|
ALWAYS WITH THE MILLERS
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 02:53 |
|
|
Xiahou Dun posted:Are you watching the hearing? Yep! Let's see if this leads to ANYTHING real. This is not even a speedbump towards the specter of Trump 2024. Riptor posted:its pretty significant my dude Significant to whom exactly? Who is this going to affect?
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:48
|
|
|
 Trump wanted to go to the insurrection, but walk to the Capital?
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:48
|
|
|
"we're going to get charged with every crime imaginable" that's a pretty good quote to show people were aware of what was happening
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:48
|
|
|
Inner Light posted:Looks like I was right! Nothing 'explosive' today, although the hearing is not over yet, I doubt they are saving the best for last.  If you think a firsthand account of Trump (and Meadows lying) knowing all those people were heavily armed and wanted them to march to the Capitol is "Nothing" then your brain is a worm ridden applecore That's conspiracy to commit sedition TulliusCicero fucked around with this message at 18:52 on Jun 28, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:48
|
|
|
Every time I forget mogul was his secret service name
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:49
|
|
|
Haha Trump's code name was Mogul
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:49
|
|
|
TulliusCicero posted:
We basically knew all of this before my dude. How on earth could anyone not know there was going to be violence on the 6th, especially the intelligence community and chiefs of staff? Credible threats were widely reported in all major media outlets for several days beforehand. Maybe the 7 years of apathy has rotted my brain a bit but I don't think I'm too far off base from reality.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:50
|
|
|
Inner Light posted:We basically knew all of this before my dude. How on earth could anyone not know there was going to be violence on the 6th? Credible threats were widely reported in all major media outlets for several days beforehand. We had an idea but nothing solid enough which gave everybody plausible deniability. They could've just said "Hey we gave a speech and, all of the sudden, the armed people showed up and took over. I was shocked!" They not only knew, they orchestrated it!
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:51
|
|
|
Good actual god, such a wide amount of getting hosed is happening. She's running them over back and forth with the bus
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:51
|
|
|
Inner Light posted:We basically knew all of this before my dude. How on earth could anyone not know there was going to be violence on the 6th, especially the intelligence community and chiefs of staff? Credible threats were widely reported in all major media outlets for several days beforehand. Maybe the 7 years of apathy has rotted my brain a bit but I don't think I'm too far off base from reality. do you understand the legal distinction between an assumption and testimony
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:52
|
|
|
Mark and Scott Perry, Mark and Rudy Giuliani... a convo about him going into the House Chamber at one point...
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:52
|
|
|
Never before have so many people been so thoroughly hosed by a single hour of a testimony.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:53
|
|
|
I hope this woman gets 24/7 protection for the foreseeable future.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:53
|
|
|
Trump wanted to be in the Senate chamber for the vote certification 
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:53
|
|
|
Riptor posted:do you understand the legal distinction between an assumption and testimony Yes, but I think the Jan 6 committee has had similar testimony before. I'm not hearing anything new. It's 'explosive' in that you can get some more clicks on the news articles, but what effect will the testimony have in reality? That is the point I am trying to get at. Maybe I'll drop it for now sorry, my apathy is pretty unstoppable at this point and it can come across as annoying in my posts.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:54
|
|
|
Inner Light posted:Yes, but I think the Jan 6 committee has had similar testimony before. You are incorrect
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:54
|
|
|
Ahahaha he had a huge fit when he was told no.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:55
|
|
|
What the gently caress... he litteraly tried to loving commandeer the car and drive to the capitol...
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:55
|
|
|
Ahahahahaha omg
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:55
|
|
|
Add assault to the charges.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:55
|
|
|
Credible, but yeah, this part of relaying a conversation she wasn't in is hearsay. But this gets a lot more pressure on people to get up and testify under oath. Jesus Christ, Trump may have gone after a guy physically??
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:55
|
|
|
Holy poo poo Trump tried to take the wheel and tried to strangle a guy in the car
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:55
|
|
|
TRUMP TRIED TO CHOKE A DUDE HE STRAIGHT UP WENT FOR HIS THROAT LIKE A RAGING PSYCHO
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:55
|
|
|
Holy gently caress! He tried to choke his security detail!
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:55
|
|
|
Trump reaching for the steering wheel of the beast, then attacking Bobby Engle. loving hell.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:55
|
|
|
Holy gently caress. Trump tried to attack his Secret Service driver. What the poo poo
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:56
|
|
|
Woah, she is probably going to fall out of a window or something after this hour.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:56
|
|
|
He tried to grab the steering wheel and assault his driver lol. TRUMP TAKE THE WHEEL
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:56
|
|
|
volts5000 posted:"Don't believe your lying ears!" Is this legally hearsay? I'm not a lawyer, but I thought hearsay would be if this witness were to say she heard another person talk about what Trump said. Anyway, that magnetometer statement is pretty damning. The only defense I can think of is that Trump could insist he meant "These people wouldn't hurt me, they're my biggest fans!" If he emphasized the "me", as in "hurt me", that seems inescapable. Edit: Jesus H Christ, he attacked a Secret Service guy?
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:57
|
|
|
BTW we are only now approaching 14:00 ETD.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:57
|
|
|
Jesus loving Christ
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:57
|
|
|
William Bear posted:Is this legally hearsay? I'm not a lawyer, but I thought hearsay would be if this witness were to say she heard another person talk about what Trump said. It's definitely hearsay. That's easy. The complex part is that there are a poo poo load of exceptions that allow hearsay into testimony. Like, keep in mind, the concept of e-mail is also technically hearsay.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 18:59
|
|
|
"Ketchup dripping down the wall..." god drat reality
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 19:00
|
|
|
William Bear posted:Is this legally hearsay? I'm not a lawyer, but I thought hearsay would be if this witness were to say she heard another person talk about what Trump said. The stuff about the mags, no. She was a witness. The stuff about the motorcade back to the West Wing, yes. Personally, I think the mags stuff is more damning.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 19:00
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 19:00
|
|
|
He’s a loving ketchup throwing toddler.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 19:00
|
|
|
mik posted:"Ketchup dripping down the wall..." Goddamn baby
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 19:00
|
|
|
Broken China and Ketchup on The Wall By Cassidy Hutchinson.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 19:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 02:53 |
|
|
Do we know if they have subpoenaed or deposed the secret service guy?
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2022 19:00
|
|
