|
adaz posted:Sure, great glad they got a pick swap and a couple 2nds for a guy who likely? will only play a year or two but also equally as likely with the RAGE will probably win the loving MVP knowing him. The second next year is pretty much guaranteed to become a first unless he misses a bunch of time due to injury. This is a great trade for GB.
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 21:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 23:52 |
|
|
MJeff posted:Maybe the Packers can tank Rodgers' value so much that they wind up having to throw in 15 overall to get the Jets to take him. Holy poo poo!
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 21:34
|
|
|
Hot Diggity! posted:The second next year is pretty much guaranteed to become a first unless he misses a bunch of time due to injury. This is a great trade for GB. I mean that solely depends on how good Jordan Love is and or how you feel about aaron hoisting a superbowl trophy for the stupid jets but i'm not inclined to believe in anything this FO does wrt is aaron is particularly good considering they've hosed up literally everything about handling him over the last 5 years.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 21:36
|
|
|
adaz posted:I mean that solely depends on how good Jordan Love is and or how you feel about aaron hoisting a superbowl trophy for the stupid jets but i'm not inclined to believe in anything this FO does wrt is aaron is particularly good considering they've hosed up literally everything about handling him over the last 5 years. packers could go 1-16 and this is still a great trade
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 21:39
|
|
|
R.D. Mangles posted:he's gone we both know Jordan Love will be a Hall of Fame QB for the next 15 years
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 21:39
|
|
|
Seems like a decent trade for both teams. Jets don't completely cripple themselves for a guy who will likely only play 1-2 more years. If they think Rodgers was their last piece to make a serious Super Bowl run, then they have their piece. If he doesn't work out, then they can reset in a couple years and try again.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 21:41
|
|
|
Just me and 869 friends waiting for Tom Grossi’s stream to start in five minutes.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 21:42
|
|
|
I think this is a win for the Packers. But I also think Rodgers' 40 year old body is gonna dive off a cliff this year.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 21:42
|
|
|
Jets made a mistake not doing the swap on next years' Packers first rounder. Coulda gone from Rodgers straight into Caleb.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 21:46
|
|
|
xbilkis posted:Now I just need Aaron to fake an injury that keeps him out 36% of the season as one final act of spite against Green Bay's front office If Rodgers is missing more than 1/3 of the season then that 2nd rounder next year is likely a high second.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 21:46
|
|
|
it is so loving funny that his career is an exact mirror of favre
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 21:47
|
|
|
It's official!! https://twitter.com/erikschlitt/status/1650599482734551048?s=20
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 21:47
|
|
|
R.D. Mangles posted:it is so loving funny that his career is an exact mirror of favre Kirk will leave the Vikings just in time for Aaron to get one last year in purple.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 21:51
|
|
|
fishing with the fam posted:I think this is a win for the Packers. But I also think Rodgers' 40 year old body is gonna dive off a cliff this year. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 21:54
|
|
|
Rodgers is going to wear number 8 with the Jets.  He’s doomed. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 21:58
|
|
|
People were making GBS threads in the Packers but it seems like they got everything they wanted
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 21:59
|
|
|
Bird in a Blender posted:Kirk will leave the Vikings just in time for Aaron to get one last year in purple. I want the Niners to trade for Kirk so the thread title can be changed to Kirk & Aaron Gone
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 21:59
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Schuster_Elias/status/1353488439832936454 https://twitter.com/jon_greenberg/status/1650604379659968534
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 22:00
|
|
|
R.D. Mangles posted:he's gone
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 22:01
|
|
|
So to complete the timeline he just needs to send dick pics to someone in the media and then defraud his home state.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 22:02
|
|
|
and lose a game for the vikings
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 22:04
|
|
|
R.D. Mangles posted:well if there's one thing i can say about aaron rodgers it's that he is extremely annoying
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 22:04
|
|
|
FINALLY. Rot in Alright, here were my pick predictions: - March 7: "I'm guessing the return is pick #13 this year and a conditional fourth-rounder next year that can escalate up to the second-round based on performance." - March 7: "I'm going to revise my earlier prediction: GB will only get #13 and a conditional 2024 mid-rounder if they also agree to keep a bunch of Rodgers' salary." - March 14: "Elijah Moore, 3rd-rounder" And a prediction from beat writer Tom Silverstein on March 15: "I'm thinking a 3rd this year and a conditional 3rd that could be as high as a 1st next year depending on play-time or achievement in '23. Maybe a player thrown in." And estimates from a survey of four league personnel execs by the Journal Sentinel on March 17: - 2023 second or third-rounder and a 2024 conditional dependent on Rodgers not retiring - 2023 second-rounder, 2024 first-rounder, and a player - 2023 first-rounder and 2024 conditional dependent on making the playoffs - 2023 third-rounder, better if the Packers take some of the cap hit ---------------- So, looking at the actual trade, it's a little tough to compare because we don't know if the Packers are keeping any of the Rodgers salary. Assuming they're not because that hasn't been mentioned in the reporting, though, I think this is a little worse for Green Bay than my first prediction and the second league personnel prediction, but better than the others. Overall, I'm pretty happy with this, and especially with the 2024 pick not being contingent on performance.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 22:09
|
|
|
I think the Packers did very well in the trade considering they did not want him back.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 22:14
|
|
|
yeah they did better than I thought they would, considering the Jets had the leverage in being able to wait, knowing the Packers have to get rid of him, with no other team giving offers.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 22:16
|
|
|
Gonna get my jets’ Love jersey a few years early. Also gonna need a new av.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 22:19
|
|
|
Dexo posted:yeah they did better than I thought they would, considering the Jets had the leverage in being able to wait, knowing the Packers have to get rid of him, with no other team giving offers. The jets not having a competent QB on their roster kind of killed any of that so called leverage they had
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 22:22
|
|
|
How many times has Woody said that Rodgers was gonna be on the Jets?
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 22:23
|
|
|
Dexo posted:yeah they did better than I thought they would, considering the Jets had the leverage in being able to wait, knowing the Packers have to get rid of him, with no other team giving offers. Well, it was such a goofy situation because neither team gave themselves an out. The Packers could have theoretically kept a benched Rodgers but that would be extremely stupid, while the Jets could have traded up for one of the big four quarterbacks in this draft. It would've been pretty expensive since they weren't in the top 10 to begin with, but I'm not sure it would've cost more than that to get to, like, #7 or whatever. But they threw out all of their leverage by saying that Rodgers was the plan and signing his buddies. So, both teams had all the leverage and none of the leverage. I did think the Jets could just wait the Packers out, but I guess not.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 22:24
|
|
|
IcePhoenix posted:The jets not having a competent QB on their roster kind of killed any of that so called leverage they had They could wait until after the draft and closer to training camp, they were betting the Packers did not want to spike the chance to get picks this year. and generally have that specter hanging around into the Love torch passing. Which was a correct bet. Packers ended up having to come closer to what the Jets were looking for.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 22:24
|
|
|
Dexo posted:They could wait until after the draft and closer to training camp, they were betting the Packers did not want to spike the chance to get picks this year. and generally have that specter hanging around into the Love torch passing. I guess I feel like the Packers got the better end of the trade is all, so I don't think they were the ones that broke first. A second this year + a (probable) first next year is pretty good for a 39 year old QB
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 22:27
|
|
|
Sounds like the Packers may be eating some of Rodger’s future money as well, so they may have been willing to trade some cap space this and next year to get more value in picks.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 22:28
|
|
|
Abugadu posted:Gonna get my jets’ Love jersey a few years early. Yeah, same. My first and only av gifted to me by Soothing Vapors (rip). Man if he thought he was treated badly by the Green Bay press. Are there any good receivers in the draft? If there is, Comedy Option says Packers draft him at #13 because Love Needs Weapons.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 22:31
|
|
|
Aaaaaaarrrrrggggg posted:Are there any good receivers in the draft? If there is, Comedy Option says Packers draft him at #13 because Love Needs Weapons. Jaxon Smith-Njigba is far and away the best WR prospect with a fairly significant gap between him and the second tier (Flowers, Addison, Q. Johnson, Hyatt). Given that the pick swap involved going from 15 to 13, notably leapfrogging New England in the process, I think it's suddenly much, much more likely the Packers take JSN. That said, the TEs are much better prospects than the WRs we have this season, so there's also a pretty strong chance the Packers just take someone like Myles Murphy or Lukas Van Ness and then takes TE on day 2.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 22:35
|
|
|
If Rodgers is good, they probably didn't get the better of the trade. outside of generally "getting rid of guy everyone hates". Probably a push, maybe favoring the Jets, unless Love is also good. If he sucks or is mid and completely falls off, then yeah fleeced.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 22:35
|
|
|
Aaaaaaarrrrrggggg posted:Yeah, same. My first and only av gifted to me by Soothing Vapors (rip). Not really, but TE is loaded
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 22:36
|
|
|
Dexo posted:If Rodgers is good, they probably didn't get the better of the trade. outside of generally "getting rid of guy everyone hates". Probably a push, maybe favoring the Jets, unless Love is also good. I mean I feel like that’s how QB trades go. Really good or really bad. No inbetween
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 22:37
|
|
|
The Packers drafting exceptional wideouts the moment that Rodgers leaves would truly be a humorous turn of events.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 22:38
|
|
|
Aaaaaaarrrrrggggg posted:Yeah, same. My first and only av gifted to me by Soothing Vapors (rip). In the 2023 Goon Draft, we're finishing up the fourth round. I was drafting for the Packers and selected the following: #15: Jaxon Smith-Njigba, WR, Ohio State University #45: Luke Musgrave, TE, Oregon State #78: Keeanu Benton, DL, Wisconsin #116: Quan Martin, S, Illinois If I had picks #13 and #42, I still would've grabbed JSN for #13, and I would've added Will McDonald IV (EDGE, Iowa State) with the extra pick at #42.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 22:38
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 23:52 |
|
|
the real funny part is if like mid point of the season, they are bad, and disappointing, and then they like sit Rodgers for the rest of the year to make sure they kept that first. lol Zach Wilson.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2023 22:39
|
|