Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
What is the most powerful flying bug?
This poll is closed.
🦋 15 3.71%
🦇 115 28.47%
🪰 12 2.97%
🐦 67 16.58%
dragonfly 94 23.27%
🦟 14 3.47%
🐝 87 21.53%
Total: 404 votes
[Edit Poll (moderators only)]

 
  • Post
  • Reply
V. Illych L.
Apr 11, 2008

ASK ME ABOUT LUMBER

i actually have a fair amount of sympathy for the language policy of ukrainian nationalists - i can absolutely see how this is an important thing which they feel justifies coercion. it's just that they make up an easily falsifiable narrative to support it. it's very silly.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Corky Romanovsky
Oct 1, 2006

Soiled Meat
I'm too lazy to fix the auto translate, but this shouldn't be too hard to parse. This is from the "post-Stalin" section.

https://src-h.slav.hokudai.ac.jp/publictn/46/shiokawa/shiokawa1.html#1-1 posted:

Here we have to think about how the form of "free choice" takes on the meaning of "promoting Russification". Naturally, it is conceivable that the government's guidance and, in some cases, coercion act behind free choice, but that is not the only problem. Even in the absence of administrative pressure, when it comes to the choice of educating children in the widely-used Russian language or in a narrow ethnic language, many parents choose to attend Russian-language schools. This is the biggest problem. If too few students attend ethno-language schools, they may be abolished, leaving only Russian-language schools in some regions. The above is about the selection of class terminology, but the same can be said for "language as a subject," which is distinguished from it. The fact that both Russian language education at ethnic language schools and ethnic language education at Russian language schools were elective instead of compulsory is, formally speaking, ``both are elective and the same,'' but practically speaking While the majority of children receive Russian language education at ethnic language schools, the number of those who do not choose ethnic language education at Russian language schools is increasing. Thus, for a long time after this, the trend of expanding Russian language education and reducing ethnic language education continued (43) .

genericnick
Dec 26, 2012

tazjin posted:

lmao there's a 50% discount on this t-shirt featuring the Moskva:



Big boat, barely sunk

Ardennes
May 12, 2002
Also, from available evidence, it doesn’t seem food transfers out of Ukraine has explicitly an ethnic component either. It isn’t a mystery either, hell I personally have looked at archival documents that weren’t even touched since the 1980s. It wasn’t that they were classified or something, no one cared.

The problem is the more that slowly comes out from research just pushes in the opposite direction, so now the push is for a “secret” archive that takes “advanced scientific methods (!?)” to access.

the bitcoin of weed
Nov 1, 2014

Weka posted:

My understanding is that the repression of the Ukrainian language that is claimed was a reversal of the policy of spreading the Ukrainian language that had previously been in effect. Korenizatsiya, or "indigenization", was the policy in the national republics of the USSR to encourage local language and culture in a de-Russification process. Initially implemented to bring these national groups on board of the socialist project, in the early 30s it was ended and partially reversed because it was considered to be encouraging separatist nationalist tendencies.
Here's a couple wiki articles if you want to have a glance, the first one is a lot more even handed for some reason.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrainization

ok this is wild, I followed some links from here just for curiosity and ended up on this page about mass killings of I guess itinerant bards playing ethnic stringed instruments?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecuted_kobzars_and_bandurists
There's quite a lot of names here and I'm not looking into them, I'm sure most of those people were killed by the government for one reason or another, who knows. The claim that immediately raised suspicion was

quote:

In 1932, on the order of Stalin, the Soviet authorities called on all Ukrainian Kobzars to attend a congress in Kharkiv. Those that arrived were taken outside the city and were all put to death.

which is fairly ridiculous cartoon villainy if true, but the citations offered are 1) Robert Conquest, Harvest of Sorrow - and I don't have access to this text or I'd check the specific citation but there's plenty of questionable scholarship here, I'm guessing he cribbed this from some emigre association
2) a paper exploring the post-war Ukrainian diaspora in Australia (what the gently caress these people are everywhere), which just directly quotes Harvest of Sorrow on this topic
3) the memoirs of some Russian pianist that I'm also unable to verify - but wait, what the gently caress?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solomon_Volkov#Controversy_over_Testimony posted:

Some have asserted the book's authenticity due to Shostakovich's son Maxim's alleged about-face on the accuracy of the book. After he defected to the West in 1981, he told the Sunday Times that it was a book "about my father, not by him".[2] However, in a BBC television interview with composer Michael Berkeley on 27 September 1986, Maxim admitted, "It's true. It's accurate.... The basis of the book is correct."[3] Fay has alleged that whilst Maxim admits that the general context of the times and what it would have been to live as a composer under Soviet rule are generally correct, that Shostakovich's individual portrait was "grossly misconstrued",[4] and hence, whilst praising the book for highlighting the potential hardships of living under totalitarianism, nevertheless has repeatedly maintained his claim that "it [Testimony] was a book about my father, not by him" — in short, that in his opinion the book cannot be treated as Shostakovich's memoirs, so much as a book about what Shostakovich may have been like.

so this book has a huge amount of controversy surrounding it, was written by a different person entirely after the subject of the book died and the author emigrated to the United States from the USSR (!!!), and it seems like there's decent evidence that a lot of it is made up or poorly sourced. ok



Is Soviet history all like this? just playing games of telephone with emigrant freaks and fascists to figure out how many virgins Stalin tied to the train tracks in 1933? doesn't matter, good enough for wikipedia. this claim about the honeypot congress of ukrainian bards lives on like 4 different articles regardless

also does anyone with more patience or better access to primary sources want to look into this claim because it's so loving weird I need to know if there's any basis in truth here

Chamale
Jul 11, 2010

I'm helping!



Ardennes posted:

Also, from available evidence, it doesn’t seem food transfers out of Ukraine has explicitly an ethnic component either. It isn’t a mystery either, hell I personally have looked at archival documents that weren’t even touched since the 1980s. It wasn’t that they were classified or something, no one cared.

Yeah, the policy was explicitly prioritizing food aid to industrialized areas, with the result that Ukrainians disproportionately starved during the Great Famine.

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

the bitcoin of weed posted:

Is Soviet history all like this? just playing games of telephone with emigrant freaks and fascists to figure out how many virgins Stalin tied to the train tracks in 1933? doesn't matter, good enough for wikipedia. this claim about the honeypot congress of ukrainian bards lives on like 4 different articles regardless

yes lol. I’d assume Russian language academic history is better due to having slightly easier archive access than non-Russians but those works never get translated

razorscooter
Nov 5, 2008


tazjin posted:

lmao there's a 50% discount on this t-shirt featuring the Moskva:



need

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

This sort of thing happens in Central Europe with Austria-Hungary too. They went out of their way to promote and teach 5 official languages plus German, but because German was the language of the administration and words of command in the military, the urban intellectual nationalists spun up all sorts of romantic stuff about the Czech nation being suppressed. Meanwhile, every postman and official in the Czech lands had to learn Czech anyway, even if they were ethnic Croats or Hungarians.

Galicia was an exception as the official language there was Polish, but the point is that Austria-Hungary made efforts to promote these languages, the peasants spoke whichever language they pleased, but romantic nationalism will mythologize whatever.

e: And post independence each one of these new nations suppressed minority languages within their own borders I forgot to mention that.

Frosted Flake has issued a correction as of 00:23 on Dec 2, 2022

Marenghi
Oct 16, 2008

Don't trust the liberals,
they will betray you

the bitcoin of weed posted:

Is Soviet history all like this? just playing games of telephone with emigrant freaks and fascists to figure out how many virgins Stalin tied to the train tracks in 1933? doesn't matter, good enough for wikipedia. this claim about the honeypot congress of ukrainian bards lives on like 4 different articles regardless

Pretty much. Look through the talk pages for anything soviet/communist related and you can see how the bias of an article is formed.
You'll see articles that were once more balanced but the pro-soviet bit gets removed because it has only one source, and the pro-west bit is allowed to remain because they have multiple sources. Despite those being a robert conquest quote and then a few others quoting his quote.

Or even stuff where the source doesn't match what's written on the wiki. When zlibrary existed it was useful to be able quickly download a book, go the the quoted page and check it, which more often than not didn't back up the claims. Suspect this is why the Americans got it closed down, hard to feed people anti-communist propaganda when they're literate.

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

This just came up because I went to the Romanian Embassy’s screening of a film this week. Metronom, which is about the terrible Romanian Secret Police - sort of a combination of The Lives of Others and a coming of age film. Introduction by the ambassador, reception after, whole thing. Tyranny this, Securitate that, “Authoritarianism”. Same old, same old.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7w3kHVfG8ic

The film was nice enough but when it looked it up after, just as I had with the Stasi and KGB before, they weren’t doing anything the RCMP of the same period wasn’t, and probably less than the FBI and CIA all told, but it’s all been so mythologized that you have to go into specialist academic work to find accounts in English about daily life and state security interaction in the Eastern Bloc. Anything a regular person might read is about murderers and torturers who targeted innocents at random or for loving Freedom too much, but the academics paint a picture of police work and bureaucracy that was pretty hands off and lenient.

I mean the internal dynamics in Romania under Ceaușescu are fascinating, as are all of the Warsaw Pact countries in that first post-war generation as they charted their own path, some moving more towards the Soviet style of government, some towards Stalinism, others towards cults of personality or party bureaucracy, and there was a huge variance in their internal policing. The common thread is that emigres and defectors have set the narrative about what these societies were like from 1945-91, when the records bear out that while it may be unusual to have a police file noting someone bought illegal rock and roll records, they weren’t shooting people for it. Compare their bodycounts to say, Argentina and other Free World contemporaries.

But to cycle back around, most people don’t read Romanian and most people don’t read obscure English publications about the Eastern Bloc, so we’re just repeating the same stories from the 70’s despite now having access to the archives that disprove a good deal of them.

Slim Jim Pickens
Jan 16, 2012

Corky Romanovsky posted:

I'm too lazy to fix the auto translate, but this shouldn't be too hard to parse. This is from the "post-Stalin" section.

Ukrainian was and is vibrant in the areas where Ukrainian originated, like West Ukraine. It's relative decline places like the Black Sea Coast, Kuban, Northern Kazakhstan, or Khabarovsk is as sinister as the decline of Ukrainian speakers in Canada or the USA. These were all settler colonies, Ukrainian is only as native to these places as Russian.

The decline of minority languages as a matter of parental choice is a complicated subject to discuss, but there are examples of language revival within Russia. Yakut and Tuvan have a growing number of speakers and enjoy regular usage as languages of administration.


Frosted Flake posted:

e: And post independence each one of these new nations suppressed minority languages within their own borders I forgot to mention that.


Language in Austria-Hungary is such a nightmare. You have 1 Germanic language, THREE families of Slavic languages with further subdivisions, a loving Finno-Ugric language in Hungarian, and then two marginally different and equally ancient Romance languages in Romanian and Italian.

Then imagine being a Yiddish speaking Jew on top of it all.

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

Slim Jim Pickens posted:

Language in Austria-Hungary is such a nightmare. You have 1 Germanic language, THREE families of Slavic languages with further subdivisions, a loving Finno-Ugric language in Hungarian, and then two marginally different and equally ancient Romance languages in Romanian and Italian.

Then imagine being a Yiddish speaking Jew on top of it all.

the legislature created by the 1867 Austro-Hungarian compromise was often a tourist attraction as spectators watched the representatives argue fruitlessly with each other in unintelligible languages

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

Slim Jim Pickens posted:

Then imagine being a Yiddish speaking Jew on top of it all.

About that…

Lostconfused
Oct 1, 2008

For anyone keeping up with the church news.

https://twitter.com/KyivIndependent/status/1598435637346111489


Edit: just noticed they used a white hand emoji. Wonder if that's the default for whichever application they're posting from.

Lostconfused has issued a correction as of 01:03 on Dec 2, 2022

V. Illych L.
Apr 11, 2008

ASK ME ABOUT LUMBER

the bitcoin of weed posted:

ok this is wild, I followed some links from here just for curiosity and ended up on this page about mass killings of I guess itinerant bards playing ethnic stringed instruments?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecuted_kobzars_and_bandurists
There's quite a lot of names here and I'm not looking into them, I'm sure most of those people were killed by the government for one reason or another, who knows. The claim that immediately raised suspicion was

which is fairly ridiculous cartoon villainy if true, but the citations offered are 1) Robert Conquest, Harvest of Sorrow - and I don't have access to this text or I'd check the specific citation but there's plenty of questionable scholarship here, I'm guessing he cribbed this from some emigre association
2) a paper exploring the post-war Ukrainian diaspora in Australia (what the gently caress these people are everywhere), which just directly quotes Harvest of Sorrow on this topic
3) the memoirs of some Russian pianist that I'm also unable to verify - but wait, what the gently caress?

so this book has a huge amount of controversy surrounding it, was written by a different person entirely after the subject of the book died and the author emigrated to the United States from the USSR (!!!), and it seems like there's decent evidence that a lot of it is made up or poorly sourced. ok



Is Soviet history all like this? just playing games of telephone with emigrant freaks and fascists to figure out how many virgins Stalin tied to the train tracks in 1933? doesn't matter, good enough for wikipedia. this claim about the honeypot congress of ukrainian bards lives on like 4 different articles regardless

also does anyone with more patience or better access to primary sources want to look into this claim because it's so loving weird I need to know if there's any basis in truth here

nobody is going to make a name and career for themselves by defending the good name of the defunct soviet union. there's no market for it. there is a lot of interest in making the soviet union look bad in various ways, so you get a lot of leeway if that's what you're up to

tristeham
Jul 31, 2022
studying the austro-hungarian empire was the best thing i ever did at school

tristeham has issued a correction as of 01:07 on Dec 2, 2022

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

the bitcoin of weed posted:

ok this is wild, I followed some links from here just for curiosity and ended up on this page about mass killings of I guess itinerant bards playing ethnic stringed instruments?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecuted_kobzars_and_bandurists
There's quite a lot of names here and I'm not looking into them, I'm sure most of those people were killed by the government for one reason or another, who knows. The claim that immediately raised suspicion was

which is fairly ridiculous cartoon villainy if true, but the citations offered are 1) Robert Conquest, Harvest of Sorrow - and I don't have access to this text or I'd check the specific citation but there's plenty of questionable scholarship here, I'm guessing he cribbed this from some emigre association
2) a paper exploring the post-war Ukrainian diaspora in Australia (what the gently caress these people are everywhere), which just directly quotes Harvest of Sorrow on this topic
3) the memoirs of some Russian pianist that I'm also unable to verify - but wait, what the gently caress?

so this book has a huge amount of controversy surrounding it, was written by a different person entirely after the subject of the book died and the author emigrated to the United States from the USSR (!!!), and it seems like there's decent evidence that a lot of it is made up or poorly sourced. ok



Is Soviet history all like this? just playing games of telephone with emigrant freaks and fascists to figure out how many virgins Stalin tied to the train tracks in 1933? doesn't matter, good enough for wikipedia. this claim about the honeypot congress of ukrainian bards lives on like 4 different articles regardless

also does anyone with more patience or better access to primary sources want to look into this claim because it's so loving weird I need to know if there's any basis in truth here

https://diasporiana.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/books/13564/file.pdf

lol the conquest citation is the shostakovich book

circular citations are the best

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold
anyhow since all the citations are "this totally happened bro, trust me" i'm going to wager that being a blind begger musician during the holodomor did not have a particularly long lifespan as for why they all disappeared rather than being shot

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

It’s cool that the Freedom and Democracy Nation banned first media, then the opposition, now a religion.

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold
https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A...%80%D1%96%D0%B2

lmao ukrainian wikipedia even says its a myth

quote:

As of 2019, there is no documented information about the "shot congress", this is confirmed by the former directors of the Branch State Archive of the SBU , Volodymyr Vyatrovych and Ihor Kulyk [14] . According to the senior researcher of the Taras Shevchenko National Museum , historian Oleh Magdych, there is no documentary evidence of this event. Magdych emphasizes "There are no documents [about the shooting]! The story about the "Kobzar congress" is based exclusively on oral testimony" [15] [16] .

According to the Canadian historian Serhii Yekelchyk , the shooting of the Kobzars near Kozacha Lopan is a legend, originating from Solomon Volkov's book "Testimony: Memories of Dmitri Shostakovich" [en] [6] , published in 1979 in English in the USA [17] . In particular, Yekelchyk noted that the real reason for the disappearance of lyreniks and kobzars from Ukrainian streets and rural roads in the 1930s are other campaigns of the Stalinist regime, such as collectivization , the introduction of passports in cities, arrests of traveling musicians for illegal begging, etc. [6] . According to Vakhtang Kipiani , this was the basis for the legend [14] .

english academia is such garbage

Jazerus
May 24, 2011


stalin personally rounded up all of the bards in ukraine because he feared their arcane cantrips and proficiency with light armor

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

I mean, it’s pretty clear all of this mythology is going to be cemented now.

Slavvy
Dec 11, 2012

Jazerus posted:

stalin personally rounded up all of the bards in ukraine because he feared their arcane cantrips and proficiency with light armor

What class was Stalin? I'm thinking fighter/mage if we think of Lenin as pure mage and Zhukov as a str tank, for context

A Bakers Cousin
Dec 18, 2003

by vyelkin

Frosted Flake posted:

I mean, it’s pretty clear all of this mythology is going to be cemented now.

Cementing mythology is when you dump a vampire in concrete

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

Stalin is a rogue / saboteur

the bitcoin of weed
Nov 1, 2014

Raskolnikov38 posted:

https://diasporiana.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/books/13564/file.pdf

lol the conquest citation is the shostakovich book

circular citations are the best

sick i love doing history. thanks for checking this out

AnimeIsTrash
Jun 30, 2018

Slavvy posted:

What class was Stalin? I'm thinking fighter/mage if we think of Lenin as pure mage and Zhukov as a str tank, for context

stalin was a manlet

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

one person in the world is the most responsible person for killing Hitler : and that is Hitler

but the person second most responsible person is Stalin and I will always stan him for that

redneck nazgul
Apr 25, 2013

euphronius posted:

one person in the world is the most responsible person for killing Hitler : and that is Hitler

but the person second most responsible person is Stalin and I will always stan him for that

this is eva braun erasure

crepeface
Nov 5, 2004

r*p*f*c*

euphronius posted:

Stalin is a rogue / saboteur

sounds more like gorbachev to me!

Lostconfused
Oct 1, 2008

the bitcoin of weed posted:

ok this is wild, I followed some links from here just for curiosity and ended up on this page about mass killings of I guess itinerant bards playing ethnic stringed instruments?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecuted_kobzars_and_bandurists
There's quite a lot of names here and I'm not looking into them, I'm sure most of those people were killed by the government for one reason or another, who knows. The claim that immediately raised suspicion was

which is fairly ridiculous cartoon villainy if true, but the citations offered are 1) Robert Conquest, Harvest of Sorrow - and I don't have access to this text or I'd check the specific citation but there's plenty of questionable scholarship here, I'm guessing he cribbed this from some emigre association
2) a paper exploring the post-war Ukrainian diaspora in Australia (what the gently caress these people are everywhere), which just directly quotes Harvest of Sorrow on this topic
3) the memoirs of some Russian pianist that I'm also unable to verify - but wait, what the gently caress?

so this book has a huge amount of controversy surrounding it, was written by a different person entirely after the subject of the book died and the author emigrated to the United States from the USSR (!!!), and it seems like there's decent evidence that a lot of it is made up or poorly sourced. ok



Is Soviet history all like this? just playing games of telephone with emigrant freaks and fascists to figure out how many virgins Stalin tied to the train tracks in 1933? doesn't matter, good enough for wikipedia. this claim about the honeypot congress of ukrainian bards lives on like 4 different articles regardless

also does anyone with more patience or better access to primary sources want to look into this claim because it's so loving weird I need to know if there's any basis in truth here

https://varjag2007su.livejournal.com/2523309.html

quote:

And now the naked truth about the "summit of massacred kobzars"

I will tell the terrible truth about the "summit of massacred kobzars" and how the Soviet authorities destroyed "Ukrainian Homers, who are the keepers of our national coda, its living historical memory".

The story of the so-called "congress of executed kobzars" was told to me back in Soviet times by my "homeboy" - Victor Mishalov, an Australian-born bandura player from the United States. Allegedly the NKVD organized a congress of kobzars in Kharkov in 1927, then these kobzars and lirnyks were scooped up, put on a train and dropped off in a field, surrounded the by a chain of NKVDers and were not let out until they froze to death.

Under Yushchenko, the version has changed somewhat. It became as follows: someone from "Stalin's falcons" got an idea: to gather the kobzars and lyrniks supposedly at the summit and for all ... to be shot, and kobza and lyre to be destroyed. The congress was planned to be held in 1925, then it was postponed until December, 1 1927. But even then it did not happen. The thing is that not all the kobzars were registered by the so-called ethnographic commission, created for this purpose by the Ukrainian SSR Academy of Sciences.

You will laugh, but the only sources about the so-called "congress of the executed kobzars" are two foreign sources. In 1939 a book by the Russian white emigrant Shostakovich was published in London. "In the mid-1930s," he writes, "the First All-Ukrainian Congress of Lyrniks and Bandurists was proclaimed, and all the folk singers were forced to get together and discuss their future. "Life got better, it got merrier". Stalin said. These blind men believed him. They came to the congress from all over Ukraine, from small forgotten villages. Several hundred of them attended the congress. It was a living museum, a living history of Ukraine, all its songs, its music, its poetry. And then almost all of them were shot, almost all of these pathetic singers were killed.

Robert Conquest, an IRD employee hired by the OUN to write the book "The Harvest of Sorrow" for $80,000, also writes about this convention of "shot kobzars":

"Popular national culture has been maintained for centuries in the Ukrainian countryside by bards, the kobzars sung by Shevchenko, who traveled from village to village making a living by performing ancient folk songs and translating folk ballads. They constantly reminded the peasants of their free and heroic past. This "undesirable phenomenon" was now suppressed. The kobzars were summoned to a convention and, having gathered them all together there, they were arrested. Many of them were reportedly shot, which had its own logic, because they were of little use in the forced labor camps."

The transfer of the date of the extermination of the kobzars from 1927 to 1934 is interesting here. If we represent "flies separately, cutlets separately", then we get two unrelated phenomena. But if after the "artificial holodomor" the extermination of the carriers of the cultural tradition is immediately presented, then it is just possible to sum up the extermination on ethnic grounds.

The most interesting thing is another. For example, Mikhail Polotay, a well-known in his time Ukrainian Soviet researcher of the art of kobzars and bandurists, always denied stories about the destruction of kobzars, saying that this is an invention of bourgeois propaganda, there was no congress in the mid thirties. The famous kobzaar Andrey Bobyr also said that it was all a fable. The first republican meeting of kobzaars and lirnyks took place in Kiev in 1939. And other kobzaars of the older generation, some of whom I knew (Evgeny Adamtsevich, Alexander Markevich, Grigory Ilchenko, Georgiy Tkachenko) also denied all these stories. By the way, in 1971, the Union of Composers triumphantly hosted a concert of the same kobzars, who had been executed in the 30s. I was a schoolgirl, but I still remember the tremendous impression that this concert made on the audience!

The terrible truth was revealed in the wave of perestroika, acceleration and glasnost, when Gorbachev in Lviv called for "pressure from below". In a nationalist newspaper «Українські обрії» (Ukrainian Horizons) in April 1991, a terrible secret was revealed. Two at once.

First, the kobzars were annihilated in Kharkiv. They, along with their guides, were taken from the theater where the convention was held by "black crows" to Kholodnaya Gora. Some say that they were shot in prison cellars, others say that they were taken by train outside Kharkov and thrown into a pit, and armed guards were placed around the pit.

In the magazine "Ukrainian Culture" (1991, No. 4), Viktor Rafalsky from Stryi in Lviv region wrote: "I knew about this tragedy for a long time, but nothing specific. And it was troubling. And suddenly ... 1956 I had to stay for two weeks in a transit prison in Moscow. Big cell. There were about a hundred prisoners (political). Here fate brought me into contact with a former NKVD worker, who had been repressed by that time. We talked about the events of 1932-1933 in Ukraine. We remembered the kobzars. And at this point my interlocutor stunned me: he had full information about the annihilation of more than two hundred Ukrainian kobzars, who were called to Kharkov by orders from above under the pretext of some meeting at the end of 1932. He spoke sparingly - probably he himself was involved in this affair. One thing is certain: he was telling the truth, for, as a former NKVD employee, of course, he risked - to divulge such secrets!

It was a kind of prelude to the terrible famine that was growing ... In the following pre-war years no one saw a kobzar in Ukraine anymore."

They can tell me that in the Soviet Union the kobzari patriarchs were afraid for their lives, so they denied that such an event took place, as they say. BUT WHY IN HIS ENTIRE LIFE WAS IT NOT MENTIONED BY, Kytasty who emigrated from post-war Germany to the USA, posthumously awarded by Yushchenko the rank of the Hero, to whom in "the free world nobody prevented to reveal the" terrible truth "? This alone crosses out any fabrications about the congress of the executed "kobzars", who, like with Holodomor, have already started to put monuments to in Ukraine.

In fact, the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (b) issued decrees: "On Prohibition of Begging", "On Approval of the Repertoire in the Institutions of the People's Commissariat for Education", "Regulations on Individual and Collective Musician-Playing Activity". The Bolsheviks fought not against kobzars and lirnyks, but against poverty and begging. Most of the kobzars were elderly blind men who used to sing at bazaars and fairs "for the sake of Christ" and so earned their living. So they were placed in collectives, where there was no need to beg, but to receive a WAGE. This is what they called the "destruction of the national coda".

In short, it is all myth-making again, designed to create a new history of the Ukrainian Whig and to prepare the basis for accusing Moscow of ethnocide.



quote:

Kiev, 15 April. (Correspondent "Pravda"). Today at the institute of folklore Academy of Sciences Ukrainian SSR opened the 1st republican congress of kobzars and lyrniks. 27 people participated, coming from Kiev, Kharkov, Dnepropetrovsk, Poltava, and other regions of Ukraine.

Among the participants - storyteller Marfa Kryukova, famous kobzar Kushnerik, who created an exemplary story about Lenin, kobzar Movchan, lyrnik Dodatko and others.

Professor Glinchenko will present a report on history of kobzars, professor Revutsky - about musical art of kobzars. Kobzars and lyrniks will tell about themselves and their works.

The summit will last several days.



quote:

Ensemble of national singers

Kiev, 20 april. (Correspondent "Pravda").
Today was the closing summit of ukrainian peoples singers - kobzars and lyrniks. Eight summit participants received awards from the institute of folklore of Academy of Sciences Ukrainian SSR for folk performances. On the closing day the Ukrainian philharmonic and institute of folklore decided to create an ensemble of folk singers - kobzars and lyrniks. They will perform their first tour in may among Ukrainian kolkhoz.

Participants performed a rousing greeting to the people's leader comrade Stalin. Greetings-epic was written by kobzars and lyrniks.

Under the auspices of dramatist A. Korniychuk a plenum of Ukrainian writers union was held, where it was decided to create a section of folk art.

Talented kobzars, and others, were accepted as members in the writers union - Kushnerik and Movchan, Nosach, Ivanchenko, Litvenko and Shpinai.

I dunno, this is some random rear end blog post, but now you can dig some more into this poo poo I guess.

speng31b
May 8, 2010

Lostconfused posted:

For anyone keeping up with the church news.

https://twitter.com/KyivIndependent/status/1598435637346111489


Edit: just noticed they used a white hand emoji. Wonder if that's the default for whichever application they're posting from.

wow super hosed up

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy
so not only did Zelenskyy do prison abolition, he's also promoting secularism?

most progressive president of all time!

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy
https://twitter.com/roadtoserfdumb/status/1598191578170163200?t=z1jAMzVx97LlxL0p9FQBXg&s=19

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

Chalupa

the bitcoin of weed
Nov 1, 2014

Lostconfused posted:

https://varjag2007su.livejournal.com/2523309.html





I dunno, this is some random rear end blog post, but now you can dig some more into this poo poo I guess.

I still couldn't tell you when or where this even happened can they get the dates straight at least

Corky Romanovsky
Oct 1, 2006

Soiled Meat

the bitcoin of weed posted:

I still couldn't tell you when or where this even happened can they get the dates straight at least

It said 1939. It is on the encyclopediaofukraine dot com under kobzars

E: it even includes the (yet to be supported by evidence) mass execution of kobzars and lirnyks

EE: the claim on the website I mentioned was that the names of 37 people that attended essentially became collaborators with the Soviets, and after the execution they were sent about as some kind of proof that there was no mass execution

Corky Romanovsky has issued a correction as of 04:54 on Dec 2, 2022

Grimnarsson
Sep 4, 2018

Marenghi posted:

https://www.dw.com/en/germany-declares-stalin-era-holodomor-famine-in-ukraine-a-genocide/a-63944665

It's official, in Germany at least. The Holodomor was genocide and Stalin was worse than Hitler.

Laying the ground work for when the far right control Germany and they can revise the Holocaust as a defensive measure to prevent Judeo–Bolshevism carrying out more Holodomors.

The millions of non-Ukrainians who starved all across the Soviet Union, mainly concentrated in food producing regions, weren't victims of genocide? Russians and Kazakhs and others are unworthy of being called victims of this heinous crime and receiving this coveted and prestigious label? Sounds like a bunch of genocide denying bullshit to me.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Pistol_Pete
Sep 15, 2007

Oven Wrangler
From today's Financial Times:

The FT posted:


Military briefing: Ukraine war exposes ‘hard reality’ of west’s weapons capacity


Nearly 10 months into Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the allies that have backed Kyiv’s war effort are increasingly concerned by the struggle to ramp up ammunition production as the conflict chews through their stockpiles.

At stake is not only the west’s ability to continue supplying Ukraine with the weapons it needs but also allies’ capacity to show adversaries such as China that they have an industrial base that can produce sufficient weaponry to mount a credible defence against possible attack.

“Ukraine has focused us . . . on what really matters,” William LaPlante, the Pentagon’s chief weapons’ buyer, told a recent conference at George Mason University. “What matters is production. Production really matters.”

After sending more than $40bn of military support to Ukraine, mostly from existing stocks, Nato members’ defence ministries are discovering that dormant weapons production lines cannot be switched on overnight. Increasing capacity requires investment, which in turn depends on securing long-term production contracts.

The US has sent about a third of its stock of Javelin anti-tank missiles to Ukraine, and a third of its stockpile of anti-aircraft Stinger missiles. But it has little prospect of being able to replace these quickly. “There’s no question that . . . [supplying Ukraine] has put pressure on our defence industrial base,” Colin Kahl, US under-secretary of defence for policy, said last month.

The UK has turned to a third party, which it has declined to identify, to restock its depleted stores of NLAW anti-tank missiles. “There are some really hard realities that we have been forced to learn,” James Heappey, armed forces minister, said in October.

Weapons stocks in many European countries are even skimpier. When France sent six Caesar self-propelled howitzers to Ukraine in October, it could only do so by diverting a Danish order for the high-tech artillery.

There are two main reasons why western nations are struggling to source fresh military supplies, defence officials and corporate executives said.

The first is structural. Since the end of the cold war, these countries have reaped a peace dividend by slashing military spending, downsizing defence industries and moving to lean, “just-in-time” production and low inventories of equipment such as munitions. That is because combating insurgents and terrorists did not require the same kind of heavy weaponry needed in high-intensity land conflicts.

Ukraine has up-ended that assumption. During intense fighting in the eastern Donbas region this summer, Russia used more ammunition in two days than the British military has in stock. Under Ukrainian rates of artillery consumption, British stockpiles might last a week and the UK’s European allies are in no better position, according to a report by the Royal United Services Institute think-tank in London.

“The west has a problem with constrained defence industrial capacity,” said Mick Ryan, a former major general in the Australian army. “A major industrial expansion programme will be required if the nations of the west are to rebuild the capacity to design, produce and stockpile . . . large quantities of munitions.”

The second factor is bureaucratic. Governments say they are committed to bigger defence budgets. Yet, amid so much economic uncertainty, they have been slow to write the multiyear procurement contracts that defence groups need to accelerate production.

“It’s a corporate finance problem,” said a senior European defence official. “No company wants to invest in a second factory line to boost production without long-term, contractual certainty. Will Russia still be a threat in five years and, if it’s not, will governments still be buying arms from the companies then?”

This lack of certainty holds on both sides of the Atlantic, corporate executives say. Saab, the Swedish defence and aerospace company which makes NLAWs and Gripen fighter jets, says it has been in talks with several governments about new orders but progress on signing contracts has been slow.

“When it comes to order intake directly connected to Ukraine . . . very little has really emerged or happened,” said Saab chief executive Micael Johansson. “I am sure it will come . . . but the contracting procedures are still quite slow.”

Britain’s BAE Systems also says it is “in talks” with the UK government about ramping up output of a number of munitions, while US defence companies have similar complaints about the lack of a clear “demand signal” from Washington.

“They are in a situation of ‘show me the money’,” said Mark Cancian, senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. “What they [the defence companies] are worried about is that they will expand capacity, then the war will end and the defence department will cut the contracts.”

Kathy Warden, chief executive of Northrop Grumman, said the Pentagon’s procurement procedures — which give a “very choppy demand signal” to build up stockpiles but only after a conflict rapidly depletes them — are not a model that is “going to make sense” if the aim is sustained investment in production.

Some defence manufacturers are already producing at full capacity, with shifts running 24 hours a day.

“When we have a clear understanding of what the demand signal is going to be . . . we are willing to fund expansion of capacity,” said Frank St John, chief operating officer of Lockheed Martin, which makes Himar artillery rocket systems and Javelins.

Western officials say that supplying Ukraine has not jeopardised their own countries’ military readiness, while Russian military shortages are far worse. Moscow is having to source weapons such as artillery shells and drones from North Korea and Iran.

Yet while there is a near-consensus across Nato, especially its European members, of the need to bulk up their militaries and defence industries, companies can only proceed once they have more contractual certainty.

“Contracts matter. Money . . . matters,” said the Pentagon’s LaPlante. “Once [defence companies] see that we’re going to put money [into orders] . . . they’ll get it, that’s their job.”



The UK has enough ammo stocked to last for 1 week of actual warfare, provided they don't go too wild lol.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply