|
Judge Schnoopy posted:^^ beat me to it, thanks! Right. Though given she’s a) a lawyer and b) a whack job I expect a lot of taking the 5th.
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2022 15:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 11:03 |
|
|
selec posted:The Mueller She Wrote lady is a fed, incapable of accepting contrary evidence, a PPP loan scammer and a lovely boss who took all the money and paid her coworkers peanuts. Avoid at all costs. Link?
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2022 17:28
|
|
|
She'll be the first to approach the press, probably within fifteen minutes of leaving, claiming harassment and illegal questions and attacking her husband and "Illegitimacy!" Speaking of illegitimate, Cannon greased up her pen and told Dearie to just review whatever documents are claimed, well not claimed, because the plantiff bearing the burden of responsibility doesn't... have to make any responsible claim about what's being reviewed. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-judge-says-trump-will-not-be-required-attest-accuracy-fbis-list-seized-2022-09-29/ This presumably means they can go through the entire process without the plantiff having claimed any harm whatsoever ("I want my property back... None is my property"). More likely, there will be a bunch of fake tweets claiming "Just as I said, the things that are mine are the things I said were mine! And I would have given back the other things if they had given me time". Cannon may have also added 15dy to the schedule. (?) And I cannot tell anymore who's paying for this, but hopefully within the next fortnight we'll see a contempt charge for failure to pay the special master and assistants.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2022 22:43
|
|
|
PhantomOfTheCopier posted:She'll be the first to approach the press, probably within fifteen minutes of leaving, claiming harassment and illegal questions and attacking her husband and "Illegitimacy!" This is all kind of procedural because the DOJ or whoever was allowed to move forward with the classified docs, right?
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2022 23:43
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1575561167476498432
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2022 23:47
|
|
|
Crazyweasel posted:This is all kind of procedural because the DOJ or whoever was allowed to move forward with the classified docs, right? Yes, they have been able to use them for investigation since Dearie's earlier ruling. Which means they are almost certainly done with all of it, by now, no matter how many hundreds of thousands of pages are at issue. This is no longer an issue. If and when Trump gets charged, it will happen in DC and they already have what they need to make that case to the sitting grand jury.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2022 00:15
|
|
|
Crazyweasel posted:This is all kind of procedural because the DOJ or whoever was allowed to move forward with the classified docs, right? Well, there’s still PRA violations and getting the records under control for appropriate use and all but for the serious stuff, yeah, this is all a side show. Kind of interesting that DoJ is letting this go on since 11th circuit agreed with them that Cannon doesn’t have jurisdiction in this matter. In some ways I guess it helps them get a preview and maybe even early defusing of some of his arguments.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2022 03:15
|
|
|
Murgos posted:Well, there’s still PRA violations and getting the records under control for appropriate use and all but for the serious stuff, yeah, this is all a side show. I mean, for all we know "letting this go" means they're just doing less public stuff cause it's back-burnered but not forgotten. No idea what, but I'm just guessing that they at least left the equivalent of Kevin the Intern on it or something.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2022 03:50
|
|
|
Fuschia tude posted:Link? https://projects.propublica.org/coronavirus/bailouts/loans/mueller-she-wrote-4869517304 Also some bits from the lawsuit against her by her employee here: https://twitter.com/fishontherun2/status/1554339615447740416?s=46&t=lkiepm_IU7Wv62cFOs9OxA And just for catty fun: https://twitter.com/buniculatv/status/1531432654922465282?s=46&t=lkiepm_IU7Wv62cFOs9OxA
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2022 04:20
|
|
|
selec posted:https://projects.propublica.org/coronavirus/bailouts/loans/mueller-she-wrote-4869517304 The ProPublica link doesn't prove that and the rest are (AFAIK) unproven allegations. Also the whole "how dare she take PPP loan forgiveness while she buys a pool" thing is so loving stupid. Personal income and business income is not the same thing. I'm not going to speak to the allegations in the lawsuit, because I have no evidence one way or the other, but using these tweets as some kind of evidence is laughable and you should be embarrassed. Fart Amplifier fucked around with this message at 06:47 on Sep 30, 2022 |
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2022 06:31
|
|
|
selec posted:https://projects.propublica.org/coronavirus/bailouts/loans/mueller-she-wrote-4869517304 Huh, and here I thought the first clue to whether or not the "Mueller, She Wrote" podcast lady kind of really loving sucked was that she 1) built her brand off of Robert Mueller's name, and 2) kept using the loving name into what is now the closing months of Twenty Goddamn Twenty Two AD. So yeah, I can totally buy that this woman would be out of touch with reality enough to... do all of that poo poo, I guess. Making a podcast about people who you think are going to face consequences for political crime poo poo that invokes the name of Robert Mueller is like hosting a podcast about cracking open old safes in search of fabulous treasures and naming it after Geraldo Rivera 
nine-gear crow fucked around with this message at 10:53 on Sep 30, 2022 |
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2022 10:48
|
|
|
You got a link to the actual lawsuit? Because I don’t think the twitter account of someone using it to promote onlyfans is a credible one.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2022 11:14
|
|
|
Just a reminder that PPP "loans" were never meant to really be loans from the very beginning. They were always intended, and everyone involved knew this, to be a bribe to businesses to not lay off their employees. It was structured as a loan to force them to pay the money back if they didn't hold up their end of the bargain. And yes, for businesses that were doing well and never intended to lay off employees, it was free money, but it was a crisis and we didn't have time for complicated bureaucracy.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2022 14:04
|
|
|
It was also never meant for businesses like "a podcast". That poo poo was for restaurants and hotels and airlines and retail. poo poo where people needed to interact in person and weren't allowed to. Not podcasts and personally assistants to guillotine fodder. Making it happen quickly necessitated few restrictions, but that poo poo got ABUSED.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2022 14:56
|
|
|
any successful business owner knows that you don't need employees or equipment to be successful. All you need is more stock, which you can borrow against to buy stuff. Stuff like a jet ski.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2022 15:23
|
|
|
Cranappleberry posted:any successful business owner knows that you don't need employees or equipment to be successful. All you need is more stock, which you can borrow against to buy stuff. Stuff like a jet ski. I'm stealing this and making it my LinkedIn header.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2022 15:28
|
|
|
Boris Galerkin posted:You got a link to the actual lawsuit? Because I don’t think the twitter account of someone using it to promote onlyfans is a credible one. Onlyfans is just another job and I think you’re weirder for pointing it out than they are for operating one. Despite this, I saved you ten seconds on google: https://unicourt.com/case/ca-sd-johnson-vs-gill-1058793 (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST) selec fucked around with this message at 15:49 on Sep 30, 2022 |
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2022 15:46
|
|
|
selec posted:Onlyfans is just another job and I think you’re weirder for pointing it out than they are for operating one. For future reference, next time lead with the actual source instead of a Twitter rando sharing cropped screenshots with no link back to source. e: like you posted the claim, the googling is on you
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2022 20:22
|
|
|
ReidRansom posted:It was also never meant for businesses like "a podcast". That poo poo was for restaurants and hotels and airlines and retail. poo poo where people needed to interact in person and weren't allowed to. Not podcasts and personally assistants to guillotine fodder. Making it happen quickly necessitated few restrictions, but that poo poo got ABUSED. I was laid off the day I came back from parental leave and given an 14 week garden leave, coincidentally right when the PPP loans would of run out.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2022 20:33
|
|
|
Rigel posted:Just a reminder that PPP "loans" were never meant to really be loans from the very beginning. They were always intended, and everyone involved knew this, to be a bribe to businesses to not lay off their employees. It was structured as a loan to force them to pay the money back if they didn't hold up their end of the bargain. And yes, for businesses that were doing well and never intended to lay off employees, it was free money, but it was a crisis and we didn't have time for complicated bureaucracy. lol yeah totally, it was the best system they could come up with. Definitely not free money to businesses with almost 0 strings attached.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2022 21:08
|
|
|
Is this the new bad with money thread? Let's see, "January 6th". Oh yes. https://www.mediaite.com/politics/bennie-thompson-confirms-jan-6-committee-will-release-its-final-report-before-the-midterms/ Bennie says report release is scheduled before midterms. https://www.reuters.com/legal/jury-is-selected-oath-keepers-capitol-riot-trial-2022-09-29/ Opening arguments start Monday. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-maggie-haberman-book-desantis-b2176151.html Interesting. Must admit to not really knowing the author/chronicler, but it seems she had lots of inside info, include Trump telling her that he was in meetings 1/6, directly contradicting eye witnesses saying Peach was watching television. (I've earned an off topic post now, right? https://www.murkowski.senate.gov/press/release/murkowski-sullivan-introduce-bill-to-recognize-the-legacy-of-the-late-congressman-don-young- It's called loving Mount Cerberus because it has three points you loving chuds. What's next, when you get a majority in the house you're going to call it The Floor For Facism?!) https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/09/30/trump-lawyers-kise-corcoran-bobb/ DoublePeached is not listening to his $3M lawyer. https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/tennessee-man-pleads-guilty-felony-charges-actions-during-jan-6-capitol-breach 1/6 rioter pleads guilty to felony obstruction with advanced planning. PhantomOfTheCopier fucked around with this message at 23:26 on Sep 30, 2022 |
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2022 23:24
|
|
|
Potential posting about posters removed
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2022 00:37
|
|
|
Here's a fun one. An Oath Keepers bigwig just learned, apparently, of a witness that could support him. https://mobile.twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1576597300012408832 It wasn't until Rhodes' notes were shared last week that the Meggs learned about Siemens... which is understandable, given that Siemens has spent the year as chairman of the Patriots Legal Defense Fund, a grift setup by Stewart Rhodes for the purpose of.... bankrolling Oath Keeper defenses.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2022 18:26
|
|
|
Looks who's appealing to SCOTSU, it's out special boy! https://twitter.com/SCOTUSblog/status/1577386826112827392 As usual, IANAL but seems pretty desperate and unlikely to do anything
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2022 22:12
|
|
|
In a 6-3 decision....
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2022 22:26
|
|
|
BigBallChunkyTime posted:In a 6-3 decision.... I am unclear what you think this meme adds to the discussion. There are no justices who are slavish zombies for Donald Trump, and there aren't actually that many who are slavish zombies for the Republican Party. Slavish zombies for the federalist society are more common but not QUITE the same thing. This appeal is basically nonsense and it's nonsense in a way that is unlikely to appeal to the sensibilities of six justices. Even Alito, arguably the worst justice on the court, is going to be confronted with the conflict between "help Trump" and "never, under any circumstances, give the slightest assistance or credence to anyone the cops suspect of a crime". E: on a related "it's not as simple as making a 6-3 decision shitpost" topic, https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1576931875670614018 Goatse James Bond fucked around with this message at 22:41 on Oct 4, 2022 |
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2022 22:35
|
|
|
I can't imagine SCOTUS liking the idea that Trump expects them to drop everything to rule in his favor
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2022 22:37
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/rgoodlaw/status/1577267264872910848
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2022 22:39
|
|
|
GreyjoyBastard posted:
hmmmm. Maybe not him specifically but certainly his brand of politics. Also, Thomas should instantly recuse himself for obvious reasons (but he won't) and that right there speaks to something. To me anyway. Also, lol, I caught a whiff of Hannity today and didn't learn until a few hours ago that Lindell has moved on with his business model of adding "My" onto an existing, widely available, affordable product, up charging it by 200% and pretending it's superior and inherently patriotic by virtue of being advertised on FOX News and talk radio. Today was the day I learned about "My Slippers". What are we up to now, product wise, here with this huckster? Because the possibilities are endless. You can "My _____________" any loving thing and I fully expect it tbh. Winter is coming up and I need a My Scarf, a My Log and some My Gloves. ... My Post.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2022 00:43
|
|
|
Trump's election cases were all slapped down 7-2 or 8-1. Don't see why this would be different.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2022 01:00
|
|
|
Has anyone told DoublePeach (or the supreme court for that matter) thatsomeone A posted:in positions of great responsibility every one should do his duty to the best of his ability where assigned by competent authority, without application or the use of influence to change his position. Or that someone B posted:The power confided to us increases the weight of our obligations to the people, and we must be profoundly sensible of them... Aiming only at the public good, we cannot err. Or that someone C posted:I believe in a strong executive; I believe in power, but I believe that responsibility should go with power, and that it is not well that the strong executive should be a perpetual executive Or that someone D posted:in a democratic world, as in a democratic Nation, power must be linked with responsibility, and obliged to defend and justify itself within the framework of the general good Given our great heritage, I assume that several SC judges, who are interested in traditionalism and originalism, some circuit court judges, a number of 2016 thru 2020 executive branch officials, as well as a dozen people violating national archives expectations and the country's security policies, will immediately want to get themselves broadcast on every available airwave and virtual platform, that they might issue an immediate apology for their failures to uphold their oaths of office, as well as identifying the self-imposed public services they will support and engage upon to repay society. A: Ulysses S Grant 1885 B: William McKinley 1899 C: Theodore Roosevelt 1908 D: Franklin Roosevelt 1945 ps. Historians are clearly waiting for things to work themselves out, but various surveys consistently place trump in the bottom five. https://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/presidents-ranked-worst-best/4/ This seems likely only to get worse in the next decade, and when it becomes official that T caused an insurrection, perhaps they'll finally realize that's actually worse than "not doing enough to prevent the civil war". PhantomOfTheCopier fucked around with this message at 08:17 on Oct 5, 2022 |
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2022 07:46
|
|
|
Well it's a florping month away but presumably faster than the 11th would normally hear an appeal. https://twitter.com/roblegare/status/1577705335418195968?s=21
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2022 18:37
|
|
|
PhantomOfTheCopier posted:Well it's a florping month away but presumably faster than the 11th would normally hear an appeal. A month and change? That's pretty loving fast for a federal appellate court, isn't it? Like, 1/10th or less of the usual wait?
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2022 18:41
|
|
|
Xiahou Dun posted:A month and change? 
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2022 22:20
|
|
|
Well it's in the south so you might have expected 3/5
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2022 05:32
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/KatiePhang/status/1578138731432878080
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2022 22:47
|
|
|
Erm, were the 6hr of missing call logs among the documents recovered in the search? Page6 here refers to recovered calls https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.40.0.pdf But it's not clear those are logs from January 6.
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2022 23:44
|
|
|
Think the court will go along? https://twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1577887661217484804
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2022 04:24
|
|
|
This motherfucker... https://twitter.com/rgoodlaw/status/1578169988178882560
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2022 05:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 11:03 |
|
|
Something is happening right now.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2022 06:01
|
|