Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
Shes Not Impressed
Apr 25, 2004


Orio posted:

It would be a war crime, but the evidence submitted isn't really sufficient to make any judgments. But what rule would this be breaking? I think being so extremely aggressive in prohibiting any discussion of potential Ukrainian wrongdoing is a little ridiculous.

There's no evidence of it seemingly beyond the tweet so what should we talk about that isn't just making things up? Besides, it's a Russian source saying it. Of course they want to have an excuse for why Ukrainians are bad even when they're losing.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




Shes Not Impressed posted:

There's no evidence of it seemingly beyond the tweet so what should we talk about that isn't just making things up? Besides, it's a Russian source saying it. Of course they want to have an excuse for why Ukrainians are bad even when they're losing.

All of that is irrelevant to the thread rule against cosplaying an ICC judge, besides tangentially making the content even less interesting to read than it was the last 10 times.

Feliday Melody
May 8, 2021

Why would Ukrainians ever wear a Z? Is there anything less desirable to be in Ukraine than a Russian soldier?

What are they going to do? Sneak behind Russian lines and get beaten up and robbed by Russian soldiers who thinks they're Russian too?

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Deteriorata
Feb 6, 2005

e: nm

Mikojan
May 12, 2010

Would painting Z's on their own tanks fall under perfidy?

Geneva convention states

quote:

Article 39. – Emblems of nationality

1. It is prohibited to make use in an armed conflict of the flags or military emblems, insignia or uniforms of neutral or other States not Parties to the conflict.

2. It is prohibited to make use of the flags or military emblems, insignia or uniforms of adverse Parties while engaging in attacks or to shield, favour, protect or impede military operations.

I doubt this actually happened

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




Please read the thread rules, people. I'm not going to tolerate an evening of people copy-pasting the Geneva Convention and making “legal arguments” about whether if a court would find that someone is a party to the conflict or something is their insignia. Especially on this occasion, when the sum of “evidence” is a third-party rumour filtered through a Russian “war correspondent”.


That was a perfectly fine post, and I have no idea why you deleted it. The only conversation I care to prevent here is a tedious derail about the Geneva convention.

cinci zoo sniper fucked around with this message at 16:05 on Oct 4, 2022

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa
This war has gotten too brutal for even Geneva conventions to help :ohdear:

https://twitter.com/kyivpost/status/1576979159959552002
https://twitter.com/cokedupoptions/status/1577005270500184065
https://twitter.com/lewis_baston/status/1576983673005834240

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

KitConstantine
Jan 11, 2013

This is a really cool video of Ukrainian soldiers performing a bridging operation - including evac of a wounded soldier right at the beginning. big recommend.
https://twitter.com/GirkinGirkin/status/1577308466649120768?s=20&t=L2VZBwRMxF5CG_fbFOhGBw
Apparently the Ukrainians are planning to push as deep in Luhansk as they can - warning from the local authorities
https://twitter.com/liz_cookman/status/1577309482400489480?s=20&t=L2VZBwRMxF5CG_fbFOhGBw
From Russia - apparently if you sign up for the FSB you can get out of frontline service (though it's reported FSB agents have been present in Ukraine for 'interrogations' (read: torture sessions)
https://twitter.com/NoYardstick/status/1577282312018210818?s=20&t=NLQvF6wPbKh-EAP-IDo0MQ
Really interesting article about the possible future of Russia under Putin - the author is very well-versed in modern Russian culture. Their blog is also quite good.
https://twitter.com/NoYardstick/status/1577287057889976323?s=20&t=NLQvF6wPbKh-EAP-IDo0MQ
Selections - there's a lot of good stuff, so sorry this got long

quote:

...
First, some quick caveats: Russia is not currently, nor is it likely to become, a full-blown dictatorship. There’s a lot of debate about how constrained Russian president Vladimir Putin is in his actions – both in how Russia is conducting the war, and on the ‘home front’ inside the country. There’s also, understandably, anger among supporters of Ukraine, who rightly question why there is no uprising in Russia against mobilisation.

But if you are surprised by Russians’ inability or unwillingness to resist, you do not have a realistic picture of just how effective Putin’s punitive state is.
...
By now, the Russian securitised state is a machine that largely runs on automatic. The leader can issue commands, and some of them are important, but most have so many layers of execution to work through that inevitably the original orders get distorted.
...

An automatic machine can have many lines of command, and its functioning can be compromised by too much input, even if broadly the commands work to the same purpose. That Russia will likely not look like North Korea, or even China, is down to the high degree of competition and conflict between factions in the regime. The emergence of new security players (like Evgeny Prigozhin, head of the private security firm Wagner), and the lack of clear agreements on ‘territories’ in the Russian economy where there is high-level corruption are also relevant. These destabilising elements were always present in Russia; the war is accelerating and exacerbating them. We can add to the mix failing social provisions, which were previously a key source of regime legitimacy and part of the ‘fair bargain’ for regular Russians’ agreement to be apolitical.

So why and how might Russia nonetheless come to resemble a state like North Korea? The answer is in the even more extreme model of coercion and personalised rule that the territories in southern and eastern Ukraine represent.
...
Since 2014, the Luhansk and Donetsk ‘republics’ have differed from Russia in the sense that the rule of law – which was still meaningful in Russia – does not apply there. Even now, people in Russia can resist the state – even the mobilisation – using legal means as well as social pressure. They might not ultimately be successful, but they can still resist.

But in these territories, and future Russia, emergency rule and military concerns will overrule due process and the trappings of legal order. This would be a logical conclusion to Putin’s slippery slope towards a ‘barracks state’, where power and brute force are the principal forms of regulation. Except it will still be state capitalism, where the Russian elites will continue to taste the fruits of corrupt rent-seeking and enjoy an opulent lifestyle; subjects (no longer citizens) will be divided into quasi-feudal estates; and Russian state security personnel will get more rations and nicer bunks than the rest.
...
But given Putin’s isolation, and his background, it’s not hard to believe he looks at the territories in eastern Ukraine and sees a ‘simpler life’, where his inputs to the system are less likely to be frustrated.

For 20 years, he has been used to thinking of himself as the ultimate arbiter of personalised deals, dividing resources and their allocation in Russia. However, the same period showed how often his commands resulted in inefficiency, more corruption and what I’ve called an ‘incoherent’ state.

It’s a mark of Putin’s continuing hubris that he might believe that making the whole of Russia into a ‘People’s Republic’, like in Donbas, would see him retain control as the ‘warlord’ king. More likely this process will just accelerate the disintegration of the Russian state into lawless misery – a situation that is already true for residents of occupied eastern Ukraine.

Staluigi
Jun 22, 2021

Really feels like they're just describing a dictatorship there

Chalks
Sep 30, 2009

Some rumours about where the Russians may fall back to on the Kherson front. This would be a huge retreat if true

https://twitter.com/WarMonitor3/status/1577331254764208129

Edit: I believe it's suggesting something like this:

Chalks fucked around with this message at 17:43 on Oct 4, 2022

Cicero
Dec 17, 2003

Jumpjet, melta, jumpjet. Repeat for ten minutes or until victory is assured.

Tree Bucket posted:

It's so weird following this war through twitter maps and forum posts. It's like... the Russian army is this kind of inert mass that just sits there getting bits sliced out of it by Ukrainian pincers, envelopments and strikes. Particularly when compared to the opening month of the war.
Remember during the late spring and summer months when Russia was still slowly grinding out territory, and many people were like, "well yeah they're still slowly gaining, but it looks like they're expending too much strength to do it, they can't keep this up forever"?

This is what the conclusion of that looks like, probably. They expended their strength to make minor gains (especially once HIMARS started hitting their logistics) and now they're too understrength to resist, hence struggling to respond to even obvious Ukrainian maneuvers like taking Lyman, and needing to order a partial mobilization to try and bring more troops in. Their more experienced and trained troops are mostly dead, wounded, captured, escaped to back home, or exhausted from too many months at the front without rotation.

Meanwhile, Ukraine was gradually integrating more and more Western weapons, and getting more and more new troops trained, either by themselves or by friendly nations, as they called for mobilization early. By this point Ukraine just has more troops, and due to being much less of a corrupt authoritarian poo poo hole, they're using them much more intelligently as well.

Deteriorata
Feb 6, 2005

Chalks posted:

Some rumours about where the Russians may fall back to on the Kherson front. This would be a huge retreat if true

https://twitter.com/WarMonitor3/status/1577331254764208129

https://twitter.com/NOELreports/status/1577260136908800000

Failboattootoot
Feb 6, 2011

Enough of this nonsense. You are an important mayor and this absurd contraption has wasted enough of your time.
It's so weird to me how some Russian media people keep floating NATO is in Ukraine as... some kind of defense? If your army is getting dumpstered by your biggest enemy, isn't that still a pretty bad look? It's probably just cover for further escalation, and it's not like that kind of cognitive dissonance is uncommon, but still.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




https://twitter.com/fa_burkhardt/status/1577327961082155010

https://twitter.com/maxfras/status/1577325139565465601

https://twitter.com/daniel_mcdowell/status/1577288468086116352

https://twitter.com/maxseddon/status/1577227851568271360

https://twitter.com/maxseddon/status/1577190430747279362

https://twitter.com/maxseddon/status/1577189269491355648

https://twitter.com/maxseddon/status/1577187732757282817

https://twitter.com/x1skv/status/1577186524596011009

https://twitter.com/dandeluce/status/1576980197190123520

https://twitter.com/maria_shagina/status/1576969041507274753

https://twitter.com/maxseddon/status/1576955072168488961

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound

Failboattootoot posted:

It's so weird to me how some Russian media people keep floating NATO is in Ukraine as... some kind of defense? If your army is getting dumpstered by your biggest enemy, isn't that still a pretty bad look? It's probably just cover for further escalation, and it's not like that kind of cognitive dissonance is uncommon, but still.

A big driver of this war was racism. Imagine how the confederate army would have reacted if they'd gotten their rear end kicked trying to invade post-revolutionary Haiti.

Nato is a big bad enemy. It's more tolerable to get your rear end kicked by a big powerful enemy than by a people you see as "lesser".

Fray
Oct 22, 2010

Failboattootoot posted:

It's so weird to me how some Russian media people keep floating NATO is in Ukraine as... some kind of defense? If your army is getting dumpstered by your biggest enemy, isn't that still a pretty bad look? It's probably just cover for further escalation, and it's not like that kind of cognitive dissonance is uncommon, but still.

Yes. But it’s the only way at this point to pretend they’re not losing to the people they consider their idiot hillbilly cousins.

fatherboxx
Mar 25, 2013

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

A big driver of this war was racism. Imagine how the confederate army would have reacted if they'd gotten their rear end kicked trying to invade post-revolutionary Haiti.

Nato is a big bad enemy. It's more tolerable to get your rear end kicked by a big powerful enemy than by a people you see as "lesser".

I am sure if we dig into more bloodthirsty Vietnam War correspondence we would find numerous misattributions of local defeats to scary professional soviet "advisors"

the holy poopacy
May 16, 2009

hey! check this out
Fun Shoe

Failboattootoot posted:

It's so weird to me how some Russian media people keep floating NATO is in Ukraine as... some kind of defense? If your army is getting dumpstered by your biggest enemy, isn't that still a pretty bad look? It's probably just cover for further escalation, and it's not like that kind of cognitive dissonance is uncommon, but still.

:umberto:

From the start of the Ukraine project the propaganda has revolved around how scary and threatening NATO is. There's some notion that NATO is desperately pouring its entire strength into keeping NATO afloat against a small handful of elite Russian units on a limited special operation, which is part of the whole dance around mobilization: it's vitally important that Russia projects the image that it's not actually fighting with its full strength, because admitting that they've liquidated most of their conventional military capability and are still losing would be disastrous. But NATO has always been the evil empire being fought by plucky little Russia.

Neorxenawang
Jun 9, 2003

fatherboxx posted:

Ideological and imperial

Русский is often meant as ethnically Russian, while российский is always "of the russian state". Russian nationalists loathe the words российский and россиянин while for every non-white person in Russia русский as an adjective before unusual things is a red flag.

Think English vs British, sort of, how the former frequently has nationalistic connotations.

cinci zoo sniper posted:

The linguistic distinction is about as common and clear as a distinction between a brick and an apple, meaning that the only shift is with people who find it imperative to put an accent on Russian ethnicity for a reason, which is going to be highly dependent on what sort of people you’re hearing.

It's hard to stay on top of this thread, but I wanted to say thanks for these responses! So basically it is exactly the red flag it seemed to be.

Cicero
Dec 17, 2003

Jumpjet, melta, jumpjet. Repeat for ten minutes or until victory is assured.
"I'm not getting any weaker," announces very strong man.

Shes Not Impressed
Apr 25, 2004


https://twitter.com/paulmcleary/status/1577343689382313984?s=20&t=OFkskxQUhHNvR9QpQN-dXQ

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy
^^^
Weren't they going to send another dozen HIMARS?


This is pretty :lol:

This is google translated with some manual fixes for our friends

quote:

"Crimeaisours" was the first stage of the "Ukrainian trap" designed for us. The old principle worked: give a little so that you can get everything later. Now it's already obvious.
I look at everything that is happening in Ukraine and clearly see that we have been set up with a classic strategic trap. It was obvious, but we, nevertheless, climbed into it ourselves. Why did emotions win over reason? We were strongly motivated to do this back in 2014.

The essence of the "Ukrainian trap" is simple. All the expert assessments of the Western military leaked to the media kept repeating: Ukraine will not last even a week against Russia. We picked up this misinformation every time and through our media convinced ourselves of this nonsense.
Russian troops entered Ukraine, fully sharing this illusion: an easy walk ahead and flowers on the armor. They even brought dress uniforms for the forthcoming parade in Kyiv. This is how not very far-sighted bosses train personnel.

But it was not there. Our fighters were met with fierce fire and Jevelins. Then we were allowed to get bogged down in viscous battles, and then quickly formed a pro-Ukrainian coalition of 54 leading economically developed countries. Enormous military and economic aid went to Ukraine.

The balance of forces and resources changes daily. The potential of Ukraine due to the supply of high-tech and high-precision weapons is growing, and ours, due to natural losses at the front, sparingly speaking, is not increasing. We are replacing the retired most trained soldiers with mobilized, poorly motivated, and sometimes even demotivated by forced mobilization, practically untrained civilians.
As a result, we have constructed a situation where it is difficult to win, and it is impossible to leave without losing face and collapsing the internal political vertical. That's it, the trap is slammed!

What shaped the image of an easy victory in the minds of the military-political leaders?
Enchanting return of the Crimea. The "designers" of the trap had calculated and taken into account everything down to the molecules. Was there a colossal support for our "little green men" by the Crimeans? Was. Was the motivation of people to vote for joining the Russian Federation high? Too much!

And most importantly, there was no military resistance. Why? The Ukrainian military received an order: leave without a fight! And they obeyed the order - they left.
It was this and much that came with it that created the illusion that the whole of Ukraine would react in the same way to Russia's forcible entry into its territory.
It must be admitted that in 2014 there were much more pro-Russian Ukrainian citizens than now.

However, time was lost, and propaganda on both sides pitted the two fraternal peoples for 8 years. Russophobia and Ukrainophobia have become the main content of TV channels. The results have been stunning. And what is the result? In Ukraine, Russia has been made into an insane monster. From Ukraine, in the minds of Russians, an image was blinded, where all the Nazis and Bandera, who dream of cutting us, even Ukrainian Jews, including Zelensky himself.
All this propaganda work has formed intransigence and worked against the SVO, since our state information resource, through the pumping of Russophobia, motivated Ukrainian citizens to desperate resistance: victory or death.

The work done could not but affect the behavior of the fighters on the battlefield. Being pitted, both armies fight furiously. To death!
As a result, an ideal situation has developed for a third party - a strategic planner, when it is he who largely controls the development of the situation on the fields of military and political battles and can keep the fire burning at his discretion, throwing logs with support from one side or the other.
designing the parties to agree if the main levers of influence on the situation are in their hands?

tl;dr: we owned ourselves so hard, it couldn't possibly be our fault

Paladinus
Jan 11, 2014

heyHEYYYY!!!

Important to not here that it's not an excess of 700k, but 700k in total. A lot of people travel for work, there are mixed families, truck drivers, etc., and many of them return. Kazakhstan published some stats, where out of 140k people who visited the country, at least half have already returned to Russia. The real number of people escaping mobilisation is probably close to 150-200k. Some more will try to leave, and some will return if they can't settle in the new place.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




mobby_6kl posted:

^^^
Weren't they going to send another dozen HIMARS?

18 announced, the timeline for those is 1 or 2 years, I don’t remember. 4 is the first, immediate batch. The reason for longer timeline is that I think these are rolling into Ukraine direct from factory, the question pending on the first batch.

Tomn
Aug 23, 2007

And the angel said unto him
"Stop hitting yourself. Stop hitting yourself."
But lo he could not. For the angel was hitting him with his own hands

mobby_6kl posted:

^^^
Weren't they going to send another dozen HIMARS?

This is pretty :lol:

This is google translated with some manual fixes for our friends

tl;dr: we owned ourselves so hard, it couldn't possibly be our fault

I like how this whole thing rests on the assumption that Russian military intelligence consisted solely of watching Western news channels, with no other attempt to verify this information via, like, espionage or the like.

Even when trying to explain away their failures as a Western plot they own themselves.

madeintaipei
Jul 13, 2012

fatherboxx posted:

I am sure if we dig into more bloodthirsty Vietnam War correspondence we would find numerous misattributions of local defeats to scary professional soviet "advisors"

Analogy incoming!

I'd say more like Rhodesians, South Africans, and the Portuguese bitching about Soviets and E. Germans. Sure, them being there had an outsized effect, but it was Africans doing the fighting. All of the former were avowed racists with a political need to define black Africans as "the lesser", even if they fought on the same side.

Not that they could have actually done anything about the latter being in Africa, helping Africans. Not that any of what they did do served their ultimate aims. Africans won, remaining colonialists left or were integrated into the new order, and the Eastern Bloc kept friendly-ish relations while gaining arms contracts.

I don't mean to paint a rosy picture about the Border Wars, or post-colonial Africa in general. Just letting a snowball roll down a hill.

Warbadger
Jun 17, 2006

mobby_6kl posted:

^^^
Weren't they going to send another dozen HIMARS?

This is pretty :lol:

This is google translated with some manual fixes for our friends

tl;dr: we owned ourselves so hard, it couldn't possibly be our fault

"No way out"
-Brought to you by the side who can literally just leave, abandon the locations they're occupying in the neighboring country they invaded, and the war ends.

Warbadger fucked around with this message at 19:00 on Oct 4, 2022

PerilPastry
Oct 10, 2012
Very good article on the NS sabotage and on how threatening this kind of hybrid action offers Russia extra rungs on the escalation ladder:

"Experts say damage to the Nord Stream 1 and 2 gas pipelines is a cynical use of a “gray zone” aggression that leaves few good options for retribution.

“We have war-gamed this for years, we’ve always been a bit afraid that this is something that the Russians could do if they wanted to,” said Jim Townsend, who served as deputy assistant secretary of Defense for Europe and NATO during the Obama administration.

“I think all of us have got to know that Putin has other cards that he can play besides conventional or nuclear, he’s got something in between — this critical infrastructure that can be a target.”"

https://thehill.com/policy/international/3668946-pipeline-sabotage-is-mystery-but-putin-russia-are-prime-suspects/

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

Warbadger posted:

"No way out"
-Brought to you by the side who can literally just leave, abandon the locations they're occupying in the neighboring country they invaded, and the war ends.
Like a monkey with a hand stuck in coconut. Simply no way out (unless I let the rice go).

cinci zoo sniper posted:

18 announced, the timeline for those is 1 or 2 years, I don’t remember. 4 is the first, immediate batch. The reason for longer timeline is that I think these are rolling into Ukraine direct from factory, the question pending on the first batch.

Oh, thanks. I remember reading they were part of this package so I thought they'd be shipped out promptly. I'm hoping the reason is that more aren't currently needed, because Biden sure as hell has hundreds of them sitting in garages.

Tuna-Fish
Sep 13, 2017

mobby_6kl posted:

Weren't they going to send another dozen HIMARS?

Yes, it's a different package. The US is providing support using multiple different mechanism. The one posted above is about the presidential drawdown authority, which allows the POTUS to send equipment from US military stocks. The 18 additional HIMARS were part of lend-lease, and were bought new from the manufacturer, not sent from DoD stocks. They will be delivered over a much longer timescale, it's something like one per month iirc.

Herstory Begins Now
Aug 5, 2003
SOME REALLY TEDIOUS DUMB SHIT THAT SUCKS ASS TO READ ->>

Tomn posted:

I like how this whole thing rests on the assumption that Russian military intelligence consisted solely of watching Western news channels, with no other attempt to verify this information via, like, espionage or the like.

Even when trying to explain away their failures as a Western plot they own themselves.

Influence operations feedback looping back into reporting on foreign sentiments seems to be a recurring problem. It makes sense, too: the people meant to be monitoring foreign media and discourse are going to report back on the rise in messaging that just happens to be what they're hoping to see or have been instructed to look out for. After a few cycles of that it's going to rapidly solidify the perception that the foreign position is strikingly similar to your own beliefs!

At times you can see some of this happening with all the pro-Ukraine reporting on Russian telegram channels, which are being spammed with false reports from pro-Ukraine people and a few times now this has led to reported Ukrainian successes getting walked back, sometimes dozens of kilometers or more. Obviously I'm not saying that's the only reason why rumors spread, very much the opposite, it's just seems to consistently come up any time you are both trying to observe and influence some kind of social commons type space. Particularly with opposition sources, there's a widespread tendency on all sides to take negative news reported as likely credible because 'why would they make up bad news?' which neglects a variety of reasons why seemingly negative news might not be what it purports to be.

With that said, man there are a lot of layers to unwrap wrt why Russian leadership got almost everything about Ukraine so wrong

Herstory Begins Now fucked around with this message at 19:17 on Oct 4, 2022

Popete
Oct 6, 2009

This will make sure you don't suggest to the KDz
That he should grow greens instead of crushing on MCs

Grimey Drawer
Russian sponsored disinformation campaigns coming back around to convince Russian leadership to conduct a failed invasion is pretty on point though.

TulliusCicero
Jul 29, 2017



Failboattootoot posted:

It's so weird to me how some Russian media people keep floating NATO is in Ukraine as... some kind of defense? If your army is getting dumpstered by your biggest enemy, isn't that still a pretty bad look? It's probably just cover for further escalation, and it's not like that kind of cognitive dissonance is uncommon, but still.

It is pretty hilarious that some of the Russian nationalists had this mentality of Russia taking on all of NATO when individial countries like Finland at this point would give Russia a run for its money.

The Russian military and it's preparation/ ability just looks...sad at this point. Like put it out of its misery sad. "Superpower" is a loving joke.

TulliusCicero fucked around with this message at 19:37 on Oct 4, 2022

Telsa Cola
Aug 19, 2011

No... this is all wrong... this whole operation has just gone completely sidewaysface
I'm actually kinda curious about the cultural impact this is going to have given the absolute botched nature of the Russian response.

By this I mean the Soviets and Russia have been a staple, to be feared, antagonist in lots of media and peer to peer war games and I'm wondering if in the near future we are going to see a sharp decline in this as a result of how bad they are performing with a pivot to someone else.

TulliusCicero
Jul 29, 2017



Telsa Cola posted:

I'm actually kinda curious about the cultural impact this is going to have given the absolute botched nature of the Russian response.

By this I mean the Soviets and Russia have been a staple, to be feared, antagonist in lots of media and peer to peer war games and I'm wondering if in the near future we are going to see a sharp decline in this as a result of how bad they are performing with a pivot to someone else.

I think that NATO both got a reason to exist in the 21st century and got to go "lmao look at these fuckin clowns compared to us", which is a huge loss of Russian clout.

I think Russia will increasingly be seen in the vein of North Korea by the rest of the world: a wierd country nobody really talks about unless it's about some insane thing they believe/ did.

Doccers
Aug 15, 2000


Patron Saint of Chickencheese

TulliusCicero posted:

It is pretty hilarious that some of the Russian nationalists had this mentality of Russia taking on all of NATO when individial countries like Finland at this point would give Russia a run for its money.

The Russian military and it's preparation/ ability just looks...sad at this point. Like put it out of its misery sad. "Superpower" is a loving a joke.

They mis-spelled "subpar power".

Also it sounds like Ukraine has been having fun with Russian comms, since they operate mainly on commercial analog unscrambled sets at this point, giving fake confusing/conflicting orders, and then hard jamming the frequencies, effectively confusing and isolating pockets/units as they roll in a coordinated assault.

WarpedLichen
Aug 14, 2008


Telsa Cola posted:

I'm actually kinda curious about the cultural impact this is going to have given the absolute botched nature of the Russian response.

By this I mean the Soviets and Russia have been a staple, to be feared, antagonist in lots of media and peer to peer war games and I'm wondering if in the near future we are going to see a sharp decline in this as a result of how bad they are performing with a pivot to someone else.

I would argue media largely moved on to the middle eastern conflicts in recent years and this conflict would shift the focus back.

Media in general has never had a problem with enemies that are threats on paper hindered by absolute incompetence. It seems like that's the preferred archetype. I'm sure we will get a Call of Duty in this setting before long. What are the alternatives really? China seems like a poor pick given how sensitive the government is over there about being portrayed as the bad guys.

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

Herstory Begins Now posted:

Influence operations feedback looping back into reporting on foreign sentiments seems to be a recurring problem. It makes sense, too: the people meant to be monitoring foreign media and discourse are going to report back on the rise in messaging that just happens to be what they're hoping to see or have been instructed to look out for. After a few cycles of that it's going to rapidly solidify the perception that the foreign position is strikingly similar to your own beliefs!

At times you can see some of this happening with all the pro-Ukraine reporting on Russian telegram channels, which are being spammed with false reports from pro-Ukraine people and a few times now this has led to reported Ukrainian successes getting walked back, sometimes dozens of kilometers or more. Obviously I'm not saying that's the only reason why rumors spread, very much the opposite, it's just seems to consistently come up any time you are both trying to observe and influence some kind of social commons type space. Particularly with opposition sources, there's a widespread tendency on all sides to take negative news reported as likely credible because 'why would they make up bad news?' which neglects a variety of reasons why seemingly negative news might not be what it purports to be.

With that said, man there are a lot of layers to unwrap wrt why Russian leadership got almost everything about Ukraine so wrong
I don't think it's entirely comparable to the fog of war we're all occasionally experiencing. Nobody can go and check where exactly the russians just moved in Kherson, so we have to go by legit looking information.

Before the war, any one of those assholes could've walked across the border and asked what's up. Had to be some sort of huge failure in communicating this information to the dear leader.

Fabulous Knight
Nov 11, 2011

mobby_6kl posted:

^^^
Weren't they going to send another dozen HIMARS?

This is pretty :lol:

This is google translated with some manual fixes for our friends

tl;dr: we owned ourselves so hard, it couldn't possibly be our fault

"In Ukraine, Russia has been made into an insane monster". Yeah, I don't know what might've given them such an impression. Can't think of anything right now, really.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

deathbysnusnu
Feb 25, 2016


Telsa Cola posted:

I'm actually kinda curious about the cultural impact this is going to have given the absolute botched nature of the Russian response.

By this I mean the Soviets and Russia have been a staple, to be feared, antagonist in lots of media and peer to peer war games and I'm wondering if in the near future we are going to see a sharp decline in this as a result of how bad they are performing with a pivot to someone else.

The greatest threat from this all imo is not clancychat Russia shenanigans but the us applying Russian standards to China and finding out the hard way. Institutional rot is a hell of a drug and while Russia is the Olympic gold medalist the US is an up and comer.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5