Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

Weka posted:

How is Ukraine not a full on proxy war?

the West doesn't want to pay for it

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Remulak
Jun 8, 2001
I can't count to four.
Yams Fan
lol I’m liking google today:

Slavvy
Dec 11, 2012

Danann posted:

(from t.me/presstv/61614, via tgsa)

Iran's got a new bote.

What kind of missiles does the speed boat swarm carry?

Delta-Wye
Sep 29, 2005
more shovel porn
https://i.imgur.com/kiqJvUc.mp4
slops on

forget about st javelin, im all in on shovel musicians now

Azathoth
Apr 3, 2001

Weka posted:

Henry Kasandringer.

The bottom income quartile is under represented in the military, the poverty draft isn't real.
How is Ukraine not a full on proxy war?

Because Russia isn't using a proxy, hence the half proxy war part.

Centrist Committee
Aug 6, 2019

Azathoth posted:

The war with China stuff feels like the MIC going for one more big score, but it's hard to see how the remainder of the capital class lets anything get anywhere beyond sailing our big, expensive aircraft carriers around and the military waving their collective dicks out the portholes.

I'd say there's political consensus that hating China is good, but look at how the rank and file politicians reacted when Trump decided to do trade war poo poo with China. There was broad, bipartisan consensus that he was loving it up for everyone and only minority on either side actually on board for that poo poo.

the mic wants it, energy wants it, industrial capital wants it (bc they hate finance capital), and bidens done nothing but stay the course so I don’t think the other capitals have much of a say

Cuttlefush
Jan 15, 2014

gotta have my purp

Slavvy posted:

What kind of missiles does the speed boat swarm carry?

Not entirely clear what the new ones are. Found one article that said they are Ashura and Tariq class, which are things they don't seem to be unless those are new class names. I'd guess they're using the 107mm MLRS but with some guided missiles instead of rockets. That's dinky but those are obviously not meant to take out big ships.

There are a variety of boats Iran has that people call "speedboats with missiles". Here's an unsourced image of some.



Some of the bigger ones there are probably https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peykaap_II-class_missile_boat?useskin=vector or similar which have actual cruise missiles with like 35 or 150kg warheads (~150kg is like an Exocet or the Neptune missiles that got the Moskva). Not sure what the 107mm MLRS are for. The old timey rocket versions have like a 9kg payload. Still if anything blows up anywhere near a carriers it's basically lost.

The little speedboats also probably have mines, torpedoes, and also if they are near a carrier so are a bunch of the big land-based or big ship-based cruise missiles. Also little submarines.

Cuttlefush
Jan 15, 2014

gotta have my purp
They're pretty much the eve online angry bee swarm tackler ship thing. also even if the dinkiest explosion hit the conning tower or pretty much anywhere on a carrier it's already dead, loving off at 50+ knots (they are the fast as gently caress), or incapable of doing anything because it's lost most of its eyes and ears.

also figure this might fit here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVQBV4J8Yqg

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

Cuttlefush posted:

Tariq class,

Iran is gonna buck-break the US Navy

Delta-Wye
Sep 29, 2005

:zerg:

Relevant Tangent
Nov 18, 2016

Tangentially Relevant

The Oldest Man posted:

Including elites who think they can shove their dicks right up to the bandsaw and everything will be fine because they're JIT-brained dipshits who don't understand some things can't be stopped once started and have never had to face a generational crisis of any kind

covid was a generational crisis

sullat
Jan 9, 2012

Frosted Flake posted:

The Late Victorian British Empire is interesting too because it invaded Ethiopia and Tibet for no real reasons anyone could explain or defend, just the failsons had started to take over, and they had all the machinery, so…

Pretty borders faction is always powerful

Tankbuster
Oct 1, 2021
wasn't the tibet thing just brainrot leftover from the great game?

bedpan
Apr 23, 2008

it has been a long time since I saw a free tibet bumper sticker

Junkozeyne
Feb 13, 2012

bedpan posted:

it has been a long time since I saw a free tibet bumper sticker

Well yeah that matter is finished since 1959 :smuggo:

Danann
Aug 4, 2013

https://twitter.com/clary_co/status/1633845357678559232

think tanks love lawyer people huh

PhilippAchtel
May 31, 2011

Cuttlefush posted:

idk about that. seems like it depends on who you're calling media and how you're defining consensus though. and possible. and some otehrs tuff maybe

Yeah this is what this discussion would devolve to, and I'm not super interested in getting in the weeds.

But anyone looking at the events of the last few years who doesn't believe the media apparatus can whip up war fervor from nothing either isn't paying attention or defines any degree of ineffective counternarrative as lack of consensus.

Ardennes
May 12, 2002
The question isn’t whipping up a war fervor over some random country in a colonial operation that doesn’t effect anyone but actually fighting a war that may require mobilization and economic restructuring (or at very least a drastic change in the quality of the life of the population).

China isn’t Iraq or Libya, if anything the US would be going into probably a losing conflict where a lot of Americans would be killed and it probably wouldn’t effect China as much.

Shrecknet
Jan 2, 2005


Relevant Tangent posted:

covid was a generational crisis
only for those with one comma or less in their income

Buffer
May 6, 2007
I sometimes turn down sex and blowjobs from my girlfriend because I'm too busy posting in D&D. PS: She used my credit card to pay for this.
wait, is the contention that they* handled covid well or like, at all?

because I was under the impression they'd done a mass social murder for basically no reason after massively loving it up in a way that would ultimately destroy wealth due to the mass death and disablement

it's not a thing I would point to as evidence of being able to handle anything

* - to the extent there's a "they" and not a loose collection of similarly minded failsons spread across government, industry, law and finance

Thoguh
Nov 8, 2002

College Slice

Relevant Tangent posted:

covid was a generational crisis

*is

PhilippAchtel
May 31, 2011

I would have thought that WWI, and particularly the about face taken by the United States, would have taught us that any argument that concluded a Great War cannot happen or could not be sold to the populace is mistaken.

But sure, if you simply assert that the media landscape has changed in spite of all recent events, fine.

As others have said, look at how easily hatred of China or Russia has been fanned, the propaganda mobilized in that effort, and honestly tell me that if the US could not push all the way.

Doesn't make sense to me.

KomradeX
Oct 29, 2011

Ardennes posted:

The question isn’t whipping up a war fervor over some random country in a colonial operation that doesn’t effect anyone but actually fighting a war that may require mobilization and economic restructuring (or at very least a drastic change in the quality of the life of the population).

China isn’t Iraq or Libya, if anything the US would be going into probably a losing conflict where a lot of Americans would be killed and it probably wouldn’t effect China as much.

Thats the exact thing that occurred to me today. In focusing on how the US could or could not get away with doing a draft in the modern era we overlook something even more important than that, the restructuring of the economy that is necessary to fight a total war. The US in essence had a direct command economy and strict rationing during both world wars, no American politician is capable of doing that today, PR speak and platitudes aren't a substitute for neeeing to supply and feed and even bigger army necessary to fight a global war. Would Joe Brandon, Meatball Ron, or loving Mayor Ratboy, introduce rationing? COVID really was the test of could modern American society meet the challenge that a World War would entail and it failed miserably.

PhilippAchtel
May 31, 2011

The difference of course is that no one in power cared about COVID once it was clear the ruling class could be shielded from it.

In the early stages, when it seemed to be a real crisis akin to the 2008 bank crash, those sorts of controls were implemented, vaccines were fast tracked, and enormous resources were bent toward the effort.

That wained over time both for partisan reasons but also because there was simply no desire to do so if the people bearing the burden were only workers.

Are we really arguing that the US, pushed or pushing itself into a no poo poo confrontation with China or Russia, wouldn't pull out all the fascist tricks?

KomradeX
Oct 29, 2011

It doesnt matter how many fascist tricks the US pulls if something like subborning capitalism to needs of the State is impossible in modern American society. Again is anyone in American political class capable of saying no corporations you have to produce what we tell you to keep the war effort going and introduce rationing so that the American people have access to basic food stuffs? These Mckinsey assholes that run American governance are going to do any of that? Which is going to lead to mass social upheaval when mass harship introduced by total war (assuming nuclear war doesnt end it quickly) make living actually impossible.

Tell.me which Ameircan politician is capable of introducing rationing or increasing war production to fight a world war, where currently were seeing boutique numbers of missles made to replace stocks sent to Ukraine

sullat
Jan 9, 2012

PhilippAchtel posted:

I would have thought that WWI, and particularly the about face taken by the United States, would have taught us that any argument that concluded a Great War cannot happen or could not be sold to the populace is mistaken.

But sure, if you simply assert that the media landscape has changed in spite of all recent events, fine.

As others have said, look at how easily hatred of China or Russia has been fanned, the propaganda mobilized in that effort, and honestly tell me that if the US could not push all the way.

Doesn't make sense to me.

IIRC WW1 wasn't really 'sold' to the American population. They hoped to get a million volunteers and got less then half of that so they had to resort to conscription. The heavy hand of the government was used to suppress dissent pretty quickly as well.

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

and destroy German American culture in the midwest

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

sullat posted:

IIRC WW1 wasn't really 'sold' to the American population. They hoped to get a million volunteers and got less then half of that so they had to resort to conscription. The heavy hand of the government was used to suppress dissent pretty quickly as well.

It was also a relatively short war for the Americans that ended in victory and relatively low casualties (for the period).

That is the thing, fascism actually isn’t really that great at total war. The entire point of fascism is to keep capital entrenched at all costs, a factor that is often directly contrary what you need to win a real peer to peer conflict. You could argue the MIC could ram rod the US into it, but all of the structure needed to sustain such a war just doesn’t exist.

I think this is at the core of what people don’t get about fascism.

StashAugustine
Mar 24, 2013

Do not trust in hope- it will betray you! Only faith and hatred sustain.

Frosted Flake posted:

and destroy German American culture in the midwest

It is always funny-sad that this happened not because of the grand crusade to stop a genocidal madman but because of the glorified debt collection

Lostconfused
Oct 1, 2008

https://twitter.com/JasonMBrodsky/status/1634136382011572224

Relevant Tangent
Nov 18, 2016

Tangentially Relevant

lol if russia can't reverse-engineer those themselves what does that say about russian tech

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

Relevant Tangent posted:

lol if russia can't reverse-engineer those themselves what does that say about russian tech

You couldn't even read a CNN story.

KomradeX
Oct 29, 2011

Ardennes posted:

It was also a relatively short war for the Americans that ended in victory and relatively low casualties (for the period).

That is the thing, fascism actually isn’t really that great at total war. The entire point of fascism is to keep capital entrenched at all costs, a factor that is often directly contrary what you need to win a real peer to peer conflict. You could argue the MIC could ram rod the US into it, but all of the structure needed to sustain such a war just doesn’t exist.

I think this is at the core of what people don’t get about fascism.

Thats the other thing, Germany didnt swtich over to a total war model till what 42, 43? And even than their tank prodution was workshop focused not assmebly line. Plus the funded dozens of redundant super weapon ideas. Jesus it is funny just how much the US has emulated them. Surely this has nothing to do with why everything is collasping

Relevant Tangent
Nov 18, 2016

Tangentially Relevant

Ardennes posted:

You couldn't even read a CNN story.

not bothering to read propaganda
surely that's all cnn is?

Buffer
May 6, 2007
I sometimes turn down sex and blowjobs from my girlfriend because I'm too busy posting in D&D. PS: She used my credit card to pay for this.
Why would Russia not just like, send a guy to teach Iran how an Igla works or whatever?

Azathoth
Apr 3, 2001

KomradeX posted:

Thats the other thing, Germany didnt swtich over to a total war model till what 42, 43? And even than their tank prodution was workshop focused not assmebly line. Plus the funded dozens of redundant super weapon ideas. Jesus it is funny just how much the US has emulated them. Surely this has nothing to do with why everything is collasping

It was about mid-1943 when they made the switch, roughly equivalent to when the Eastern Front started to turn against them. It really can't be overstated just how many times they said "okay, now Soviet Russia is finished, they surely will surrender now" and then loving nope, they just kept fighting.

Lostconfused
Oct 1, 2008

Relevant Tangent posted:

not bothering to read propaganda
surely that's all cnn is?

So what did you read then?

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

Buffer posted:

Why would Russia not just like, send a guy to teach Iran how an Igla works or whatever?

They already have a bunch of comparable systems, it is probably more about just weapons testing on their own systems. Can a Karrar take a shot from a Javelin?

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

KomradeX posted:

Thats the other thing, Germany didnt swtich over to a total war model till what 42, 43? And even than their tank prodution was workshop focused not assmebly line. Plus the funded dozens of redundant super weapon ideas. Jesus it is funny just how much the US has emulated them. Surely this has nothing to do with why everything is collasping

Speer got production to rapidly increase in 42, but really he only had full control of the economy by mid-1943, and by Autumn 1944 production dropped off as bombing and resources both became an issue. There was never serious nationalization (as the Nazis were fighting FOR those owners), and as mentioned, German techniques even during 'total war" were slow and antiquated and many German designs were not really appropriate for the war they were fighting. Even during total war after mid-1943, the German government was merely "working alongside" German industry by giving them everything they wanted including what remaining resources and slave labor, and in turn, the results provided by industry were underwhelming compared to allied output.

Ah well double post

Ardennes has issued a correction as of 17:25 on Mar 10, 2023

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Relevant Tangent
Nov 18, 2016

Tangentially Relevant

Lostconfused posted:

So what did you read then?

twitter headline

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply