Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
skeleton warrior
Nov 12, 2016


Zulily Zoetrope posted:

Everyone should have a concern crew.


I'm on the concern crew

::looks at my anxiety::

wait, I *am* the concern crew

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Tunicate
May 15, 2012

I'm on the question crew....

Or am I?

Leal
Oct 2, 2009
Explaining is condoning concerning

Inexplicable Humblebrag
Sep 20, 2003

the usual suspects

outsiders

concern trolls

brigades

Nuns with Guns
Jul 23, 2010

It's fine.
Don't worry about it.

pentyne posted:

The dog bricker required a thread in QCS because it was only a minor probe, and like clockwork it devolved into the "concern trolls/crew" arguements.

Yeah and Mr. Bon Bon needed a thread there before he ate a ban as well. And this was after months of posting weird fanfics about how the nazis had infiltrated this comedy forum from top to bottom, plus the way he encouraged and constructed those creepy FBI Most Wanted lists of posters. That's what I mean though, if there's still rancid poo poo that's floating around, I'd rather it be pointed out so we could flush it.

I do wish we could reach a state where every criticism of posts, specific posting behavior, overly-permissive modding, etc. could just be co-posters being concerned and not "an attack on ~my forum/thread~ by An Enemy Stand" but I don't know what can be done about that. The political discussion spaces seem to get that pretty bad, maybe just from the way political discourse pushes people into rigid binaries online? I dunno, I guess that is beyond the scope of this thread, too.

Feels Villeneuve
Oct 7, 2007

Setter is Better.
i generally do not like treating other forums as enemies except for GBS but for my entire time on the forums GBS has had that reputation lol

NoiseAnnoys
May 17, 2010

i like to imagine people talking about “crews” like they’re some victory records Street team from 1999.

Feels Villeneuve
Oct 7, 2007

Setter is Better.
popping in with concern crew snapping fingers like it's west side story

bertolt rekt
Jul 30, 2007

Leal posted:

Explaining is condoning concerning

Was that us or was that a twitter thing? I can't remember

Rea
Apr 5, 2011

Komi-san won.

bertolt rekt posted:

Was that us or was that a twitter thing? I can't remember

I remember it mainly as a thing used in D&D arguments during the 2020 election, although it might have been used in (poorly conveyed) jest? Not sure.

Cthulu Carl
Apr 16, 2006

NoiseAnnoys posted:

i like to imagine people talking about “crews” like they’re some victory records Street team from 1999.

Step Up 2: The Forums

Feels Villeneuve
Oct 7, 2007

Setter is Better.

bertolt rekt posted:

Was that us or was that a twitter thing? I can't remember

it was from this

Fister Roboto posted:

Neither of these posts needed to be 24 hour probations, or probations at all. If there's something rhetorically objectionable about them then they can be responded to with another post, rather than shutting them out of the discussion for an entire day. Moderators should be moderators to discussion, not referees throwing people in the penalty box. Many people have pointed out this problem - that D&D mods are way too quick to use their buttons in discussions like these, and it comes across as the mods wanting to get their point in without letting the other person respond. Probations should be for when someone is being obviously obnoxious or offensive, or actual rule breaking, not just "didn't phrase your argument correctly". It's especially noticeable in this thread which already has a history of questionable mod actions.

And yes, for the record, explaining the process of an unjust system can be seen as tacit support for that injustice. Discuss that instead of probating people.

Fajita Queen
Jun 21, 2012

Feels Villeneuve posted:

it was from this

Never not loling at this post

IGgy IGsen
Apr 11, 2013

"If I lose I will set myself on fire."

Feels Villeneuve posted:

it was from this
Every time I read this I just ask myself what had to happen to the poster in life to reach that conclusion. I've rarely seen a more stupid take.

Pham Nuwen
Oct 30, 2010



Spanish Manlove posted:

why are every government agency infographics either 480x240 with john galt's speech written in it's entirety, or ten thousand pixels tall?

like 90% of information exchange within the government is done via powerpoint decks, which usually explains the former.

Inexplicable Humblebrag
Sep 20, 2003

IGgy IGsen posted:

Every time I read this I just ask myself what had to happen to the poster in life to reach that conclusion. I've rarely seen a more stupid take.

it seems like a deeply mutated version of "taking an absurd argument seriously is granting it authority"

Zulily Zoetrope
Jun 1, 2011

Muldoon
Posters ITT outing themselves as condoning that post by trying to understand it, smdh

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006




Zulily Zoetrope posted:

Posters ITT outing themselves as condoning that post by trying to understand it, smdh

That’s not what the poster is saying. Understanding is not the same thing.

Another way to say what the poster is saying is:
Theodicy is justification for what it explains.

And that is a correct assertion.

16-bit Butt-Head
Dec 25, 2014

Bar Ran Dun posted:

That’s not what the poster is saying. Understanding is not the same thing.

Another way to say what the poster is saying is:
Theodicy is justification for what it explains.

And that is a correct assertion.

actually what they were saying is that explaining something is endorsing something

Pablo Nergigante
Apr 16, 2002

Bar Ran Dun posted:

That’s not what the poster is saying. Understanding is not the same thing.

Another way to say what the poster is saying is:
Theodicy is justification for what it explains.

And that is a correct assertion.

Not sure I understand, maybe if you had a few more gangtags?

Feels Villeneuve
Oct 7, 2007

Setter is Better.

Bar Ran Dun posted:

That’s not what the poster is saying. Understanding is not the same thing.

Another way to say what the poster is saying is:
Theodicy is justification for what it explains.

And that is a correct assertion.

I don't think that's correct op.

bertolt rekt
Jul 30, 2007

Feels Villeneuve posted:

it was from this

Lmao thank you

NoiseAnnoys
May 17, 2010

where does copying and pasting a Wikipedia entry fall on the scale?

Tokyo Sexwale
Jul 30, 2003

Pablo Nergigante posted:

Not sure I understand, maybe if you had a few more gangtags?

lol remember when people convinced grouchio to ask GA for a new avatar in fyad and he got a dozen of the worst gang tags

Feels Villeneuve
Oct 7, 2007

Setter is Better.
16bbh gave me this tag and I will destroy him with a grenade launcher for it

16-bit Butt-Head
Dec 25, 2014
is there a list of gangtags

Grassy Knowles
Apr 4, 2003

"The original Terminator was a gritty fucking AMAZING piece of sci-fi. Gritty fucking rock-hard MURDER!"

NoiseAnnoys posted:

where does copying and pasting a Wikipedia entry fall on the scale?

That and posting unexplained tweets are what constitutes ‘discussion’

16-bit Butt-Head
Dec 25, 2014

Feels Villeneuve posted:

16bbh gave me this tag and I will destroy him with a grenade launcher for it

brigading is banned

Grassy Knowles
Apr 4, 2003

"The original Terminator was a gritty fucking AMAZING piece of sci-fi. Gritty fucking rock-hard MURDER!"

16-bit Butt-Head posted:

is there a list of gangtags

Bar ran dun’s profile page?

The Wicked ZOGA
Jan 27, 2022
Probation
Can't post for 3 days!
The most charitable possible interpretation of that post is 'explaining something in an attempt to justify it is attempting to justify it'. which is facile

cheetah7071
Oct 20, 2010

honk honk
College Slice

Bar Ran Dun posted:

That’s not what the poster is saying. Understanding is not the same thing.

Another way to say what the poster is saying is:
Theodicy is justification for what it explains.

And that is a correct assertion.

it doesn't get truer just cause you use bigger words

fool of sound
Oct 10, 2012
It was just people getting upset at being told that their magical thinking didn’t survive scrutiny. They weren’t crazy, they were just deflecting because they were embarrassed that their arguments didn’t hold up.

Pablo Nergigante
Apr 16, 2002

Looking at all the gangtags like

elf help book
Aug 5, 2004

Though the battle might be endless, I will never give up

16-bit Butt-Head posted:

is there a list of gangtags

there used to be a thread with all of them in qcs but i cannot find where it was sent after everything

DaysBefore
Jan 24, 2019

Bar Ran Dun posted:

That’s not what the poster is saying. Understanding is not the same thing.

Another way to say what the poster is saying is:
Theodicy is justification for what it explains.

And that is a correct assertion.

Lol

Ibram Gaunt
Jul 22, 2009

Feels Villeneuve posted:

16bbh gave me this tag and I will destroy him with a grenade launcher for it

lol owned

Ibram Gaunt
Jul 22, 2009

the best gang tag is the stupid bitches one. topic locked.

Feels Villeneuve
Oct 7, 2007

Setter is Better.

He is mad with power.

Inexplicable Humblebrag
Sep 20, 2003

well he's been killed (for six hours), for telling the truth. much like another certain someone who died around easter, for telling the truth...

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Smirking_Serpent
Aug 27, 2009

Pablo Nergigante posted:

Looking at all the gangtags like


  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5