Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

If he lives at number 10 then does it count as working from home and is it wrong to engage in oral sex while working from home?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

jiggerypokery
Feb 1, 2012

...But I could hardly wait six months with a red hot jape like that under me belt.

I mean, it doesn't feel wrong

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro



https://twitter.com/PerthshireMags/status/1542856025950359552?s=20&t=smbElyVlUZM9zzFkY03eDA

Jaeluni Asjil
Apr 18, 2018

Sorry I thought you were a landlord when I gave you your old avatar!

OwlFancier posted:

If he lives at number 10 then does it count as working from home and is it wrong to engage in oral sex while working from home?

I thought his living quarters were actually in No. 11 and Chancellor lives in No. 10 living quarters.
I know it changed for Blair/Brown and I think it stayed like that? I might be wrong!

Lord of the Llamas
Jul 9, 2002

EULER'VE TO SEE IT VENN SOMEONE CALLS IT THE WRONG THING AND PROVOKES MY WRATH

Jaeluni Asjil posted:

I thought his living quarters were actually in No. 11 and Chancellor lives in No. 10 living quarters.
I know it changed for Blair/Brown and I think it stayed like that? I might be wrong!

Yes Blair moved into No11 because it's bigger and he had kids at the time, and basically everyone since has stayed there.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Maybe by never strike a deal it's because he's admitting how awful he is at negotiations.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

massive spider posted:

Yeah but this is one of the issues with dealing with a narcissistic sack of poo poo, you end up getting eroded to the point where youre like “well this isn’t as bad as the time they…”. They erode your standards.
Yeah it's this. I don't care about his dick, but I do care that he's basically prioritized his own pleasure and convenience over everything else since ever, like if he was given the choice between two marshmallows now and one marshmallow now and Brexit in fifteen minutes he'd never have bothered with Brexit, and somehow this keeps being not only tolerated but also encouraged by a faction who believe that they're somehow getting their knob polished by proxy.

Lord of the Llamas
Jul 9, 2002

EULER'VE TO SEE IT VENN SOMEONE CALLS IT THE WRONG THING AND PROVOKES MY WRATH

Tesseraction posted:

Maybe by never strike a deal it's because he's admitting how awful he is at negotiations.

He's against striking workers, striking deals, and striking a chord with voters.

feedmegin
Jul 30, 2008

ThomasPaine posted:

Just screams prudishness to me, as if half the people talking wouldn't be delighted if they were getting sucked off at work. r.

If I did that, and got caught, I'd be fired. Why not him?

jiggerypokery
Feb 1, 2012

...But I could hardly wait six months with a red hot jape like that under me belt.

feedmegin posted:

If I did that, and got caught, I'd be fired. Why not him?

have you considered doing it for the bantz?

ThomasPaine
Feb 4, 2009

We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.

feedmegin posted:

If I did that, and got caught, I'd be fired. Why not him?

I don't think you should be fired if you were caught getting a cheeky blowy under the desk in your office, assuming everything is consensual and you're not exploiting your power over anyone.

e: Obviously assuming you have your own office, don't be doing this in open plan places. That's a bit too last days of rome even for me.

feedmegin
Jul 30, 2008

ThomasPaine posted:

I don't think you should be fired if you were caught getting a cheeky blowy under the desk in your office, assuming everything is consensual and you're not exploiting your power over anyone.

That's an...interesting point of view but also not congruent with modern employment reality.

ThomasPaine
Feb 4, 2009

We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.
I never said it was!

feedmegin
Jul 30, 2008

Like, it's like the r/relationships posts where someone comes in to work wearing a slave collar and leash and insists everyone calls their boyfriend 'master'. You sort of have a right to not be involved in someone else's sex weirdness in your workplace.

massive spider
Dec 6, 2006

If youre getting a blowie in your place of work youre kind of involving anyone who might walk in. Which is reportedly exactly what happened and some poor soul now has to live with knowing what Johnson’s O face looks like.

I mean the general principle of sex positivity/non prudishness/whatever is “what consenting adults do in private” and this isn’t exactly in accordance with the last bit.

Barry Foster
Dec 24, 2007

What is going wrong with that one (face is longer than it should be)

ThomasPaine posted:

I never said it was!

Well, no, but you replied to a statement on what is with what you think should be

which seems to have been your approach from the beginning on this

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

If you don't think that people should be fired for that then the extrapolated answer for why he wouldn't be fired for it even if you would, is that "he doesn't have a boss who could fire him"

feedmegin
Jul 30, 2008

OwlFancier posted:

If you don't think that people should be fired for that then the extrapolated answer for why he wouldn't be fired for it even if you would, is that "he doesn't have a boss who could fire him"

Well. Technically, he does. Assuming she's still on this earth and not doing a Weekend at Bernie's, of course.

ThomasPaine
Feb 4, 2009

We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.

Barry Foster posted:

Well, no, but you replied to a statement on what is with what you think should be

which seems to have been your approach from the beginning on this

Yes, exactly. I know it's widely considered inappropriate, but I think it's a bit of a throwback and making a much bigger deal out of something than it needs to.

massive spider posted:

If youre getting a blowie in your place of work youre kind of involving anyone who might walk in. Which is reportedly exactly what happened and some poor soul now has to live with knowing what Johnson’s O face looks like.

I mean the general principle of sex positivity/non prudishness/whatever is “what consenting adults do in private” and this isn’t exactly in accordance with the last bit.

Well yes, I would suggest that you lock the office door first. I kind of assumed the situation was he was about after hours or something when he thought the place was dead or at least didn't expect to be disturbed.

feedmegin posted:

Like, it's like the r/relationships posts where someone comes in to work wearing a slave collar and leash and insists everyone calls their boyfriend 'master'. You sort of have a right to not be involved in someone else's sex weirdness in your workplace.

Obviously expecting other people to participate by calling someone 'master' isn't the same, but notwithstanding that can you honestly tell me you wouldn't find the situation just a little bit entertaining.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I mean sure I guess but the queen hasn't intervened at any previous juncture so it seems very unlikely she would do so at this point.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Personally it's just difficult to give a poo poo because I am in the process of inventing a new type of socialism where instead of building a worker's paradise on earth because there is none in the afterlife, we should instead focus on constructing hell so that we can put politicians in it for their many and incalculable crimes.

So, with that in mind, it seems a bit small potatoes.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
The entire country deteriorates into a terrible American frat comedy as the Queen walks in on a drunk Boris getting his dick licked and then a dozen tories start chanting GILF GILF GILF

Brendan Rodgers
Jun 11, 2014




OwlFancier posted:

Personally it's just difficult to give a poo poo because I am in the process of inventing a new type of socialism where instead of building a worker's paradise on earth because there is none in the afterlife, we should instead focus on constructing hell so that we can put politicians in it for their many and incalculable crimes.

So, with that in mind, it seems a bit small potatoes.

You might like Surface Detail by Iain M. Banks if you haven't read it:

"As the book begins, a war game—the "War in Heaven"—has been running for several decades. The outcome of the simulated war will determine whether societies are allowed to run artificial Hells, virtual afterlives in which the mind-states of the dead are tortured. The Culture, fiercely anti-Hell, has opted to stay out of the war while accepting the outcome as binding."

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I stopped reading banks half way through excession cos honestly I kinda got a bit bored.

But I think I vaguely recall something like that being mentioned possibly in another book or in a summary online or something.

Chubby Henparty
Aug 13, 2007


happyhippy posted:

Do you think Liz and Phil ever did it on the throne?

Thanks for the memory of The Crown ep that literally ends with Liz giving Phil a blowie

Z the IVth
Jan 28, 2009

The trouble with your "expendable machines"
Fun Shoe

OwlFancier posted:

I stopped reading banks half way through excession cos honestly I kinda got a bit bored.

But I think I vaguely recall something like that being mentioned possibly in another book or in a summary online or something.

Excession is a really hard read. It was my first and nearly bounced off as well since the concept sounds really cool but the execution is hard to follow if you dont know the universe. The other books are better if you haven't tried them yet.

Surface Detail and Hydrogen Sonata have a fairly normal story structure and are far more accessible.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Z the IVth posted:

Excession is a really hard read. It was my first and nearly bounced off as well since the concept sounds really cool but the execution is hard to follow if you dont know the universe. The other books are better if you haven't tried them yet.

Surface Detail and Hydrogen Sonata have a fairly normal story structure and are far more accessible.

I actually read consider phlebas and the player of games before that, the whole thing never really clicked with me for some reason. I like the ideas in the books, I just didn't enjoy the actual stories very much. Also the details just did not at all stick in my brain, I would struggle to tell you anything really memorable from them and certainly not any of the characters.

I think my abiding feeling is that I would like someone else to write stories set in the same universe.

Barry Foster
Dec 24, 2007

What is going wrong with that one (face is longer than it should be)
Player of Games is the place to start with Culture novels. Short, to the point, leaves you wanting more

It's nowhere near the best of them, I just think it's the best intro

feedmegin
Jul 30, 2008

ThomasPaine posted:

Well yes, I would suggest that you lock the office door first. I kind of assumed the situation was he was about after hours or something when he thought the place was dead or at least didn't expect to be disturbed.

Given Bozza, why on earth do you assume this?

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Funnily I think I liked that less that consider phlebas because it seemed like the most mundane of the ones I read. To the point that I can remember almost nothing about it other than the general plot synopsis of the leader of faze clan being sent to dunk on the esports tournament civilization so he can win the mountain dew sponsorship for the culture.

Literally no other memory of the novel at all other than "man good at games, goes to game planet, beats everyone on game planet, game planet self destructs because foreigner won game tournament"

Which is weird cos the book is several centimeters thick so presumably a lot of other things must have happened and I must have read them but I couldn't tell you what they are.

OwlFancier fucked around with this message at 16:31 on Jul 1, 2022

bessantj
Jul 27, 2004


This lady knows what's up

https://twitter.com/PriyamvadaGopal/status/1542818236181397506

Rustybear
Nov 16, 2006
what the thunder said

ThomasPaine posted:

Yes, exactly. I know it's widely considered inappropriate, but I think it's a bit of a throwback and making a much bigger deal out of something than it needs to.

inter-office affairs are chill guys don't be prudes is not the attitude of the modern sexually-liberated free thinker it's the attitude of 1950s executives forcing their secretaries to have abortions... something which boris has also done!

feedmegin
Jul 30, 2008


I mean. Half the top Tories went through the Union (Bozza included) so it's hardly surprising. It's training school for Oxford rightwingers. (Leftwingers tend to go through OUSU instead, that is the actual Oxford student union) (and by leftwingers, other than Tony Benn عليه السلام‎ ʿ I mostly mean people on the Starmer end of the party)

feedmegin fucked around with this message at 16:41 on Jul 1, 2022

grobbo
May 29, 2014

OwlFancier posted:

Funnily I think I liked that less that consider phlebas because it seemed like the most mundane of the ones I read. To the point that I can remember almost nothing about it other than the general plot synopsis of the leader of faze clan being sent to dunk on the esports tournament civilization so he can win the mountain dew sponsorship for the culture.

Literally no other memory of the novel at all other than "man good at games, goes to game planet, beats everyone on game planet, game planet self destructs because foreigner won game tournament"

Which is weird cos the book is several centimeters thick so presumably a lot of other things must have happened and I must have read them but I couldn't tell you what they are.

No, this is pretty much it, except there's also a lot of political manoeuvring / "utopian ambassador to an authoritarian world finds he can trust nobody" stuff which I remember felt to me a bit cribbed from Left Hand Of Darkness. (Which isn't a bad thing, because if you have to steal from somewhere...)

Private Speech
Mar 30, 2011

I HAVE EVEN MORE WORTHLESS BEANIE BABIES IN MY COLLECTION THAN I HAVE WORTHLESS POSTS IN THE BEANIE BABY THREAD YET I STILL HAVE THE TEMERITY TO CRITICIZE OTHERS' COLLECTIONS

IF YOU SEE ME TALKING ABOUT BEANIE BABIES, PLEASE TELL ME TO

EAT. SHIT.


OwlFancier posted:

Funnily I think I liked that less that consider phlebas because it seemed like the most mundane of the ones I read. To the point that I can remember almost nothing about it other than the general plot synopsis of the leader of faze clan being sent to dunk on the esports tournament civilization so he can win the mountain dew sponsorship for the culture.

Literally no other memory of the novel at all other than "man good at games, goes to game planet, beats everyone on game planet, game planet self destructs because foreigner won game tournament"

Which is weird cos the book is several centimeters thick so presumably a lot of other things must have happened and I must have read them but I couldn't tell you what they are.

The easiest to read are the last three, ideally in the order of Surface Detail/Matter/Hydrogen Sonata. Look to Windward isn't too difficult either.

Don't read Inversions or Use of Weapons unless you want more difficult reads though. UoW is written in a weird intervowen order that only makes sense at the end and Inversions is written entirely from the perspective of a low-technology civilization.

e: Surface Detail has the hypercapitalism bits everyone likes to quote.

Private Speech fucked around with this message at 16:53 on Jul 1, 2022

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I don't think I found them difficult to read so much as banks doesn't write characters that I am invested in or can remember anything about. I don't know if that is just a stylistic thing or whether it counts as being "bad" at writing them. Also while the setting is very compelling I feel like the fact that the protagonists are utterly uninterested in it, kinda spoils it, because I just find myself wishing there were just pages long descriptions of background stuff.

Give me, I dunno, a light romance between landscape engineers living on a ringworld narrated by the ring Mind who has a side hobby doing matchmaking for random people using its big brain, where every chapter is them going on a trip to a different cool space thing and talking about it.

ThomasPaine
Feb 4, 2009

We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.

feedmegin posted:

Given Bozza, why on earth do you assume this?

Very fair point

Rustybear posted:

inter-office affairs are chill guys don't be prudes is not the attitude of the modern sexually-liberated free thinker it's the attitude of 1950s executives forcing their secretaries to have abortions... something which boris has also done!

Bit different when it's a colleague, yeah. But if I was working late and somehow stumbled my way into a sexual partner turning up and giving me a blowie in the office I certainly wouldn't consider that some great moral issue and I'd be pretty mad if Dave from accounts decided push to have me sacked if if he decided to pick up a file at 10pm and saw me through the blinds.

ANYWAY. I am going to stop arguing about the ethics of workplace blowjobs now, tyvm.

Reveilled
Apr 19, 2007

Take up your rifles

OwlFancier posted:

I don't think I found them difficult to read so much as banks doesn't write characters that I am invested in or can remember anything about. I don't know if that is just a stylistic thing or whether it counts as being "bad" at writing them. Also while the setting is very compelling I feel like the fact that the protagonists are utterly uninterested in it, kinda spoils it, because I just find myself wishing there were just pages long descriptions of background stuff.

Give me, I dunno, a light romance between landscape engineers living on a ringworld narrated by the ring Mind who has a side hobby doing matchmaking for random people using its big brain, where every chapter is them going on a trip to a different cool space thing and talking about it.

That pretty much mirrors my own feelings, having read the first two books also, I just couldn't get invested in any of the characters. Ultimately I decided the style wasn't for me, much as I wanted it to be. Heck, I think I remember even less about Consider Phlebas, there was a...planet that had like...a bunch of underground train stations or something?? It had an AI in it they needed to get. I don't think I could tell you literally anything about the characters other than that one was an Iridian and the other was a Culture operative. I think? It just completely failed to have any impact on me which I found rather disappointing.

Strom Cuzewon
Jul 1, 2010

People reccomend Player of Games because its a nice simple introduction to the Culture, but this also means it's by far the least interesting of the novels. Excession and Use of Weapons are the absolute highpoints for me, and work as a pretty good duology, looking at the Culture from the perspective of the Minds on top, and the random schlubs on the bottom.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Bobby Deluxe
May 9, 2004

the sex ghost posted:



Keirs solemn election pledge: we will never appeal to anybody anywhere
He's so loving dumb, he falls into every single trap they lay. This is just the 'yes, but I want to hear the son of a bitch deny it' thing, except he's trying to preempt mention of it before they even trick him into talking about it. Amazing.

Now they just add the words 'despite what he says' onto the end of the sentance and get to lump bonus untrustworthiness on there.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply