|
Transformers that are bicycles instead of cars so you can drive one when you’re too young for a license Edit: I recognize and stand by this page snipe. Grassy Knowles has a new favorite as of 17:36 on Mar 7, 2023 |
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 17:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 23:08 |
|
|
The bicyclotron transforms into a stick figure
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 17:56
|
|
|
Grassy Knowles posted:Transformers that are bicycles instead of cars so you can drive one when you’re too young for a license That guy exists 
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 18:01
|
|
|
Those things are no joke, they're for precision assassination kills. Iirc, it's some deal like you could take out someone in a car with one, and the person sitting next to the target would be unscathed. Well, physically anyway, probably some mental trauma from seeing the other guy get pulped and diced by a missile penetrating the car.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 18:05
|
|
|
It's a Slap Chop for people
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 18:18
|
|
|
Phy posted:That guy exists How much must that suck. Not only are you a go-bot but you're not even one of the missile trucks or whatever. That guy over there is a fighter jet and you're not allowed on motorways. Splicer has a new favorite as of 18:23 on Mar 7, 2023 |
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 18:20
|
|
|
Tree Bucket posted:
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 18:26
|
|
|
Splicer posted:Also there's a go-bot who's a scooter. and he's like the main bad guy
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 18:31
|
|
|
Kit Walker posted:It's a Slap Chop for people lol
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 18:33
|
|
precious
|
Platystemon posted:Santoku YOU SAID IT WOULD BE DULL I COULDNÄT FIND MY SHOE HORN NYW IM BLEODNG I CND; E:AR.fa vc
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 18:37
|
|
|
Kit Walker posted:It's a Slap Chop for people Vince here with Raytheon bringing you another SLAPPIN' invention!
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 18:41
|
|
|
LifeSunDeath posted:Raytheon (Aside) Vince: They make the best stuff
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 18:48
|
|
|
Kit Walker posted:It's a Slap Chop for people You’re gonna love my nuts! I’ll forget my own name before I forget this https://youtu.be/-gLOALCvlMI
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 18:56
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 19:05
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 19:06
|
|
|
Hahaha
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 19:10
|
|
|
Nice. Reminds me of the quote in the other thread where James Cameron made the bad terminator robot in T2 a cop because cops are hosed up and bad
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 20:20
|
|
|
Neddy Seagoon posted:Those things are no joke, they're for precision assassination kills. Iirc, it's some deal like you could take out someone in a car with one, and the person sitting next to the target would be unscathed. Not quite that precise:  Unless I'm mixing up events here, this is an image from when one was used on a vehicle in Yemen, and the missile killed three people inside the car. Maybe there was a fourth with the best luck in the universe, but it doesn't look like you're getting away unscathed from that. The blades seem to cover the same area as all four carseats.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 22:06
|
|
|
Still, better than a conventional Hellfire missile, which would annihilate the whole car and injure or kill anyone near it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 22:16
|
|
|
And all this time I thought Robert Evans' jokes about Raytheon's knife missiles were just a bit
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 22:18
|
|
|
it should have been a spork missile, it could have been way more useful.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 22:25
|
|
|
You know what that needs. Chainsaws. I mean honk horns. They need honk horns haha Raytheon did you hear that, I said honk horns
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 22:29
|
|
|
Deploying a 1.2 billion us dollar inflatable spank hammer that goes "honk" That'll show em
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 22:30
|
|
|
Hyperlynx posted:Still, better than a conventional Hellfire missile, which would annihilate the whole car and injure or kill anyone near it. I don't know, that car looks pretty totaled to me. At least Lockheed got paid to make a dumb thing, and in the end that's what matters  It must have been pretty hard to keep a straight face while trying to sell the 2 meter missile that can definitely hit only the target and no Esran has a new favorite as of 23:10 on Mar 7, 2023 |
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 23:08
|
|
|
The wedding missile.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 23:13
|
|
|
Chitin posted:The wedding missile. obama just enjoyed cutting his own cake so much, he wished to leverage his platform to engage with it more
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 23:18
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 23:25
|
|
|
Esran posted:I don't know, that car looks pretty totaled to me. It's the second part of Hyperlynx's reply that's key. I think a regular warhead on a Hellfire missile has a kill radius of like 35 meters. If your guy is parked up next to a playground, the 'flying ginsu' is definitely a better option and a progressive development in missile technology. ... I can't believe I just said that, what bizarre times we're living in.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 23:36
|
|
|
Mister Speaker posted:It's the second part of Hyperlynx's reply that's key. I think a regular warhead on a Hellfire missile has a kill radius of like 35 meters. If your guy is parked up next to a playground, the 'flying ginsu' is definitely a better option and a progressive development in missile technology. I mean if you accept the premise that this world requires weapons and killing people sometimes, then you should at least want those weapons to be as targeted as possible and kill as few people as possible as painlessly as possible. If it were World War I, the missiles would be filled with mustard gas, killing a lot of people much more painfully.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 23:46
|
|
|
SyNack Sassimov posted:I mean if you accept the premise that this world requires weapons and killing people sometimes, then you should at least want those weapons to be as targeted as possible and kill as few people as possible as painlessly as possible. If it were World War I, the missiles would be filled with mustard gas, killing a lot of people much more painfully. I do generally accept that premise, but there's a whole other can of worms in there about whether there is a necessity to kill these particular people and whose business it is to carry it out, and the question therein of why a party from halfway across the world would want to take care of it. That's a conversation I don't want to go into in this, the Funny Pictures Thread. Projectin' force all about the place. Just projectin' big thick ropes of force all over the world. Don't get it in the eyes though! That stings, and then everyone has a bad time. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2023 23:53
|
|
|
We're killing ourselves off anyway, I wouldn't worry about it too much.   
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2023 00:31
|
|
|
3D Megadoodoo posted:Posts like this is what happens when kids don't get a classical education. Kinds menu was great, three stars would eat again.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2023 00:44
|
|
for some people:
|
SyNack Sassimov posted:I mean if you accept the premise that this world requires weapons and killing people sometimes, then you should at least want those weapons to be as targeted as possible and kill as few people as possible as painlessly as possible. If it were World War I, the missiles would be filled with mustard gas, killing a lot of people much more painfully. This was supposed to be horrifying and unethical on its face https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTx_qTwQqjU But I'm like ... I mean ...
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2023 01:18
|
|
|
Mister Speaker posted:I do generally accept that premise, but there's a whole other can of worms in there about whether there is a necessity to kill these particular people and whose business it is to carry it out, and the question therein of why a party from halfway across the world would want to take care of it. That's a conversation I don't want to go into in this, the Funny Pictures Thread. Modposting: If y'all could read this and move on from missile chat, that would be great. Thank you!
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2023 01:31
|
|
|
I apologize for continuing missile derail. Here is some content.  
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2023 01:46
|
|
|
He's lucky he was at full health or this wouldn't have worked. What's it from? What if I hate both sides
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2023 02:42
|
|
|
Any idea what this is from? vvv tanks Blue Footed Booby has a new favorite as of 02:59 on Mar 8, 2023 |
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2023 02:48
|
|
|
I believe that is Edit: Wrong bad Sword and Sorcery movie, it is The Sword and the Sorcerer. muscles like this! has a new favorite as of 03:01 on Mar 8, 2023 |
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2023 02:58
|
|
|
Pretty sure that's Albert Pyun's The sword and the sorcerer.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2023 03:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 23:08 |
|
|
muscles like this! posted:I believe that is Hawk the Slayer. The Sword and the Sorcerer The sword gets more silly: it has TWO sword that it can fire off like that. Then the center blade gets broken, and there's a short sword INSIDE that, just slide off the broken blade! AND the hero has an extendo blade inside his gauntlet!
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2023 03:03
|
|