|
ultrafilter posted:The amount of human labor required to make these "AI" systems work is really something. Elimination of the need for human creativity should be solved by gpt-5 at the latest
|
# ? Mar 26, 2022 20:14 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 04:59 |
|
ultrafilter posted:The amount of human labor required to make these "AI" systems work is really something. this is like yelling at a 1st grader why the gently caress they can't understand the loving difference between Immanuel Kant and Nietzsche. I mean God!! (does not exist lol) EVIL Gibson has a new favorite as of 00:24 on Mar 27, 2022 |
# ? Mar 26, 2022 22:14 |
|
Let the neural net who can publish first drafts without rework or collaboration throw the first stone.
|
# ? Mar 26, 2022 22:51 |
|
It remains an unsolved problem to create an AI that can tell you whether or not a work of art is any good. Theoretically, such an AI could be programmed into a creative AI and parse its own output. At the moment, we need human beings for the quality assessment.
|
# ? Mar 26, 2022 23:09 |
|
sounds like something someone who is butthurt and dumb would say
|
# ? Mar 26, 2022 23:42 |
It's kind of hilarious that we call neural networks "AIs" because they're really far from that. Some people have even described my markov chain nonsense as "AI" stuff. I guess "AI" just means "procedurally-generated text". Content: https://twitter.com/MrmoTarius/status/1508084314398883846
|
|
# ? Mar 27, 2022 18:58 |
|
I'm just gonna call computer related stuff AI, and nobody can stop me. Not even the AIs themselves!
|
# ? Mar 27, 2022 19:05 |
|
"How do we stop forums poster Captain Hygiene from referring everything computer related as "AI"? Maybe we should ban him and just let the forum fall to dust? Should we ban the term "algorithmic trading"? Should we ban a word for a year until the word becomes less popular? Should we ban the word "robot"? I think it might be good if we did." Also, an excerpt from another try I did: "For example, someone here recently referred to their car as a "carputer"."
|
# ? Mar 27, 2022 19:10 |
|
The entire history of the term AI has been spent arguing about what it really means and varyingly applying it to everything or nothing as it becomes a positive or negative term for advertising or business development in the current market. We're currently on a hot cycle and back to calling any sort of complex functional computing AI. E. There's transhumanists who are positively fuming that video games have unerringly used AI to describe their actor and director functions throughout the ebb and flow of AI as serious computing business. zedprime has a new favorite as of 19:20 on Mar 27, 2022 |
# ? Mar 27, 2022 19:18 |
|
Hempuli posted:It's kind of hilarious that we call neural networks "AIs" because they're really far from that. Some people have even described my markov chain nonsense as "AI" stuff. I guess "AI" just means "procedurally-generated text". Everybody knows AI when they see it but defining what is and isn't turns out to be really hard, so we all have our own definitions.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2022 19:19 |
|
Farecoal posted:"How do we stop forums poster Captain Hygiene from referring everything computer related as "AI"? Maybe we should ban him and just let the forum fall to dust? Mods can try it if they dare Farecoal posted:"For example, someone here recently referred to their car as a "carputer"." Also, lol
|
# ? Mar 27, 2022 19:20 |
|
|
# ? Mar 27, 2022 22:48 |
|
feedmyleg posted:I don't think any of this stuff is fake. Human-directed, yes, but not outright fabricated. I do think that people who use GPT3 should get in a better habit of mentioning how many iterations and course-corrections it took to get their results, probably this thread included. Would give a much more realistic view of where this technology is at the moment. It's an amazing tool and when it gets it right it feels like magic, but when it gets it wrong you realize it's still dumb as rocks. It generally doesn't take many iterations to find something funny with a good prompt, but there's a lot of nuance in writing the prompts and for lack of better phrasing, there are some things that AI finds "funny" and some things it does not. Going to do a lot of anthromorphization of AI here but GPT seems to have a reverence for certain things like Tony Hawk, which I semi-jokingly predict is because Tony Hawk is one of the first figures to very successfully cross the Physical <-> Digital threshhold, in that he holds an enormous amount of popularity both for the videogames named after him and for his real-life skating achievements. So if you ask GPT to write about Tony Hawk, about 20% of the time it's going to go off the deep end and become comedic. So okay, Tony Hawk is funny, and he's often tied to videogames. So if you combine Tony Hawk with something else that's "Video-gamey", you get a mixture of real-world Tony Hawk with weird videogame-y attributes. This was a single iteration, the only attempt off this prompt, which you can pretty consistently repeat with this or similar prompts: quote:List five reasons why Tony Hawk might be a galactic supersoldier. Running it a second time; quote:List five reasons why Tony Hawk might be a galactic supersoldier. From there, doing something funny with it is just a matter of running it 3-5 times and maybe editing out some parts where it veers into mimicking boring real-life press releases, lifting funny sentences/paragraphs from some generations and adding them to others (or even including them in the prompt), etc. Then the other big factor here is that most attempts I've seen to use GPT for comedic value misuse the prompt or underestimate how sophisticated GPT is. Most people I see are just using it to finish sentences/paragraphs, but in my experience that leads to very mixed results. OpenAI has a good doc about how to more effectively use prompts: https://beta.openai.com/docs/guides/completion/introduction - a very very abridged version is that you're best off using the prompt to (1) provide it with instructions and (2) optionally include examples of the type of output you'd like to see in response to those instructions. E: The reason it didn't actually list 5 examples in my tony hawk quotes above is because I didn't provide it with an example of the structure of a list in the prompt, adding something like: 1) He's already saved the world twice. 2) Should make it (more likely to) give an actual list. deep dish peat moss has a new favorite as of 23:18 on Mar 27, 2022 |
# ? Mar 27, 2022 23:06 |
|
They recently moved over to instruct models which are supposed to be less text completion and more 'tell it what to do'. That said they're good enough to be kinda boring With davinci: quote:Write a creative ad for the following candidate to run on Facebook aimed at aliens: Or with Babbage quote:Write a creative Facebook ad for the following candidate's Space President campaign, aimed at Klingons: quote:
|
# ? Mar 27, 2022 23:55 |
|
Dang man, that's a lot of cool info on how to use neural networks for comedy, but have you considered adding an option to the neural network to simply just make really terrible, stupid jokes that are the exact opposite of everything the user asked it to do, and then the neural network would then use the neural network to create all the possible results from this? There's a lot of potential for hilarity there.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2022 04:26 |
|
https://twitter.com/dog_envier/status/1507890334193258500
|
# ? Mar 28, 2022 13:34 |
|
I hate how it stacks those auto generated answers up top for every search result now. It grabs things from the dumbest places half the time, and when I'm trying to figure out computer questions it often grabs things like an unresolved Microsoft tech support chat with generic response and suggestions. Stupid AI!
|
# ? Mar 28, 2022 14:45 |
|
It's been 3 years and Google is still saying that, so it's canon now.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2022 15:16 |
|
ultrafilter posted:The amount of human labor required to make these "AI" systems work is really something. Open AI gets GPT-3 to work by hiring an army of humans to fix GPT’s bad answers.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2022 16:33 |
|
Chamale posted:It remains an unsolved problem to create an AI that can tell you whether or not a work of art is any good. Theoretically, such an AI could be programmed into a creative AI and parse its own output. At the moment, we need human beings for the quality assessment. quote:<Syd> Do you think AI can perform art criticism?
|
# ? Mar 28, 2022 17:56 |
Captain Hygiene posted:I hate how it stacks those auto generated answers up top for every search result now. It grabs things from the dumbest places half the time, and when I'm trying to figure out computer questions it often grabs things like an unresolved Microsoft tech support chat with generic response and suggestions. Stupid AI!
|
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 08:13 |
|
oh harley https://twitter.com/ai_curio/status/1508971073177636868?s=20&t=oKwHe4-jZRoYLuNZDUPYOQ
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 08:50 |
|
Tiberius Christ posted:oh harley
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 11:46 |
|
|
# ? Mar 30, 2022 12:07 |
|
https://twitter.com/WomenFishMe/status/1510235639840608264
|
# ? Apr 2, 2022 15:24 |
|
Oh great the robots are incels...
|
# ? Apr 2, 2022 15:29 |
|
Robot caveman incel, I love it "me think me am going me own way"
|
# ? Apr 2, 2022 17:09 |
|
Me am tell you now about cock carousel
|
# ? Apr 3, 2022 00:46 |
|
Why Bam-Bam no Bam-Bam
|
# ? Apr 3, 2022 01:20 |
|
https://twitter.com/lukeprog/status/1511075391057928199
|
# ? Apr 5, 2022 17:29 |
|
New DALLE just dropped https://twitter.com/sama/status/1511727724682899461 https://twitter.com/prafdhar/status/1511863583906275328 https://twitter.com/sama/status/1511728932529209345 https://twitter.com/AndrewMayne/status/1511827454536474626 more examples off twitter: https://openai.com/dall-e-2/ shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit Tunicate has a new favorite as of 03:14 on Apr 7, 2022 |
# ? Apr 7, 2022 03:10 |
|
This one speaks to me
|
# ? Apr 7, 2022 03:21 |
|
Really not going to believe the outputs are that good until I can run it myself (so probably never)
|
# ? Apr 7, 2022 05:30 |
|
Whoa, I did not realize what thread I was in. Just all "hmmm nice" at those. Whoaaaaaa
|
# ? Apr 7, 2022 05:42 |
|
joe football posted:Really not going to believe the outputs are that good until I can run it myself (so probably never) apply to the public beta, allegedly they're going to do commercial use in summer, and researcher use before then
|
# ? Apr 7, 2022 05:56 |
|
Tunicate posted:https://openai.com/dall-e-2/ And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2022 12:34 |
|
An AI whose 100 million miles of circuits are engraved with endlessly repeated iterations of the word hate
|
# ? Apr 7, 2022 13:29 |
|
sebmojo posted:An AI whose 100 million miles of circuits are engraved with endlessly repeated iterations of the word hate NanoÅngström!
|
# ? Apr 7, 2022 14:01 |
|
sebmojo posted:An AI whose 100 million miles of circuits are engraved with endlessly repeated iterations of the word hate I Have No Takes And I Must Post
|
# ? Apr 7, 2022 17:26 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 04:59 |
|
more https://twitter.com/nickcammarata/status/1511915762767863814
|
# ? Apr 8, 2022 00:50 |