|
The ones who stay are probably going to quickly envy the ones who were fired.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2022 15:14 |
|
|
# ? May 17, 2024 07:55 |
|
Ghost Leviathan posted:The ones who stay are probably going to quickly envy the ones who were fired.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2022 15:18 |
|
Ghost Leviathan posted:The ones who stay are probably going to quickly envy the ones who were fired.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2022 15:46 |
|
Elon Musk’s planned Twitter layoffs are imminent Some of the greatest hits: quote:Layoffs are expected to be broad, according to three people familiar with the discussions, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe private matters. One of the first targets is likely to be legal, trust, and safety, the organization that sets policy and oversees content moderation, one of the people said. Managers in information security and privacy also were among those drawing up lists Saturday of people to lay off, said a fourth person who spoke under the same conditions.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2022 16:44 |
|
lol at the idea Tesla engineers are inherently better, just because they're already Elon's people
|
# ? Oct 30, 2022 17:10 |
|
Thanks Ants posted:lol at the idea Tesla engineers are inherently better, just because they're already Elon's people Twitters inferior engineers have not driven a single person into the back of a fire truck.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2022 17:19 |
|
Arsenic Lupin posted:Elon Musk’s planned Twitter layoffs are imminent But people will be clamoring to work for THE Elon Reeve Musk, and so would never leave a job under him unless forced! I think the thing that gets me is that he specified he wanted print-outs. That screams "I want to see big thick stacks of paper so I can feel like I do big-boy work", rather than just tracking commits into the source control.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2022 17:43 |
|
Thanks Ants posted:lol at the idea Tesla engineers are inherently better, just because they're already Elon's people
|
# ? Oct 30, 2022 19:36 |
|
Neito posted:But people will be clamoring to work for THE Elon Reeve Musk, and so would never leave a job under him unless forced! We’re going to find out that’s how Tesla does any code review
|
# ? Oct 30, 2022 19:38 |
|
i love the idea of people lining up to work at twitter because of musk. im sure the best and brightest are just lining up to work for a dubiously-profitable social media company staffed by a mercurial ceo who just fired half his staff and saddled the company with 300 million more in debt than its annual revenue. that's totally comparable to actually significant technologies like electric cars and rockets where there was previously zero private sector competition
|
# ? Oct 30, 2022 20:13 |
|
What's the social media equivalent of making a car that burns you to death or gleefully runs into pedestrians?
|
# ? Oct 30, 2022 20:17 |
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:What's the social media equivalent of making a car that burns you to death or gleefully runs into pedestrians? the algorithm feeding everyone reactionary bullshit and leading to the end of democracy.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2022 20:19 |
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:What's the social media equivalent of making a car that burns you to death or gleefully runs into pedestrians? tumblr
|
# ? Oct 30, 2022 20:22 |
|
Arivia posted:the algorithm feeding everyone reactionary bullshit and leading to the end of democracy. Oh, so they should feel right at home, then.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2022 20:29 |
|
Arsenic Lupin posted:Elon Musk’s planned Twitter layoffs are imminent i'm confused; this just seems to be a direct path to destroying Twitter as quickly as possible? Which, lol and lmao. But you can't do normal brick & mortar vulture capitalism, and creating an insane toxic environment by firing a shitload of your company and micromanaging the ones left using people who don't know their product seems like a questionable way to try and maintain your enormous social media service, let alone retain/attract better talent? like how would you gently caress up a tech company worse other than flat out dissolving the company and turning off the servers?
|
# ? Oct 30, 2022 21:42 |
|
idiotsavant posted:i'm confused; this just seems to be a direct path to destroying Twitter as quickly as possible? Which, lol and lmao. But you can't do normal brick & mortar vulture capitalism, and creating an insane toxic environment by firing a shitload of your company and micromanaging the ones left using people who don't know their product seems like a questionable way to try and maintain your enormous social media service, let alone retain/attract better talent? Owners of companies do incredibly dumb and self destructive poo poo all the time, this is par for the course.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2022 23:41 |
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:What's the social media equivalent of making a car that burns you to death or gleefully runs into pedestrians? This is more like setting fire to your own factories.
|
# ? Oct 31, 2022 00:15 |
|
Reminder: When you use a "free" service you are not the customer, you are the product.
|
# ? Oct 31, 2022 00:39 |
|
You are always the product, paid service or not.
|
# ? Oct 31, 2022 00:43 |
withak posted:Reminder: When you use a "free" service you are not the customer, you are the product. Note that this doesn't really apply to FOSS stuff, or stuff backed by non-profits. You're not a product when you use Wikipedia or Blender, for example. I'm not trying to be pedantic; I just think it's worth pointing out that there are alternatives to "pay or be the product".
|
|
# ? Oct 31, 2022 00:48 |
|
No, you are not "the product". Access to you and to information collected about you is the product.VikingofRock posted:Note that this doesn't really apply to FOSS stuff, or stuff backed by non-profits. You're not a product when you use Wikipedia or Blender, for example. I'm not trying to be pedantic; I just think it's worth pointing out that there are alternatives to "pay or be the product". When it's FOSS you're an unpaid QA tester and/or dev.
|
# ? Oct 31, 2022 00:49 |
|
There is always more, and it is always worse. https://twitter.com/alexeheath/status/1586883942870749185 quote:The directive is to change Twitter Blue, the company’s optional, $4.99 a month subscription that unlocks additional features, into a more expensive subscription that also verifies users, according to people familiar with the matter and internal correspondence seen by The Verge. Twitter is planning to charge $19.99 for the new Twitter Blue subscription, though that price is subject to change. Employees working on the project were told on Sunday that they need to meet a deadline of November 7th to launch the feature or they will be fired.
|
# ? Oct 31, 2022 02:02 |
|
Arsenic Lupin posted:There is always more, and it is always worse. That's not the kind of dev I do but it sounds completely off the wall to me to try and push a user-facing change like this in about a week. And with monetization on the line?
|
# ? Oct 31, 2022 02:06 |
|
Imagine seeing that and not laughing. Hell, I don't even work there and I'm laughing.
|
# ? Oct 31, 2022 02:09 |
|
elon overpaid for twitter and now he wants everyone else to overpay too
|
# ? Oct 31, 2022 02:13 |
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:
|
# ? Oct 31, 2022 02:18 |
|
OctaMurk posted:elon overpaid for twitter and now he wants everyone else to overpay too It's this, now that Elon owns Twitter he has to do what previous Twitter executives have only barely scratched the surface on, making the website profitable.
|
# ? Oct 31, 2022 02:21 |
|
Foxfire_ posted:Guessing that Musk has no belief that it's going to actually work/exist on that timescale and that it's a scheme to try to claim that people were fired for poor performance. Then Twitter doesn't have to pay any previously agreed severance or unemployment insurance tax increases. That won't work, but fired employees are going to have to sue to get what they're owed And they will and they will win because it's CA
|
# ? Oct 31, 2022 02:25 |
|
VikingofRock posted:Note that this doesn't really apply to FOSS stuff, or stuff backed by non-profits. You're not a product when you use Wikipedia or Blender, for example. I'm not trying to be pedantic; I just think it's worth pointing out that there are alternatives to "pay or be the product". You're definitely the product when you use Wikipedia. Just like any social media platform, it functions by monetizing the content provided for free by random unpaid users, overseen by a small army of unpaid admins. They monetize via donation-begging instead of ads, but they're still monetizing the work of random unpaid users. Absurd Alhazred posted:
Musk is definitely of the "just add a button, how hard could it possibly be" school of tech company leadership.
|
# ? Oct 31, 2022 02:33 |
|
lol if musk manages to provoke a class-action wrongful termination lawsuit within a week of owning twitter
|
# ? Oct 31, 2022 02:35 |
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:
$20 for a blue checkmark is still cheaper than an account, custom title, and plat on the forums.
|
# ? Oct 31, 2022 02:35 |
|
idiotsavant posted:lol if musk manages to provoke a class-action wrongful termination lawsuit within a week of owning twitter
|
# ? Oct 31, 2022 02:38 |
|
Mister Facetious posted:$20 for a blue checkmark is still cheaper than an account, custom title, and plat on the forums. Not per month
|
# ? Oct 31, 2022 02:40 |
|
Mister Facetious posted:$20 for a blue checkmark is still cheaper than an account, custom title, and plat on the forums. Per month though? e: heh snap
|
# ? Oct 31, 2022 02:40 |
|
idiotsavant posted:lol if musk manages to provoke a class-action wrongful termination lawsuit within a week of owning twitter Get ready to hold your sides!
|
# ? Oct 31, 2022 02:44 |
|
Riven posted:Not per month For some goons it is a weekly expense.
|
# ? Oct 31, 2022 02:44 |
|
Riven posted:Not per month I thought the $20 was one time, and that the ongoing sub was separate. Not gonna lie, i hope musk increases the amount so you can really see who the haves and the have nots are in the Twitter class war Mister Facetious fucked around with this message at 02:52 on Oct 31, 2022 |
# ? Oct 31, 2022 02:48 |
|
Main Paineframe posted:You're definitely the product when you use Wikipedia. Just like any social media platform, it functions by monetizing the content provided for free by random unpaid users, overseen by a small army of unpaid admins. "Wikipedia is a social media platform" and "registered non-profits are actually for-profit" are definitely takes.
|
# ? Oct 31, 2022 02:59 |
|
withak posted:Reminder: When you use a "free" service you are not the customer, you are the product. so how does this apply to SA? especially those that havent paid SA in years ? is that one buttcoin lord that got a perma, a SA whale?
|
# ? Oct 31, 2022 03:11 |
|
|
# ? May 17, 2024 07:55 |
|
This only applies to "services" that make money for someone.
|
# ? Oct 31, 2022 03:13 |