|
You should be allowed pets measured by a maximum weight of, say, 50 kilos of pet per household. So in any one property, you could potentially have 1 large dog, 10 medium-sized cats, or 25,000 cockroaches.
|
# ? May 11, 2022 15:49 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 05:11 |
|
Deketh posted:I've mentioned either a cat or small dog to them. It's a regular bungalow really, nothing about it that makes it unsuitable for pets. On a quiet cul de sac, loads of my neighbours have pets. I've made my case in an email to them, initially they just said "no pets as per clause" but the clause doesn't actually say no pets, it says consent may not be unreasonably withheld. So I've made that point, among others. Like Bobby D said, I'm sure they'll come up with some petty reason and it'll be a back and forth of them just saying no in different ways and, as intended, I'll be powerless to actually force their hand. hmmm, so you're not protected.
|
# ? May 11, 2022 15:50 |
|
My previous experience with landlords has taught me to not even contest when they say no, because if you push it and make them notice you as more than a + on their bank statement, they'll 'decide to look for other tenants' with a section 21. The inverse of this of course is that if you're up for the battle, it's always morally correct to make your landlord's life hell. Get a pregnant mother cat. Fit catflaps to all the doors. Put a big sign up in your front garden saying 'give me more cats.'
|
# ? May 11, 2022 15:51 |
|
Pistol_Pete posted:You should be allowed pets measured by a maximum weight of, say, 50 kilos of pet per household. So in any one property, you could potentially have 1 large dog, 10 medium-sized cats, or 25,000 cockroaches. That just gives landlords an easy way to stop tenants owning pets and to raise the rent for exceeding the limits.
|
# ? May 11, 2022 15:52 |
|
Pistol_Pete posted:You should be allowed pets measured by a maximum weight of, say, 50 kilos of pet per household. So in any one property, you could potentially have 1 large dog, 10 medium-sized cats, or 25,000 cockroaches.
|
# ? May 11, 2022 15:53 |
|
You can actually have as many outdoor cats as you like, because you can simply say they don't live there, and you'd be right.
|
# ? May 11, 2022 15:57 |
|
-get a pet that could eat a landlord -indoctrinate it in the teachings of mao -wait for inspection with revolutionary zeal
|
# ? May 11, 2022 15:59 |
|
They said no again. Reason being a previous property got trashed by a tenant's dog. Is that reasonable? No, cos it wasn't me that did it. I even had an inspection this week and the place was spotless, so they know the kind of tenant I am. I hate being so powerless about things like this. Would be a great help to my mental health to have a little buddy around. Extract money, insert misery.Bobby Deluxe posted:My previous experience with landlords has taught me to not even contest when they say no, because if you push it and make them notice you as more than a + on their bank statement, they'll 'decide to look for other tenants' with a section 21. Yeah, I considered this before making a fuss. I was pretty pissed off though so I did it anyway, I'll leave it alone now though.
|
# ? May 11, 2022 16:06 |
|
Interestingly, you are legally allowed under the Provision of Allotment act 1950 to keep Chickens and Rabbits, no matter what your tenancy agreement says. But while Section 21 still exists, the landlord can use that. If that goes (Which the queens speech suggested it will) then fill your garden with the little cluckers.
|
# ? May 11, 2022 16:22 |
|
Tsietisin posted:Interestingly, you are legally allowed under the Provision of Allotment act 1950 to keep Chickens and Rabbits, no matter what your tenancy agreement says. I've always wanted some little chickens to listen to as they cluck about
|
# ? May 11, 2022 16:23 |
|
keep punching joe posted:Mr Justice Tugendhat? Is his first name actually Justice? A while back we had Lord Chief Justice Judge.
|
# ? May 11, 2022 16:27 |
|
Necrothatcher posted:A while back we had Lord Chief Justice Judge. Igor Judge is a pretty good name all round tbh.
|
# ? May 11, 2022 16:32 |
|
Deketh posted:They said no again. Reason being a previous property got trashed by a tenant's dog. Is that reasonable? No, cos it wasn't me that did it. I even had an inspection this week and the place was spotless, so they know the kind of tenant I am. I hate being so powerless about things like this. Would be a great help to my mental health to have a little buddy around. Extract money, insert misery. https://www.otssolicitors.co.uk/news/renting-property-to-tenants-with-pets/ some solicitors posted:If a landlord doesn’t want to rent out their property to a tenant with pets, then they have to object in writing within twenty-eight days of a written pet request from a tenant. The landlord has to provide a good reason for their objection to a pet.
|
# ? May 11, 2022 16:41 |
|
https://twitter.com/ITVNewsPolitics/status/1524403747878752258
|
# ? May 11, 2022 17:10 |
|
NotJustANumber99 posted:https://www.otssolicitors.co.uk/news/renting-property-to-tenants-with-pets/ Right but a) that only applies if you didn't sign "I don't have pets and won't get any" as part of your contract, and b), as I've experienced with ethnic discrimination, it's basically impossible to prove that the landlord didn't let to you on the basis of something prohibited as opposed to just because they didn't like you (and they can refuse to let to you for being mouthy or w/e else they'd like). They might not be able to evict you for it, but they can still get around that. Private Speech fucked around with this message at 17:13 on May 11, 2022 |
# ? May 11, 2022 17:10 |
|
NotJustANumber99 posted:https://www.otssolicitors.co.uk/news/renting-property-to-tenants-with-pets/ Thanks for this. I believe they are in the wrong in their decision, but I also know they won't accept that. How far do I take it? They will say it's a good reason and I don't have the resources to get someone in authority to tell them otherwise. As long as the wording is open to interpretation, they will continue to take the interpretation that they prefer until they can be forced otherwise
|
# ? May 11, 2022 17:11 |
|
I don't think there is a need for lee anderson and yet here he is.
|
# ? May 11, 2022 17:12 |
|
Deketh posted:I've mentioned either a cat or small dog to them. It's a regular bungalow really, nothing about it that makes it unsuitable for pets. When I rented and wanted a cat, I asked my landlord directly.
|
# ? May 11, 2022 17:15 |
|
I hate this, I hate him, and this infuriates me beyond belief.
|
# ? May 11, 2022 17:42 |
|
I was going to joke that there were probably bronze age patriarchs going on about "there are generations who have forgotten how to forage and wild hunt, all they do is expect their equal dole of beer and leavened bread for bringing in the einkorn and rye harvest", but there was that lib dem lady suggesting that the urban poor forage in berry bushes like 5 years ago so actually gently caress all of them.
|
# ? May 11, 2022 17:48 |
|
^^^ The Sandman issue Men of Good Fortune covers 600 years of Dream meeting the same man in the same pub once a century, has people talking about the same things over and over including about how people on the dole all eat better food and drink better booze. Nothing ever changes. Jeherrin posted:I hate this, I hate him, and this infuriates me beyond belief. Then I recommend not reading his clarification. Jedit fucked around with this message at 18:03 on May 11, 2022 |
# ? May 11, 2022 17:55 |
Jeherrin posted:I hate this, I hate him, and this infuriates me beyond belief. so much for the tolerant left!!!
|
|
# ? May 11, 2022 17:58 |
|
Tugendhat is a synonym for knobhead
|
# ? May 11, 2022 18:05 |
|
So the Government claims there is no need for food banks. Its just that they are not preparing school leavers for the real world. Failing to teach them how to budget, cook, or even feed themselves. Its an interesting defense.
|
# ? May 11, 2022 18:09 |
|
Deketh posted:As long as the wording is open to interpretation, they will continue to take the interpretation that they prefer until they can be forced otherwise
|
# ? May 11, 2022 18:10 |
|
1965917 posted:So the Government claims there is no need for food banks. That's not part of the academic rigour we need in our students.
|
# ? May 11, 2022 18:26 |
|
Former Labour Councillor, this.
|
# ? May 11, 2022 18:31 |
|
Tsietisin posted:But while Section 21 still exists, the landlord can use that. If that goes (Which the queens speech suggested it will)
|
# ? May 11, 2022 19:01 |
|
Gonzo McFee posted:Former Labour Councillor, this. His Wikipedia page reads like an absolute parody, like what you'd get if you trained an AI on the Collected Tweets Of The Conservative Party and then had it write the thing. It's insane.
|
# ? May 11, 2022 19:15 |
|
Jeherrin posted:His Wikipedia page reads like an absolute parody, like what you'd get if you trained an AI on the Collected Tweets Of The Conservative Party and then had it write the thing. It's insane. some abit......... yeh
|
# ? May 11, 2022 19:28 |
|
1965917 posted:So the Government claims there is no need for food banks. Yeah, but the last labour government. Wait - poo poo, we can’t possibly use that this time?
|
# ? May 11, 2022 19:29 |
|
cyril sneeeer posted:some abit......... yeh you will always feeel this bit bad. Eyeeballls deep in mudddy water.
|
# ? May 11, 2022 19:30 |
|
I have trieded t os show how I can suppport whatever r the gently caress it was is explained as
|
# ? May 11, 2022 19:32 |
|
Completely normal article published on the State broadcaster's website. https://twitter.com/JohnOBrennan2/status/1524382576089219074?t=t9iEULYEmNkIJKDkX9MG8w&s=19
|
# ? May 11, 2022 19:32 |
|
I Have e to accept altho8gh i am swimming in deathe U hope I find a course of the 1999 quicker than now
|
# ? May 11, 2022 19:35 |
|
DesperateDan posted:-get a pet that could eat a landlord Get a dog, call it Gramsci, teach it to attack rich people
|
# ? May 11, 2022 19:36 |
|
Surely Diogenes would be a better name and also a compliment to Diogenes.
|
# ? May 11, 2022 19:37 |
|
The Tories should really be thanking their lucky stars that there are food banks because without them British society would probably collapse in about two weeks
|
# ? May 11, 2022 19:42 |
TACD posted:Eh what? What's the catch with this, that'd be two things (off the top of my head) that the Tories have done to benefit renters Could be there’s a catch in the legislation and it’s designed to accompany some other measure to allow easier evictions, could be the government is foreseeing mass exercise of s21 orders for some reason and is worried about unrest and civil disorder, could be something else.
|
|
# ? May 11, 2022 19:48 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 05:11 |
|
cyril sneeeer posted:I Have e to accept altho8gh i am swimming in deathe U hope I find a course of the 1999 quicker than now
|
# ? May 11, 2022 20:05 |