|
Juul-Whip posted:next time we'll just find someone willing to go to jail to preserve our bags! "No Your Honor you are the one who is guilty, of FUD!"
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2022 20:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 14:59 |
|
|
Lord have mercy. https://twitter.com/mikeinspace/status/1503754795848450061
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2022 20:14
|
|
|
Twice in one day I have had to say this, but logic gates are hard.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2022 20:16
|
|
|
Holy poo poo I am dying laughing, that is loving amazing.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2022 20:22
|
|
|
Zil posted:Twice in one day I have had to say this, but logic gates are hard. XOR and AND is a bit of a significant mix up. It raises the question "Who tested this?" but I think we all know that answer.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2022 20:23
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2022 20:24
|
|
|
Random Stranger posted:XOR and AND is a bit of a significant mix up. Of course this is Solidity. I bet it's something astronomically dumb like equal is cheaper gas than and.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2022 20:33
|
|
|
happyhippy posted:Then watch the full thing. i was looking for something i posted and then ran back into this. remember this guy? i bet this guy was so excited he was "blowing" up... let's see what happened.  lmao.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2022 20:36
|
|
|
It can't be that stupid, you must be explaining it wrong.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2022 20:43
|
|
|
Strong Sauce posted:i was looking for something i posted and then ran back into this. remember this guy? i bet this guy was so excited he was "blowing" up... let's see what happened. I hope he didn't quit his job to youtube full time. Wait, being a crypto guy was probably his job. Then I really hope he quit his job to youtube full time.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2022 20:51
|
|
|
I'm just trying to wrap my head around the thought process that decided that in this key authentication check, where money is on the line, they would not check for the desired output of (dummy function names) signatureOK() and fromGuardian() but just check that the return values are the same. Slapdash, lazy, dumb, whatever code is law, two wrongs make a right
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2022 20:52
|
|
|
Oh it's just entirely a bug from my understanding. Normally you would check that both of those things are true, and I think that was the intent. What the code actually did was check that the results of both of those checks were equal, not true. So when both checks were actually false, the code was like "well they're equal, all good." Even though both of the checks had, in practice, failed as designed. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2022 20:56
|
|
|
Thing is a bug light that ought to be caught in a review and testing. You would, in an ideal development environment, test all the inputs. poo poo, there are only four. Three if you're rushed. True/True True/False False/True False/False. Clearly this did not happen. They're lazy, rushed, incompetent, or some combo of that. But the thing that gets me, is that as much as they go on about "code is law" and "decisions will be made by perfect, rational machines" here is a perfect example of that flawless rational machine having a flaw with irreversible consequences.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2022 21:02
|
|
|
El Spamo posted:Thing is a bug light that ought to be caught in a review and testing. You would, in an ideal development environment, test all the inputs. poo poo, there are only four. Three if you're rushed. True/True True/False False/True False/False. The best description I've seen for smart contracts is that they are self funding bug bounties
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2022 21:03
|
|
|
Coding complex systems is hard, but that is literally the easiest possible part of it to get correct because that is the entire point of a checking algorithm. It’s just amazingly shoddy work. This should be taught in introductory coding courses as it is a great example for complete beginners how not to do things.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2022 21:06
|
|
|
I guess two wrongs DO make a right!
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2022 21:14
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/AGlasgow12/status/1503795820310761472/photo/1 Not quite that dumb but still dumb. Solana lets you pass what are effectively function pointers and the attacker provided their own implementation of what the bridge was assuming would be a built-in to validate the signature.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2022 21:32
|
|
|
Which early Coiner was it that said the first version of anything was best because it captured the spirit of the designer, like some sort of Martian Techpriest? Was it Dank?
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2022 21:33
|
|
|
is Solana one of the ones that has an actual development team beyond whoever was cheapest on Fiverr
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2022 21:34
|
|
|
Professor Shark posted:Which early Coiner was it that said the first version of anything was best because it captured the spirit of the designer, like some sort of Martian Techpriest? Was it Dank? Thermos, the admin of the BitcoinTalk forum
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2022 22:15
|
|
|
ok, so how would you like to write a computer program, that handles nominally enormous amounts of money*, and if money* changes hands it can't be reversed if anything went wrong, but also you have to write it in a language where there are no such things as private methods, you just pass function objects around and anyone on the internet can call any of your functions so you better have a big old stack of boilerplate at the start of each function that checks that it's being called from where you expected [every computer programmer runs out of the room screaming]
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2022 22:21
|
|
|
The boolean spoonerism is much less embarrassing when you put it that way.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2022 22:33
|
|
|
Hammerite posted:ok, so how would you like to write a computer program, that handles nominally enormous amounts of money*, and if money* changes hands it can't be reversed if anything went wrong, but also you have to write it in a language where there are no such things as private methods, you just pass function objects around and anyone on the internet can call any of your functions so you better have a big old stack of boilerplate at the start of each function that checks that it's being called from where you expected Don't worry, it's in Rust so it's Safe™
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2022 23:16
|
|
|
novamute posted:https://twitter.com/AGlasgow12/status/1503795820310761472/photo/1 He went on to post this, which is quite that dumberer.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2022 00:18
|
|
|
El Spamo posted:code is law, two
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2022 00:24
|
|
|
some idiot dm d me something about disney doing nft god
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2022 02:38
|
|
|
Ups_rail posted:some idiot dm d me something about disney doing nft I’m a pixel artist. I’m not amazing, I’m not famous. I still have to deal with these idiots trying to hit me up on twitter to make their next big drop or whatever the gently caress. I just chiseled one of these fucks out of my discord DMs.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2022 02:46
|
|
|
I've gotten several nft proposals just from having a few 3d things on artstation and instagram, all with a comical lack of understanding about how 3d art works. Haven't gotten any for a month or so, I hope everything's OK in the using other people's IP for grifting space
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2022 02:58
|
|
|
Bean posted:I’m a pixel artist. I’m not amazing, I’m not famous. I still have to deal with these idiots trying to hit me up on twitter to make their next big drop or whatever the gently caress. I just chiseled one of these fucks out of my discord DMs. Do you ever get people wanting you to make porn?
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2022 06:43
|
|
|
Ups_rail posted:Do you ever get people wanting you to make porn? Just ask him to make you some porn. Also, of course he does
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2022 07:12
|
|
|
Juul-Whip posted:next time we'll just find someone willing to go to jail to preserve our bags! "I didn't hand over all my money, I only handed over my wallet which happened to contain all my money."
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2022 10:40
|
|
|
In videogame news, a studio that managed to break out of Licensed Mobile Game Hell with a Power Rangers fighting game that was better than a Power Rangers game in Anno Domini 2019 had any right to be is coming to the scam party fashionably late and making very few friends in the process. https://twitter.com/nWayGames/status/1504239839905935361
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2022 10:45
|
|
|
Collateral Damage posted:That's some impressive hair splitting. that hair splitting is vital to their worldview, tho. it's in defense of a treasured principle of cryptobros. They all believe ardently in crypto being Provably Secure and Backed By Math etc. so anything that points out that the lack of usability, lack of consumer protections, lack of redress when things go wrong, capacity of individuals to compel actions from others or put them under duress, etc... detracts from that security from the perspective of an actual user, is anathema to them. you are required to look only at the cryptosystem qua mathematical system and concede "yes, as far as that goes, it is secure". if you look at what the system is like for a real person to try and interact with and factor that into your assessment of how secure it is, you'll arrive at a less rosy conclusion, and they'll fight tooth and nail against any such ideas, because unlike the simplistic beep boop robot viewpoint they prefer, it doesn't at all flatter cryptocurrency.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2022 10:50
|
|
|
The Kins posted:In videogame news, a studio that managed to break out of Licensed Mobile Game Hell with a Power Rangers fighting game that was better than a Power Rangers game in Anno Domini 2019 had any right to be is coming to the scam party fashionably late and making very few friends in the process. It's always fun to read the comments.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2022 10:54
|
|
|
https://kotaku.com/pepe-frog-nft-lawsuit-sue-dao-matt-furie-halston-thayer-1848663957quote:Furie had formed a Decentralized Autonomous Organization, or DAO called PegzDAO and on October 8 auctioned off a single NFT representing the image above, while at the same time clearly stating that aside from the one being auctioned, there would be 99 more NFTs representing the same image made and kept in the DAO’s possession and never put up for sale. quote:This action arises from Defendants’ unlawful, unfair, and fraudulent business practices, which includes their unfair, deceptive, untrue, and misleading advertising and wrongful actions with respect to an auction for a particular nonfungible token (“NFT”) that led Plaintiff and others to grossly overbid on the NFT. Plaintiff therefore brings this action for fraudulent inducement, intentional and negligent misrepresentation, unfair competition and unlawful business acts and practices, breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment.  NFT's are really the second dumbest thing, the dumbest being the investors.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2022 11:25
|
|
|
The best part is that the other ones were indeed never put up for sale 
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2022 12:21
|
|
|
I don't envy a regular old judge trying to make any sense of that case. I know the lawyers involved have no idea what they're writing in the motion, it's just an assemblage of crypto words and concepts with some legal boilerplate hanging off of them, like tinsel.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2022 14:04
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/mikeinspace/status/1503754795848450061?t=mj8KkG0zIt0n-qUOcZfgfA&s=19 Bitcoin: incorrect+incorrect=correct
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2022 15:52
|
|
|
Oscar Wild posted:https://twitter.com/mikeinspace/status/1503754795848450061?t=mj8KkG0zIt0n-qUOcZfgfA&s=19 See? Two wrongs do make a right!
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2022 17:07
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 14:59 |
|
|
C'mon, be reasonable. What are the chances of two (2!) function parameters on a publicly accessible API both being invalid simultaneously? It's got to be like millions to one if not more, right?
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2022 19:26
|
|
