|
Dirt Road Junglist posted:Did Vic sustain a greivous head injury in the recent past? How does anyone, regardless of their known sex pest past, think that's a cool joke to do on a stream? With the lack of opportunities to sexually harass women at cons ever since his Cancellation, Vic's Urges have been building up for the past several years so no wonder he lacked the self control to Not expose himself to women on a zoom call.
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2022 02:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 22:50 |
|
|
MechaX posted:I... before this video I honest thought Leopard print speedos/tighty-whities were just gag items
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2022 02:58
|
|
|
TenementFunster posted:it was always pretty clear after decades of Vic being a creep to people to anyone who even just asked around, but it took a totally inexperienced and greedy showboat like Nick to push forward with the grift instead of actually doing some investigation into the veracity of the claims. intense client selection/screening is the very first step of any impact litigation and Nick just didn't do his homework because he was too focused on that sweet Hateron cash. What's the mechanism for vetting a client like this? I've only ever worked the legal research side of things, and even then I would never trust a client to tell me the truth about anything embarrassing.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2022 07:12
|
|
|
Does anyone know who those women are? Did they just have him on so they could go, "wow vic how awful that those libs cancelled you" only for him to do the thing that got him cancelled in the first place? Which, if so lol
Happy Landfill fucked around with this message at 08:08 on Dec 6, 2022 |
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2022 08:01
|
|
|
Great now you're making me look at that video again out of morbid curiosity. I swear they looked like plain whites
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2022 08:04
|
|
|
grassy gnoll posted:What's the mechanism for vetting a client like this? I've only ever worked the legal research side of things, and even then I would never trust a client to tell me the truth about anything embarrassing. in the Oscar Wilde case, ol' Oscar filed a defamation suit because his boyfriend's dad said he was gay. not only was it not defamation, but Wlide had to serve hard labor when he was subsequently charged and convicted of the crime of Being Gay
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2022 09:16
|
|
|
Happy Landfill posted:Does anyone know who those women are? Did they just have him on so they could go, "wow vic how awful that those libs cancelled you" only for him to do the thing that got him cancelled in the first place? Which, if so lol From what I understand of it... yes? They're three Pick Me nerd chud hangers on who thought they were going to have a pleasant evening with him chatting about how unfair it is that everything thinks he's a sex offender, only for him to do the thing that gets you put on a sex offender registry if you did it in public to random people.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2022 09:55
|
|
|
nine-gear crow posted:From what I understand of it... yes? They're three Pick Me nerd chud hangers on who thought they were going to have a pleasant evening with him chatting about how unfair it is that everything thinks he's a sex offender, only for him to do the thing that gets you put on a sex offender registry if you did it in public to random people. roflmao he is just an incorrigible pervert!
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2022 10:21
|
|
|
nine-gear crow posted:From what I understand of it... yes? They're three Pick Me nerd chud hangers on who thought they were going to have a pleasant evening with him chatting about how unfair it is that everything thinks he's a sex offender, only for him to do the thing that gets you put on a sex offender registry if you did it in public to random people. Wonder how the rest of their stream went. After they cut him off
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2022 10:28
|
|
|
Happy Landfill posted:Wonder how the rest of their stream went. After they cut him off They're trying to pass it off as ol' Uncle Vic just had a 'boomer moment.' I only know one of them subscribed to get a Twitter checkmark, so LOL.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2022 14:07
|
|
|
grassy gnoll posted:What's the mechanism for vetting a client like this? I've only ever worked the legal research side of things, and even then I would never trust a client to tell me the truth about anything embarrassing. Broadly speaking if you want to do strategic litigation first off you want a perfect case and a perfect client. So obviously you want all the facts of the matter on your side, then you want your client's character to be unimpeachable. Someone upstanding, someone with no personal vices, and also with the acuity and willpower to work closely with your lawyers and give disciplined statements. Mignogna is none of that. He has a reputation for being a pervert, can't stop bing a pervert. He was lazy and preferred to spend his time flying out to cons to meet much younger fans, he kept botching up his dispositions, and was often not available to help his lawyers. Famously, preceding Rosa Parks, a teenager named Claudette Colvin also wanted to take legal action over being arrested for not moving to the back of the bus. However, the ACLU declined her case, she was too young, she was pregnant out of wedlock, her skin was too dark and didn't appeal to the middle class. So her existence has been used by subsequent opponents of the civil rights act to attack it, smearing the movement as cynical. They should be ignored out of hand, but alas cynicism is required for positive social change. Therefore, impact litigation that goes against the prevailing establishment needs a certain quality to their clients. I suppose that's going to matter less in the future. Right now SCOTUS is hearing a case from a homophobic website designer who intends to but currently does not make wedding announcement websites, the right to put a "no gay weddings allowed" banner on her site. No one has sued her, but her and a cabal of evangelical dark money psychopaths have sued the state for the right to discriminate against LGBT clients. This has been appealed all the way up to the loving supreme court, and you know what this pack of 6-3 jackals are about to do. Mignogna's case was simply ahead of its time.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2022 23:13
|
|
|
In a response to Vic flashing those three women, I saw the weirdest deflection "How's Ron beating people with a remote going?" in the comments and I'm sure I probably don't want to know but find myself forced to ask anyway.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2022 19:45
|
|
|
Dawgstar posted:In a response to Vic flashing those three women, I saw the weirdest deflection "How's Ron beating people with a remote going?" in the comments and I'm sure I probably don't want to know but find myself forced to ask anyway. No clue, it's obviously target hate at one of the defendants, Ron Toye, but whether it’s a real incident or one of a million made up things vic stans made up, I don't know, and is hardly relevant to the actual contents of the case.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2022 20:03
|
|
|
Julias posted:No clue, it's obviously target hate at one of the defendants, Ron Toye, but whether it’s a real incident or one of a million made up things vic stans made up, I don't know, and is hardly relevant to the actual contents of the case. It's a real incident in the sense that Ron Toye once hit his ex on the thigh, I think? with a remote in anger, and he acknowledges that was a dumb rear end in a top hat thing to do, and neither Ron or his ex care about the incident anymore, since Ron is by all accounts a changed man.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2022 21:35
|
|
|
It is also, again, irrelevant to the case at hand.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2022 21:55
|
|
|
It's whataboutism to a tee.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2022 15:35
|
|
|
No ur not wearing pants https://twitter.com/marzgurl/status/1600663702335737856?s=46&t=cXKAByU9AxAjUookUIX5Jg
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2022 05:02
|
|
|
Who could have expected any less from Vic "Well No One Ever Told Me NOT To Take Underage Fans Back To My Room" Mignogna 
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2022 05:08
|
|
|
Could see his explanation as being true, but it's so besides the fact that it's hilarious he feels like it vindicates him alone. Good measure of a person how they react to something like this. "I made a stupid decision to go pantless in a zoom and I am so so sorry in a moment of absent-mindedness I flashed everyone my crotch. I will be better." vs. "THESE PEOPLE HAVE THE AUDACITY TO try to make me accountable for mistakes i made WHEN I WAS RUNNING LATE."
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2022 17:25
|
|
|
His explanation is that he was reaching for "something" behind his laptop but never actually manages to come up with what he might have been reaching for, and doesn't explain why he quit the stream immediately afterwards. He's lying and you shouldn't give him the benefit of the doubt
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2022 17:47
|
|
|
My point was more it doesn't even matter if you did. Bewildering that people are still eager to meet this baby.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2022 18:48
|
|
|
Amazing how the most charitable reading of basically anything Vic has ever done in his life at this point is now that he's just the god's honest most stupidest newborn-child-brained perfect special idiot to ever walk the earth and has not learned a single thing from his six decades of existence about right and wrong and he should be judged on his actions as though he was a real life Boo Radley or something.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2022 21:58
|
|
|
A perfectly frictionless brain.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2022 00:24
|
|
|
God I keep forgetting he's 60
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2022 00:41
|
|
|
Does his mom still run his fan club?
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2022 19:46
|
|
|
Happy Landfill posted:God I keep forgetting he's 60 That he keeps trying frosted tips is probably a distraction.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2022 20:08
|
|
|
He also uses a profile pic from about 20 years ago lol
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2022 20:32
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/KathrynTewson/status/1608849757296033792 Welp.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2022 17:54
|
|
|
9 down 1 to go right? Going to the US Supreme Court next?
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2022 17:56
|
|
|
Hughlander posted:9 down 1 to go right? Going to the US Supreme Court next? If his lawyers want to spend a big chunk of change to get similarly denied, sure. He has no chance of further appeal. Petitioning for cert in the SCOTUS is a little bit trickier than just efiling stuff through a state court system. Since Vic will not be granted pauper status, he'll have to send in like 45 published books of his petition for cert. There are a lot of publishers in DC that will take your money to do it, but they are going to require money up front.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2022 18:01
|
|
|
Yeah, this seems to be the point where the representation can say "I have pushed this case as far as I can reasonably manage and I am under no obligation to pursue it further."
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2022 18:04
|
|
|
Let’s be honest He’d have Clarence Thomas for sure
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2022 18:04
|
|
|
Mr. Nice! posted:If his lawyers want to spend a big chunk of change to get similarly denied, sure. He has no chance of further appeal. He's absolutely gonna do this because he's an idiot.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2022 18:04
|
|
|
The next procedural thing in this case will be a new hearing on attorneys fees for the two defendants who won on appeal. There may be a further appeal of those attorneys' fees. Everyone else can proceed to collection as there should be a final judgment for them.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2022 18:07
|
|
|
halftime the promise has been made
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2022 18:11
|
|
|
Alan Smithee posted:Let’s be honest He'd have an uncomfortably large number in the bag for sure.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2022 18:12
|
|
|
Vincent Van Goatse posted:He's absolutely gonna do this because he's an idiot. Even if he does, I don't believe the TX courts are going to hold off any longer. There's certainly some window after this order date that it is finalized, but that is just ministerial at this point. The SCOTUS isn't going to grant a stay to proceedings. The judgment is final as to everyone except the two who were awarded too small of a fee award.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2022 18:13
|
|
|
Happy new year, thread! 
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2022 19:11
|
|
|
And at the end of the road, he found a sign. The sign read "gently caress you, Vic Mignogna."
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2022 19:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 22:50 |
|
|
With all the poo poo going on this latest embarrassment barely registers top 3 this week
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2022 23:34
|
|