Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
What is the most powerful flying bug?
This poll is closed.
🦋 15 3.71%
🦇 115 28.47%
🪰 12 2.97%
🐦 67 16.58%
dragonfly 94 23.27%
🦟 14 3.47%
🐝 87 21.53%
Total: 404 votes
[Edit Poll (moderators only)]

 
  • Post
  • Reply
fits my needs
Jan 1, 2011

Grimey Drawer
https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1605832022341160960?s=20&t=CzqPlkQGW2zez4XhwypSQQ

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy

PawParole posted:

There’s no tragedy in the death of the deviationists but Hoxiaism was ideologically correct and yet it collapsed as well.
stalinism/hoxhaism were destined to "collapse" one way or another. i agree with what isaac deutscher wrote about stalinism in that it represented a contradiction in the soviet union at the time, which was a marxist party taking power in a backwards country that was still pre-industrial in a lot of places, and that this party both accelerated the society while also constructing a political regime that had characteristics of a lower-stage of civilization with the magical god-emperor of the sun being the lord of everything. the serfs were only emancipated in russia in 1865 and stalin wasn't born long after that.

marxism is highly logical within the context of an industrialized society, which the communist party of the soviet union tasked itself with creating, but as it was doing this, stalin became the leader of a quasi-religion centered around his person, which was not "logical" and certainly "grotesque" to see. there were a lot of educated party members who had a cynical attitude about this too. but it "made sense" as socialism adapting itself to its environment, but then the material conditions of the society punched into the atomic age in 25 years which took centuries in britain, which also paradoxically created the conditions for stalinism to "whither away." i think there's also an analogy to napoleon inheriting the revolution and spreading it beyond its borders but also reviving some elements of the "ancien regime."







https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Net9YgT7qMM

Slavvy posted:

Denouncing Stalin is what ultimately destroyed the USSR and I will never be convinced otherwise.
khrushchev's criticisms, even if unfair in some respects, were not as strong as sometimes described. but stalin's death was going to create a crisis of "faith" no matter what because people had become accustomed to treating stalin as a demigod. china did it better vis-a-vis mao. then there's north korea, which is still like the USSR in the early 1950s in a lot of ways, but north korea is like that because of its situation, which makes it "ugly" to look at too, but it's not in a normal situation.

Slavvy
Dec 11, 2012

That crisis of faith is what I'm referring to. They could've said 'he did what he had to, made mistakes, but it's ultimately how we got here and we can't forget that because it's our history' like the ccp did with mao afaict. But if you insist everything to do with him was bad and wrong and the capitalists might not actually be evil incarnate, then you put yourself in the situation of asking wtf we're all actually doing here and why and suddenly you start thinking bourgeois consumerism is aspirational and a couple decades later you've got gorby. Imo the ccp haven't fully dodged this bullet even now.

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy

A Russian troll farm posted:

I'm not going to say that Stalin did nothing wrong. Like anyone else, he was flawed, and he made mistakes. But his heart was in the right place and he never gave up on his dreams
there's a genre of russian marxist propaganda that says as much, while also criticizing (in hilariously spiteful ways) the new russian bourgeoisie who simultaneously vilify stalin and try to recuperate stalin as a bourgeois patriotic figure. so if stalin was a napoleon, putin is the "napoleon III" (which didn't end well for him)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GZBYgMlPcI&t=1810s

Slavvy posted:

That crisis of faith is what I'm referring to. They could've said 'he did what he had to, made mistakes, but it's ultimately how we got here and we can't forget that because it's our history' like the ccp did with mao afaict. But if you insist everything to do with him was bad and wrong and the capitalists might not actually be evil incarnate, then you put yourself in the situation of asking wtf we're all actually doing here and why and suddenly you start thinking bourgeois consumerism is aspirational and a couple decades later you've got gorby. Imo the ccp haven't fully dodged this bullet even now.
yeah. i'm just saying that khrushchev never said that everything to do with stalin was bad and wrong, it was more focused on three specific things: military mistakes during the war (unfair imo), the cult of personality, and the purges. but he said that stalin did that because he thought he was advancing socialism in the process, which i think is true.

BrutalistMcDonalds has issued a correction as of 09:46 on Dec 22, 2022

Vomik
Jul 29, 2003

This post is dedicated to the brave Mujahideen fighters of Afghanistan
imo I think the rise of neo nazism is probably because the nazis were never actually removed from power they just slid into NATO and the us government.

or I guess maybe a country that collapsed 30 years ago and had/has been looted and sabotaged by the west is to blame for the problems in the west

Vomik
Jul 29, 2003

This post is dedicated to the brave Mujahideen fighters of Afghanistan
of course besides the nazis I’d be remiss not to mention that all the other slave empires and genociders also just naturally slid into the extended American empire while never actually having to face their reckoning

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

Vomik posted:

imo I think the rise of neo nazism is probably because the nazis were never actually removed from power they just slid into NATO and the us government.

or I guess maybe a country that collapsed 30 years ago and had/has been looted and sabotaged by the west is to blame for the problems in the west

Tbf when we looted and sabotaged that country 30 years ago, we allowed/helped a lot of Nazis to worm their way into the government as well. But yeah, that just underlines your point - neo-nazism is there because it's convenient for capital for them to be there.

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

Slavvy posted:

That crisis of faith is what I'm referring to. They could've said 'he did what he had to, made mistakes, but it's ultimately how we got here and we can't forget that because it's our history' like the ccp did with mao afaict. But if you insist everything to do with him was bad and wrong and the capitalists might not actually be evil incarnate, then you put yourself in the situation of asking wtf we're all actually doing here and why and suddenly you start thinking bourgeois consumerism is aspirational and a couple decades later you've got gorby. Imo the ccp haven't fully dodged this bullet even now.

Where have I heard this before? :thunk:

That crisis of faith is what I'm referring to. They could've said 'we made mistakes, but it's ultimately how we got here and we can't forget that because it's our history' like the Catholic Church did in addressing its scandals. But if you insist everything to do with the Church was bad and wrong, then you put yourself in the situation of asking what we're all actually doing here and why and suddenly you start thinking that leaving the Church is aspirational. It will take a long time for the Church to fully recover from the damage that has been done, and it may never fully dodge this bullet.

Tankbuster
Oct 1, 2021
The catholic church pretends that calcutta was an open sewer that was stopped from imploding by mother teresa running around with a corpse cart.

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

Tankbuster posted:

The catholic church pretends that calcutta was an open sewer that was stopped from imploding by mother teresa running around with a corpse cart.

Missionaries of Charity were applying Maoist vanguard theory.

evilmiera
Dec 14, 2009

Status: Ravenously Rambunctious

Ardennes posted:

More than in a jokey sense, do you really actually think the world is in a better place with the collapse of the Soviet Union? I mean really deep down?

Time for a study on GBS syndrome: it's origins, symptoms, and prognosis

Much like the US, if it keeps endorsing and cheering on mass-murderers and power-hungry narcissists, or if that endorsement was the only thing keeping it afloat, then maybe there's something structurally wrong about it and it needs to either change or be replaced by something else.

Tankbuster
Oct 1, 2021

Frosted Flake posted:

Missionaries of Charity were applying Maoist vanguard theory.

and just like every other maoist group in India they succeeded in kneecapping the left.

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

evilmiera posted:

if it keeps endorsing and cheering on mass-murderers and power-hungry narcissists, or if that endorsement was the only thing keeping it afloat,

the USSR specifically stopped doing that

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

evilmiera posted:

Much like the US, if it keeps endorsing and cheering on mass-murderers and power-hungry narcissists, or if that endorsement was the only thing keeping it afloat, then maybe there's something structurally wrong about it and it needs to either change or be replaced by something else.

Imagine a system that recognized using violence, wielding power and inspiring belief as important. Crazy.

DancingShade
Jul 26, 2007

by Fluffdaddy

007 wannabes: know your worth.

evilmiera
Dec 14, 2009

Status: Ravenously Rambunctious

gradenko_2000 posted:

the USSR specifically stopped doing that

I was responding to the people who said the USSR collapsed because it denounced Stalin

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

evilmiera posted:

I was responding to the people who said the USSR collapsed because it denounced Stalin

It collapsed because it didn’t realize that levis and bananas represented a system even more red in tooth and claw instead of freedom.

lobotomy molo
May 7, 2007

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

evilmiera posted:

I was responding to the people who said the USSR collapsed because it denounced Stalin

the USSR collapsed because the richest industrial capitalist nation considered its survival an existential thread, wanted to carve it up and plunder it. certain revisionist dipshits (kruschev, gorbachov) thought appeasing the west by denouncing stalin and past soviet actions, giving concessions and not backing revolutionary movements in other countries, etc. would restore good relations with the US. they were wrong, and instead the aggressive unilateral US siege of the USSR continued until it collapsed.

just for comparison, the american empire has killed far more people than stalin, just like the british empire before it. try reading the jakarta method or killing hope to learn more. :)

Zodium
Jun 19, 2004

BrutalistMcDonalds posted:

stalinism/hoxhaism were destined to "collapse" one way or another. i agree with what isaac deutscher wrote about stalinism in that it represented a contradiction in the soviet union at the time, which was a marxist party taking power in a backwards country that was still pre-industrial in a lot of places, and that this party both accelerated the society while also constructing a political regime that had characteristics of a lower-stage of civilization with the magical god-emperor of the sun being the lord of everything. the serfs were only emancipated in russia in 1865 and stalin wasn't born long after that.

marxism is highly logical within the context of an industrialized society, which the communist party of the soviet union tasked itself with creating, but as it was doing this, stalin became the leader of a quasi-religion centered around his person, which was not "logical" and certainly "grotesque" to see. there were a lot of educated party members who had a cynical attitude about this too. but it "made sense" as socialism adapting itself to its environment, but then the material conditions of the society punched into the atomic age in 25 years which took centuries in britain, which also paradoxically created the conditions for stalinism to "whither away." i think there's also an analogy to napoleon inheriting the revolution and spreading it beyond its borders but also reviving some elements of the "ancien regime."

lobotomy molo posted:

the USSR collapsed because the richest industrial capitalist nation considered its survival an existential thread, wanted to carve it up and plunder it. certain revisionist dipshits (kruschev, gorbachov) thought appeasing the west by denouncing stalin and past soviet actions, giving concessions and not backing revolutionary movements in other countries, etc. would restore good relations with the US. they were wrong, and instead the aggressive unilateral US siege of the USSR continued until it collapsed.

just for comparison, the american empire has killed far more people than stalin, just like the british empire before it. try reading the jakarta method or killing hope to learn more. :)

:hmmyes:

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

tristeham
Jul 31, 2022

Frosted Flake posted:

Where have I heard this before? :thunk:

That crisis of faith is what I'm referring to. They could've said 'we made mistakes, but it's ultimately how we got here and we can't forget that because it's our history' like the Catholic Church did in addressing its scandals. But if you insist everything to do with the Church was bad and wrong, then you put yourself in the situation of asking what we're all actually doing here and why and suddenly you start thinking that leaving the Church is aspirational. It will take a long time for the Church to fully recover from the damage that has been done, and it may never fully dodge this bullet.

i hope it never recovers you stupid bitch

lobotomy molo
May 7, 2007

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

those tattoos :captainpop:

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

tristeham posted:

i hope it never recovers you stupid bitch

<3

Orange Devil
Oct 1, 2010

Wullie's reign cannae smother the flames o' equality!

Frosted Flake posted:

Okay, so I have not had the chance to read these books before with the exception of the Return of the Ancestral Gods, which was pretty much "Azov: The Book!". From skimming them and jotting down notes in the bookstore, It is more clear to me than ever, that "Ukrainian Nationalism" as it exists today grew out of the group of Galician Catholics that had previously identified themselves as "Rusyn" or "Ruthenian". This is a bit funny to me, because I had previously joked about "Why the Ukrainians and not the Kashubians?" but it seems like what's transpired is more-or-less what would have happened if the Kashubians had been able to define "Polish" nationalism. Specifically, a small group without a state, chafing against their neighbours, found themselves empowered in 1941 and 2014 because they were virulently anti-Russian and anti-Communist, then traded in the limited and geographically restricted identity of "Rusyn" or "Ruthenian" for defining "Ukrainian" as a whole. How they became "Ukrainian" in the first place was ironically because when the USSR assumed Galicia from Austria-Hungary, they lumped them in with people they had previously never shared a nation with. This rather clumsy effort at integrating Galicia into the Soviet Union backfired as the vengeful bumpkins never let it go. This was later used against Russia by groups who were happy to enable the Galicians in their myriad projects of revenge.

I started playing some online boardgames with a Ukrainian fella in Kiev this year, which is a little weird given uhh, you know, everything. But uhh anyway he told me just this week that starting this year Ukraine will be celebrating Christmas following the Gregorian calendar, so Dec 24th and 25th rather than January 7th.

I had to think about this poo poo instantly. These Galician Catholics are reshaping the whole country in their image.

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

Orange Devil posted:

I started playing some online boardgames with a Ukrainian fella in Kiev this year, which is a little weird given uhh, you know, everything. But uhh anyway he told me just this week that starting this year Ukraine will be celebrating Christmas following the Gregorian calendar, so Dec 24th and 25th rather than January 7th.

I had to think about this poo poo instantly. These Galician Catholics are reshaping the whole country in their image.

That’s a huge deal. Like you said, totally in line with everything else, but wow. I’m not surprised it didn’t make it to the western media - it can’t be called “decommunization”, or “decolonizing” Russian influence in the way the language stuff or suppressing the Orthodox church can.

Jesus. There will be no peace there with what’s been unleashed on their society. Changing the date of Christmas is an Early Modern level of social conflict.

Frosted Flake has issued a correction as of 13:51 on Dec 22, 2022

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

tristeham posted:

i hope it never recovers you stupid bitch

reddit atheist moment

crepeface
Nov 5, 2004

r*p*f*c*
https://i.imgur.com/I9ACT3k.mp4

Regarde Aduck
Oct 19, 2012

c l o u d k i t t e n
Grimey Drawer

going to beat this hobbit gently caress up

ContinuityNewTimes
Dec 30, 2010

Я выдуман напрочь

gradenko_2000 posted:

reddit atheist moment

Or one of the cool Christians like John Ball or Gerard Winstanley

ContinuityNewTimes
Dec 30, 2010

Я выдуман напрочь
Not that dumb bitch luther

tristeham
Jul 31, 2022

gradenko_2000 posted:

reddit atheist moment

no i'm just really tired of the epic papist nato troop

Kindest Forums User
Mar 25, 2008

Let me tell you about my opinion about Bernie Sanders and why Donald Trump is his true successor.

You cannot vote Hillary Clinton because she is worse than Trump.

tristeham posted:

no i'm just really tired of the epic papist nato troop

Thank you for your courage

Cerebral Bore
Apr 21, 2010


Fun Shoe
epic papist nato troops are still completely broken as of the latest patch, they really need to nerf them soon or the posting meta will go straight to hell

ContinuityNewTimes
Dec 30, 2010

Я выдуман напрочь
The regular NATO troop posters just can't compete

samogonka
Nov 5, 2016
https://twitter.com/RedStar_Koba/status/1605884107900170240

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy
:ohdear:
oh no not fascist symbology in the US Congress

bedpan
Apr 23, 2008

epic papist?

how about epic poopist, because my pamps are overflowing atm

fits my needs
Jan 1, 2011

Grimey Drawer
https://twitter.com/AP/status/1605942487138304014?s=20&t=CzqPlkQGW2zez4XhwypSQQ

Cerebral Bore
Apr 21, 2010


Fun Shoe
one could ask how, given that the city is supposed to be in ruins, there are still tens of thousands of homes to demolish

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy
there's more than one Papist on this forum

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply