Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Feels Villeneuve
Oct 7, 2007

Setter is Better.
oh my god i need to stop looking at incredibly impractical-looking turntables on craigslist


Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Djarum
Apr 1, 2004

by vyelkin
I hear those are really good except for the belts being made of tissue paper and needing replaced every 5-10 years.

Mederlock
Jun 23, 2012

You won't recognize Canada when I'm through with it
Grimey Drawer
Has anybody tried re-capping /repairing and/or replacing old speaker crossovers before? Or other generic refurbs like redoing gasket materials, packing the cabinet and whatnot? My dad has a pair of old 3-way Realistic Optimus 25 speakers, those 1' x ~3' style of grandpa speakers. They just sound.. dead? Like the low-mids and down and the highs feel rolled off and compressed, they just sound so thin and meh. Which is weird because this thing has a 12" woofer, 4" midrange woofer, and a 2-1/2" tweeter. He has an older Realistic STA-530 driving them which definitely needs some Deoxit at the bare minimum, too.

Just looking for suggestions on brands of caps to replace them with, and consideration about making a new crossover for it if that's a reasonable thing to do. I have some basic to average soldering skills and I'd like to wake these speakers up for my dad.

Not my picture but they are pretty nice, it's actually real Walnut veneer on the cabinets

bigman.50grand
Mar 31, 2007
no
Have you futzed with the bass/treble knobs on the receiver? I'd suspect a problem from the source before diving into speaker components. Especially if the speakers sound identically lovely. Give the LOUDNESS button a shot, too. It should increase higher frequencies at lower volumes.

Mederlock
Jun 23, 2012

You won't recognize Canada when I'm through with it
Grimey Drawer

bigman.50grand posted:

Have you futzed with the bass/treble knobs on the receiver? I'd suspect a problem from the source before diving into speaker components. Especially if the speakers sound identically lovely. Give the LOUDNESS button a shot, too. It should increase higher frequencies at lower volumes.

Yeah I've already done lots with that to get it to a listenable state. Added an active sub, loudness on and the treble and bass have been painstakingly set. But yeah you're right, I should bring my little Fosi TB10D class D amp over and try the speakers with that 200W animal before I go too far into the weeds.

TooLShack
Jun 3, 2001

SMILE, BIRTHDAY BOY!
Picked up a few things over the past couple weekends. For my system I found this pair of Mission 707 speakers, I love how they sound and will have a perm place in the stack. Right now I'm driving them with my VTL/Rotel system, but I wanna pair them with my Linn Majik intergrated amp for an all UK system.

Also looking at the Mission 778X, nice small foot print and plenty of inputs for all the stupid poo poo I have.

Reorganized the Rotel system, added the monster power thing, SMSL SU-9 DAC, and a 3rd gen AppleTV that is hidden in back.



Found 3 turntables that I will be cleaning up, servicing and selling. A MCS turntable with a Pmount cart, basically one of the technics SL-q200 rebadge. Then two Pioneer turntables, a PL-400 and PL-300, both quartz lock and always decent tables to flip. I think I'll match the PL-400 with a Denon receiver I got laying around, along with a pair of Bose 4.2 I picked up today. Decent first system I'll list for 300 bucks.

Also found a Shure V-15 Type II basically NOS, it and the stylus look untouched, I'm starting to horde these drat carts.

trilobite terror
Oct 20, 2007
BUT MY LIVELIHOOD DEPENDS ON THE FORUMS!

Mederlock posted:

Has anybody tried re-capping /repairing and/or replacing old speaker crossovers before? Or other generic refurbs like redoing gasket materials, packing the cabinet and whatnot? My dad has a pair of old 3-way Realistic Optimus 25 speakers, those 1' x ~3' style of grandpa speakers. They just sound.. dead? Like the low-mids and down and the highs feel rolled off and compressed, they just sound so thin and meh. Which is weird because this thing has a 12" woofer, 4" midrange woofer, and a 2-1/2" tweeter. He has an older Realistic STA-530 driving them which definitely needs some Deoxit at the bare minimum, too.

Just looking for suggestions on brands of caps to replace them with, and consideration about making a new crossover for it if that's a reasonable thing to do. I have some basic to average soldering skills and I'd like to wake these speakers up for my dad.

Not my picture but they are pretty nice, it's actually real Walnut veneer on the cabinets



it’s absolutely reasonable—within reason, so to speak.

there’s actually a fairly committed and extensive Realistic upgrading/refurbishing scene on the internet.

It’s mainly focused on the somewhat iconic metal-bodied Minimus line, but there are ppl who know about Optimus in the Audiokarma/etc orbits who might be able to give you good advice or even point you toward complete crossover upgrade kits or guides, or help you put one together from raw parts. I know people have put together various crossover upgrade kits for the Minimus over the years.

All that being said, keep your expectations within reason. At the end of the day, Realistic was a Radio Shack house label, and while there may be some gems of varying value in that portfolio, and certainly there’s historic and personal value in keeping these things in working order, you’re not going to magically turn a 50 year old budget-branded “mid-fi” speaker into a proper high end speaker with some new capacitors and a woofer refoam.

These kinds of restorations/refurbishments can get expensive and time consuming much more easily than ppl think, so think of it as a passion project and hobby job first, because once you’re spending $150+ on parts and tools and shipping and trips to Home Despot and whatnot for all the various poo poo you need (and god forbid you get to the point where you’re paying professionals for help), you’ve blown past the point of diminishing returns from a purely performance-for-dollar standpoint.

TLDR- fix them up because they’re your dad’s old speakers, and that means something to you; but if you want your dad to have nicer sounding speakers just spend the money on new speakers. There’s a lot of speakers under $500/pair from the past several decades that will easily and handily beat a pair of Realistic Optimus.

Palladium
May 8, 2012

Very Good
✔️✔️✔️✔️

namlosh posted:

Yep, barring the super expensive headphones… I addressed this. Some people don’t like the output of built-ins which is fine. They want a different one.

It still doesn’t justify why they cost ($100) so much separately. At least not to me. 15-20 watt amplifiers are a single Integrated Circuit chip now

The default approach to headphone amps is to buy and test with the Apple dongle first before you even think of any amp

99% of the time that would work perfect unless you want to damage your hearing

His Divine Shadow
Aug 7, 2000

I'm not a fascist. I'm a priest. Fascists dress up in black and tell people what to do.
I'm thinking of buying a pair of old speakers (5 euros pair of Philips F 9216 3-way), 4ohm but I got 8ohm amp amplifier (Phillips F5110). I don't plan to run this thing very hard so I think I am fine.

I am also considering rebuilding the speakers with new wooden enclosures (pine I guess) and just reusing their innards. This isn't like sacrelige or anything right.

e: Open to alternatives to pine I just got this memory of hearing pine's good for audio for some reason. Assuming I go through with it, the speakers now are all black and uggo but maybe they will pretty up.

His Divine Shadow fucked around with this message at 10:00 on Mar 15, 2023

BigFactory
Sep 17, 2002

His Divine Shadow posted:

I'm thinking of buying a pair of old speakers (5 euros pair of Philips F 9216 3-way), 4ohm but I got 8ohm amp amplifier (Phillips F5110). I don't plan to run this thing very hard so I think I am fine.

I am also considering rebuilding the speakers with new wooden enclosures (pine I guess) and just reusing their innards. This isn't like sacrelige or anything right.

e: Open to alternatives to pine I just got this memory of hearing pine's good for audio for some reason. Assuming I go through with it, the speakers now are all black and uggo but maybe they will pretty up.

You usually want a really dense speaker box, so most home speaker builders use something like MDF.

His Divine Shadow
Aug 7, 2000

I'm not a fascist. I'm a priest. Fascists dress up in black and tell people what to do.
MDF sure is ugly though :(

Enos Cabell
Nov 3, 2004


That's what veneers are for.

His Divine Shadow
Aug 7, 2000

I'm not a fascist. I'm a priest. Fascists dress up in black and tell people what to do.
I would prefer massive wooden construction instead of veneers, veneers never manage that real wooden look. I remember John Heisz made a pair of really nice looking speakers years ago. I should go look it up again as that was the start of me wanting to do my own speakers.

I got the speakers home now, not very pretty, original construction is particle board. For another 5 euros the guy threw in a Pioneer SX-400 amp, might need some work.

BigFactory
Sep 17, 2002

His Divine Shadow posted:

I would prefer massive wooden construction instead of veneers, veneers never manage that real wooden look. I remember John Heisz made a pair of really nice looking speakers years ago. I should go look it up again as that was the start of me wanting to do my own speakers.

I got the speakers home now, not very pretty, original construction is particle board. For another 5 euros the guy threw in a Pioneer SX-400 amp, might need some work.

A good walnut veneer is going to look better than pine, right?

trilobite terror
Oct 20, 2007
BUT MY LIVELIHOOD DEPENDS ON THE FORUMS!

His Divine Shadow posted:

I would prefer massive wooden construction instead of veneers, veneers never manage that real wooden look. I remember John Heisz made a pair of really nice looking speakers years ago. I should go look it up again as that was the start of me wanting to do my own speakers.

I got the speakers home now, not very pretty, original construction is particle board. For another 5 euros the guy threw in a Pioneer SX-400 amp, might need some work.

at least use Baltic birch if you insist on solid wood

it's used in a lot of speaker and amp cabs, particularly touring equipment

the only thing pine has over MDF is that it holds up marginally better with serious moisture, and that assumes that you're leaving your cabinets unsealed, which is inadvisable

if you're spendy you could build out of solid walnut/oak/etc but lmao

trilobite terror fucked around with this message at 18:12 on Mar 15, 2023

Mederlock
Jun 23, 2012

You won't recognize Canada when I'm through with it
Grimey Drawer
OP if you really must, you can run Baltic birch plywood with a good stain(use stain conditioner) or just use MDF like everyone does for a reason and use a nice walnut or cherry veneer. Align the grain as you go around the box and it'll look great.

His Divine Shadow
Aug 7, 2000

I'm not a fascist. I'm a priest. Fascists dress up in black and tell people what to do.

BigFactory posted:

A good walnut veneer is going to look better than pine, right?

I haven't yet seen a veneer I liked tbh. I think it could be done if you had like like 15mm or so of solid wood outside the MDF. Then it would actually look like solid wood and I could have those roundover edges I want being all a solid wood roundover.

BigFactory
Sep 17, 2002

His Divine Shadow posted:

I haven't yet seen a veneer I liked tbh. I think it could be done if you had like like 15mm or so of solid wood outside the MDF. Then it would actually look like solid wood and I could have those roundover edges I want being all a solid wood roundover.

Why not just box in the existing speakers with solid wood?

His Divine Shadow
Aug 7, 2000

I'm not a fascist. I'm a priest. Fascists dress up in black and tell people what to do.
I wouldn't like to make them any larger than they are now. I was wondering if I could make them a little smaller even. I guess there are rules to that too so we'll have to see.

e: Dunno what the material they're made of now is, looks like OSB but smaller grain.

His Divine Shadow fucked around with this message at 19:42 on Mar 15, 2023

BigFactory
Sep 17, 2002

His Divine Shadow posted:

I wouldn't like to make them any larger than they are now. I was wondering if I could make them a little smaller even.

As long as you’re not expecting to take cheap speakers with cheap drivers and somehow make them sound better by putting them in homemade pine cabinets, you can make them as big or small as you want, I’d say. It might be a fun project.

my turn in the barrel
Dec 31, 2007

I finally found a vintage boombox that wasn't beat to hell thrifting.

Hefty, silver, has a rail to protect the tape deck controls

The bad news it's mono.



But...

A quick wipe with a damp paper towel and it cleaned up perfectly.



And googling the model it's actually a semi rare version of the GE superradio and is probably worth $100



Everything works except the tape deck belt needs to be replaced as tapes play but are warbly.

wa27
Jan 15, 2007

That's the fanciest mono boombox I've ever seen. I've always been looking for a SuperRadio but never find them.

my turn in the barrel
Dec 31, 2007

I've been looking for a good condition 80s ghettoblaster style boombox to use as a photoshoot prop.

I've got this old sharp that is mint and better than nothing but way more of a 90s vibe


The weirdest thing about the GE is it has an external antenna input block on the back that had an archer 300 ohm to 75 ohm adapter attached so whoever previously owned it probably just left it on a shelf playing the radio 24/7 which explains why it was in such great cosmetic shape.

wa27
Jan 15, 2007

It looks like they just cut down a GE 3-5286a boombox:



I actually own the Zenith version of that boombox:

wa27 posted:


But the real find of today was this sweet Zenith R99 for $5, but that's probably not for this thread. :v:

namlosh
Feb 11, 2014

I name this haircut "The Sad Rhino".
So we’ve been thinking of getting a turntable. It’ll be our first one since I was a kid.

The question revolves around if I should buy new or used. I had assumed used would be the way to go since most of these things were made better years ago… for example the way tape decks all suck now

But then I saw the

Audio-Technica ATLP120X-USB

And it seems to be really good… like i can’t see anything that this table is lacking compared to a good quality table from the past.

What’s the thread consensus on it?

We have some 33’s, 45’s and even some old 78s we’d like to be able to play. This turntable should be all we need right? Shellac 78s will need a different stylus though, like one made out of bamboo or steel.
Does it make sense to buy a whole new headshell and just switch those out to play with different stylus’?

Endless Mike
Aug 13, 2003



I have one of those. It seems fine. You can replace the cartridge if you want (and as you noted, you'll need to for 78s), but it sounds good to me, and the RPM checking app seems to suggest it's solid.

I understand it's technically a downgrade in some manner from the model it replaces, but probably not in any way that really matters.

trilobite terror
Oct 20, 2007
BUT MY LIVELIHOOD DEPENDS ON THE FORUMS!

namlosh posted:

So we’ve been thinking of getting a turntable. It’ll be our first one since I was a kid.

The question revolves around if I should buy new or used. I had assumed used would be the way to go since most of these things were made better years ago… for example the way tape decks all suck now

But then I saw the

Audio-Technica ATLP120X-USB

And it seems to be really good… like i can’t see anything that this table is lacking compared to a good quality table from the past.

What’s the thread consensus on it?

We have some 33’s, 45’s and even some old 78s we’d like to be able to play. This turntable should be all we need right? Shellac 78s will need a different stylus though, like one made out of bamboo or steel.
Does it make sense to buy a whole new headshell and just switch those out to play with different stylus’?

Makes perfect sense. Audio Technica themselves make a 78 stylus, and you can buy a headshell with the cartridge pre-mounted on it if you want

https://www.audio-technica.com/en-u...78-rpm-records/

don’t pay $160 for a VM95SP, you can get it on its own for $70 if you Google it, or $100 mounted.

Endless Mike posted:

I understand it's technically a downgrade in some manner from the model it replaces, but probably not in any way that really matters.

AT downgraded the 120? How so?

EL BROMANCE
Jun 10, 2006

COWABUNGA DUDES!
🥷🐢😬



I think they removed a feature of the previous iteration, I forget what but I recall it being pretty minor, and fixed a bunch of stuff like the line out. The current version is definitely the one to go for.

If you go used, factor in either a service or learning how to service it yourself.

namlosh
Feb 11, 2014

I name this haircut "The Sad Rhino".
Thanks for the replies… what made this a tougher decision was the fact that I have been tinkering with electronics and could probably have fun tinkering and fixing an old table… but in this case, for us I think, sticking with new makes a lot more sense.

BigFactory
Sep 17, 2002

namlosh posted:

Thanks for the replies… what made this a tougher decision was the fact that I have been tinkering with electronics and could probably have fun tinkering and fixing an old table… but in this case, for us I think, sticking with new makes a lot more sense.

(Buy an old one)

trilobite terror
Oct 20, 2007
BUT MY LIVELIHOOD DEPENDS ON THE FORUMS!

BigFactory posted:

(Buy an old one)

Eh, they’re much harder to get cheap in good order than they were 10 years ago

If you can get one from a family member/estate/etc then 👍

BigFactory
Sep 17, 2002

Ok Comboomer posted:

Eh, they’re much harder to get cheap in good order than they were 10 years ago

If you can get one from a family member/estate/etc then 👍

Still more fun, especially if tinkering is a plus not a minus.

trilobite terror
Oct 20, 2007
BUT MY LIVELIHOOD DEPENDS ON THE FORUMS!

BigFactory posted:

Still more fun, especially if tinkering is a plus not a minus.

“change an old belt” is a pretty ‘meh’ kind of tinkering

BigFactory
Sep 17, 2002

Ok Comboomer posted:

“change an old belt” is a pretty ‘meh’ kind of tinkering

Not if that’s all you’re capable of!

Enos Cabell
Nov 3, 2004


I mean the real answer is buy the ATLP120 so you can play records now, and then start scouting local spots for a promising fixer upper. Then you either flip one or keep both and start hoarding vintage gear like god intended.

Mederlock
Jun 23, 2012

You won't recognize Canada when I'm through with it
Grimey Drawer

Enos Cabell posted:

I mean the real answer is buy the ATLP120 so you can play records now, and then start scouting local spots for a promising fixer upper. Then you either flip one or keep both and start hoarding vintage gear like god intended.

This goon gets it

VladimirLeninpest
Jun 23, 2005

gn gorilla
Fallen Rib

Ok Comboomer posted:

“change an old belt” is a pretty ‘meh’ kind of tinkering

Get an old automatic, like a Bic 960, and you can spend hours degreasing then re-greasing everything!

namlosh
Feb 11, 2014

I name this haircut "The Sad Rhino".

Enos Cabell posted:

I mean the real answer is buy the ATLP120 so you can play records now, and then start scouting local spots for a promising fixer upper. Then you either flip one or keep both and start hoarding vintage gear like god intended.

Ding ding ding ding!

I’m pretty sure this is what’s going to happen :)

Thanks guys!

Sigmund Fraud
Jul 31, 2005

I am looking to add a subwoofer to my stereo. My current speakers are a pair of old Wharfedale 9.2 bookshelf speakers. They have 6.5" drivers and go down to ~55 Hz at -3 dB. Now the problem is that I live small so size is a factor. I don't need a powerful subwoofer because I live in an apartment and don't want to annoy my neighbours. I mostly listen to music so I don't think I need a huge subwoofer that can go down below the audible frequencies? Can I get away with an 8" sub?

Also, does anyone here have experience with the Wharfedale Evo 4.2 speakers? I listened to them briefly and and were impressed. Their form factor is similar to my current speakers (which I like). Are big bookshelf speakers unnecessary if I also have a subwoofer that can deal with the lower frequencies?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Palladium
May 8, 2012

Very Good
✔️✔️✔️✔️

Sigmund Fraud posted:

Also, does anyone here have experience with the Wharfedale Evo 4.2 speakers? I listened to them briefly and and were impressed. Their form factor is similar to my current speakers (which I like). Are big bookshelf speakers unnecessary if I also have a subwoofer that can deal with the lower frequencies?

I'm doing a test listen at somebody's else house before i buy them second hand

I also did listened to them briefly at an audio shop, at least i know for sure they aren't sibilant at all. They also had the Lintons which I wasn't impressed at all probably due to their excessively small room

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply