|
There will probably be some cool urbex videos of people wandering through this tunnel in a few years after it's been shut down and closed up.
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2023 08:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 17:52 |
|
|
Lead out in cuffs posted:It's literally just to get across the Convention Centre from the parking lot. It's a glorified valet service but in a lovely tunnel. Another success by business genius rocket man Elon Musk!
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2023 16:16
|
|
|
Senor Tron posted:There will probably be some cool urbex videos of people wandering through this tunnel in a few years after it's been shut down and closed up. Probably have to bring extra oxygen depending on why it's shut down lol Evil Fluffy posted:Another success by business genius rocket man Elon Musk! Only a true genius like Elon Musk could get us to Mars by 2018.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2023 17:29
|
|
|
Anno posted:Maybe this is widely known and I've just been blissfully unaware but Jesus Christ how is this real lmao It's a tunnel people and Elon Musk will never love you.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2023 18:06
|
|
|
I can't wait in a few years where a YouTube video comes up in my feed for an SCP-like horror game set in the tunnel. You have to walk through it while avoiding the craze Elonmonster in underpants that is hunting you down. You know, I'm mashing around in Unity a bit . . .
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2023 21:00
|
|
|
Boris Galerkin posted:https://apps.apple.com/us/app/vinegar-tube-cleaner/id1591303229 I’ve been using this Stadium app for … a few years now. I think originally because I actually was going to do something with Stadia (ha!) and then as a byproduct noticed that it would only roll one add at the beginning of some videos and I could just fast forward through it and then no more adds… Vinegar is probably better and only $1.99 so I will check it out.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2023 22:02
|
|
|
Perestroika posted:It would literally be more efficient (and safer) if they'd just let people walk through the tunnel. It's not even two miles long. When the money runs out and everyone loses interest, that is probably its fate.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2023 22:12
|
|
|
The people who live in the drainage tunnels can move in
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2023 22:14
|
|
|
Senor Tron posted:There will probably be some cool urbex videos of people wandering through this tunnel in a few years after it's been shut down and closed up. It won't even be cool, it's a boring tunnel.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2023 23:58
|
|
|
C.H.U.D.: cannibalistic humanoid underground dweller.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 00:27
|
|
|
MixMasterMalaria posted:C.H.U.D.: cannibalistic humanoid underground dweller. CHauvinist and Utter Douche
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 00:58
|
|
|
Perestroika posted:It would literally be more efficient (and safer) if they'd just let people walk through the tunnel. It's not even two miles long. That tunnel probably has no airflow aside from the motion of the cars and I sure as poo poo don't expect the lights to be maintained well, if at all.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 01:11
|
|
|
Perestroika posted:It would literally be more efficient (and safer) if they'd just let people walk through the tunnel. It's not even two miles long. Put a moving sidewalk in, it will be like changing terminals at Frankfurt! EDIT: Honestly, with ventilation and the cool high-speed moving sidewalks they use at some airports now.... not the worst idea in the world. Probably faster and more pleasant than bundling into a Tesla like a loving idiot.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 01:50
|
|
|
The boring company is a clever company name looking for a solution looking for a problem
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 02:06
|
|
|
Make it a bike path with free bikes on both ends.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 02:09
|
|
|
nachos posted:The boring company is a clever company name looking for a solution looking for a problem They solved the problem of parting the LVCC from $50M or so and are still in the process of trying to bilk Miami and Ft. Lauderdale.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 02:44
|
|
|
"The boring company is a clever company name" this is wrong so the rest of your sentence is also wrong.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 02:57
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/jbrowder1/status/1612312707398795264 https://twitter.com/jbrowder1/status/1612312710112481282 (screencap) I'm sure judges will LOVE this. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 06:08
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:https://twitter.com/jbrowder1/status/1612312707398795264 Best fast track to getting disbarred that I can think of, short of stealing your client's money.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 07:03
|
|
|
Memnaelar posted:Best fast track to getting disbarred that I can think of, short of stealing your client's money. Chatgpt should be required to pass a bar exam  ... What happens if it DOES pass though? 
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 07:32
|
|
|
It's not too unreasonable; a lot of lawyers are really dumb.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 08:31
|
|
|
I'm just left wondering if you are allowed to "repeat exactly what someone says" to your earpiece, even if that someone was Ben loving Matlock. I'm assuming that no, you're not.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 09:04
|
|
|
Hmm yes let me gamble my career on a promise of $1m from a company called *checks notes* DoNotPay.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 10:27
|
|
|
goatsestretchgoals posted:Hmm yes let me gamble my career on a promise of $1m from a company called *checks notes* DoNotPay. Don't laugh, reports of Alex Jones' lawyers formulating a plan are emerging. (not really but LOL they are pretty fucken dumb)
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 11:25
|
|
|
It always impressed me how tech startups can get such high valuations ($210m in this case) while seemingly haven't next to no knowledge in the field they plan to break into/replace.
Mega Comrade fucked around with this message at 11:38 on Jan 10, 2023 |
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 11:25
|
|
|
They have much experience in the "move fast and break some laws" field and are excited to implement this experience in someone else's courtroom for once.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 11:35
|
|
|
Are they the folks that started as a repository for templates you could use to get out of traffic tickets?
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 12:24
|
|
|
Amphigory posted:Are they the folks that started as a repository for templates you could use to get out of traffic tickets? Indeed.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 12:30
|
|
|
Mega Comrade posted:It always impressed me how tech startups can get such high valuations ($210m in this case) while seemingly haven't next to no knowledge in the field they plan to break into/replace. LPs are dumber than the VCs they give money to who are dumber than the CEOs they give money to
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 12:58
|
|
|
Idk the current generation of chat bots is basically just cribbing from Google which I understand is how law arguments are made. You're basically just testing its ability to make a sentence from law-googling relevant case law. - sent from my McCoyLPT
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 13:13
|
|
|
I was curious about the actual route of this tunnel and lol It's not even 1 km long, and the entire building is already connected so you can walk it without leaving the building and dealing with the heat.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 15:08
|
|
|
Yes, the point of the tunnel was for the convention center to show off since it's where they have CES every year. That it actually moves people from one side of the center to the other is a side effect.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 16:13
|
|
|
AIs need therapy and legal representation too.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 16:40
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:https://twitter.com/jbrowder1/status/1612312707398795264 Some real Torment Nexus poo poo here from people who watched later seasons of Westworld.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 20:23
|
|
|
Jaxyon posted:Some real Torment Nexus poo poo here from people who watched later seasons of Westworld. I'll admit that between this and chat bots now generating garbage code that passes an eyeball test getting uploaded to repositories that coders making the chat bots use, it's really heartening to see AI making worse the lives of people who have thus far only been using it to make the lives of others worse. Godspeed I say, if the courts don't like it they should ban it. It's not going to be something they have to deal with only when it's right in front of them.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 20:37
|
|
|
Epic High Five posted:I'll admit that between this and chat bots now generating garbage code that passes an eyeball test getting uploaded to repositories that coders making the chat bots use, it's really heartening to see AI making worse the lives of people who have thus far only been using it to make the lives of others worse. Godspeed I say, if the courts don't like it they should ban it. It's not going to be something they have to deal with only when it's right in front of them. The people who'll have their lives made worse by ChatGPT'd legal arguments won't be judges and lawyers, it'll be poor people hoping for cheap legal advice. Hell, how many years do you think it'll be before some Southern state tries to abolish public defenders altogether and tells indigent defendants to use LawGPT-4 instead? Somebody will absolutely try it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 21:17
|
|
|
"I would like to strike my previous statement from the record, I had my earpiece in but instead of listening to my Chatbot Lawyer I accidentally opened the app for my Chatbot Girlfriend (NSFW DLC paid for in full)"
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 21:31
|
|
|
Instead of wondering if it could replace skilled professionals, the real question is, in my opinion, can AI aid skilled professionals? Is it decent enough that, for example, a lawyer could merely look over its arguments and correct certain aspects with their professional expertise and judgement? Could it access an amount of case law that a human would have trouble being familiar with? Probably. That sounds like a really useful tool. I don't think it's going to replace a lawyer, but it sounds like it could really help a lawyer do their job more effectively and with less effort and time involved. To put it another way: what if we look to AI to replace effort instead of expertise? You're not going to end up with something for nothing, but I think you could make experts more effective at what they do by eliminating some of the things that honestly don't require much expertise, but still need doing. If you look at it like an autopilot in an aircraft, for example, I think it makes a great deal of sense. I don't trust an autopilot to make decisions about my flight, I trust it to relieve me of the busywork of holding an altitude and a heading and maybe manage the throttles, because those things are annoying and can easily be handled by automation, and then I sit back and make sure it doesn't gently caress up, and make decisions about how to direct it next. We could be missing the forest for the trees here; we might be so enamored with the idea of AI replacing people (for better or worse) that we're overlooking the fact that it has the possibility to simply relieve trained experts of the stupid, worst parts of their jobs and allow them to use their expert skills more effectively and productively, with less work involved.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 21:54
|
|
|
Main Paineframe posted:The people who'll have their lives made worse by ChatGPT'd legal arguments won't be judges and lawyers, it'll be poor people hoping for cheap legal advice.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 22:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 17:52 |
|
|
bawk posted:"I would like to strike my previous statement from the record, I had my earpiece in but instead of listening to my Chatbot Lawyer I accidentally opened the app for my Chatbot Girlfriend (NSFW DLC paid for in full)" We put all the evidence in an algorithm and ran the simulation, it said you were guilt 100% of the time. What no, the algorithm is a trade secret you can't know what we used.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2023 22:50
|
|