|
I can see a QB being drafted in the 2nd round, if one of - Young/Stroud/AR is available then i could see it with pick 6, but let's be honest, none of those guys are gonna be available at 6
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2023 15:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 06:19 |
|
|
Right and outside of those 3 I think you wait until the 2nd-3rd round and take a shot on a developmental QB. If Carter somehow drops I think you take him, if not, I'd see what the value is for a trade back and try to pick up a combo of DL, corner, and maybe TE depending on what's available and when.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2023 17:06
|
|
|
I’ve been seeing a lot of national sports media suggest that they could draft Hendon Hooker in the third round.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2023 20:05
|
|
|
Gonz posted:I’ve been seeing a lot of national sports media suggest that they could draft Hendon Hooker in the third round. I'm sure there are worse moves they could make (look at every third rounder from the Gutekunst era), but drafting a 25 year old Hendon Hooker to replace a 28 year old Jared Goff doesn't make as much sense for the Lions as it might for other teams.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2023 20:13
|
|
|
I think Hooker would be being drafted as a backup since afaik the Lions have no backup QB under contract right now
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 00:20
|
|
|
MikeCrotch posted:I think Hooker would be being drafted as a backup since afaik the Lions have no backup QB under contract right now You don’t draft a backup as high as Hooker will go unless you intend for him to be the starter in a year or two and drafting a 25 year old and not even playing him immediately would be really unwise.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 00:26
|
|
|
Well he tore his acl so probably not the end of the world to redshirt him for a season.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 00:32
|
|
|
The real issue is regardless of age, Hooker's ceiling isn't higher than Goff's. If you want a backup go get an UDFA.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 02:05
|
|
|
Is there a high(ish) floor QB that would still be around by the second round? I could see them going in that direction if they don't think The Guy is there at 6. The draft being deep at every position listed as a need of theirs combined with a high pick seems like the best time to take a swing on your future QB. If you whiff, you still have 2 more years of Goff at least, and it's not even their own pick that's this high, so they aren't likely to be drafting here in the near future. I'd love to see a monster D line terrorizing opposing offenses though, that's more fun to me than seeing deep bombs.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 03:45
|
|
|
I can't get over how much the NFL has changed. Justin fields was like 4 times the prospect of Levis or Richardson but didn't even go top 10
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 05:28
|
|
|
mastershakeman posted:I can't get over how much the NFL has changed. Justin fields was like 4 times the prospect of Levis or Richardson but didn't even go top 10 Justin Fields would be the Number one Prospect in this draft lol. But also, QB's always drop, it wouldn't shock me if one of Levis/Richardson fall out of the top 10. Also if there was a real combine Justin Field's year, uh, he would have put up Richardson numbers lol. Carolina/Falcons almost assuredly take him, if they had athletic testing, if not him replacing Zach Wilson's buzz.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 06:23
|
|
|
Dexo posted:Justin Fields would be the Number one Prospect in this draft lol. Eh, I doubt it. Teams found reasons to drop him a few years ago they’d find the same reasons this year. He’d be behind Stroud and Young I’m sure. quote:Also if there was a real combine Justin Field's year, uh, he would have put up Richardson numbers lol. Richardson has a couple of inches and 20lbs on Fields. He’s Josh Allen sized. Putting up the numbers he did is nuts. Shame he’s bad at football.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 06:29
|
|
|
YOLOsubmarine posted:Richardson has a couple of inches and 20lbs on Fields. He’s Josh Allen sized. Putting up the numbers he did is nuts. Shame he’s bad at football. But what if... ... ... He's not.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 14:02
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/NFLonCBS/status/1638513418964545536
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 14:46
|
|
|
Solid Midboss energy
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 14:53
|
|
|
seems like the bears should be way up this if you count all their pre superbowl wins. checked and they're at .557, ahead of the packers
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 15:07
|
|
|
A bit surprised that the Raiders are that high after how the last 20 years have gone for that franchise.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 15:08
|
|
|
Who’s the lowest percentage of the Super Bowl Era to win one? I would guess the Jets.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 15:13
|
|
|
It's the Buccs
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 15:24
|
|
|
Henchman of Santa posted:Who’s the lowest percentage of the Super Bowl Era to win one? I would guess the Jets. https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask?q=nfl+team+with+highest+winning%25+since+1970 Tampa
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 16:01
|
|
|
YOLOsubmarine posted:Eh, I doubt it. Teams found reasons to drop him a few years ago they’d find the same reasons this year. He’d be behind Stroud and Young I’m sure. Fields might not have been the physical freak, but he wasn't far off. And his tape was significantly better than Richardson's. Even without the combine, it still makes no sense
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 16:14
|
|
|
Man, talk about waking up and choosing violence, what the hell brought that up CBS? Also a pretty impressive jump going up to both the Steelers and Cowboys.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 16:23
|
|
|
The Lions’ backup QB problem is https://twitter.com/aroundthenfl/status/1639290351721795590?s=46&t=GxZoSKgPzb_-zyUnvLFKvg Of course, if it ever gets to the point where Nate Sudfeld is playing QB, the season is already over with.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 16:47
|
|
|
HootTheOwl posted:https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask?q=nfl+team+with+highest+winning%25+since+1970 This has the commies, eagles, and seahawks above the colts, raiders, and rams. I get that it’s 1970 vs 1967 but surely a couple years wouldn’t change it that much? And obviously it’s moot for the hawks e: maybe one is counting post season and the other not? idk still seems like it wouldn’t move the needle much Pontius Pilate fucked around with this message at 17:04 on Mar 24, 2023 |
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 17:01
|
|
|
Gonz posted:Of course, if it ever gets to the point where Nate Sudfeld is playing QB, the season is already over with. "Sudfeld Starts, Season Washed." The headlines write themselves. I think I'm sold on Tyree Wilson at 6 if Carter isn't there, or if he is and Holmes says nah. I think he's earned the trust at this point.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 17:05
|
|
|
I hope he has no guaranteed money and just gets cut.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 17:38
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/schultz_report/status/1639308803224027136?s=46&t=GxZoSKgPzb_-zyUnvLFKvg
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 17:53
|
|
|
Brad Holmes gonna do some wild bullshit to replace Chark. I can just feel it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 17:53
|
|
|
That's a good signing for them.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 17:54
|
|
|
Fuuuuuuuuuck. Man, Panthers might be good this season.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 18:02
|
|
|
Given the state of their division, how crazy is it to view them as the favorites to win the NFCS?
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 18:15
|
|
|
lmao when the panthers have a worse pick than the bears next season
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 18:24
|
|
|
Guess it depends on how much you believe in the Saints now that they have a real QB, but at this point I think they're no worse than second best and quite possibly the favorites.R.D. Mangles posted:lmao when the panthers have a worse pick than the bears next season tbh this is why it was very smart for the Bears to hold out for Moore instead of taking another first.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 18:24
|
|
|
I would normally think the Saints are the clear favorites but man Allen might just be a poo poo head coach.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 18:27
|
|
|
Sataere posted:Fields might not have been the physical freak, but he wasn't far off. And his tape was significantly better than Richardson's. Even without the combine, it still makes no sense I 100% agree that Fields is an amazing athlete and him dropping made no sense. Hand Row posted:I would normally think the Saints are the clear favorites but man Allen might just be a poo poo head coach. He’s pretty bad. His cowardice cost them two or three games last season.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 18:31
|
|
|
Gonz posted:https://twitter.com/schultz_report/status/1639308803224027136?s=46&t=GxZoSKgPzb_-zyUnvLFKvg Wow WR#2
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 18:38
|
|
|
R.D. Mangles posted:lmao when the panthers have a worse pick than the bears next season They were never going to be a top ten pick. I don't know why people felt that way. Two firsts next year is still really good.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 18:42
|
|
|
Gonz posted:https://twitter.com/schultz_report/status/1639308803224027136?s=46&t=GxZoSKgPzb_-zyUnvLFKvg poo poo 
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 19:17
|
|
|
Sataere posted:They were never going to be a top ten pick. I don't know why people felt that way. Two firsts next year is still really good. From my perspective as someone who doesn't have much knowledge of teams outside the NFC North my entire thought process was "well they are the ninth pick this year and drafting a rookie QB and supposedly gave their best receiver to us, so they will probably be a little worse next year while their QB develops". I fully defer to more knowledgeable people ITT tho and agree that in any case 2 first rounds is still really good EDIT: also probably subconscious Bears fan bias: "teams just get worse and worse each year till everyone gets fired, right?"
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 19:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 06:19 |
|
|
I think the Panthers probably win 7+ games, especially considering their schedule, but I think their floor is still lower than most people might think. They’ve made a bunch of Solid Moves but it’s not like you can look at their roster and go “Oh no way they’re bad” just because they have a competent-seeming coaching staff and WRs who don’t project as sub-replacement level
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2023 19:34
|
|
