Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Grip it and rip it
Apr 28, 2020

Kith posted:

what parts of the world would you consider to be functional societies

I don't think any state on the planet would be improved by the introduction of summary execution. Certainly the United States remains a functioning society, even if it isn't doing particularly well. I'd say the same for everywhere in Europe I have been and many parts of South America.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

AreWeDrunkYet
Jul 8, 2006

IMO there's a place for executions, the US just goes about it entirely the wrong way (by design). Substantial fraud or corruption by the rich or those in power should warrant capital punishment. These crimes undermine democratic systems and hurt way more people than any street violence. What happened is generally going to be well documented and anyone charged will have the resources able to defend themselves fully so way less risk of people being railroaded. The people committing these sorts of crimes thoroughly premeditate them, and can often continue to cause harm even post conviction.

Rick Scott for example - there is a clear paper trail that he is responsible for fraud of hundreds of millions, if not billions of dollars, from public agencies. But even after this fraud came to light, he was allowed to continue to own/work for healthcare companies, and was elected to a governorship and senate seat where he undermined (and continues to undermine) public oversight and enforcement for the same sort of crimes he committed. He is, of course, staunchly pro death penalty - but in the conservative way, to intimidate poor people. We would have all been better off if he was executed.

FlapYoJacks
Feb 12, 2009

bulletsponge13 posted:

Utah had a firing squad as an option until well into the 21st century, and has used it throughout my lifetime. There are dozens of ways to kill a person humanely. Most are ugly, and the rest aren't vicious enough for the bloodlust.

I think executions should be done like jury duty. I think we should make society play a more personal, in-depth role and be more visible.

I think the way we use the death penalty is useless, but I do think it has a place in a functioning criminal justice system- which we don't have.

The death penalty is a barbaric practice that should be completely and utterly removed from society. It's disgusting and serves no purpose other than for bloodlust.

facialimpediment
Feb 11, 2005

as the world turns
Donnie stuff: One of his lawyers is in court about the Pence testifying subpoena. The NY-DA didn't call the Grand Jury today, so next possible day on that indictment vote is Monday.

Bragg's office did respond back to the House with a polite middle finger:

https://twitter.com/HouseInSession/status/1638916745028341760?t=BsVyFrHddBEIj06f5-o9NA&s=19

bulletsponge13
Apr 28, 2010

FlapYoJacks posted:

The death penalty is a barbaric practice that should be completely and utterly removed from society. It's disgusting and serves no purpose other than for bloodlust.

I disagree. There are people who are beyond rehabilitation- people who can't be fixed, and will continue to do their heinous actions upon release. I think it's more humane to execute them than it is to keep them locked up for the rest of their lives.

E- I also killed people for money, so there is that.

M_Gargantua
Oct 16, 2006

STOMP'N ON INTO THE POWERLINES

Exciting Lemon

Grip it and rip it posted:

A functional society doesn't need to summarily execute anyone to be better off at any point. That kind of poo poo is only a "good" move when some beleagured totalitarian group/invidivual needs to further consolidate power. The idea that it's in society's best interest is just false window dressing to sell it to the public.

Nice to see you posting from the 24th century, when we've solved all these things and can work out these things in amicable manners.

I do agree that so long as everybody is playing by the rules of society there is both a logical and moral reason for never executing anybody ever no matter how bad their crimes are. But here those are rule systems like "criminal justice" and "contract negotiation". Whereas you can occasionally run into things like "Genocide" and "Totalitarianism" in which case you get out the 1911 or the guillotine and once the needful is done you move on back to productive endeavors such as teaching or art or maybe even excel spreadsheets.

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

bulletsponge13 posted:

I disagree. There are people who are beyond rehabilitation- people who can't be fixed, and will continue to do their heinous actions upon release. I think it's more humane to execute them than it is to keep them locked up for the rest of their lives.

E- I also killed people for money, so there is that.

I don’t think any human should decide who is beyond rehabilitation.

Cugel the Clever
Apr 5, 2009
I LOVE AMERICA AND CAPITALISM DESPITE BEING POOR AS FUCK. I WILL NEVER RETIRE BUT HERE'S ANOTHER 200$ FOR UKRAINE, SLAVA

Stultus Maximus posted:

I don’t think any human should decide who is beyond rehabilitation.
I'm now imagining an AirBud situation where they put the prosecutor on one side and the accused on the other and let the dog choose which one is executed.

Less adorably: ChatGPT

M_Gargantua
Oct 16, 2006

STOMP'N ON INTO THE POWERLINES

Exciting Lemon

Stultus Maximus posted:

I don’t think any human should decide who is beyond rehabilitation.

I have faith in people, because there are good people. I don't have faith in systems. Both systems and people require constant corrective input to avoid straying into awfulness and systems have a lot more inertia toward it than individuals.

facialimpediment
Feb 11, 2005

as the world turns
There's always a lot of death penalty debate about the costs associated, morality, "maybe they deserve it", deterrence, and etc.

I just can't get past the fact that per the innocence project, there have been 375 people exonerated by DNA evidence to date and 21 of those people were on death row.

That system's hosed.

Soylent Pudding
Jun 22, 2007

We've got people!


facialimpediment posted:

There's always a lot of death penalty debate about the costs associated, morality, "maybe they deserve it", deterrence, and etc.

I just can't get past the fact that per the innocence project, there have been 375 people exonerated by DNA evidence to date and 21 of those people were on death row.

That system's hosed.

We have multiple documented cases of innocent people being executed. Scalia (rot in piss) straight up said that that constitutionally speaking actual innocence isn't constitutional grounds to overturn a conviction achieved through due process.

Arrath
Apr 14, 2011


Soylent Pudding posted:

Scalia (rot in piss) straight up said that that constitutionally speaking actual innocence isn't constitutional grounds to overturn a conviction achieved through due process.

A statement which should cause violent reactions in reasonable people. Like, what the gently caress. "The process was followed so the truth doesn't matter!"

But yeah. While I may personally think there is a narrow set of crimes for which the death penalty may be a reasonable sentence, as long as there is the potential for a single innocent person to be executed, I can't support it.

bulletsponge13
Apr 28, 2010

Arrath posted:


But yeah. While I may personally think there is a narrow set of crimes for which the death penalty may be a reasonable sentence, as long as there is the potential for a single innocent person to be executed, I can't support it.

This is where I'm at.

Hekk
Oct 12, 2012

'smeper fi

Looks like everyone has picked their side and made their claims on why the death penalty should/should not continue.

Let’s move onto some other topic now. Nothing good will come from trying to convince others why your firmly held belief is the correct one.

maffew buildings
Apr 29, 2009

too dumb to be probated; not too dumb to be autobanned
It's time for important topics that have been getting ignored but are definitely still pressing, like evaluating which Muppets gently caress. Fozzy Bear definitely cleans up, I feel like that's just an obvious one, though

CainFortea
Oct 15, 2004


maffew buildings posted:

It's time for important topics that have been getting ignored but are definitely still pressing, like evaluating which Muppets gently caress. Fozzy Bear definitely cleans up, I feel like that's just an obvious one, though

Gonzo. There's literally a porn category named after him.

Arrath
Apr 14, 2011


The existence of a Tiny Tim Frog firmly established the fact that Kermit Frog fucks.

RFC2324
Jun 7, 2012

http 418

Miss Piggy has herself a good ol time

CainFortea
Oct 15, 2004


Arrath posted:

The existence of a Tiny Tim Frog firmly established the fact that Kermit Frog fucks.

Some frogs can reproduce asexually.

There's a good documentary on the subject. It's called Jurassic Park.

Tiny Timbs
Sep 6, 2008

It’s true

Mappo
Apr 27, 2009

maffew buildings posted:

It's time for important topics that have been getting ignored but are definitely still pressing, like evaluating which Muppets gently caress. Fozzy Bear definitely cleans up, I feel like that's just an obvious one, though

Animal fucks, and so does Crazy Harry.

On a side note if you want a break from the news and enjoy Mupptery watch DefunctLand's documentary on Jim Henson. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVoGf1JTVeI

facialimpediment
Feb 11, 2005

as the world turns

Hekk posted:

Let’s move onto some other topic now.

Have some tiktok dances (by the CEO, who is testifying and going down in flames)

https://twitter.com/boblatta/status/1638927952778862596

https://twitter.com/AndrewDesiderio/status/1638926740193153025

Commented as well: "teenagers don't donate to campaigns." ByteDance should probably sell tiktok or that poo poo's probably getting congressionally banned in a bipartisan vote.

Tiny Timbs
Sep 6, 2008

And you know Rizzo fucks god bless him (Gonzo does not)

stealie72
Jan 10, 2007
Real "the worst person you know made a good point" vibe. gently caress TikTok, but gently caress Rob Latta "The Jyneez COMMUNIST PARTY" poo poo.

Edit: To clarify, this guy is in a forever safe district that includes almost exclusively corn and exurban chuds making angry videos about cancel culture from the driver seat of their $90,000 Yukons. I don't really want to hear his opinions on tech and the chinese communist party.

stealie72 fucked around with this message at 17:35 on Mar 23, 2023

Arrath
Apr 14, 2011


https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/23/new-starbucks-ceo-says-hell-work-a-shift-at-its-cafes-once-a-month.html

New CEO of Starbucks says he'll pull a not-so-undercover boss and work a half shift as a barista once a month.

It might be more impactful if he took a barista's pay for a month now and then, but maybe at least they'll publicise when he will work a shift so a flash mob can descend and order a big pile of 19-ingredient "secret menu" monstrosities at once?

Tiny Timbs
Sep 6, 2008

That’s crazy. Imagine if China started using social media data to do something to harm Americans, like arrest them for seeking abortions.

Zamujasa
Oct 27, 2010



Bread Liar

Arrath posted:

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/23/new-starbucks-ceo-says-hell-work-a-shift-at-its-cafes-once-a-month.html

New CEO of Starbucks says he'll pull a not-so-undercover boss and work a half shift as a barista once a month.

It might be more impactful if he took a barista's pay for a month now and then, but maybe at least they'll publicise when he will work a shift so a flash mob can descend and order a big pile of 19-ingredient "secret menu" monstrosities at once?

so jaded my first thought is "now that i've worked 4 hours in their shoes i am qualified to say their current pay and benefits level is adequate and will not be improved and perhaps are even too generous"

RFC2324
Jun 7, 2012

http 418

Tiny Timbs posted:

And you know Rizzo fucks god bless him (Gonzo does not)

Yes he does.

He has a well documented relationship with Camilla, the chicken

Arrath
Apr 14, 2011


Zamujasa posted:

so jaded my first thought is "now that i've worked 4 hours in their shoes i am qualified to say their current pay and benefits level is adequate and will not be improved and perhaps are even too generous"

It would be far too much of a Hallmark Movie Moment for him to realize "wow this sucks poo poo and the customers are often rude assholes. All these line workers need a raise!"

But it's not as if he'll take shifts on Black Friday or hell even during an average morning rush, so you're probably on the money.

A.o.D.
Jan 15, 2006

RFC2324 posted:

Yes he does.

He has a well documented relationship with Camilla, the chicken

If there is any muppet that has an explicitly carnal relationship, it is Gonzo.

AreWeDrunkYet
Jul 8, 2006

Does China have more access to TikTok data than the US does to Instagram or Twitter data? Why would anyone assume that a technology company hosted in a particular country doesn't have an open feed to the intelligence services there?

And unlike China, the US uses this data to blow up people all over the world.

RFC2324
Jun 7, 2012

http 418

AreWeDrunkYet posted:

Does China have more access to TikTok data than the US does to Instagram or Twitter data? Why would anyone assume that a technology company hosted in a particular country doesn't have an open feed to the intelligence services there?

And unlike China, the US uses this data to blow up people all over the world.

But social credit scores!!!

facialimpediment
Feb 11, 2005

as the world turns

stealie72 posted:

Edit: To clarify, this guy is in a forever safe district that includes almost exclusively corn and exurban chuds making angry videos about cancel culture from the driver seat of their $90,000 Yukons. I don't really want to hear his opinions on tech and the chinese communist party.

Oh absolutely knew he was a chudfuck. Didn't know him before a pre-post googling, but all I needed was the "R-" in his name to know he was far out there. The general news media has only been focusing on the democratic angle and "Biden bans tiktok" when this kind of thing is absolutely going to be bipartisan if ByteDance doesn't sell.

AreWeDrunkYet posted:

Does China have more access to TikTok data than the US does to Instagram or Twitter data? Why would anyone assume that a technology company hosted in a particular country doesn't have an open feed to the intelligence services there?

And unlike China, the US uses this data to blow up people all over the world.

I may have news for you about what China uses the data to do.

But anyways, it's more of the above from the right, and the below from the left:

https://twitter.com/Mediaite/status/1638946167299141635

Zuckfuck et al get away with it because they're American employees, employing Americans, with American campaign contributions. Tiktok has influencers.

facialimpediment fucked around with this message at 18:13 on Mar 23, 2023

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

AreWeDrunkYet posted:

Does China have more access to TikTok data than the US does to Instagram or Twitter data? Why would anyone assume that a technology company hosted in a particular country doesn't have an open feed to the intelligence services there?

And unlike China, the US uses this data to blow up people all over the world.

US tech companies can choose to tell the government to pound sand. Chinese companies cannot tell the Chinese government the same.

Grip it and rip it
Apr 28, 2020

Stultus Maximus posted:

US tech companies can choose to tell the government to pound sand. Chinese companies cannot tell the Chinese government the same.

lol yeah right

McNally
Sep 13, 2007

Ask me about Proposition 305


Do you like muskets?

CainFortea posted:

Some frogs can reproduce asexually.

There's a good documentary on the subject. It's called Jurassic Park.

They were not reproducing asexually. They were changing sex from female to male and then loving.

shame on an IGA
Apr 8, 2005

the true issue is that chinese companies can tell the us government to pound sand

CainFortea
Oct 15, 2004


McNally posted:

They were not reproducing asexually. They were changing sex from female to male and then loving.

life, uh, finds a way?

fknlo
Jul 6, 2009


Fun Shoe

facialimpediment posted:


I may have news for you about what China uses the data to do.


What exactly are they doing with the data? They already have all my information since I was a government employee during a certain data breach. What exactly are they going to do with my data that isn't already being done with my data by US companies?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

That Works
Jul 22, 2006

Every revolution evaporates and leaves behind only the slime of a new bureaucracy


fknlo posted:

What exactly are they doing with the data? They already have all my information since I was a government employee during a certain data breach. What exactly are they going to do with my data that isn't already being done with my data by US companies?

Sell it to US companies

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply