|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2022 19:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 03:56 |
|
|
VelociBacon posted:I didn't mean it as a criticism I suppose but it does seem to my eye like some sharpening is happening somewhere, I guess the sharpen for screen checkbox. They're cool scenes and the clouds do look wild. It's cool, I just like technical discussion because it's so easy to overdo basically everything and think it looks fine.. then it looks like poo poo to the world.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2022 23:52
|
|
|
    
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2022 06:01
|
|
|
i enjoyed this post
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2022 06:08
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2022 03:07
|
|
|
Yes.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2022 05:35
|
|
|
yeah, especially the first one
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2022 05:59
|
|
|
CRAYON posted:i enjoyed this post thank u
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2022 10:33
|
|
|
Is it still landscape if my dog inadvertently became the star of the shot?
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2022 02:05
|
|
|
  Some more Miami shots. Question for hobbyists: when you travel with the intention of shooting, are you solo or with others? Headphones in? If so what are you listening to? What's the workflow like? And for more serious photographers, how about you? Whenever I go to a new place I try to set aside as much time as possible for walking around, usually no more than one backup lens, one backup roll of film, and a destination in mind. I'll walk there, and walk back another way unless I found something super interesting on the way.
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2022 00:52
|
|
|
More hiking as the colors change day to day. 
Philthy fucked around with this message at 08:53 on Dec 23, 2022 |
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2022 02:09
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2022 21:13
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2022 22:51
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2022 00:20
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2022 09:26
|
|
|
 
ape fucked around with this message at 23:53 on Nov 2, 2022 |
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2022 22:11
|
|
|
This is either a vet's office or a very weirdly decorated sex dungeon.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2022 01:03
|
|
|
Helen Highwater posted:This is either a vet's office or a very weirdly decorated sex dungeon. yes
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2022 02:56
|
|
|
i like all these
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2022 03:10
|
|
|
yea good stuff
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2022 15:21
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2022 15:24
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2022 16:12
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2022 16:27
|
|
|
It was foggy last night   reaching by Tom Pepper, on Flickr  headlights by Tom Pepper, on Flickr  arrested by Tom Pepper, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2022 18:37
|
|
|
Still foggy this morning, and even now at 2pm. We've been blessed
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2022 19:21
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2022 20:58
|
|
|
I really dig this, but like, everything on this page has also been extremely good. The soothing glow of the sodium vapour lamps especially.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2022 23:24
|
|
|
Thanks. I miss them, everything is changing to LEDs here.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2022 23:53
|
|
|
   
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2022 00:57
|
|
|
still foggy tonight 
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2022 03:30
|
|
|
the fog is still here, thicker than yesterday.   
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2022 14:23
|
|
|
 Colorado Winter - Non Postcard Edition by B. B., on FlickrAnd, the weird colors I got with the combo of Classic Negative and then the dehaze slider.  Conifer Marketjplace by B. B., on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2022 16:38
|
|
|
torgeaux posted:And, the weird colors I got with the combo of Classic Negative and then the dehaze slider. Man does this one ever do something for me specifically.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2022 16:42
|
|
|
Does anyone else use negative values on dehaze? Undehaze is a valid approach I think. Talking Fuji raws here too.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2022 22:18
|
|
|
SMERSH Mouth posted:Does anyone else use negative values on dehaze? Undehaze is a valid approach I think. Talking Fuji raws here too. Never heard of that. Can you talk thru the process a bit? Sounds like the end result could be interesting. Edit: I mean, I know how to pull the slider the other way. I mean, what type of photo gives you that idea?
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2022 22:24
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2022 22:42
|
|
|
SMERSH Mouth posted:Does anyone else use negative values on dehaze? Undehaze is a valid approach I think. Talking Fuji raws here too. I've done it to cheat on creating a hint of fog, but it only works with small values on certain types of images.. generally a bright sky at the top and a dark foreground. If the image is low contrast it looks horrible, even as subtle as -5. I think it's working on a luminosity mask, targeting the highlights and blurring the mask as the values get more extreme. So if you have bright stuff in the foreground it will get foggy and look really fake. But if the brightest areas are in the distance it's somewhat convincing.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2022 00:46
|
|
|
a really good image
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2022 01:28
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2022 19:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 03:56 |
|
|
         
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2022 22:04
|
|