|
ASAPI posted:I think this is the reason we haven't seen some things happen. Ultimately, if you're smart enough to surround yourself with knowledgeable people who give good advice and you're smart enough to negotiate what advice to heed and what to ignore, you get to be called an effective leader, even if you have no expertise relative to what you're being advised on.
|
# ? Mar 29, 2022 23:00 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 03:00 |
|
Lovely Joe Stalin posted:Apologies for leaving off the link when I posted. There's a difference between "The poisoning attack didn't happen" and "None of the Ukraine contingent reported being poisoned" which IIRC it was said that only the Russian delegation was poisoned in the first place, and not all of them. The story in that tweet is the 'Ukraine officials poisoned as well' report.
|
# ? Mar 29, 2022 23:47 |
|
zoux posted:We just might be on the downslope here Not a chance, Russia isn't having much success around Kyiv, but where else would those troops around Kyiv do a whole lot of good if you withdrew them? Money's on they're getting on trucks and redeploying elsewhere in theater. I could think of a few places that Russia would benefit from a ton of troops and their equipment more than smashing their faces into Kyiv with not much success. orange juche fucked around with this message at 00:02 on Mar 30, 2022 |
# ? Mar 29, 2022 23:57 |
|
Trust but verify.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 00:41 |
|
Or take putins skull. Legitimately ok too.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 00:42 |
|
I can't believe Iron Eagle was about an F-16 and not an F-15 what the hell
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 00:49 |
|
Radical 90s Wizard posted:I can't believe Iron Eagle was about an F-16 and not an F-15 what the hell F-16 has 1 more number and thus more betterer, right? Nevermind that, Top Gun 2 is finally coming out in like 2 months and I wonder how they're going to square the circle of Maverick driving an F/A-18 now lol
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 01:46 |
|
Radical 90s Wizard posted:I can't believe Iron Eagle was about an F-16 and not an F-15 what the hell
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 01:46 |
|
Radical 90s Wizard posted:I can't believe Iron Eagle was about an F-16 and not an F-15 what the hell F-15s are dual seated, with a pilot and a wizzo, while the f-16 are single seated. Easier to steal two of 'em that way.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 01:52 |
|
Cimber posted:F-15s are dual seated, with a pilot and a wizzo, while the f-16 are single seated. Easier to steal two of 'em that way. You have not watched that movie. *eye is twitching *
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 01:57 |
|
Flikken posted:You have not watched that movie. *eye is twitching * I have, and it was f16s. Becides, the electric jet is a better aircraft than the eagle.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 02:08 |
please, electric jets don't even exist yet
|
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 02:12 |
|
Comrade Blyatlov posted:please, electric jets don't even exist yet That's what big aviation wants you to believe.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 02:20 |
|
Cimber posted:F-15s are dual seated, with a pilot and a wizzo, while the f-16 are single seated. Easier to steal two of 'em that way. In the 80s F15s were single seaters.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 02:23 |
|
orange juche posted:That's what big aviation wants you to believe. Electric prop planes do though! https://www.beta.team/
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 02:28 |
|
Murgos posted:In the 80s F15s were single seaters. Partially correct. There were dual seat (d model) and single seat (c model), but its a moot point because the f16 is just better
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 02:33 |
|
Comrade Blyatlov posted:please, electric jets don't even exist yet My brother in Christ, have you not heard of the EF-18?
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 02:34 |
|
Cimber posted:the f-16 are single seated. Sure bud, and I suppose they're flown by the Air Force too.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 02:53 |
|
Cimber posted:Partially correct. There were dual seat (d model) and single seat (c model), but its a moot point because the f16 is just better Uhhh someone ban this sick filth. The F-16 is emphatically not better than the F-15. Why do you think we’re buying new build F-15’s with all the bells and whistles and not bespoke F-16’s.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 02:54 |
|
LtCol J. Krusinski posted:Uhhh someone ban this sick filth. The F-16 is emphatically not better than the F-15. Why do you think we’re buying new build F-15’s with all the bells and whistles and not bespoke F-16’s. Because Lockheed Martin owns the F-16 and F-35
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 02:56 |
LtCol J. Krusinski posted:Uhhh someone ban this sick filth. The F-16 is emphatically not better than the F-15. Why do you think we’re buying new build F-15’s with all the bells and whistles and not bespoke F-16’s. Are they cheaper?
|
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 02:56 |
|
Kinda sad how many people in here can't count. 16 is bigger than 15 just a heads up
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 02:58 |
|
Wish there was more love for the century-series fighters. I'll never get tired of the story of a F-106 cheat-coding against a F-16 during an exercise by firing a nuke at it.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 03:01 |
|
Comrade Blyatlov posted:Are they cheaper? Not even a little. F-15’s are pricier and have a higher per flight hour cost. But it’s got range, and is a much more capable jet than any F-16. The C/D models are… falling the gently caress apart after decades of being flown hard and put up wet. The -E and -EX are better than the F-16 in every conceivable way, other than cost. The F-16 is a very very affordable jet when compared to other fighters, though, and I can’t deny that.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 03:04 |
|
LtCol J. Krusinski posted:Not even a little. F-15’s are pricier and have a higher per flight hour cost. But it’s got range, and is a much more capable jet than any F-16.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 03:09 |
|
Well 16 is a bigger number than 15 and I is later than C or D, so clearly the champion is this twin-seat fighter, famous for its fat back, broad spine, questionable thrust to weight ratio, nose blobs, and reduced maneuverability in favor of ability to loiter over neighborhoods.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 03:14 |
|
Jimmy Smuts posted:What about maneuverability? I remember that was a big advantage of the F-16 over pretty much anything other than a MiG-29 in the '90s, but I haven't kept up since then. Does it even matter nowadays? Seems knife fights are very rare. They’re comparable in that they’re both 9g capable jets, but all that thrust the -15 has helps it lose a lot less energy in a one or two circle fight. A really good viper pilot can win a BFM fight against a less good eagle pilot, no doubt, but not usually against a really good eagle driver. Both are capable jets, but the f-16 suffers from it’s smaller size, shorter range, and less thrust. Meanwhile the F-35 and F-22 can wipe the floor with either jet. I don’t know how the -EX does with its fancy new AESA against LO targets, but with 20 something AIM-120’s onboard surely they’ll get at least one kill, haha. Especially with cooperative targeting.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 03:17 |
|
Jimmy Smuts posted:What about maneuverability? I remember that was a big advantage of the F-16 over pretty much anything other than a MiG-29 in the '90s, but I haven't kept up since then. Does it even matter nowadays? Seems knife fights are very rare. Considering the F-16 was apparently the world's first purpose-built 9g fighter, I'd say its a bit more maneuverable than a F-15. F-15 can go way, way faster though. (Mach 2.45 for the F-15 and 1.8 for the F-16) I think there was a guncam pic of an Eagle driver winning against a Viper at some point though? E: nevermind it was the Tomcat driver managing a kill on an Eagle. orange juche fucked around with this message at 03:32 on Mar 30, 2022 |
# ? Mar 30, 2022 03:23 |
|
Interesting stuff. To steer the thread back on topic, I wonder how those used MiG-29s being given to Ukraine will do against the RFAF, which seems to consist heavily of SU-27 variants. What I've kept hearing about the MiG-29 is that it has poo poo range, but I guess that's not a big issue if you're on defense?
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 03:31 |
|
orange juche posted:Considering the F-16 was apparently the world's first purpose-built 9g fighter, I'd say its a bit more maneuverable than a F-15. F-15 can go way, way faster though. (Mach 2.45 for the F-15 and 1.8 for the F-16) It’s not. They’re both 9g jets, but the eagle loses a boat load less energy in a turn because of all that goddamned thrust. I feel as though I’m repeating myself.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 03:36 |
|
Cimber posted:Partially correct. There were dual seat (d model) and single seat (c model), but its a moot point because the f16 is just better Wasn’t the D just the trainer though? Not sure that really counts.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 03:57 |
|
Jimmy Smuts posted:Wish there was more love for the century-series fighters. I'll never get tired of the story of a F-106 cheat-coding against a F-16 during an exercise by firing a nuke at it. I would love to hear more about this
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 04:02 |
|
Anticheese posted:I would love to hear more about this quote:
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 04:09 |
that's like exactly what the Genie was designed to do
|
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 04:42 |
|
Comrade Blyatlov posted:that's like exactly what the Genie was designed to do Not exactly, it was designed to be fired into a mass formation of Soviet bombers coming over the Pole.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 04:51 |
|
lol just found out an F-106 landed itself after its pilot punched out, how did I never know about this?Cornfield Bomber posted:Faust fired his ejection seat and escaped the stricken aircraft at an altitude of 15,000 feet (4,600 m). Good thing that was after they worked out the bugs in the ejection seat: quote:Following the resolution of initial teething problems – in particular an ejection seat that killed the first 12 pilots to eject from the aircraft – its exceptional performance made it very popular with its pilots.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 05:00 |
|
Loden Taylor posted:lol just found out an F-106 landed itself after its pilot punched out, how did I never know about this? quote:Following its misadventure, the "Cornfield Bomber" was repaired and returned to service, operating with the 49th Fighter-Interceptor Squadron, the final Air Force unit to operate the F-106. Faust flew the aircraft again in 1979 while training at Tyndall Air Force Base. Upon its retirement, it was presented to the National Museum of the United States Air Force in August 1986, where it remains on display.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 05:05 |
|
LtCol J. Krusinski posted:Genie story This always reminds me of the Hoser classic "Top Gun - The Navy's Fighter Weapons School” by George Hall posted:Hoser also knew a thing or two about the element of surprise. During the much-maligned AIMVAL-ACEVAL fighter trials of a decade ago, Hoser was put in a 1 V 1 against a Navy Aggressor flying an F-5. As the two combatants sat side-by-side on the Nellis runway, awaiting tower clearance for a second takeoff, Hoser looked over at his opponent, reached his hand up over the control panel, and mimicked the cocking of machine guns in a World War I Spad. A thumbs up came from the other cockpit- guns it would be, the proverbial knife fight in a phone booth, forget the missiles. Both jets blasted off.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 05:14 |
|
LtCol J. Krusinski posted:Not even a little. F-15’s are pricier and have a higher per flight hour cost. But it’s got range, and is a much more capable jet than any F-16. The F-15 sounds WAY cooler than the F-16 when it’s cold starting both it’s engines, too. This is one of the more important points. https://youtu.be/3bpRfx0DT2g
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 05:49 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 03:00 |
|
The F-14 is way cooler than either of those Air Force tryhards.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 05:57 |