaty signed by Bolshevik government until it was invaded by troops shipped in by Lenin from Petrograd, and the instituted regime completely sidelined domestic communist movements.

That is good context to have.

CommieGIR posted:

Putin and Putin's Government has openly argued Ukraine is not a real country. Putin both told Bush this and his Diplomats have said as much:

https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lseih/2020/07/01/there-is-no-ukraine-fact-checking-the-kremlins-version-of-ukrainian-history/

cinci zoo sniper posted:

Putin's released this giant essay the other year, where he denounces Ukrainian culture/language/etcetera as being fictional. With that, he laid claim of Ukrainians being "basically Russians", and, you see, he's the president of Russia, therefore...

Welp.

Shes Not Impressed
Apr 25, 2004


https://twitter.com/ChristopherJM/status/1494406719836930054?s=20&t=vK8XlZoOMl-qo_cD_GT63A

Obviously, they'd have to be allowed to join first.

PDF has more information for those who can read Ukrainian.

Page 9 asks if Ukraine should withdraw from Minsk if Russia recognizes DNR/LNR. 55% say yes.

Fabulous Knight
Nov 11, 2011

cinci zoo sniper posted:

Putin's released this giant essay the other year, where he denounces Ukrainian culture/language/etcetera as being fictional. With that, he laid claim of Ukrainians being "basically Russians", and, you see, he's the president of Russia, therefore...

My "favorite" part from Putin's essay from last summer was the one where he said that Ukraine becoming and being independent and being recognized as such was equivalent to using nuclear weapons against Russia, since separating Ukrainians from Russians as an ethnic entity dramatically reduces the number of Russians in the world.

Owling Howl
Jul 17, 2019

WAR CRIME GIGOLO posted:

Shhhh I don't think that Ukraine is going to lock down the cities in a final city state hurrah. Id think the overwhelming force would cause most people's sanity to weigh weiwring a Russian armband over being killed and starved to death in a terror bombing campaign.

I'll direct your attention to the events of Debaltseve and Donetsk Airport. Now add 8 years of simmering anger and preparations. It seems reasonable that more of Ukraine would be controlled by Russia/separatists today if there hadn't been such pockets that had slowed their advance in 2014 so Ukraine has every reason to repeat this strategy.

The one strategy that makes zero sense whatsoever is to send their forces out to meet Russia in the open where they are at every disadvantage and then dutifully surrender when they have been destroyed.

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

A Buttery Pastry posted:

My point is that you assumed that the Ukrainian military was about to crush a secessionist movement with popular support, but we don't actually know that these "states" have that. If they don't, then what the Ukrainian government was doing was crushing what was essentially just a major bandit gang, not undermining the right of self-determination of the locals.

In that case a free and fair internationally administered referendum would settle the question decisively.

My question to CG was more along the lines of whether the regions have the right to secede if that's indeed what they want, not an assertion that I know what they would choose if given the option.

Also obviously I do not think "Russia invades and Russian soldiers supervise a referendum to ratify the occupation" is self-determination

Mulva
Sep 13, 2011
It's about time for my once per decade ban for being a consistently terrible poster.

VitalSigns posted:

Ideally? Demilitarization by both governments and a League of Nations peacekeeping force of nonaligned nations to administer a referendum to determine the status of the region

Obviously my ideal world is not going to happen

Your ideal world involves the phrase "League of Nations".

Dream bigger.

Sekenr
Dec 12, 2013




Fabulous Knight posted:

My "favorite" part from Putin's essay from last summer was the one where he said that Ukraine becoming and being independent and being recognized as such was equivalent to using nuclear weapons against Russia, since separating Ukrainians from Russians as an ethnic entity dramatically reduces the number of Russians in the world.

If he only cared as much for actual russian russians. Russian Federation lost a fucken million people previous year. And thats deaths over births statistic.

DandyLion
Jun 24, 2010
disrespectul Deciever

Sekenr posted:

If he only cared as much for actual russian russians. Russian Federation lost a fucken million people previous year. And thats deaths over births statistic.

He cares (and by proxy his Russian Mob and Oligarch backers) deeply about the huge amount of wealth in Ukraine to be had and how those mean Ukrainians are keeping him from getting it.

Sekenr
Dec 12, 2013




No, this int about more wealth. Its about cronies unable to access their castles due to sanctions. They paid millions and cant access the property. Second is Putin loves to be a chessmaster, its a meme how he hates to deal with Rusdian internal isdues such as rabid dogs attacking a child or even grown man (a real thing that ru internal news talk a lot about) but is giddy moving pieces around the map

V. Illych L.
Apr 11, 2008

ASK ME ABOUT LUMBER

putin wants a big foreign policy victory because his present domestic policy is not especially popular. there's no particular reason to think that he's not perfectly sincere about not wanting NATO to expand eastwards.

also i very sincerely doubt that there's going to be an invasion and occupation of ukraine outside of the breakaway republics*. most realistic offensive action i could see would be putin officially recognising those republics as sovereign and then securing them. modern russia has been pretty smart about hard power use in the past, and occupying ukraine proper would be both ruinously expensive and would quickly turn extremely unpopular; having a couple of pet republics on the border making an unresolved border issue is a de facto guarantee of no further NATO expansion and can be spun at home as a victory. it's a status quo which seems to suit the russian government's interests just fine.

*offer does not apply to military actions not amounting to occupation such as air strikes or tactical offensives

Grouchio
Aug 31, 2014

V. Illych L. posted:

putin wants a big foreign policy victory because his present domestic policy is not especially popular. there's no particular reason to think that he's not perfectly sincere about not wanting NATO to expand eastwards.

also i very sincerely doubt that there's going to be an invasion and occupation of ukraine outside of the breakaway republics*. most realistic offensive action i could see would be putin officially recognising those republics as sovereign and then securing them. modern russia has been pretty smart about hard power use in the past, and occupying ukraine proper would be both ruinously expensive and would quickly turn extremely unpopular; having a couple of pet republics on the border making an unresolved border issue is a de facto guarantee of no further NATO expansion and can be spun at home as a victory. it's a status quo which seems to suit the russian government's interests just fine.

*offer does not apply to military actions not amounting to occupation such as air strikes or tactical offensives
Somehow I think Putin's pride is getting in the way of his decision-making to the point he wants to capture Kiev and install a puppet govt. Much like how Tywin's pride cost him in asoiaf.

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead
While I agree the only invasion scenario that isn't fantastically stupid is one focused on the bits that are already de facto Russian-controlled, I could very easily see some limited land grabs tacked onto it. Particularly in the service of further securing Crimea.

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead
also as usual "is fantastically stupid" isn't a 100% guarantee that something won't happen

mdemone
Mar 14, 2001

https://twitter.com/IntelCrab/status/1494441943803183105?s=20&t=oaJ-6WgJDn_KHW6RmSWh6w

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

V. Illych L. posted:

putin wants a big foreign policy victory because his present domestic policy is not especially popular. there's no particular reason to think that he's not perfectly sincere about not wanting NATO to expand eastwards.

also i very sincerely doubt that there's going to be an invasion and occupation of ukraine outside of the breakaway republics*. most realistic offensive action i could see would be putin officially recognising those republics as sovereign and then securing them. modern russia has been pretty smart about hard power use in the past, and occupying ukraine proper would be both ruinously expensive and would quickly turn extremely unpopular; having a couple of pet republics on the border making an unresolved border issue is a de facto guarantee of no further NATO expansion and can be spun at home as a victory. it's a status quo which seems to suit the russian government's interests just fine.

*offer does not apply to military actions not amounting to occupation such as air strikes or tactical offensives

Yeah, that's pretty much my read as well. I think the trick that U.S., NATO, and Ukrainian negotiators need to pull off is finding a foreign policy "victory" that Putin can hold aloft to demonstrate that this all hasn't been for nothing, and that he didn't back down. Obviously things like just letting Russia send tanks into the Donbas without consequences aren't an option. Neither is the "gently caress you, you get nothing" strategy. But there's a lot of ground in between those two extremes. Working to build a new security framework in Europe that includes Russia and supplants NATO would probably be a good start. So would laying the groundwork for new arms control/reduction treaties. There would probably have to be more confidence-building measures, including a renegotiation/clarification of the language in Minsk II (which, yes, would become Minsk III), but there are ways of going about that which could potentially save face for everyone involved.

Paladinus
Jan 11, 2014

heyHEYYYY!!!

For context, this person is in the occupied part of Donbas, and supports DNR.

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

These ceasefire violations sure are new and fancy.

It would appear I was wrong when I said wed see the invasion occur after a few 0 ceasefire days. I would expect the Russian offensive would utilize a cooling off period of a week or so to catch the Ukrainian Military off guard.


However now it would seem the Russia wants to increase the violations as a method of justification. As in OH the Ukrainians shot back therefore war!

WAR CRIME GIGOLO fucked around with this message at 01:44 on Feb 18, 2022

Solaris 2.0
May 14, 2008

Majorian posted:

Yeah, that's pretty much my read as well. I think the trick that U.S., NATO, and Ukrainian negotiators need to pull off is finding a foreign policy "victory" that Putin can hold aloft to demonstrate that this all hasn't been for nothing, and that he didn't back down. Obviously things like just letting Russia send tanks into the Donbas without consequences aren't an option. Neither is the "gently caress you, you get nothing" strategy. But there's a lot of ground in between those two extremes. Working to build a new security framework in Europe that includes Russia and supplants NATO would probably be a good start. So would laying the groundwork for new arms control/reduction treaties. There would probably have to be more confidence-building measures, including a renegotiation/clarification of the language in Minsk II (which, yes, would become Minsk III), but there are ways of going about that which could potentially save face for everyone involved.

The thing is, the Ukrainians get the final say (as they should) on any of this. The US/NATO/EU can’t just tell them they will never be members or can’t have any further integration. The Ukrainians need to decide that, and afaik doing so would be political suicide for Zelensky. I agree with this tweet.

https://twitter.com/ralee85/status/1494450875963621411?s=21

Everyone seems to forget the Ukrainians themselves have agency here. It’s their country that is under attack.

Grouchio
Aug 31, 2014

Solaris 2.0 posted:

The thing is, the Ukrainians get the final say (as they should) on any of this. The US/NATO/EU can’t just tell them they will never be members or can’t have any further integration. The Ukrainians need to decide that, and afaik doing so would be political suicide for Zelensky. I agree with this tweet.

https://twitter.com/ralee85/status/1494450875963621411?s=21

Everyone seems to forget the Ukrainians themselves have agency here. It’s their country that is under attack.
In a different timeline where Ukraine didn't have a giant irredentist bear breathing down it's neck each day, they would have agency over their own country. But the reality ever since Crimea was invaded has been: They do not. It's too late now.

Orthanc6
Nov 4, 2009

WAR CRIME GIGOLO posted:

These ceasefire violations sure are new and fancy.

It would appear I was wrong when I said wed see the invasion occur after a few 0 ceasefire days. I would expect the Russian offensive would utilize a cooling off period of a week or so to catch the Ukrainian Military off guard.


However now it would seem the Russia wants to increase the violations as a method of justification. As in OH the Ukrainians shot back therefore war!

Yeah the latter makes more sense, Casus belli isn't just about a fig leaf of legality on the international stage, it's also about how a war will be perceived back home. As much control as Putin has over Russia, he still needs something substantial to spin to start up a conflict that will severely impact his populace. Also, they can't sit on the knife-edge forever, deploying troops this far forward costs a ton of money and the troops will lose morale if they're doing nothing for months. I honestly expect we'll have our answer one way or the other within a month at most.

Grape
Nov 16, 2017

Happily shilling for China!

V. Illych L. posted:

putin wants a big foreign policy victory because his present domestic policy is not especially popular. there's no particular reason to think that he's not perfectly sincere about not wanting NATO to expand eastwards.

also i very sincerely doubt that there's going to be an invasion and occupation of ukraine outside of the breakaway republics*. most realistic offensive action i could see would be putin officially recognising those republics as sovereign and then securing them. modern russia has been pretty smart about hard power use in the past, and occupying ukraine proper would be both ruinously expensive and would quickly turn extremely unpopular; having a couple of pet republics on the border making an unresolved border issue is a de facto guarantee of no further NATO expansion and can be spun at home as a victory. it's a status quo which seems to suit the russian government's interests just fine.

*offer does not apply to military actions not amounting to occupation such as air strikes or tactical offensives

But that's already the status quo since 2014. Aside from actual recognition anyway.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

fez_machine
Nov 27, 2004

WAR CRIME GIGOLO posted:

Shhhh I don't think that Ukraine is going to lock down the cities in a final city state hurrah. Id think the overwhelming force would cause most people's sanity to weigh weiwring a Russian armband over being killed and starved to death in a terror bombing campaign.

I'd just like to note that never in the entire history of terror/saturation bombing has it ever achieved any effect on morale other than hardening civilian's resolve that the war must still be fought.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5