Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
Should I step down as head of twitter
This poll is closed.
Yes 420 4.43%
No 69 0.73%
Goku 9001 94.85%
Total: 9490 votes
[Edit Poll (moderators only)]

 
  • Post
  • Reply
Jelly
Feb 11, 2004

Ask me about my STD collection!

Doctor Butts posted:

Who can afford it

That all depends on the society we live in at the time.

But yeah, not likely to be too different from the one we're in now.

e: What a dumb nerd snipe

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Ror
Oct 21, 2010

😸Everything's 🗞️ purrfect!💯🤟


love to fire all my janitorial staff and then let the computer touchers live in the building 24/7

Jelly
Feb 11, 2004

Ask me about my STD collection!
Eugenics is the study of how to arrange reproduction within a human population to increase the occurrence of heritable characteristics regarded as desirable.

Transhumanism does absolutely nothing to arrange reproduction towards desirable heritable characteristics. In fact, it does the exact opposite, giving people option to artificially enhance undesirable characteristics, preserving their existing ones.

Brendan Rodgers
Jun 11, 2014




Jelly posted:

I guess I am still not following the problem with improving ourselves artificially just because we can, or I'm missing another point you're making.

I think perhaps I'm still on the cyberpunk wavelength of transhumanism and you've evolved the argument toward literal eugenics, like crafting humans in a lab. A bionic eye isn't going to effect the gene pool.

Rich people will get augmented and poor people won't.

Decrepus
May 21, 2008

In the end, his dominion did not touch a single poster.


Doctor Butts posted:

Who can afford it

My health insurance is augmented

Underwhelmed
Mar 7, 2004


Nap Ghost

PITY BONER posted:

Is anyone else's twitter feed getting chud recommendations now?

I have a lost account for which I forgot the password and and no longer use, but still get emails with recent activity feeds in it. I've unsubscribed from this a couple times but it never stops coming.

Lately it has been a poo poo load of anti-trans stuff and republican official accounts screeching about Hunter Biden's 15 pound hog. Previously the only anti Trans stuff I would see regularly was the occasional odd comment attached to something else.

Telsa Cola
Aug 19, 2011

No... this is all wrong... this whole operation has just gone completely sidewaysface
Look if I loose an arm and get a cool fancy robotic arm you can bet I'm going to paint hazard stripes on it.

Kingo Ligma
Aug 24, 2019

Ask me about calling people racist because I failed geography.

Jelly posted:

we'll assume the brain and heart remain human/untouched.


I always knew people with pacemakers didn't have souls

F_Shit_Fitzgerald
Feb 2, 2017



Jelly posted:

I guess I am still not following the problem with improving ourselves artificially just because we can, or I'm missing another point you're making.

I think perhaps I'm still on the cyberpunk wavelength of transhumanism and you've evolved the argument toward literal eugenics, like crafting humans in a lab. A bionic eye isn't going to effect the gene pool.

quote:

Eugenics is the study of how to arrange reproduction within a human population to increase the occurrence of heritable characteristics regarded as desirable.

Transhumanism does absolutely nothing to arrange reproduction towards desirable heritable characteristics. In fact, it does the exact opposite, giving people option to artificially enhance undesirable characteristics, preserving their existing ones.

Yeah, you're right; never mind. I think I was mixing up transhumanism with other bizarre SV beliefs.

crispix
Mar 28, 2015

Grand-Maman m'a raconté
(Les éditions des amitiés franco-québécoises)

Hello, dear
these people should accept their mortality and try to stop being massive c...

crispix
Mar 28, 2015

Grand-Maman m'a raconté
(Les éditions des amitiés franco-québécoises)

Hello, dear
cack-faced cunnies, in this world

imo

Doctor Butts
May 21, 2002

Jelly posted:


e: What a dumb nerd snipe

It's ok I almost posted a dumb neuralink porn joke

Shaman Tank Spec
Dec 26, 2003

*blep*



CuwiKhons posted:

Also the Greeks believed small dicks were better if you were trying to get a woman pregnant because "the semen has less distance to travel from the penis to the vagina," so they obviously they weren't super geniuses.

Yeah that's dumb as gently caress, you want a good penis length so the sperm can generate enough muzzle velocity to have good penetrative powers and what's more have it be in proportion to diameter to ensure even big loads get sufficient muzzle velocity. I would recommend a length of at least 56 times penis diameter, maybe even 71 for serious fuckin'.

Dang It Bhabhi!
May 27, 2004



ASK ME ABOUT
BEING
ESCULA GRIND'S
#1 SIMP

Thou shalt not smash the back walls.

Doctor Butts
May 21, 2002

I have +p sperm

madeintaipei
Jul 13, 2012

Flowers for QAnon posted:

How do you feel about getting a tail installed?

Roger Dean (of Yes album cover fame) was once asked if there was a chair he'd like to design, but was outside of the realm of the possible. He responded that he hadn't yet figured out a way to extend the spine (as chair).

See, this motherfucker is running over people, killing untold quantities of apes, and trying to become King of Mars when we could all be sitting on spine chairs.

Truly, the worst timeline.

StrangersInTheNight
Dec 31, 2007
ABSOLUTE FUCKING GUDGEON

F_Shit_Fitzgerald posted:

I'm concerned that it could easily transform from "we can help people with disabilities" to "we can augment perfectly good joints to eliminate the possibility that anyone other than what we consider to be 'perfect' humans can exist".

probably, but what's the other solution. we just....don't help people? let's do the thing and then plan for this problem ahead of time-ahahahaha wait i'm talking about people. we'll do it and let it hit us straight in the face first. still a better situation than this hellworld of no medical care and ableism!

Tiny Timbs
Sep 6, 2008

Shaman Tank Spec posted:

Yeah that's dumb as gently caress, you want a good penis length so the sperm can generate enough muzzle velocity to have good penetrative powers and what's more have it be in proportion to diameter to ensure even big loads get sufficient muzzle velocity. I would recommend a length of at least 56 times penis diameter, maybe even 71 for serious fuckin'.

I built a special sounding tool that can introduce some rifling

SirPhoebos
Dec 10, 2007

WELL THAT JUST HAPPENED!

If I had to guess, the worry with trans-humanism is that it can come across as optimistic to the point of naivety. Whereas the cyberpunk genre posits that 'people are people, and will invariably turn life-changing technology to lovely ends', transhumanism tends to just go "nah don't worry about it, this'll be different! :v:'

But that is just my take.

StrangersInTheNight
Dec 31, 2007
ABSOLUTE FUCKING GUDGEON
dreamin' about having the crappy joints in my body replaced, and this guy is over here like, yes, but what if - too many joints were replaced?? *twilight zone theme*

F_Shit_Fitzgerald
Feb 2, 2017



StrangersInTheNight posted:

probably, but what's the other solution. we just....don't help people? let's do the thing and then plan for this problem ahead of time-ahahahaha wait i'm talking about people. we'll do it and let it hit us straight in the face first. still a better situation than this hellworld of no medical care and ableism!

SirPhoebos posted:

If I had to guess, the worry with trans-humanism is that it can come across as optimistic to the point of naivety. Whereas the cyberpunk genre posits that 'people are people, and will invariably turn life-changing technology to lovely ends', transhumanism tends to just go "nah don't worry about it, this'll be different! :v:'

Jelly is right that I was conflating a few things, so I take back the eugenics comments.

But the latter comment provides an answer to the former. I think transhumanism is an easy solution to systemic problems. If we had cybernetic implants tomorrow, we'd still be beset with homelessness, poverty and hunger, just with "superhumans". If we want a better society, we should first address those problems directly rather than relying on technology to be a magic bullet that automatically serves all the other problems.

GABA ghoul
Oct 29, 2011

StrangersInTheNight posted:

dreamin' about having the crappy joints in my body replaced, and this guy is over here like, yes, but what if - too many joints were replaced?? *twilight zone theme*

That's restoring a regular human ability that has been lost and we've been doing that for thousands of years, e.g. wooden teeth and peg legs

Augmentation is different, it's about super-human abilities like installing an artificial rear end with a rocket engine or a machine gun arm

crispix
Mar 28, 2015

Grand-Maman m'a raconté
(Les éditions des amitiés franco-québécoises)

Hello, dear
what about those people who get artificial asses but just silicone

learnincurve
May 15, 2014

Smoosh

Jelly posted:

Eugenics is the study of how to arrange reproduction within a human population to increase the occurrence of heritable characteristics regarded as desirable.

Transhumanism does absolutely nothing to arrange reproduction towards desirable heritable characteristics. In fact, it does the exact opposite, giving people option to artificially enhance undesirable characteristics, preserving their existing ones.

One of the big talking points in the disability community right now is "am I disabled because I only have one leg or am I disabled because this building has no lifts/elevators" and the people leading the charge on this are young adults with Down syndrome - these young people are absolutely something else, and it's because of them we are seeing the rise of venues for disabled people only, like youth and night clubs, which are run and owned by disabled people themselves.

This is deeply unpopular on twitter, the right hate it because they are terrible people who want control, and a lot of idiot kids hate it because they don't like being told that "allies" are not welcome in these safe spaces.

big black turnout
Jan 13, 2009



Fallen Rib
An artificial rear end with a machine gun arm sounds good to me where do I sign up

Brendan Rodgers
Jun 11, 2014




If rich people end up artificially resillient to disease, longer lived, stronger, and smarter than baseline humans, how does that not effect human genetics going forward? It doesn't have to be direct genetic manipulation to cause a selection pressure.

GABA ghoul
Oct 29, 2011

Brendan Rodgers posted:

If rich people end up artificially resillient to disease, longer lived, stronger, and smarter than baseline humans, how does that not effect human genetics going forward? It doesn't have to be direct genetic manipulation to cause a selection pressure.

With the exception of Musk, rich people don't tend to have a lot of children. Fertility correlates with poverty

learnincurve
May 15, 2014

Smoosh

Brendan Rodgers posted:

If rich people end up artificially resillient to disease, longer lived, stronger, and smarter than baseline humans, how does that not effect human genetics going forward? It doesn't have to be direct genetic manipulation to cause a selection pressure.

Happily we already know exactly what will happem

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7X01_j_oDA

Dewgy
Nov 10, 2005

~🚚special delivery~📦

crispix posted:

what about those people who get artificial asses but just silicone

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmOw-jplSMk

Gros Tarla
Dec 30, 2008

F_Shit_Fitzgerald posted:

Jelly is right that I was conflating a few things, so I take back the eugenics comments.

But the latter comment provides an answer to the former. I think transhumanism is an easy solution to systemic problems. If we had cybernetic implants tomorrow, we'd still be beset with homelessness, poverty and hunger, just with "superhumans". If we want a better society, we should first address those problems directly rather than relying on technology to be a magic bullet that automatically serves all the other problems.

I don't believe anyone besides dipshits like Musk are preaching that. For most, implants and poo poo like that are about returning QOL and dignity to people suffering. And that is something that should be up there in the top priorities, as part of healthcare.

Brendan Rodgers posted:

If rich people end up artificially resillient to disease, longer lived, stronger, and smarter than baseline humans, how does that not effect human genetics going forward? It doesn't have to be direct genetic manipulation to cause a selection pressure.

Rich people are already generally healthier, it's not really an if. Money gets you better healthcare and better education (that addresses many healthcare problems before they actually become problems).

Mr.Pibbleton
Feb 3, 2006

Aleuts rock, chummer.

Kingo Ligma posted:

I always knew people with pacemakers didn't have souls

...my dad became a conservative after getting a pace maker.

Klyith
Aug 3, 2007

GBS Pledge Week

Brendan Rodgers posted:

Rich people will get augmented and poor people won't.

this is a reason to be anti-capitalist, not anti-transhumanist


I think it's fine to dismiss a lot of the tech-bros who talk about transhumanism while still being pretty chuddy, just like you can dismiss a crypto-bro who takes game about effective altruism while stealing from people. But idiots who pay lip service to a philosophy without following the principles aren't an indictment of the philosophy itself.

Like, Elon is anti-trans. You can't be anti-trangender and a transhumanist at the same time without being a giant idiot hypocrite.

pixaal
Jan 8, 2004

All ice cream is now for all beings, no matter how many legs.


What I really want is an extra arm or two it'd come in handy.

Ultra
Dec 30, 2004

Oh no.
Any news on the wunderkind programmer who is going to fix search in a single line of Javascript?

Mozi
Apr 4, 2004

Forms change so fast
Time is moving past
Memory is smoke
Gonna get wider when I die
Nap Ghost

Ultra posted:

Any news on the wunderkind programmer who is going to fix search in a single line of Javascript?

yeah it's actually me - have a look at what i've got so far!

code:
newSearch: (params) =>
  ch = curl_init()
  curl_setopt(ch, CURLOPT_URL, "www.google.com?" + params)
  results = curl_exec(ch)
  curl_close(ch)
  return results

Trillhouse
Dec 31, 2000

Ultra posted:

Any news on the wunderkind programmer who is going to fix search in a single line of Javascript?

Right after Twitter Blue, arriving November 29.

mysterious frankie
Jan 11, 2009

This displeases Dev- ..van. Shut up.

SirPhoebos posted:

If I had to guess, the worry with trans-humanism is that it can come across as optimistic to the point of naivety. Whereas the cyberpunk genre posits that 'people are people, and will invariably turn life-changing technology to lovely ends', transhumanism tends to just go "nah don't worry about it, this'll be different! :v:'

But that is just my take.

It introduces the potential for new hierarchies of capability that are gated behind wealth\debt into a highly competitive system that is already weighed down by inequality. Earlier in the thread I mentioned wanting Lasik, but I don't need it to see my screen and perform my job since my (comparatively cheap) glasses replicate adequate vision; imagine if there were brain implants that turned people in my field into human computers, functionally making me complete dogshit at my job in comparison unless I spent what I imagine would be a staggering amount of money to get the procedure and maintain parity. Maybe without the implant I'd still be able to find work, but it would be worse work for less pay than I receive now. I think transhumanism is a little scary at this point in our history because our economy presents extreme precarity in the lives of its workers as a desirable driver of innovation, competition, and lower overhead for the employer. Everything I know about how our extravagantly capitalist society operates would have to fundamentally change for me to not expect a worsening of conditions to arise from common transhumanist promises breeching into reality.

The idea of exciting new fixes for common problems or aesthetic procedures don't really bother me, because they would just get added to the ever-growing pile of things I can't afford. It's when you start talking about theoretical improvements to baseline humanness that I begin squirming.

Sylvian Wastes
Jan 3, 2022

by Hand Knit
What I love about this "Elon Musk running Twitter" saga is how conveniently every 24 hours there's a new major tweet or news coverage that dents his reputation even more.

Brendan Rodgers
Jun 11, 2014




Klyith posted:

this is a reason to be anti-capitalist

I am.


Gros Tarla posted:

Rich people are already generally healthier, it's not really an if. Money gets you better healthcare and better education (that addresses many healthcare problems before they actually become problems).

Well yeah, if you're someone who can't even see a doctor for something basic, which is billions of humans probably, what the gently caress good is something like cancer research to you? That's exactly what I'm saying.

Now imagine if the rich are living for hundreds of years and have capabilities far beyond our own baseline to the point where they aren't just a separate social class, but essentially a post-human species.

These things aren't inherently bad. But they are going to be used badly. We can't even do something like manufacture clothes without it being a global hellscape of human misery and exploitation.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Serious_Cyclone
Oct 25, 2017

I appreciate your patience, this is a tricky maneuver

Brendan Rodgers posted:

These things aren't inherently bad. But they are going to be used badly. We can't even do something like manufacture clothes without it being a global hellscape of human misery and exploitation.

This is where I'm at as well. Whether it's an indictment of transhumanism as a philosophy or not, we can't put transhumanism into practice until at a minimum we've mastered the practice of humanism.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply