|
mobby_6kl posted:Speaking of Thomas, new Jan 6th emails just dropped! I think we knew about them from a few quotes from a judge's ruling but I guess they're now public? Inadvertently made public at that! https://twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1587880117828997120 Eastman's legal team: "Here's a dropbox link. Don't look at it. Also, it's going to remain live so when you have to include it in a submission to the Appeals Court, reporters are probably going to find it and try it."
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2022 21:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 15:22 |
|
|
That's the kind of whoopsie you make after eating a big bowl of chili for lunch
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2022 21:30
|
|
|
No way in the hell is there someone with the last name being that close to “Cheesebro”. Also just quietly laughing at how in the year 2022, twice has an inept lawyer given an open link to their client’s crimes.txt .
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2022 22:09
|
|
|
Kenneth Chesebro is the dude who came up with the Jan 6th plan and his hilarious name pops up all over.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2022 22:17
|
|
|
Xiahou Dun posted:Kenneth Chesebro is the dude who came up with the Jan 6th plan and his hilarious name pops up all over. "now, during your first meeting with Mr. Cheesebro, was he-Sir! this is congressional testimony! please compose yourself!"
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2022 23:50
|
|
|
Am I reading correctly that in their own private emails they're describing the likelihood that Justice Thomas will help them as "1 percent"? Not really a smoking gun...
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2022 00:18
|
|
|
Oracle posted:Looks like. Too bad its not a trial its just a hearing, and the DOJ isn't going to move before midterms. Xiahou Dun posted:What does that have to do with the price of fish? Yeah, unfortunately, I don't think it moves the needle much. 1/3 of the country already knows these people are criminals and despises MAGA to the core, another third is tuned out and burnt out on all of it and the final third has already shown time and time again that any evidence regarding or attempt to prosecute crimes based on such is fabricated made up fake news false flag biased Soros funded witch hunts picking on poor Trump and trying to take down the Great Savior American Patriot. I find that a bit depressing but here we are.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2022 00:23
|
|
|
negativeneil posted:Am I reading correctly that in their own private emails they're describing the likelihood that Justice Thomas will help them as "1 percent"? Not really a smoking gun... The smoking gun is that they knew the fraud claims were fraudulent when Trump made them. Thomas stuff is just a bonus
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2022 00:36
|
|
|
Xiahou Dun posted:Kenneth Chesebro is the dude who came up with the Jan 6th plan and his hilarious name pops up all over. Wait was this the same guy Trump wanted to fire the attorney general and replace him with? Some mid-level Justice Dept loser? Oh no, that was Jeffrey Clark, my bad. Also seriously considering going for a law degree because if these idiots can pass the bar…?
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2022 00:44
|
|
|
Oracle posted:Wait was this the same guy Trump wanted to fire the attorney general and replace him with? Some mid-level Justice Dept loser? Are you rich and is your daddy a judge/senator already? These are important.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2022 02:49
|
|
|
mobby_6kl posted:The smoking gun is that they knew the fraud claims were fraudulent when Trump made them. Thomas stuff is just a bonus Ahh ok that makes sense. Is their knowing the claims were bs something that's implicit in the "1 percent" statement or is there a more explicit admission? Because I could see them easily explaining the 1% as "we just assumed SCOTUS would be too scared to join us in our patriotic endeavors" or some poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2022 03:13
|
|
|
negativeneil posted:Ahh ok that makes sense. Is their knowing the claims were bs something that's implicit in the "1 percent" statement or is there a more explicit admission? Because I could see them easily explaining the 1% as "we just assumed SCOTUS would be too scared to join us in our patriotic endeavors" or some poo poo. The emails (and others) are about removing the numbers from the statement asserting "x amount of votes were fraudulent in Georgia" because Trump would have to sign off on the affidavit and signing off on the incorrect numbers would constitute perjury. With the overarching discussion happening because they are hoping that the Supreme Court's consideration of the case will lead to a delay in certification of the vote. Effectively they are filing what they know to be a fraudulent case strictly to delay and obstruct the finalization of the Georgia vote, which I'm pretty sure is illegal in one way or another.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2022 04:37
|
|
|
idiotsavant posted:The emails (and others) are about removing the numbers from the statement asserting "x amount of votes were fraudulent in Georgia" because Trump would have to sign off on the affidavit and signing off on the incorrect numbers would constitute perjury. With the overarching discussion happening because they are hoping that the Supreme Court's consideration of the case will lead to a delay in certification of the vote. Yes, but the even bigger deal is that means they knew they were committing a crime, thus fulfilling the "corrupt intent" clause of the charge. Up until their was always the specter that Trump would swear up and down that nope, he totally believed it was election fraud, he's just that dumb. It's a big deal because that's legally about as close as you can get to proving intent short of psychic powers.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2022 05:49
|
|
|
Ringo Star Get posted:No way in the hell is there someone with the last name being that close to “Cheesebro”.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2022 06:23
|
|
|
Paper shredders, burn bins, and toilets have existed for years. Think of all the documentation we don't have from their criminal activities. Instead of house arrest with gps locator anklets, we've graduated to a new level of sci-fi criminal monitoring: Here we need 24/7 audio visual recordings of every utterance, a dozen watchers to tag transcripts for review. Bleh a few score seem to need implants with remote electric shock therapy. What's it say about a country when it can't conduct honest government without 1984? A much easier solution would be to start electing good public servants.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2022 07:27
|
|
|
PhantomOfTheCopier posted:What's it say about a country when it can't conduct honest government without 1984? The bad public servants are making that a much more daunting thing to do, unfortunately
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2022 08:01
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrote/status/1588269587862196224 Its like having a folder named \dontlookinheremom\ https://www.donaldjtrump.com/news/news-aggtwvftwx0 https://twitter.com/AVindman/status/1587988276442537985 OgNar fucked around with this message at 01:50 on Nov 4, 2022 |
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2022 01:46
|
|
|
“Peekaboo”? Cutting your nicknames a bit sharp these days, eh? Is he saving the full out racist name calling for the post indictment call to Hannity?
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2022 22:04
|
|
|
Is it just me or have Trump's posts on Truth lost something? It's like the higher character limit lets him ramble longer and the tweets lose some of their punchiness. Sad!
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2022 22:48
|
|
|
Murgos posted:“Peekaboo”? Cutting your nicknames a bit sharp these days, eh? Is he saving the full out racist name calling for the post indictment call to Hannity?
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2022 22:58
|
|
|
Murgos posted:“Peekaboo”? Cutting your nicknames a bit sharp these days, eh? Is he saving the full out racist name calling for the post indictment call to Hannity? I don’t even get it? I just kind of am assuming it’s an old racist thing I don’t understand.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2022 23:05
|
|
|
Xiahou Dun posted:I don’t even get it? Murgos posted:“Peekaboo”? Cutting your nicknames a bit sharp these days, eh? Is he saving the full out racist name calling for the post indictment call to Hannity? think of some old timey slurs that end with "-aboo" and you've got it
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2022 23:15
|
|
|
I always thought of it as this https://twitter.com/BettyBowers/status/1572681157262843904 "On the other hand, Newsweek notes that term is “archaic,” and former Trump fixer Michael Cohen thinks the “J-word” is “not an option.” While Cohen has testified before Congress that Trump is a “racist,” he told Insider that “there’s no chance” Trump would use such an obvious (near) racial slur against James in public." When asked if it was something Urban Dictionary related... “There’s no way in the world that Donald Trump knows the Urban Dictionary,” Cohen told Insider. “Considering he doesn’t even know the English dictionary.” Most just think its Dementia.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2022 23:22
|
|
|
OgNar posted:I always thought of it as this His dementia addled brain combined jiggaboo and pickaninny.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2022 23:25
|
|
|
gregday posted:His dementia addled brain combined jiggaboo and pickaninny. It's like one of those synthetic drugs thats technically legal because it's been changed to be chemically distinct from existing scheduled substances, but biosimilar enough to produce the same effect.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2022 23:29
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/realtuckfrumper/status/1588692330634424320?s=46&t=IGyZpDKPKTu5oy0wCCwSUg Lol (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2022 02:48
|
|
|
Automata 10 Pack posted:https://twitter.com/realtuckfrumper/status/1588692330634424320?s=46&t=IGyZpDKPKTu5oy0wCCwSUg Just in time for him to announce he's running and then everything go on pause b/c he's a candidate
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2022 03:05
|
|
|
Automata 10 Pack posted:https://twitter.com/realtuckfrumper/status/1588692330634424320?s=46&t=IGyZpDKPKTu5oy0wCCwSUg I am now suddenly motivated to vote harder. /s What a loving joke lol
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2022 03:20
|
|
|
BonoMan posted:Just in time for him to announce he's running and then everything go on pause b/c he's a candidate Being a candidate wouldn't affect anything, but also lol loving limp-dicked assholes need to stop giving him more time.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2022 04:14
|
|
|
Someone looked at the calendar and realized that publicly pouting about Trump ignoring them days before the election was not a good idea. So, they gave it another week.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2022 04:34
|
|
|
It's fair that no one will pay attention right now, but next week could be even worse. Elections, hurricanes, DOJ investigations in the news, special masters. Next, three weeks of whining about stolen elections then months of manual recounts. Let this be a lesson kids: Prosecutions and indictments need no procrastination.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2022 07:43
|
|
|
It makes a bit more sense if you go look at the single tweet that the entire article is sources from, instead of filtering it through two layers of telephone. https://twitter.com/January6thCmte/status/1588681517328629760 So his lawyer sent them something saying he couldn't or wouldn't produce papers by the deadline, and so they gave a few extra days (from the wording and the fact they gave more time, "couldn't" is more likely than "wouldn't") but are not moving the deposition date.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2022 08:06
|
|
|
Main Paineframe posted:It makes a bit more sense if you go look at the single tweet that the entire article is sources from, instead of filtering it through two layers of telephone. I expect Trumps counsel submitted something along the lines of, “we’d love to help you but we’re super busy right now.” So the committee is playing the game, calling their bluff and extending a week. If they just straight up were like, nah, after trumps lawyers did actually engage with them it would be tough to convince people (DoJ, a Judge, a jury) that a week delay was really so onerous. Yes, it’s likely just delay for the sake of delay, but if you want to eventually convince a jury that you were totally reasonable and the other guy is the problem then you have to actually act reasonable.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2022 14:46
|
|
|
Murgos posted:I expect Trumps counsel submitted something along the lines of, “we’d love to help you but we’re super busy right now.” So the committee is playing the game, calling their bluff and extending a week. Apparently he's planning to announce his candidacy that same day, on the 14th. This will probably not impress the DOJ.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2022 14:49
|
|
|
If they serve him with papers at his announcement it will prove we're in the weirdest timeline.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2022 15:24
|
|
|
The should have started on this a year ago.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2022 15:46
|
|
Cranappleberry posted:The should have started on this a year ago. The committee's been on "this" for more than a year.
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2022 15:51
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:The committee's been on "this" for more than a year. I mean they should have subpoenaed Trump a year ago.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2022 16:09
|
|
|
Cranappleberry posted:I mean they should have subpoenaed Trump a year ago. They didn't have the supporting testimony to know what to ask him about a year ago.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2022 16:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 15:22 |
|
|
Ynglaur posted:If they serve him with papers at his announcement it will prove we're in the weirdest timeline. Slip someone into the front of the crowd during the meet and greet. Like that crazy bug eyed lady trying to throw her baby at Trump over the barricade to have him be blessed by the golden pissesed one, only the baby has a subpoena strapped to their coveralls this time.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2022 18:02
|
|