Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: fatherboxx)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Djarum
Apr 1, 2004

by vyelkin

Lum_ posted:

Before this year, they were more of a classic PMC with forces overall far better trained and equipped than the average Russian brigade. They've spent the past year bloating up with convicts and volunteers from various sources and their on-the-job training program has been "charge the front, and if you don't die, do it again tomorrow", so they are much closer to what you'd consider a paramilitary militia now, albeit still with a core of warcrimey merc goons.

It's worth remembering that well before the Ukraine war, Wagner actually got froggy and decided to attack an American base in Syria. The results were anywhere from 15 to hundreds (much more likely) of Wagner dead with 0 US casualties. The US graciously agreed to pretend it never happened to avoid WW3.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Khasham

Wagner has been used as plausible deniable Russian forces for some time. I can’t for a second believe that they do anything without the OK from Putin. The Syria incident is :psyduck: because it had to have been planned and ok’ed from above. It goes to show the Russian mindset that they didn’t think that the entire might of the US forces in the area wouldn’t come down upon them.

The US has their own versions of these; Blackwater famously was used during our desert wars with plenty of war crimes on their hands too. They have become favored in recent times to handle tasks that are politically or legally dangerous or the chance for failure is very high. They are considered expendable and if things get too spicy they can and often are cut loose.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa
You generally try to evacuate civilians out of the harm's way if you have some clue of where fighting is likely to flare up, and if you give a flying ef about them. It's possible that some people in the civilian occupation administration don't want to carry responsibility for every babushka left in the area getting splattered by artillery fire. A more pessimistic view would be that people get kidnapped to Russia and will never be let back to their homes.

A truly draconian military commander would deny them from leaving so they would act as meat shields, so at least that's a positive sign if the civilian admins can get them out.

Morrow
Oct 31, 2010
If you clean out the civilians, you also clear put partisans and observers reporting to the UA.

Hannibal Rex
Feb 13, 2010

Morrow posted:

If you clean out the civilians, you also clear put partisans and observers reporting to the UA.

Yeah, it's that. Also, now you can booby-trap and mine every village to hell and back.

fatherboxx
Mar 25, 2013

Willo567 posted:

https://twitter.com/NOELreports/status/1654500316883058689
Is this a sign that Russia is going to be retreating, or is it too early to tell?

Yeah, last two times it was announced a "gesture of goodwill" followed

Mr. Apollo
Nov 8, 2000

It looks like Russia has started bombarding Bakhmut with incendiary munitions.

https://twitter.com/RALee85/status/1654560109723537408?s=20

Chalks
Sep 30, 2009

Mr. Apollo posted:

It looks like Russia has started bombarding Bakhmut with incendiary munitions.

Is there anything about how effective this is? There's a bunch of footage from defenders on the ground and it looks like they're just kinda chilling and watching a bunch of fires from their fortifications:

https://twitter.com/markito0171/status/1654598291777003523

*edit* no idea why that's not embedding for me. It's some Ukrainians joking around while watching the incendiary landing all around them as if it's no big deal

Chalks fucked around with this message at 22:31 on May 5, 2023

Sekenr
Dec 12, 2013




Prigozhin leaving makes sense to me. He is wasting his money and people for a cause that no longer makes sense to him. He previously made a video where he wanted to just keep what we got and move on.

For newbies to the thread Prigozhin despite his role in the war is a convicted criminal who served several years in russian jail and so for a mob boss what is there to gain? But we'll see on the 10th.

Sir John Falstaff
Apr 13, 2010

fatherboxx posted:

https://twitter.com/vofchekpan/status/1654413658296840194?t=Gx9qiNU9qsIc2kExUmjKuw&s=19

Guy on twitter says that his brigade managed to shoot down the fearsome Kinzhal missile from a Patriot. File this under "guy on twitter says" of course, but if true, I expect Ukrainian MOD to make a big deal out of it soon.

Here are photos, I'll let experts verify

https://twitter.com/666_mancer/status/1654420929206800384?t=STu2HUDAI5Bxy9QLy9v9cA&s=19

Officially, apparently Ukrainian MOD has denied it happened:

https://twitter.com/KyivIndependent/status/1654467767737696256

e: But also, others think differently:

https://twitter.com/UAWeapons/status/1654448035445784576

So, :shrug: ?

Sir John Falstaff fucked around with this message at 00:14 on May 6, 2023

HonorableTB
Dec 22, 2006
The US forces in the area cleared the action against Wagner by having James Mattis call the Russian commander and basically go "those guys are coming for us, are they yours?" Russia denied it, Mattis asked again and specifically said it was going to engage, Russia denied it again, Mattis shrugged and casually proceeded to annihilate most of a Wagner battalion. The air power the US brought to bear included AC-130 gunships, F-22 Raptor and F-15E Strike Eagle fighter jets, MQ-9 Reaper unmanned combat aerial vehicles, AH-64 Apache attack helicopters, and B-52s bombers.

Wagner didn't have any aircraft because their promised air support was uniformed Russian Air Force and that would be Bad.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009
Wagner did have their "own" aircraft in Ukraine (not sure if any got shotdown, so they might still have some), but it would be bombers and CAS, which probably won't do them much good against US Air Force fighters...

Sekenr
Dec 12, 2013




HonorableTB posted:

The US forces in the area cleared the action against Wagner by having James Mattis call the Russian commander and basically go "those guys are coming for us, are they yours?" Russia denied it, Mattis asked again and specifically said it was going to engage, Russia denied it again, Mattis shrugged and casually proceeded to annihilate most of a Wagner battalion. The air power the US brought to bear included AC-130 gunships, F-22 Raptor and F-15E Strike Eagle fighter jets, MQ-9 Reaper unmanned combat aerial vehicles, AH-64 Apache attack helicopters, and B-52s bombers.

Wagner didn't have any aircraft because their promised air support was uniformed Russian Air Force and that would be Bad.

It is a known situarion in Syria. Wagner survivors complained that there was 3 apache helicopters goin in circles and firing nonstop, there was no chance

Coquito Ergo Sum
Feb 9, 2021

Chalks posted:

Is there anything about how effective this is? There's a bunch of footage from defenders on the ground and it looks like they're just kinda chilling and watching a bunch of fires from their fortifications:

https://twitter.com/markito0171/status/1654598291777003523

*edit* no idea why that's not embedding for me. It's some Ukrainians joking around while watching the incendiary landing all around them as if it's no big deal

It depends. Most people are familiar with white phosphorous munitions, but there are other incendiaries that are less (I can't think of the proper word, just less...), and are designed with an intent to spread fires or ignite fuel/munitions. They can also potentially obscure vision or just keep a target from wanting to move around in general. Russia was dropping what looked like Thermite rounds on Azovstal last year.

Herstory Begins Now
Aug 5, 2003
SOME REALLY TEDIOUS DUMB SHIT THAT SUCKS ASS TO READ ->>

Lum_ posted:

Before this year, they were more of a classic PMC with forces overall far better trained and equipped than the average Russian brigade. They've spent the past year bloating up with convicts and volunteers from various sources and their on-the-job training program has been "charge the front, and if you don't die, do it again tomorrow", so they are much closer to what you'd consider a paramilitary militia now, albeit still with a core of warcrimey merc goons.

It's worth remembering that well before the Ukraine war, Wagner actually got froggy and decided to attack an American base in Syria. The results were anywhere from 15 to hundreds (much more likely) of Wagner dead with 0 US casualties. The US graciously agreed to pretend it never happened to avoid WW3.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Khasham

neither side pretended it didn't happen and indeed it happened specifically because Russian commanders, when contacted by American leadership via deconfliction lines said 'not our guys, do whatever.' so 'whatever' ended up being 4 hours of strikes by basically every weapon system that could get within range in time.

Lum_
Jun 5, 2006

Herstory Begins Now posted:

neither side pretended it didn't happen and indeed it happened specifically because Russian commanders, when contacted by American leadership via deconfliction lines said 'not our guys, do whatever.' so 'whatever' ended up being 4 hours of strikes by basically every weapon system that could get within range in time.

After the fact the US side very carefully insisted it was an attack by Syrian forces, and Russia said there may have been a few citizens of Russia that died in the area but they were 100% not part of the Russian military nosiree not that. There wasn't any official acknowledgement until Pompeo bragged about it a few months later.

Herstory Begins Now
Aug 5, 2003
SOME REALLY TEDIOUS DUMB SHIT THAT SUCKS ASS TO READ ->>
what? it was reported on as it happened. the significant point is that there were no member of the Russian military involved because Wagner is not the Russian military. no one was being coy about that, it's a practical legal distinction because there's no diplomatic complexity to killing non-flagged mercenaries who are presently attacking you.

Wagner at that time also existed as much more of a separate force from Russian MoD and it wasn't until the war in Ukraine that they were more or less fully enmeshed within the Russian MoD structure.

reporting
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-russia-casualtie-idUSKCN1FZ2DZ

dod statement
https://www.defense.gov/News/Transc...ian-via-teleco/

there's stuff from even closer to the date, but the details of what had happened were not in any significant dispute basically from the moment it happened.

here's the middle east thread talking about it basically as the news broke

https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3839774&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=70#post481079925

note the date: https://twitter.com/LucasFoxNews/status/961617576848740352

Herstory Begins Now fucked around with this message at 01:26 on May 6, 2023

saratoga
Mar 5, 2001
This is a Randbrick post. It goes in that D&D megathread on page 294

"i think obama was mediocre in that debate, but hillary was fucking terrible. also russert is filth."

-randbrick, 12/26/08

Chalks posted:

Is there anything about how effective this is?

Well they've been doing it for months and the city is still holding out, so...

DarklyDreaming
Apr 4, 2009

Fun scary

saratoga posted:

Well they've been doing it for months and the city is still holding out, so...

Incendiary munitions in general are extremely situational in their effectiveness, even if your intentions are toward something as malleable and hard to define as "Enemy morale"

Lum_
Jun 5, 2006

Herstory Begins Now posted:

what? it was reported on as it happened. the significant point is that there were no member of the Russian military involved because Wagner is not the Russian military. no one was being coy about that, it's a practical legal distinction because there's no diplomatic complexity to killing non-flagged mercenaries who are presently attacking you.

From the DOD press conference you linked at the time:

quote:

I know you're going to ask, so I'm going to be clear that I will not speculate on the composition of this force or whose control they were under. As I've said throughout my nearly two years commanding coalition air forces, we are focused on a singular enemy: ISIS. We're not looking for a fight with anyone else, but as Secretary Mattis said last week, “If you threaten us, it will be your longest and worst day.”

I didn't say that the media and commentators didn't say explicitly at the time a bunch of Russians were killed, I said the US government/military very carefully refused to comment, which you can see above.

Much as if Russia managed to kill a bunch of Blackwater mercs somewhere, the fact they weren't uniformed Russian soldiers did not make it that much less a possible international incident if someone wanted to escalate it. Thankfully, no one did.

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010
From the Chief Foreign-Affairs Correspondent of The Wall Street Journal.

So, maybe it wasn't a false flag

https://twitter.com/yarotrof/status/1654138239387664437

Qtotonibudinibudet
Nov 7, 2011



Omich poluyobok, skazhi ty narkoman? ya prosto tozhe gde to tam zhivu, mogli by vmeste uyobyvat' narkotiki

Charlz Guybon posted:

From the Chief Foreign-Affairs Correspondent of The Wall Street Journal.

So, maybe it wasn't a false flag

https://twitter.com/yarotrof/status/1654138239387664437

those are just boat tours on the moscow river, it's completely normal

Lum_
Jun 5, 2006
look, if you've seen russian driving videos, that is perfectly possible positions for all those cars

CatHorse
Jan 5, 2008
Russia has been jamming GPS near Kremlin since 2016

Dwesa
Jul 19, 2016

Maybe I'll go where I can see stars

Sir John Falstaff posted:

Officially, apparently Ukrainian MOD has denied it happened:

https://twitter.com/KyivIndependent/status/1654467767737696256

e: But also, others think differently:

https://twitter.com/UAWeapons/status/1654448035445784576

So, :shrug: ?

Another confirmation by commander

https://twitter.com/ChristopherJM/status/1654742797725868036

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

MikusR posted:

Russia has been jamming GPS near Kremlin since 2016

That seems like it's in the Simonov raion of Moscow, which is some way from Kremlin. So it might be a case of someone cranking the dial up, but just from one tweet who knows. GPS magic is fiddly.

WarpedLichen
Aug 14, 2008


Interesting analysis on a Prigozhin video:
https://twitter.com/KevinRothrock/status/1654520105240350721?cxt=HHwWgsC-qaHRhPYtAAAA

Suggests MoD deputy head of logistics, Mikhail Mizintsev, was selling ammo to Wagner and got fired for it, then recruited by Wagner.

Gucci Loafers
May 20, 2006

Ask yourself, do you really want to talk to pair of really nice gaudy shoes?


This is weird question but what would occur in Western Militaries if a commander or leader did what Prigozhin did where his sharing videos of the dead and he isn't getting the support he needs?

Hannibal Rex
Feb 13, 2010

Crosby B. Alfred posted:

This is weird question but what would occur in Western Militaries if a commander or leader did what Prigozhin did where his sharing videos of the dead and he isn't getting the support he needs?

They'd start their career at Fox News earlier than intended.

madeintaipei
Jul 13, 2012

Crosby B. Alfred posted:

This is weird question but what would occur in Western Militaries if a commander or leader did what Prigozhin did where his sharing videos of the dead and he isn't getting the support he needs?

Any military, no matter how small, has it's own bureaucracy that supports and protects itself as an institution. Also, everyone has a boss. No boss likes to be made a fool of. Which is exactly what Prigozhin is doing. Making a fool of one of the largest and, arguably, most corrupt bureaucracies in the world.
That he has so far gotten away with it is due to many quirks, many idiosyncrasies, baked into the way the Russian government works under Putin.

Your question isn't so weird if you think about what would have to happen in a Western military for it to even be an issue. A situation so out of control, pulling the actors involved in so many directions (and them doing some pulling of their own), with so little hope of resolution, that humiliating superiors and threatening mutiny seems like an option. A whole bunch of things would already have to be broken as gently caress. Basic discipline, the threat of legal consequences, any kind of goodwill within the organization, the list goes on.

Western militaries are constrained by policy written by the civilian government they are beholden to. Within that envelope, they generally know what they can and can not accomplish. This gives the bureaucracy an "out". Do what the boss tells you as best as possible. No reason to rock the boat if the whole system (civilian and military) will be held "accountable" for how hosed things end up being. I'm not sure that applies to Prigozhin and his "orchestra".

My read is that the dude is paranoid that a bunch of heavy poo poo will fall on his head if Wagner can't achieve the aims he set for it. Lashing out and trying to spread the blame might insulate him from the worst of it. Not like what he's saying is exactly wrong either, in context. Stopped clock and all that.

gently caress, that's a bunch of rambling poo poo. :justpost:

Gucci Loafers
May 20, 2006

Ask yourself, do you really want to talk to pair of really nice gaudy shoes?


Good post, I wonder if it's even realistic if Wagner can hold the outskirts of Bakhmut. Probably not.

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa
Also notice that officers, including Russian officers, have sworn an oath of office and there are lots of regulations that affect them. The most important thing for an officer is to make sure that you and everyone around you follows those regulations, whether it's about how field latrines are placed or how nuclear warheads are stored, and failure to do so will really quickly cut your career or worse.

But Prigozhin is not an officer, he's an unscrupulous businessman who is also a good friend of the big guy so he doesn't give a gently caress if his behaviour is unbecoming of an officer. If anything that's what connects him and Putin, Vova also likes to talk tough and use criminal slang terms about his enemies.

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa
An example of how bad Prigozhin's behaviour would be for an officer is how the commander of USS Theodore Roosevelt got removed for sending this e-mail in the middle of an acute COVID-19 epidemic which was then leaked to media:

quote:

"If required, the USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT would embark all assigned Sailors, set sail, and be ready to fight and defeat and adversary that dares challenge the U.S. or our allies. The virus would certainly have an impact, but in combat, we are willing to take certain risks that are not acceptable in peacetime. However, we are not at war, and therefore cannot allow a single Sailor to perish as a result of this pandemic unnecessarily. Decisive action is required now in order to comply with CDC and NAVADMIN 083/20 guidance and prevent tragic outcomes."

He was immediately relieved of command and his career was done.

Gucci Loafers
May 20, 2006

Ask yourself, do you really want to talk to pair of really nice gaudy shoes?


Looking that up on Wikipedia, Crozier was re-instated and retired last year. Looks like he didn't do things completely right but not completely wrong either.

Tiny Timbs
Sep 6, 2008

Edit: already covered

Tiny Timbs fucked around with this message at 14:21 on May 6, 2023

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

Crosby B. Alfred posted:

Looking that up on Wikipedia, Crozier was re-instated and retired last year. Looks like he didn't do things completely right but not completely wrong either.

He was not reinstated. Like said, it killed his career.

madeintaipei
Jul 13, 2012

Crosby B. Alfred posted:

Looking that up on Wikipedia, Crozier was re-instated and retired last year. Looks like he didn't do things completely right but not completely wrong either.

I had thought about bringing up Crozier but, as you say, he seemed justified in doing the wrong thing for the right reasons. That situation was handled badly by his superiors in a lot of ways, IMO, which made things way worse than they had to be for the Navy.

It's not like you don't see criticism from Western general officers about what their organizations do, or what policies they follow. These are professionals, and political creatures in all the ways that matter. They always seem to temper their opinions, being careful not to lay too much blame on any one thing or too much on themselves and, by extension, the people under them. It's there though, in the sense of very broad condemnation.

Like, soldiers detailed what could happen with "Iraqization" and the drawdown of US troops in Iraq. They talked about the political and military failures that could cause it, too. It sounded like insane rambing from people too invested in the war for anyone's good. Talking about "messianic death cults" and "global caliphates" on national TV. Bug-gently caress crazy poo poo.

Enter, daesh.

Being right helps, I guess.

Anyways.

The Russian way of war since the fall of the USSR has, in my opinion, followed a trajectory that started with unrest during the end years of the USSR and FRY/Serbia during the Yugoslav Wars. The Russian government learned a few things from the internal strife that beset the late-USSR. They hate when it happens to them, but are all too happy to apply the worst answers anywhere else.

Shove a crowbar between the cracks, crank up the propaganda machine, arm up the nastiest criminal fuckers you can find to further the break, let them do their worst, eliminate or sideline said nasty fuckers, exploit the moonscape they leave behind. Any justification works, as long as it works for the biggest party involved (the Russian government, in this case). Ethnic division, religion, racism, nationalism, fear, hatred, what the gently caress ever, it doesn't matter. All that can be cleaned up once the "right" people are in charge. It works well enough, where it works, that failure is the exception.

Gucci Loafers
May 20, 2006

Ask yourself, do you really want to talk to pair of really nice gaudy shoes?


Nenonen posted:

He was not reinstated. Like said, it killed his career.

Was he dishonorably discharged? I am not seeing that, looks like they told him he needed to retire but wasn't fired.

Vorenus
Jul 14, 2013

Crosby B. Alfred posted:

Was he dishonorably discharged? I am not seeing that, looks like they told him he needed to retire but wasn't fired.

He was relieved of command, transferred, and then retired....because his career was over. A couple of people recommended/considered reinstating him, but ultimately he was not reinstated. To add insult to injury, he was criticized by a naval inquiry.

If you had actually read the Wiki page you would know all of this.

evilweasel
Aug 24, 2002

Crosby B. Alfred posted:

Was he dishonorably discharged? I am not seeing that, looks like they told him he needed to retire but wasn't fired.

Dishonorably discharged is vaguely akin to a criminal record. You don't get one just because you were relieved of command and told your career was over.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Sergg
Sep 19, 2005

I was rejected by the:

https://twitter.com/bogy0/status/1654809214110384128

https://twitter.com/IvanKuhn8/status/1654840079766962179

Check it out. Ramzan Kadryov is wearing a pulse oximeter while giving his speech about replacing Prighozin with his own troops.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply