|
AARD VARKMAN posted:
Usually if you upscale you can try "light upscale redo" and not get dramatic changes like that. It might stay a bean.
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2022 16:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 22:54 |
|
|
This looks like a Team Fortress 3 character
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2022 17:10
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/EMostaque/status/1598182752523722752 Also, seems like the bot functionality to generate images for free on the official SD discord is back. Uses SD2.0 and produces 768x768 images.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2022 22:20
|
|
|
BoldFace posted:Also, seems like the bot functionality to generate images for free on the official SD discord is back. Uses SD2.0 and produces 768x768 images. You beat me to it, but I have a sample of it's new, amazing skills! 
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2022 22:23
|
|
|
AARD VARKMAN posted:e: did you think I meant the whole image was just one black bean lol
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2022 23:20
|
|
|
please enjoy these screencaps from my upcoming movie "Dental Phantoms"                   
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2022 23:28
|
|
|
Apple just released a shiny new implementation that can allegedly run stable diffusion ~3x faster than pytorch. I'm not super clear on how to set it up immediately but I'll definitely be giving this a look. https://github.com/apple/ml-stable-diffusion
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2022 23:44
|
|
|
Rutibex posted:please enjoy these screencaps from my upcoming movie "Dental Phantoms" these are insane Rahu posted:Apple just released a shiny new implementation that can allegedly run stable diffusion ~3x faster than pytorch. I'm not super clear on how to set it up immediately but I'll definitely be giving this a look. perfect, and Mac native! thanks a ton  my contribution is this stupid idea
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 07:48
|
|
|
So far the Mac native version is running slower for me than the other versions (0.5 steps a second for the native swift version versus 1 step a second in Automatic1111) but I assume I’m doing something wrong and that smart people will hook it up to a GUI with all the correct settings next week.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 07:56
|
|
|
been off trying to master the anime/merged models to make digital illustrationy stuff, nicked some prompts, cut the chuff, rearranged stuff got a pretty good cyberskeleton from edgerunners: 
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 12:40
|
|
|
BARONS CYBER SKULL posted:been off trying to master the anime/merged models to make digital illustrationy stuff, nicked some prompts, cut the chuff, rearranged stuff  a powerful anime
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 12:46
|
|
|
I wish the AI Art Generation topic on Twitter was cool art like this thread and not grating chicken littles who just will not stop bitching
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 15:06
|
|
|
TheWorldsaStage posted:I wish the AI Art Generation topic on Twitter was cool art like this thread and not grating chicken littles who just will not stop bitching what's super funny to me is that the new model that's in a whitepaper and will be released soon, claims a 500% increase per iteration and 75% less iterations required which ought to put us in a spot where we can do 24 fps video in real time. So, before we've even begun to understand what any of this actually means for commercial illustrators, we're plunging headlong into procedural, real time video, and the implications of that seem vast and much more interesting to me than simple images. A trivial, not-very-important example: imagine a VR horror game that's got some of this baked in, can track your eyes to see what you're not looking at, infer what you find visually unpleasant, and then spawn monsters, each generation of which is more horrifying to you, personally. There's tons of industrial applications that instantly come to mind, but I am not rly an Ideas Guy so gods only know what's going to happen when this stuff is baked enough that there's things like Unity / Unreal Engine connectors to it to bring in checkpoints to do specific things in-engine.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 15:13
|
|
|
Spit out 50 of these, zero retouches, I think these ones are pretty goodquote:a cat reading tarot cards, antique store background, photograph, epic composition, magnum opus, highly detailed, 8 k, octane render     
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 16:07
|
|
|
Cabbages and Kings posted:what's super funny to me is that the new model that's in a whitepaper and will be released soon, claims a 500% increase per iteration and 75% less iterations required which ought to put us in a spot where we can do 24 fps video in real time.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 16:43
|
|
|
SubG posted:A perfectly normal looking person doing something perfectly normal and their hands a writhing mass of fingers whipping violently around like a dozen starfish loving. I can't wait
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 16:59
|
|
|
Been looking at some of the things posted in this thread and woof, methinks I'm gonna have to make a hard pivot from my years of art practice, ain't no way I can compete with an algorithm like this, good lord 
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 17:09
|
|
|
White Light posted:Been looking at some of the things posted in this thread and woof, methinks I'm gonna have to make a hard pivot from my years of art practice, ain't no way I can compete with an algorithm like this, good lord All of these images were generated using your post as the prompt:           
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 17:40
|
|
|
is the AI mocking him?
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 17:42
|
|
|
Rutibex posted:is the AI mocking him? Perhaps threatening...
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 17:53
|
|
|
Yeah I got no clue what wavelength y'all are are on right now so have fun with your toys
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 18:00
|
|
|
White Light posted:Yeah I got no clue what wavelength y'all are are on right now so have fun with your toys Sorry i didn't mean to be flippant if your have a genuine crisis here. But it seems obvious to me this is gonna be bigger than art, way bigger. Every one is gonna lose their job to the AIs, really soon. Like months
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 18:05
|
|
|
White Light posted:Yeah I got no clue what wavelength y'all are are on right now so have fun with your toys I think artists should get on board instead of being intimidated tbh. Yes, we can all make cool art with enough prompt crafting. But for every awesome looking image we generate we generate hundreds of images of ugly garbage. And even the nice looking art, it's just not the same as having full control over the scene and layout that you have creating art manually. So I can generate a thousand thousand images of nice looking art, but unless I have artistic talent of some kind I still can't really tell the ai what the composition in my head looks like, so if I want to truly bring to life something I'm picturing in my mind I still have to get my hands dirty. The machine can only make master copies. But once we have tools like these in the hands of the majority of actual artists, things are going to get really interesting.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 18:11
|
|
|
Yeah but what if the computer is actually just better at art than any human? Kasparov didn't learn all kinds of sick chess moves from deep blue and become an even better master, he just lost and now computers are 100% better than humans at chess.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 18:15
|
|
|
Rutibex posted:Yeah but what if the computer is actually just better at art than any human? Kasparov didn't learn all kinds of sick chess moves from deep blue and become an even better master, he just lost and now computers are 100% better than humans at chess. Art isn't a zero sum game. You don't win art. Art is about creating. A computer is just a tool for creating art. AI isn't going to destroy art the same way Photoshop didn't destroy art and cameras didn't destroy art.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 18:18
|
|
|
Cabbages and Kings posted:Spit out 50 of these, zero retouches, I think these ones are pretty good This one was uncannily successful. The cat’s expression really nails a knowing but slightly threatening look that says “Do you really wish to know what is on the other side of this card? Some things cannot be unseen…” i guess it’s just the cocked head and slightly narrowed eyes, but a pretty good gestalt impression..
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 18:19
|
|
|
Yeah TBH getting into this AI art stuff (being a unique intersection of math and computer science with visual art and creativity) has gotten me more interested in other art tools and I signed up for some courses on Blender and Photoshop and stuff. AI art is great for me because it's really easy to get something out of my head onto the screen, then I look at it and think 'wow if I was an artist and could tweak this and this a bit then that would be really cool'.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 18:22
|
|
|
I've been using my apple pencil a lot more recently drawing stuff to throw at the AI so I can get ideas across that it struggles with. Also been doing ridiculous hack Photoshop jobs using MSPaint. It would definitely be easier if I were actually good at either of those things
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 18:25
|
|
|
Honestly I think artists are gonna have to deal with it, it's part of life now I guess? Ain't no way you can stop all the momentum from the AI train. I don't really think this is the AI's fault more as the general fear of Capitalism taking it to a darker place, you know? Well, the potential for it to happen at least, but honestly what the gently caress do I know, maybe it's my inner Luddite that needs to be reigned in with my programmer side. I am thankful that I decided to keep it as a hobby for me, it was a very smart move for me to pivot into web development when I had the chance almost a decade ago else it'd be harder for me to navigate this topic 😂
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 18:27
|
|
|
Oh yeah as far as all the bad things people predict that AI image (or audio, or anything) generation could lead to - buckle up because it's going to happen. One solace is that most folks already don't care about what's real or not so maybe not a huge change.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 18:30
|
|
|
Mozi posted:Yeah TBH getting into this AI art stuff (being a unique intersection of math and computer science with visual art and creativity) has gotten me more interested in other art tools and I signed up for some courses on Blender and Photoshop and stuff. AI art is great for me because it's really easy to get something out of my head onto the screen, then I look at it and think 'wow if I was an artist and could tweak this and this a bit then that would be really cool'. Exactly this. Artists legitimately thought that photography was going to be the end of painting and by extension art, but all it really did was open up creative avenues for people who would otherwise feel excluded from creating things. I'm pretty good at Photoshop, but I have zero talent with an actual paintbrush, so it lets me express myself creatively. Ultimately I think more tools for creating art is always better than less tools, in the long run. I can definitely understand the fear though, and in the short term people cracking out budget level commission art for individuals will probably see a drop in requests/valuation. Good artists are going to do what they always do though, squeeze every drop of utility they can out, and push the boundaries of what is possible.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 18:31
|
|
|
Kharmakazy posted:Good artists are going to do what they always do though, squeeze every drop of utility they can out, and push the boundaries of what is possible.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 18:34
|
|
|
White Light posted:Yeah I got no clue what wavelength y'all are are on right now so have fun with your toys the wavelength I'm on is that this is at least as disruptive to commercial art as the invention of photoshop was, and also that it will not be the death knell of commercial art, any more than photoshop was. White Light posted:I am thankful that I decided to keep it as a hobby for me, it was a very smart move for me to pivot into web development when I had the chance almost a decade ago else it'd be harder for me to navigate this topic 😂 hilariously I started as a graphic design major in 1999, spent a semester realizing I couldn't draw and another semester realizing I didn't want to put the amount of work in to find out if I even could get good at it. So I pivoted to CS, told myself I'd go into "computer art", got a BA with a minor concentration in digital media... and then just have gone on to have a succession of non-artistic computer toucher jobs, which, so far, have likely worked out better for me than anything else would have up to this point at least. So, tl;dr on that, "same, kinda". I have dabbled with silly creative things here and there, and to me Stablediffusion has just become more of that. quote:a cat sitting on a modular synthesizer, music studio background, hackers, photograph, epic composition, magnum opus, highly detailed, 8 k, octane render 
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 18:41
|
|
|
Lots of the same people who have been actively cheering on the AI taking everyone's jobs so we end up in a Utopian society, are now mad the AI is gonna take their job too
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 18:42
|
|
|
   
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 18:45
|
|
|
Cabbages and Kings posted:Spit out 50 of these, zero retouches, I think these ones are pretty good great potential for Dixit cards Analytic Engine fucked around with this message at 09:21 on Aug 24, 2023 |
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 18:49
|
|
|
Kharmakazy posted:catte 
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 18:50
|
|
|
BARONS CYBER SKULL posted:Lots of the same people who have been actively cheering on the AI taking everyone's jobs so we end up in a Utopian society, are now mad the AI is gonna take their job too Yeah it's great, the only part we have to change now is needing to make money in order to live.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 18:56
|
|
|
Analytic Engine posted:well yeah, it wasn't supposed to take the CREATIVE jobs. those are for creative people, aka artists, aka rich kids ok come on
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 18:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 22:54 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2022 18:57
|
|