Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
StumblyWumbly
Sep 12, 2007

Batmanticore!
Complaining that "requirements aren't clear enough" is sometimes true, sometimes not, but if this is a major vfx place that works with a lot of people, maybe they are right when they say Marvel is worse than average.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Fangz
Jul 5, 2007

Oh I see! This must be the Bad Opinion Zone!
There's other people who say that Marvel is no different than average though. According to that Jo Robinson tweeter, everyone she's heard from thinks Alonso was awesome.

In the end it's just a lot of anecdotes either way.

Fangz fucked around with this message at 13:23 on Mar 23, 2023

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
Variety confirms that Alonso was fired.

It was a unanimous decision by Disney executives, HR, legal, and Marvel staff. Kevin Feige was not the one who initiated it, but he had no objection and did intervene to keep her.

No specific details as to why, but Alonso was apparently not expecting it and did not have other employment lined up as evidenced by this ironic declaration she made about a week before she was fired:

quote:

“Look at this! Two women!” Alonso insisted the pair put down their cameras and pose for a photo with her in front of a giant Oscar statuette. As they all smiled, she told them, “We’ve worked so hard to get here and we’re not going anywhere.”

https://twitter.com/DiscussingFilm/status/1638698770543136770

Some VFX artists are also going on the record as defending her, but pretty much everyone agrees that around 2021 the delays, covid disruptions, D+ releases on top of movie releases, and huge schedule of 17 MCU releases in just under two years was where her style of management (approving every shot, making changes last minute, trying to "make every shot perfect" by reiterating them over and over, but also never missing a deadline, etc.) couldn't be sustained anymore. Every studio was hitting VFX artists hard during that time, but Alonso's management style and Marvel's huge catalog ground everything to an even slower halt that would have been tough to maintain in normal times, but was basically impossible during the pandemic.

https://twitter.com/DiscussingFilm/status/1638699558300418049

quote:

At this year’s Academy Awards, Victoria Alonso was overwhelmed.

The veteran Marvel Studios executive and producer of the nominated film “Argentina, 1985” was stopped on the red carpet, posing for photographers assigned to capture top executives on Hollywood’s big night. But something shocked her.

“Look at this! Two women!” Alonso said of the female photographers hired for the gig (as in most corners of Hollywood, women are outnumbered by men on the photo line). Emotional, Alonso insisted the pair put down their cameras and pose for a photo with her in front of a giant Oscar statuette. As they all smiled, she told them, “We’ve worked so hard to get here and we’re not going anywhere.”

Eight days later, she was fired as Marvel’s president of physical production, post-production, VFX and animation, three individuals familiar with the matter told Variety. The shakeup came as a surprise to many in show business and within the vast Marvel comic book fandom (a community with a prominent online presence and an in-person significance, at the many multiplexes where the studio releases its films).

Alonso’s dismissal has raised numerous questions about behind-the-scenes workings at the prized content engine, and with them, another unfavorable news cycle as Disney CEO Bob Iger attempts to stabilize its parent company amid economic unrest.

While the cause of Alonso’s termination is unclear, the sources said, the decision was made by a consortium including human resources, Disney’s legal department and multiple executives including Disney Entertainment co-chairman Alan Bergman (to whom all of Marvel Studios reports). Alonso’s longtime boss and Marvel chief creative officer Kevin Feige felt mired in an impossible situation and, ultimately, did not intervene, one source added. Alonso was blindsided, another insider added.

A representative for Alonso declined to provide comment for this story. Marvel Studios had no comment.

Alonso joined Marvel Studios in 2006, three years before Disney acquired the label for $4 billion. Over 17 years, she has been a fixture under chief creative officer Kevin Feige, standing beside Feige’s right hand and co-president Louis D’Esposito. Simultaneously, she worked to become a brand on her own – a rare openly LGBTQ person and woman of color in a visible leadership role, known for her fiery passion and outspokenness over diversity and inclusion in Marvel’s storytelling.

She has been honored by media watchdogs and visual effects communities alike and is about to publish a memoir about her corporate ascent, the aptly titled “Possibility Is Your Superpower” (which is still set for release at the Disney book label Hyperion Avenue).

Where, then, in all of the multiverse did this dramatic fracture occur?

Numerous sources familiar with Marvel pointed to the tremendous pressure that the unit has been under over the past few years to deliver compelling content, not just to theaters, but also in the form of new streaming shows intended to bolster Disney+. In 2021 and 2022, Marvel unloaded an unprecedented torrent of comic book adventures, releasing 17 titles — seven movies, eight streaming series and two TV specials — over 23 months.

That breakneck distribution schedule, a product of the pandemic and the need to constantly feed Disney+, was not of Alonso’s making. Marvel was far from the only studio tasked with delivering feature-level content for a newly launched streaming service. But it was Alonso’s job to get each of those titles through Marvel’s gargantuan post-production process. By the summer of 2022, cracks began to show in the company’s seemingly impervious armor.

Leon Trotsky 2012 fucked around with this message at 14:40 on Mar 23, 2023

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
Kind of unexpected casting news.

Not sure if Deadpool 3 will have (another) time-travel element or if it is some other weird situation.

Also, minor spoilers for Loki season 2, I guess?

https://twitter.com/DiscussingFilm/status/1638983636283162625

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



Could also just be a cameo for all we know

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

FlamingLiberal posted:

Could also just be a cameo for all we know

Yeah, I assume it is not a major role. Just not sure how he works into Deadpool 3 without some weird time-travel gimmick (which they already did in 2).

Sockser
Jun 28, 2007

This world only remembers the results!




The TVA isn't exactly a time-travel organization as much as a ... reality hopping organization?

So I'm sure it's something to do with getting Deadpool and Wolverine into the main MCU continuity

Happy Noodle Boy
Jul 3, 2002


TVA is proper hosed after Loki S1 and Quantumania didn’t exactly help their cause.

Opopanax
Aug 8, 2007

I HEX YE!!!


FlamingLiberal posted:

Could also just be a cameo for all we know

Yeah, I mean technically all the First Class X-men are in Deadpool 2

glitchwraith
Dec 29, 2008

Sockser posted:

The TVA isn't exactly a time-travel organization as much as a ... reality hopping organization?

So I'm sure it's something to do with getting Deadpool and Wolverine into the main MCU continuity

In the first season of Loki, they where specifically time traveling to prevent alternate realities by destroying splinter timelines, though their mission statement has likely changed after notably failing their original goal and having their relative history retconned. In any case, given the time travel gag at the end of Deadpool 2, I could see Deadpool popping up on their radar. The question is weather they will be a major part of the plot, or just a quick cameo/gag where they show up to destroy the Fox X-Men reality.

live with fruit
Aug 15, 2010
It makes sense that an MCU movie about Foxverse characters would feature a character who can bounce between universes.

Desperado Bones
Aug 29, 2009

Cute, adorable, and creepy at the same time!


I have this dumb theory that i wasn't Peter or Wanda,or Loki or Loki or Ant-Man who hosed up the MCU multiverse but Deadpool back in the end gag credits of Deadpool 2.

kiminewt
Feb 1, 2022

It's a shame about Deadpool because I vehemently hate those movies but would like to see Wolverine and Mobius again.

Maybe someone will make a Dead lpool-less cut.

Omnomnomnivore
Nov 14, 2010

I'm swiftly moving toward a solution which pleases nobody! YEAGGH!
We obviously need Mobius to meet Morbius.

Vandar
Sep 14, 2007

Isn't That Right, Chairman?



Barry Convex posted:

even if the worst Star Wars fans hate Kathleen Kennedy for the worst possible reasons (and they do), I don't understand how she still has her job. when you're the head of Lucasfilm, being able to get a Star Wars film off the ground seems like it should be a pretty basic and fundamental test of job performance

All three movies in the sequel trilogy performed well, and so did Rogue One, and all the D+ Star Wars shows have been mostly well-received and have been successful. Mostly. Solo is the only Star Wars thing she's produced that's been a complete and utter failure and she has enough history of success in the film industry that I doubt they fire her for a single huge failure, y'know?

Plus the 'fanbase' dislikes her enough that if they ever DO need a scapegoat to take a huge fall, she's right there. :v:

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

Omnomnomnivore posted:

We obviously need Mobius to meet Morbius.

Well then that means the movie will be given an R.

Barry Convex
Sep 1, 2005

Think of the good things, Pim! The good things!

Like Jesus, candy, and crackerjacks! Ice cream and cake and lots o'laffs!
Grandma, Grandpa, and Uncle Joe! Larry, Curly, and brother Moe!

Vandar posted:

All three movies in the sequel trilogy performed well, and so did Rogue One, and all the D+ Star Wars shows have been mostly well-received and have been successful. Mostly. Solo is the only Star Wars thing she's produced that's been a complete and utter failure and she has enough history of success in the film industry that I doubt they fire her for a single huge failure, y'know?

Plus the 'fanbase' dislikes her enough that if they ever DO need a scapegoat to take a huge fall, she's right there. :v:

It’s not a single failure (though the serious missteps with the ST don’t help), it’s all the film projects that have fallen through, particularly Rogue Squadron after the very splashy announcement for it in late 2020. Going six years without a theatrically released Star Wars film (there’s an unrevealed one currently dated for holiday 2025) should be pretty embarrassing.

There was a point where that could maybe have been justified with “oh, they’re just trying to get the next Star Wars film right after RoS,” but eventually, the continuing pattern starts to look more like Kennedy just being bad at her job and being unable to productively work with filmmakers. anyway, rumor has it that they’re announcing three new Star Wars films at Celebration next month; maybe at least one of them will see the light of day this time.

Barry Convex
Sep 1, 2005

Think of the good things, Pim! The good things!

Like Jesus, candy, and crackerjacks! Ice cream and cake and lots o'laffs!
Grandma, Grandpa, and Uncle Joe! Larry, Curly, and brother Moe!
THR has a new report on the Victoria Alonso firing: short version, the immediate cause was her producing and promoting Argentina, 1985 for Amazon, which breached a non-compete clause in her contract at Disney. The VFX pipeline issues do seem to have at least been a secondary factor, though.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/marvels-victoria-alonso-fired-argentina-1985-1235360231/

Arist
Feb 13, 2012

who, me?


Lol, how petty

Barry Convex
Sep 1, 2005

Think of the good things, Pim! The good things!

Like Jesus, candy, and crackerjacks! Ice cream and cake and lots o'laffs!
Grandma, Grandpa, and Uncle Joe! Larry, Curly, and brother Moe!
New report on the Alonso firing from Variety, which corroborates most of what the THR report says re:Argentina, 1985 but adds the Alonso team’s denials and accusations of Disney retaliating against her over the DeSantis shitshow. Messy, to say the least.

https://variety.com/2023/film/news/victoria-alonso-fired-marvel-argentina-1985-1235564419/

quote:

In a statement to Variety, attorney Patty Glaser, who is representing Alonso in her departure from Disney, instead claims that the executive was “silenced” by Disney, and that she had the studio’s “blessing” to work on “Argentina, 1985.”

“The idea that Victoria was fired over a handful of press interviews relating to a personal passion project about human rights and democracy that was nominated for an Oscar and which she got Disney’s blessing to work on is absolutely ridiculous,” Glaser says. “Victoria, a gay Latina who had the courage to criticize Disney, was silenced. Then she was terminated when she refused to do something she believed was reprehensible. Disney and Marvel made a really poor decision that will have serious consequences. There is a lot more to this story and Victoria will be telling it shortly—in one forum or another.”

A source close to the matter also says that following Alonso’s remarks at the 2022 GLAAD awards, in which she called out then-CEO Bob Chapek by name for his reaction to Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill, she was told she could no longer do press for Marvel projects.

live with fruit
Aug 15, 2010
It’d be very on the nose if Disney fired her for making a movie about standing up to dictators.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

Barry Convex posted:

New report on the Alonso firing from Variety, which corroborates most of what the THR report says re:Argentina, 1985 but adds the Alonso team’s denials and accusations of Disney retaliating against her over the DeSantis shitshow. Messy, to say the least.

https://variety.com/2023/film/news/victoria-alonso-fired-marvel-argentina-1985-1235564419/

Interesting to read her side of it and then remember the earlier news about Feige just letting it happen.

ruddiger
Jun 3, 2004

Capitalism does not reward loyalty.

howe_sam
Mar 7, 2013

Creepy little garbage eaters

Barry Convex posted:

THR has a new report on the Victoria Alonso firing: short version, the immediate cause was her producing and promoting Argentina, 1985 for Amazon, which breached a non-compete clause in her contract at Disney. The VFX pipeline issues do seem to have at least been a secondary factor, though.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/marvels-victoria-alonso-fired-argentina-1985-1235360231/

Holy poo poo Disney, if you're going to lie, make it a more believe lie. There's zero chance she went rogue to produce Argentina 1985, and even if she did you're only just now finding out about it? Give me a break.

Soonmot
Dec 19, 2002

Entrapta fucking loves robots




Grimey Drawer
man i hate business brain. how the gently caress does what sounds like a historical drama compete with the audience for a marvel movie? I could totally understand if was some indie superhero film, or even an action film in general.

Edit:that's what i get for leaving the tab open before replying, Barry's post puts it all into context

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

live with fruit posted:

It’d be very on the nose if Disney fired her for making a movie about standing up to dictators.

Looks like the main thing was:

- She started working with another studio without telling anyone, which was in violation of her contract.

- Disney found out, let it go, and grandfathered her in with her new contract, but on the condition that she not to do it again and not to do any additional work on it without asking - including press and awards lobbying.

- She went back and started working with Amazon on the press and awards circuit without telling anyone again.

- She went to the Oscars repping and doing press for Amazon and Argentina, 1985 instead of Disney and Black Panther.

- While she was spending a ton of time working and promoting this other movie for a different studio, the VFX situation she was in charge of at Disney was falling apart. They were getting bad press and bad effects on their movies they invested $600 million into during that period.

quote:

According to sources, she was reminded of her agreement and her breach several times, but the campaigning continued. She even appeared on the Oscars arrivals carpet not as a Marvel executive associated with that studio’s multi-nominated Black Panther: Wakanda Forever, but rather as Argentina, 1985′s producer, walking with the film’s director, Santiago Mitre.

What also rankled Disney executives was that while she was busy promoting Argentina, 1985, her purview over Marvel’s visual effects — as president of physical and postproduction, visual effects and animation production — was busier than ever.

Throughout the last year or so, as Marvel pumped out an unprecedented number of series and movies, a general impression emerged that VFX artists were not being well-treated by Marvel, attributed to factors including long hours, drum-tight deadlines and a lack of a singular vision.

Releases including the February film Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania were catching flak for subpar visual effects work while Alonso herself became more and more polarizing.

“You can only ask a person to stay until 1 a.m. working on VFX shots for so long before things start to break,” says one postproduction source. Another postproduction talent says they have avoided working with Marvel because of Alonso’s reputation for being challenging.

quote:

In any case, the VFX industry will be closely watching what follows. Marvel is one of the most lucrative clients for VFX houses because of the scope of its work — its tentpoles regularly have in excess of 2,000 VFX shots, sometimes more than a whopping 3,000 per movie.

It is unclear who will take over for Alonso in the interim (at least some vendors are working with VFX producer Jen Underdahl for now). But insiders acknowledge whoever assumes her duties officially will face similar challenges as Alonso, who helped put out the unprecedented 18 films, TV shows and specials that Marvel released in 2021-22.

Says one VFX pro: “Whatever criticisms are being leveled against her, she’s not an island. Part of the problem is the aggressive release schedules.”

That aggressive schedule could already be in the rearview mirror, however, as returning Disney CEO Bob Iger has stated an intention to slow down Marvel’s output.

quote:

Sources say that Alonso did not ask permission to work on Argentina, 1985, nor did she give notice. (However, an IndieWire piece published last month on the film stated that she did have permission.) When Disney found out about the project and the violation, her longtime service and veteran status led the company to give her a dispensation on the condition that she not work on the movie further. She was also not to promote it or publicize it in any way. The situation of a top executive working on a movie outside company confines was deemed serious enough to involve the management audit team and a new memo was signed, according to an insider.

Bruceski
Aug 21, 2007

The tools of a hero mean nothing without a solid core.

howe_sam posted:

Holy poo poo Disney, if you're going to lie, make it a more believe lie. There's zero chance she went rogue to produce Argentina 1985, and even if she did you're only just now finding out about it? Give me a break.

I am shocked, SHOCKED to discover that there is gambling in this establishment!

Opopanax
Aug 8, 2007

I HEX YE!!!


I'm sure it's more complicated than all of the soundbites combined, but "spoke out against management" definitely sounds like the most plausible

Blockhouse
Sep 7, 2014

You Win!
I don't get the thought process behind violating a contract - something that would get 99% of people fired but getting away with it because you're just that much of a long-time higher-up at the company - having your bosses let it slide on the condition you not do it again, and then...doing it again.

ashpanash
Apr 9, 2008

I can see when you are lying.

Yes, let's all shed a tear for the millionaire producer.

If you want to use your super-high-level, high-profile job as a bully pulpit, you'd best be doing a good job at it.

live with fruit
Aug 15, 2010

Blockhouse posted:

I don't get the thought process behind violating a contract - something that would get 99% of people fired but getting away with it because you're just that much of a long-time higher-up at the company - having your bosses let it slide on the condition you not do it again, and then...doing it again.

She helped get a movie made about a chapter in her country's history and it received one of the highest honors in her industry. The logic in choosing Argentina 1985 over Marvel, if that's what she did, seems obvious.

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



This seems to be the first look at her character in Joker 2

https://twitter.com/popbase/status/1639621240225779717?s=46&t=BHs6Pl38GJXGN2Y4xeriNA

Shageletic
Jul 25, 2007

Omnomnomnivore posted:

We obviously need Mobius to meet Morbius.

You and I could do a lot of good

Still can't believe that was a piece of dialogue in a released movie

KurdtLives
Dec 22, 2004

Ladies and She-Hulks can't resist Murdock's Big Hallway Energy
[quote "The Hollywood Reporter posted"] But other sources say that being vocal had only increased Alonso’s profile within the company. She was asked to represent the company on the board of GLAAD, joined the company’s Pride 365 leadership team and made a deal with the company’s publishing division to write a memoir. [/quote]
The fact her activism was rewarded with a memoir deal at Disney itself tells me the Desantis stuff has nothing to do with this. Also, Chapek is longish gone too.

cant cook creole bream
Aug 15, 2011
I think Fahrenheit is better for weather

That looks really bad and I hope she cycles through different outfits. That's probably one of the most subdued outfits I've ever seen her in.
Maybe it works better in motion.

Sockser
Jun 28, 2007

This world only remembers the results!




I think it looks fantastic and uses the diamond motif in a nice subtle way, going from the blouse to the jacket to the leggings
More importantly, I think it fits the general aesthetic of the first movie while still having strong notes of the character

But then, grain of salt, I would submit myself to many dark rituals in Gaga's name so I'm definitely biased

Macaluso
Sep 23, 2005

I HATE THAT HEDGEHOG, BROTHER!

https://twitter.com/ThatBmanGuy/status/1639626497743888384

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



Oh boy.

https://twitter.com/discussingfilm/status/1639774178835406848?s=46&t=BHs6Pl38GJXGN2Y4xeriNA

site
Apr 6, 2007

Trans pride, Worldwide
Bitch
I'll wait for not tmz to confirm but sure doesn't sound great!

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Barry Convex
Sep 1, 2005

Think of the good things, Pim! The good things!

Like Jesus, candy, and crackerjacks! Ice cream and cake and lots o'laffs!
Grandma, Grandpa, and Uncle Joe! Larry, Curly, and brother Moe!

site posted:

I'll wait for not tmz to confirm but sure doesn't sound great!

it’s been confirmed by the various Hollywood trades, unfortunately

https://twitter.com/thr/status/1639780000931934208?s=46&t=vHCQymUfA8QgltN6y1_sjA

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply