Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
the_steve
Nov 9, 2005

We're always hiring!

Silly Burrito posted:

That is some grade A BS. I get why Fox would settle but drat I wanted them to lose this case.

Doesn't it take 2 to tango with this?
I mean, yeah, Fox offered to settle, but Dominion must have agreed to it.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

CuddleCryptid
Jan 11, 2013

Things could be going better

BetterToRuleInHell posted:

Dominion attorneys saying it was a $785 million settlement.

Half the money and Fox doesn't have to have more of their dirty laundry aired, sounds like an amazing deal that Dominion gave them, especially with so much damning evidence.

Scipiotik
Mar 2, 2004

"I would have won the race but for that."
Lawsuits are always a coin flip, juries be crazy, and the trial record is still out there. We also aren't going to necessarily know all the settlement details, but Dominion could have stipulations in there regarding things other than money. Either way. That's a big hit to Fox.

Inferior Third Season
Jan 15, 2005

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

The most famous recent examples were Ted Kennedy, John McCain, Robert Byrd, Thad Cochran, and Strom Thurmond.

I don't think any of them had their party publicly calling for their resignation and most of them died in office.
But did any of their absences result in something like the Senate being completely unable to approve judges while they were out? Nobody gives a poo poo if Senators are out sick for extended periods, if it makes no tangible difference whether they are there or not.

Silly Burrito
Nov 27, 2007

SET A COURSE FOR
THE FLAVOR QUADRANT

the_steve posted:

Doesn't it take 2 to tango with this?
I mean, yeah, Fox offered to settle, but Dominion must have agreed to it.

It’s a fair point. I’m just disappointed.

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006




Mellow Seas posted:

Freight rail is economically and environmentally preferable in pretty much 100% of situations - it’s 3-4 times more efficient than trucking, so even with the reduced costs that come from charging vs. filling trucks it’s likely rail will still come out ahead. And electric freight locomotives are definitely on the way (some have already been deployed.)

Unfortunately, we built a poo poo ton of poo poo in places that tracks don’t go and will never go.

That’s what intermodal is for, you dray from the rail hub.

The real problem is business extremely prefer direct door to door truck shipments.

Class3KillStorm
Feb 17, 2011



Scipiotik posted:

Lawsuits are always a coin flip, juries be crazy, and the trial record is still out there. We also aren't going to necessarily know all the settlement details, but Dominion could have stipulations in there regarding things other than money. Either way. That's a big hit to Fox.

But there's been no news from the Smartmatic side, right? Since all of this discovery was coming up in the case from Dominion, does any of that also apply to the Smartmatic case, or is that not something that they can legally use/access?

Cpt. Mahatma Gandhi
Mar 26, 2005

Scipiotik posted:

Lawsuits are always a coin flip, juries be crazy, and the trial record is still out there. We also aren't going to necessarily know all the settlement details, but Dominion could have stipulations in there regarding things other than money. Either way. That's a big hit to Fox.

Yeah, this is an important point to remember. The outcome and punishment is certainly well short of what we were all hoping for, but the fact of the matter is that Dominion won, Fox News lost, and it's now legally on record that they are a corporation that knowingly and purposefully lies in their reporting.

e: it is a massive bummer that the settlement amount is like half of what Dominion was seeking.

Cpt. Mahatma Gandhi fucked around with this message at 21:44 on Apr 18, 2023

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead
I'm definitely HOPING there are other stipulations, but two things, paraphrased from people who know more about law than me. The 1.6b initial ask was based on incorrect math (double-dipping by like 600m from two overlapping award categories), and Dominion makes about 20m a year. Combine those with "libel cases are hard" and Fox more or less accepting the facts of the case and this is a pretty unequivocal win for Dominion.

haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal
We also got an admission that Rupert Murdoch is still in control of Fox News when he publicly claims not to be, which may be relevant for future litigation

Gyges
Aug 4, 2004

NOW NO ONE
RECOGNIZE HULK

Inferior Third Season posted:

But did any of their absences result in something like the Senate being completely unable to approve judges while they were out? Nobody gives a poo poo if Senators are out sick for extended periods, if it makes no tangible difference whether they are there or not.

Byrd and Kennedy were both part of the insane bullshit super majority that wasn't when Obama came in.

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



Oh so Fox News will now be viewed as disreputable by anybody who doesn't instead just claim the fact that they're still operating the same as always means they won the court case, it's just a huge W for Fox News of the dodged bullet type for me. If they didn't consider a settlement a huge win they wouldn't have proposed it. Extremely disappointing that all the most explicit "I did this crime and here's why, and here's me admitting it was a crime I did" evidence and admissions in the world still couldn't rise above the level of a fine, is this the best promise of justice that can be offered by the system? A sad sort of admission that you can do whatever so long as you're rich enough?

Heck Yes! Loam!
Nov 15, 2004

a rich, friable soil containing a relatively equal mixture of sand and silt and a somewhat smaller proportion of clay.

Epic High Five posted:

Oh so Fox News will now be viewed as disreputable by anybody who doesn't instead just claim the fact that they're still operating the same as always means they won the court case, it's just a huge W for Fox News of the dodged bullet type for me. If they didn't consider a settlement a huge win they wouldn't have proposed it. Extremely disappointing that all the most explicit "I did this crime and here's why, and here's me admitting it was a crime I did" evidence and admissions in the world still couldn't rise above the level of a fine, is this the best promise of justice that can be offered by the system? A sad sort of admission that you can do whatever so long as you're rich enough?

USA USA

Professor Beetus
Apr 12, 2007

They can fight us
But they'll never Beetus
Yeah lol, this was win win for both tbh, the financial poo poo isn't going to hurt Fox in the slightest, and no one who still watches Fox will believe or care about the on-air apologies. This was the best chance for real skeletons to be exposed and perhaps lead to actual criminal wrongdoing that could have resulted in much larger consequences for Fox.

An unequivocal loss for everyone not Dominion or Fox News.

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

Epic High Five posted:

Oh so Fox News will now be viewed as disreputable by anybody who doesn't instead just claim the fact that they're still operating the same as always means they won the court case, it's just a huge W for Fox News of the dodged bullet type for me. If they didn't consider a settlement a huge win they wouldn't have proposed it. Extremely disappointing that all the most explicit "I did this crime and here's why, and here's me admitting it was a crime I did" evidence and admissions in the world still couldn't rise above the level of a fine, is this the best promise of justice that can be offered by the system? A sad sort of admission that you can do whatever so long as you're rich enough?

It's two companies who assessed their odds of winning at trial and multiplied that by the size of settlement divided by their EBITDA and arrived at a conclusion. It doesn't have to be a "big win" for either side

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Epic High Five posted:

Oh so Fox News will now be viewed as disreputable by anybody who doesn't instead just claim the fact that they're still operating the same as always means they won the court case, it's just a huge W for Fox News of the dodged bullet type for me. If they didn't consider a settlement a huge win they wouldn't have proposed it. Extremely disappointing that all the most explicit "I did this crime and here's why, and here's me admitting it was a crime I did" evidence and admissions in the world still couldn't rise above the level of a fine, is this the best promise of justice that can be offered by the system? A sad sort of admission that you can do whatever so long as you're rich enough?

All the possible losses for Fox were going to be financial regardless.

Dominion should have taken the loss in legal fees and potential for a reduced judgement as a donation for the public good. But, they aren't there to embarrass Fox News. It makes sense that they would take the 100% guaranteed 3/4 of a billion dollars. Especially since the company usually makes about $20 million per year. This is basically 40 years of revenue for them.

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



There was some implication from the Dominion lawyers that there are more cases forthcoming. I believe they are still suing some individual people like Rudy?

Beastie
Nov 3, 2006

They used to call me tricky-kid, I lived the life they wish they did.


Isn't it a common tactic to sue for damages that are astronomically high so that the offender is more likely to just settle?

Zamujasa
Oct 27, 2010



Bread Liar
To use an extremely tired analogy, this is like instead of the Death Star getting blown up, Darth Vader just gets shot and the movie ends. Like yes, great, the "good guys" won, but I wanted huge explosions of legal horseshit, damnit! :argh:


Beastie posted:

Isn't it a common tactic to sue for damages that are astronomically high so that the offender is more likely to just settle?

This generally works against smaller targets that cannot afford and/or do not have legal representation. You see it a lot in copyright troll poo poo.

SpeedFreek
Jan 10, 2008
And Im Lobster Jesus!

Silly Burrito posted:

It’s a fair point. I’m just disappointed.

Same, was hoping it would have shined more light on their business practices. They deserve much worse.

Blue Footed Booby
Oct 4, 2006

got those happy feet

Cpt. Mahatma Gandhi posted:

Yeah, this is an important point to remember. The outcome and punishment is certainly well short of what we were all hoping for, but the fact of the matter is that Dominion won, Fox News lost, and it's now legally on record that they are a corporation that knowingly and purposefully lies in their reporting.

e: it is a massive bummer that the settlement amount is like half of what Dominion was seeking.

This isn't actually the first lawsuit that found that, I thought

kzin602
May 14, 2007




Grimey Drawer

Cpt. Mahatma Gandhi posted:

Yeah, this is an important point to remember. The outcome and punishment is certainly well short of what we were all hoping for, but the fact of the matter is that Dominion won, Fox News lost, and it's now legally on record that they are a corporation that knowingly and purposefully lies in their reporting.

e: it is a massive bummer that the settlement amount is like half of what Dominion was seeking.

Could the discovery of evidence in this case to the effect that everyone involved knew all along there were no voting issues be used in a case for wire fraud charges related to fundraising?

Discendo Vox
Mar 21, 2013

We don't need to have that dialogue because it's obvious, trivial, and has already been had a thousand times.
A bunch of additional charges for US and Russian propaganda agents today.
Four were leaders of a pretty fringe political separatist party, the African People’s Socialist Party, which was tied up in the same network previously swept up in charges against Aleksandr Ionov a few months ago. As a recap, Ionov recruited various left and right wing fringe parties to promote secession, eventually bringing their leaders to Russia do things like record propaganda messages which were deployed in the DPR. Several quasi-independent entities were set up for this purpose, though the whole thing was remarkably overt.

More interesting and novel are separate charges for Natalia Burlinova, head of an org called PICREADI or Public Initiative "Creative Diplomacy", which apparently was set up to do similar recruitment work in academia. Some googling says she was also involved with a few other similar orgs. As with Ionov, she was the public face of the organization and reported directly to an unnamed FSB officer who managed funding for the groups she runs.

DOJ announcement with link to legal docs here:
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/us-citizens-and-russian-intelligence-officers-charged-conspiring-use-us-citizens-illegal

A quick glance at orgs affiliated with PICREADI

Discendo Vox fucked around with this message at 23:39 on Apr 18, 2023

cr0y
Mar 24, 2005



The chuds view is that "since fox settled it means they are now part of the deep state and in bed with dominion (sic)"


Majin
Apr 15, 2003

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

All the possible losses for Fox were going to be financial regardless.

Dominion should have taken the loss in legal fees and potential for a reduced judgement as a donation for the public good. But, they aren't there to embarrass Fox News. It makes sense that they would take the 100% guaranteed 3/4 of a billion dollars. Especially since the company usually makes about $20 million per year. This is basically 40 years of revenue for them.

You can say that as an uninvolved party, and I agree with you, the best case scenario was for Fox to be raked over the coals even further, but given the settlement deal there is a big possibility that bc Dominion is beholden to their shareholders if they would have refused the deal that could have been actionable against them from said shareholders.

Wonderful system we have, isn’t it?

Eletriarnation
Apr 6, 2005

People don't appreciate the substance of things...
objects in space.


Oven Wrangler

Epic High Five posted:

Oh so Fox News will now be viewed as disreputable by anybody who doesn't instead just claim the fact that they're still operating the same as always means they won the court case, it's just a huge W for Fox News of the dodged bullet type for me. If they didn't consider a settlement a huge win they wouldn't have proposed it. Extremely disappointing that all the most explicit "I did this crime and here's why, and here's me admitting it was a crime I did" evidence and admissions in the world still couldn't rise above the level of a fine, is this the best promise of justice that can be offered by the system? A sad sort of admission that you can do whatever so long as you're rich enough?

I think the key here is that it wasn't a crime in the criminal law sense, but a tort - this was a civil lawsuit, right? What outcome were you expecting from a civil lawsuit that doesn't in the end amount to "a fine"?

Brave New World
Mar 10, 2010

Eletriarnation posted:

I think the key here is that it wasn't a crime in the criminal law sense, but a tort - this was a civil lawsuit, right? What outcome were you expecting from a civil lawsuit that doesn't in the end amount to "a fine"?

We were really hoping that we would get to witness Rupert, Tucker, Hannity, Ingrahm, etc to have to answer questions on the stand, under oath...

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



Eletriarnation posted:

I think the key here is that it wasn't a crime in the criminal law sense, but a tort - this was a civil lawsuit, right? What outcome were you expecting from a civil lawsuit that doesn't in the end amount to "a fine"?

I wasnt expecting anything to happen to anybody except now some donor has to foot some operating expenses for awhile, maybe, but that doesnt mean I'm happy to be right

FizFashizzle
Mar 30, 2005







PostNouveau posted:

There seems to be a disconnect where the Senate Dems (a lot of whom are like 80 themselves, especially the leadership) are looking at this like it's just a temporary health thing that she'll be back from, when the reality seems to be that she's precipitously declined and even if they drag her back, she shouldn't be there. Based on all the reports, she should be getting a lot of treatment and not working. It's like elder abuse at this point.

This of course goes for any of the other ancient liches that run our country no matter their gender.

I mean there’s not really a lot of treatment options for dementia. I guess she could actually have a shingles outbreak, but all the meds you use to treat they are going to make her cognition worse. I really doubt that’s the issue here and her memory has just gotten to a point it can’t be ignored.

I think overall it’s more that the elder leadership doesn’t want to set the precedent that they can be forced out over health concerns.

Cheesus
Oct 17, 2002

Let us retract the foreskin of ignorance and apply the wirebrush of enlightenment.
Yam Slacker

FizFashizzle posted:

I think overall it’s more that the elder leadership doesn’t want to set the precedent that they can be forced out over health concerns.
I believe this is called the Ginsburg Doctrine.

Clarste
Apr 15, 2013

Just how many mistakes have you suffered on the way here?

An uncountable number, to be sure.

Zamujasa posted:

This generally works against smaller targets that cannot afford and/or do not have legal representation. You see it a lot in copyright troll poo poo.

Yeah, it's an intimidation tactic that only really works on the legally naive. The number you initially choose to sue for is almost irrelevant, since the judge will just reduce it to whatever they feel is appropriate anyway. And possibly chide the lawyers a little for misusing it to grab headlines (which is what happened in this case).

Fister Roboto
Feb 21, 2008

At least unlike Ginsburg, if Feinstein dies in office, her replacement can be appointed immediately and without Republican interference.

So of course that's exactly what's not going to happen.

Sir Lemming
Jan 27, 2009

It's a piece of JUNK!

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

quote:

Mr. Trump said he plans to relocate the homeless to tent cities where they can get the help they need from health care workers to get them back on their feet or into mental institutions.

This is literally the plot of a Star Trek episode where they go back in time to 2024. It's the catalyst for a massive anti-capitalist movement in America and eventually Earth as a whole.

Of course, it was based on something that was kind of already happening so I guess it's not that weird. Unfortunately.

Name Change
Oct 9, 2005


Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Trump's plan is to make homelessness illegal and give the homeless a choice of jail, a mental institution, or rehab. It also includes new programs to help homeless veterans.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/apr/18/donald-trump-vows-clean-homeless-problem-tents-reh/

This would probably be the most ambitious anti-homelessness program in American history. I don't really take it at face value from a guy who was surrounded by racists and temporarily embarrassed neocons in office, will quickly run into severe financial and logistical problems, and if even halfway executed will drive prison overcrowding, but it is a plan.

I imagine if it gets past infancy discussion stages it will just be Children of Men cages plopped down in "sanctuary cities."

Name Change fucked around with this message at 03:34 on Apr 19, 2023

Mooseontheloose
May 13, 2003

Youremother posted:

I wonder what they were afraid of the special master discovering that caused them to fold so hard.

My guess is they don't want the extent they were involved with the Republican party and how intertwined they were ever becoming public or discoverable.

lobster shirt
Jun 14, 2021

Fister Roboto posted:

At least unlike Ginsburg, if Feinstein dies in office, her replacement can be appointed immediately and without Republican interference.

So of course that's exactly what's not going to happen.

what do you think is going to happen?

Mooseontheloose
May 13, 2003

lobster shirt posted:

what do you think is going to happen?

Fienstein has found the holy grail, she will live forever now.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010
It's worth noting that Fox isn't done with Dominion-related legal actions yet. They should have settled much sooner - leaving it so long and allowing so much info to come out sowed the seeds for further trouble.

What kind of trouble? Lawsuits from pissed-off shareholders! Revealing that they purposely and knowingly promoted lies isn't good for the stock value, and that means shareholders have cause to sue them for this malfeasance and lack of oversight.

https://www.salon.com/2023/04/12/fox-knew-shareholder-sues-rupert-murdoch-over-fox-news-stolen-claims/

quote:

A Fox Corp. shareholder sued Rupert Murdoch, Lachlan Murdoch and other members of the Fox Corp. board of directors in Delaware on Tuesday, according to NBC News.

Robert Schwarz filed a derivative action — a kind of lawsuit brought by shareholders who claim to have been harmed by a corporation — alleging that Fox executives violated their fiduciary duty by allowing Fox News to air debunked election conspiracy theories, according to the report.

"The Board's decision to chase viewers by promoting the false stolen election claims has exposed the Company to public ridicule and negatively impacted the credibility of Fox News as a media organization that is supposed to accurately report newsworthy events. The Company is now the subject of two defamation cases, with combined damages claimed to exceed $4 billion," the lawsuit claims.

The suit cites revelations in Dominion Voting Systems' $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit in which Fox executives and hosts privately trashed the very conspiracy theories they aired. Fox also faces another $2.7 billion lawsuit from the voting tech company Smartmatic over the false election claims.

"FOX knew — from the Board on down — that Fox News was reporting false and dangerous misinformation about the 2020 Presidential election, but FOX was more concerned about short-term ratings and market share than the long-term damages of its failure to tell the truth," the new lawsuit says.

Dominion has argued that Fox executives allowed the network to air false election claims over concerns that they would lose their pro-Trump audience.

Fox News has denied that it defamed the company and claims it was merely reporting on the allegations, which is protected by the First Amendment.

Schwarz's complaint may be the first of several shareholder lawsuits. Several law firms are also eyeing derivative suits against Fox Corp. over the election claims, according to Bloomberg Law.

"They've got evidence that the company suffered economically, therefore the shareholders suffered economically," Doug Chia, a fellow at the Center for Corporate law and Governance at Rutgers Law School, told the outlet. "The board is ultimately accountable for those kinds of things."

Corporate boards tend to be heavily involved in different aspects of the business but media company boards don't tend to get involved in editorial policies.

"If you're a news company, and you become known for distributing blatantly false information, people aren't going to watch your news program or trust it," Sarah Haan, a law professor at Washington and Lee University, told Bloomberg. "A competent board would have some oversight system in place—they would be made aware if there was some major campaign of false news being promoted through their outlets."

At least two law firms are investigating Fox's board of directors for potential breach of fiduciary duty in connection to the Dominion and Smartmatic cases, according to the report. Shareholders would have to prove that a board member failed to provide oversight as hosts made allegedly defamatory statements.

"It would not be a hard sell for the court to say a news organization should avoid intentionally lying about people," Ann Lipton, associate dean for faculty research at Tulane University's law school, told Bloomberg. "This is core to like their identity and obviously presents legal risks."

lobster shirt
Jun 14, 2021

Mooseontheloose posted:

Fienstein has found the holy grail, she will live forever now.

the eternal senator... my respect.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

rscott
Dec 10, 2009
$800 million is not an insignificant account of money and News Corp is a publicly traded company, that's more than their net profits for last year. If they also lose or have to settle with that other voting systems company for similar amounts, that is going to really kind of hurt their ability to operate in the way they want to. You could even see the Murdochs removed from control of the company

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply