Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Srice
Sep 11, 2011

One thing that milk article makes me think about is how things fare for students that are mildly lactose intolerant. The article says that students can get a non-dairy option with a doctor's note but even ignoring how much it sucks to place the burden on the student to go out and get a note just to get a different drink at lunch, if a student is only mildly lactose intolerant they may not even realize it and thus wouldn't even think to ask a doctor about it. Of course that wouldn't guarantee that they'd drink something besides milk if they had the option but it's certainly very possible that some would pick the non-dairy milk option of their own accord if they could get it without jumping through a bunch of hoops.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Fister Roboto
Feb 21, 2008

haveblue posted:

…yes? Do you think greed only happens once you reach a certain bank balance?

To a degree, yeah! The ultra-wealthy behave completely differently from the vast majority, and a lot of it is because they are completely shielded from the consequences of their greed. They don't have to worry about not being able to afford rent, they don't have to worry about their kids getting chopped up in a meat factory, they don't have to worry about toxic sludge getting dumped in their water supply. And when they get caught doing these things, they just pay a fine. Honestly it's kind of absurd to claim that every human being is going to be equally rapaciously greedy no matter what.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Slashrat posted:

I'm not talking about donors giving money when they aren't allowed, but politicians funnelling campaign funds, which I understand have restrictions on how they can be used, into their own private bank accounts, which seems to be what was going on in this latest news story.

Yeah, there's a motive of greed, but if you're aiming to advance you political career into national office, why are you stealing the money that is intended to get you there to spend it on other things?

There's lots of legal things you can do to really enjoy your contributions more than necessary (stay at nicer hotels, serve nicer food at events, etc.) but, you can't just use campaign money for personal things. There is nothing that stops you from using your campaign money to stay in the nicest hotels whenever you are campaigning or flying private plans or catering your events with the nicest food. People do those all of the time, but the very dumb or very greedy people are the ones who try to use them for personal expenses and almost always get caught. When Santos first filed his quarterly FEC disclosures earlier this year, basically everyone thought that he was doing something very suspicious and was going to get caught. Duncan Hunter spent thousands on Steam games and taking his mistress out. They are very dumb, very greedy, or think they will never get caught because they are very smart (but, if you see point #1, they are actually very dumb).

George Santos has not really done anything over the last 8 months or so to establish that he is anything other than very dumb AND very greedy. He didn't even do a good job of even trying to cover his tracks. He just kind of assumed that lying to the feds is like lying about your mom dying during 9/11 and nothing can happen to you for doing it.

Basically...

Doctor Yiff posted:

The thing to know about a lot of these power hungry assholes is a decent chunk of them also aren't very smart or know how to not get caught.

You can definitely use campaign donations in ways that indirectly benefit you (especially if you are running a major campaign like a Presidential campaign or Senate campaign as a glorified press tour with no intention of winning and you have donors willing to throw millions of dollars at you *cough* Ron Paul *cough*), but you can't just deposit them into your bank account. It's very illegal, very easy to track, and very dumb. But, a certain percentage of people can't resist trying to do it.

Leon Trotsky 2012 fucked around with this message at 14:20 on May 10, 2023

Clarste
Apr 15, 2013

Just how many mistakes have you suffered on the way here?

An uncountable number, to be sure.

Fister Roboto posted:

To a degree, yeah! The ultra-wealthy behave completely differently from the vast majority, and a lot of it is because they are completely shielded from the consequences of their greed. They don't have to worry about not being able to afford rent, they don't have to worry about their kids getting chopped up in a meat factory, they don't have to worry about toxic sludge getting dumped in their water supply. And when they get caught doing these things, they just pay a fine. Honestly it's kind of absurd to claim that every human being is going to be equally rapaciously greedy no matter what.

There have been studies essentially showing that rich people have less empathy and do not really see strangers as people. Like, that's just a fact.

BDawg
May 19, 2004

In Full Stereo Symphony
https://twitter.com/FPWellman/status/1656288111796666371

quote:

Santos is in custody in the federal courthouse. He was charged with 7 counts of wire fraud, 3 counts of money laundering, one count of theft of public funds, and 2 counts of making materially false statements to the House of Representatives. via @NYTimes

Are we finally at the start of the "find out" phase?

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

DarkCrawler posted:

Most of human existence, not history. Can't really amass wealth beyond what you can carry as a hunter gatherer, and what is the point when wherever you go will have more stuff than you can carry, anyway? After agriculture, permanent settlement and land starting to have worth, I don't think anyone would have refused to have more of it.

And until you get to industrial revolution and corresponding further major improvements in agriculture, there are also severe limits on how much can be accumulated.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
New inflation report is out. Mostly surprisingly good news, but a few potential problems on the horizon.

Highlights:

- Inflation down to 4.9%, falling faster than expected and down from the high of 9.1% This is the first time inflation has been below 5% in the last two years.

This also means real wage growth will likely be increasing for a third month in a row.

- Food prices have risen 0% in the last two months and only a small amount in the previous month, finally reversing the trend of constantly rising grocery prices.

However, prices are still about 8% higher now than they were a year ago. They have stopped rising, but still remain elevated. They need to remain stable or rising slower than overall inflation for many more months until they experience effective price deflation.

- Housing prices still continue to rise and are still well above average inflation.


- Electricity prices and transportation are also rising much faster than inflation.

However, electricity has been slowing down dramatically. Back when the Ukraine war first broke out and inflation was around 9%, almost half of all total inflation was caused by electricity and energy prices. That percentage is way down now.

- Biggest potential problems: Housing, transportation, and electricity are now the largest drivers of inflation. Those are also the areas with the biggest challenges for reducing prices.


There's a lot of reasons to assume that housing prices will stay sticky and elevated even when overall inflation is going down:

A) Housing takes a long time to build.
B) There are still lots of people and interest groups with strong incentives to prevent additional housing for financial or personal reasons.
C) The current interest rate environment also makes it much more expensive and risky to build homes to sell without a buyer, which will likely be an additional burden on increasing production.

There's also a lot of reasons to assume electricity prices may remain sticky and inflated even when overall inflation is going down:

A) Energy prices are volatile and could spike for various reasons even after falling for a while.
B) China and India still plan to dramatically increase their energy usage and car ownership rates in the short-term and that will drive up demand.
C) Transitioning to green energy sources and electric vehicles will still be more expensive than fossil fuels for the foreseeable future, so that could increase electricity prices.

Since the biggest remaining sources of inflation are also the areas likely to be the "stickiest," it means that the last ~3% reduction in inflation to get back to the Fed target of 2% may be harder to achieve than the previous 4.2% we have already reduced.

https://twitter.com/jsblokland/status/1656275972793024514

bird food bathtub
Aug 9, 2003

College Slice

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

There's lots of legal things you can do to really enjoy your contributions more than necessary (stay at nicer hotels, serve nicer food at events, etc.) but, you can't just use campaign money for personal things. There is nothing that stops you from using your campaign money to stay in the nicest hotels whenever you are campaigning or flying private plans or catering your events with the nicest food. People do those all of the time, but the very dumb or very greedy people are the ones who try to use them for personal expenses and almost always get caught. When Santos first filed his quarterly FEC disclosures earlier this year, basically everyone thought that he was doing something very suspicious and was going to get caught. Duncan Hunter spent thousands on Steam games and taking his mistress out. They are very dumb, very greedy, or think they will never get caught because they are very smart (but, if you see point #1, they are actually very dumb).

George Santos has not really done anything over the last 8 months or so to establish that he is anything other than very dumb AND very greedy. He didn't even do a good job of even trying to cover his tracks. He just kind of assumed that lying to the feds is like lying about your mom dying during 9/11 and nothing can happen to you for doing it.

Basically...

You can definitely use campaign donations in ways that indirectly benefit you (especially if you are running a major campaign like a Presidential campaign or Senate campaign as a glorified press tour with no intention of winning and you have donors willing to throw millions of dollars at you *cough* Ron Paul *cough*), but you can't just deposit them into your bank account. It's very illegal, very easy to track, and very dumb. But, a certain percentage of people can't resist trying to do it.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2023/01/13/george-santos-finances-raising-questions/11031759002/

Santos' financial filings had dozens upon dozens of finance charges that were exactly one penny below the required reporting threshold and they were for completely ludicrous things like exactly $199.99 for parking in a facility that did not charge $0.99 for anything. It was very dumb, very greedy, and very very VERY obvious. At some point other people who generally do not want to go after their social class peers get forced in to it by the very dumb people not even bothering to put on the mask.

Randalor
Sep 4, 2011



It's honestly kind of impressive how blatant he's making his gift. If he had just put in random numbers below the filing amount, no one would have batted an eye.

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



BDawg posted:

https://twitter.com/FPWellman/status/1656288111796666371

Are we finally at the start of the "find out" phase?
Yeah he’s pretty hosed

I hope serving one term in the House was worth it

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

BDawg posted:

https://twitter.com/FPWellman/status/1656288111796666371

Are we finally at the start of the "find out" phase?

Santos is basically accused of three different things:

1) The campaign finance stuff that he was using for personal expenses and everyone said was going to get him prosecuted as soon as he released his FEC disclosures.

2) Just an unimaginably dumb move where he took advantage of the lowered documentation requirements during the expanded unemployment during Covid-19 to claim unemployment payments while he was employed in a different state.

quote:

an unemployment insurance fraud scheme: Prosecutors say that in June 2020, in the early months of the Covid-19 pandemic, Santos applied for government assistance in New York, even though he was at the time employed by a Florida-based investment firm and drew an annual salary of $120,000

3) Lying on his financial documents and disclosure to Congress.

Another completely stupid and avoidable crime.

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound
Comesy option: Santos invokes the "anyone can move for a vote of no confidence" provision while incarcerated, paralyzing the House . . .and forcing Biden to mint the coin!

Harold Fjord
Jan 3, 2004
Is there any rules that require the coin to be physical money and not a Biden NFT ape?

Fister Roboto
Feb 21, 2008

Clarste posted:

There have been studies essentially showing that rich people have less empathy and do not really see strangers as people. Like, that's just a fact.

Exactly. I dont think anyone would say that Elon Musk is an example of normal human behavior.

Like yeah, i understand the point that a worker coop could pursue unsustainable profit regardless of any consequence. But 1) i never claimed that worker coops are perfect, and 2) there are plenty of democratic ways to deal with that problem.

Slashrat
Jun 6, 2011

YOSPOS
Ah, I got Santos and DeSantis mixed up in my head. I was having trouble squaring the stupidity of the crimes with the the achievement of becoming Governor of Florida. Even though the latter doesn't seem much smarter, I'd think politicians at that level would at least be surrounded by nannies staffers who rein in the most blatant criming.

syntaxrigger
Jul 7, 2011

Actually you owe me 6! But who's countin?

haveblue posted:

…yes? Do you think greed only happens once you reach a certain bank balance?

Lol this is bullshit.

If the greed of the “worker” in this case directly resulted in all schools in the state to be underfunded to poverty conditions, you are saying the worker will still want more money?

Pleasant Friend
Dec 30, 2008

Does this bring Republicans down to +3 in the House, or is Santos allowed to cast votes from jail?

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Pleasant Friend posted:

Does this bring Republicans down to +3 in the House, or is Santos allowed to cast votes from jail?

He's not in jail right now. Even if he is found guilty, he won't be in jail for a while. They would still have to go through the court process.

BDawg
May 19, 2004

In Full Stereo Symphony

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

He's not in jail right now. Even if he is found guilty, he won't be in jail for a while. They would still have to go through the court process.

Is he not? The tweet says he's in custody and I assume will be until his hearing later. If he's considered a flight risk (doesn't he have a Brazilian passport?), they might just keep him.

Willa Rogers
Mar 11, 2005

Pleasant Friend posted:

Does this bring Republicans down to +3 in the House, or is Santos allowed to cast votes from jail?

Bob Menendez stayed a vote-casting senator after he was indicted for fraud, bribery & making false statements (although he stepped down as ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee) so I'm guessing Santos will still have voting rights, especially since the House is led by the GOP right now.

And yeah, Santos isn't in jail or prison, lol.

cr0y
Mar 24, 2005



Santos is quite literally criminally stupid. What is his deal exactly, is he legitimately just a pathological liar?

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
White House officially confirms they are considering invoking the 14th amendment for the first time.

He also says that nobody on his staff has been "studying the coin issue," which seems to imply that it has been ruled out.

Still says that Congress needs to act and any emergency actions or court battle would be damaging to the U.S. and the world. Reiterates that they will not negotiate over the debt ceiling, but says that they will negotiate with Republicans about the budget at the end of the year because they control the House. But, it will only be over the budget for the next fiscal year, like all budget negotiations have been, and not until the debt ceiling has been dealt with. Strongly opposes any short-term lifting, but doesn't rule it out entirely.

https://twitter.com/BrendanPedersen/status/1656068837345746946

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound
If he's "in custody" he's behind bars. He might get out once and if a bond is set. His bond hearing should happen ASAP if it hasn't already.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

BDawg posted:

Is he not? The tweet says he's in custody and I assume will be until his hearing later. If he's considered a flight risk (doesn't he have a Brazilian passport?), they might just keep him.

He's in custody to get bond and schedule his next court event. He isn't being held pre-trial.

It would be incredibly unusual if he was deemed a flight risk and jailed without bail for the entire pre-trial period because of fraud.

Cimber
Feb 3, 2014
That goofball is my congressman. I'm in a constant state of disgust to think that con artist 'represents' me. I surely hope he does the right thing and resign, but I know that he won't.

haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal

syntaxrigger posted:

Lol this is bullshit.

If the greed of the “worker” in this case directly resulted in all schools in the state to be underfunded to poverty conditions, you are saying the worker will still want more money?

I'm saying it's human nature to want more than you have right now and people aren't going to automatically choose social consciousness over bettering their own family's lot in life just because they're middle class or have some shares of their employer

You guys seem to be arguing that the rich are an entirely different species from the non-rich and that it's not possible for one to become the other regardless of how much money or opportunity they have access to, which just strikes me as very strange, idealistic, and ahistorical

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

Cimber posted:

That goofball is my congressman. I'm in a constant state of disgust to think that con artist 'represents' me. I surely hope he does the right thing and resign, but I know that he won't.

You have to admit though that he represents the sort of generalized cursed aura that permeates the North Shore

Cimber
Feb 3, 2014

Failed Imagineer posted:

You have to admit though that he represents the sort of generalized cursed aura that permeates the North Shore

I'm on the south shore, but yeah, I think he represents the area pretty accurately.

Piell
Sep 3, 2006

Grey Worm's Ken doll-like groin throbbed with the anticipatory pleasure that only a slightly warm and moist piece of lemoncake could offer


Young Orc

Harold Fjord posted:

Is there any rules that require the coin to be physical money and not a Biden NFT ape?

yes, it specifically has to be be a physical coin made of platinum

quote:

The Secretary may mint and issue platinum bullion coins and proof platinum coins in accordance with such specifications, designs, varieties, quantities, denominations, and inscriptions as the Secretary, in the Secretary’s discretion, may prescribe from time to time.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

syntaxrigger posted:

Lol this is bullshit.

If the greed of the “worker” in this case directly resulted in all schools in the state to be underfunded to poverty conditions, you are saying the worker will still want more money?

I have difficulty seeing how workers could realistically be offered that choice in such a clear and unambiguous manner that they couldn't reason, justify, or cognitive dissonance their way out of seeing it as a binary choice.

But as long as there's private schools they can buy their way into with all that extra money, sure. Anyone who's ever dealt with a white suburban parent knows that there's plenty of people out there who'd gladly burn down the entire public school system as long as their own kids get a decent education, and plenty of them have day jobs.

Fister Roboto
Feb 21, 2008

haveblue posted:

I'm saying it's human nature to want more than you have right now and people aren't going to automatically choose social consciousness over bettering their own family's lot in life just because they're middle class or have some shares of their employer

You guys seem to be arguing that the rich are an entirely different species from the non-rich and that it's not possible for one to become the other regardless of how much money or opportunity they have access to, which just strikes me as very strange, idealistic, and ahistorical

First of all, youre going to need to provide more evidence for this claim beyond just a vague appeal to "human nature." Second, you're still ignoring the critical difference that I pointed out, which is that the ultra wealthy dont have to deal with the consequences of their greed. Third, youre continuing to conflate two different concepts - the desire to have a more comfortable life, and the desire to have literally all the money in the world. There is a gulf of difference between what the vast majority of people want, and having hundreds of billions of dollars and still wanting more.

Like, i for one would be perfectly satisfied with a couple million bucks. But maybe im some kind of freak who defies human nature :shrug:

Fister Roboto fucked around with this message at 16:12 on May 10, 2023

Meatball
Mar 2, 2003

That's a Spicy Meatball

Pillbug

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

White House officially confirms they are considering invoking the 14th amendment for the first time.


https://twitter.com/BrendanPedersen/status/1656068837345746946

All this talk about the 14th makes me think that the dems believe the Republicans are going to shoot the hostage and default on the debt.

Dick Trauma
Nov 30, 2007

God damn it, you've got to be kind.
Not sure if anyone else has seen this but it's raw footage from Jan 6 released yesterday that shows that the person who was operating the camera feed that day did a good job trying to capture the face of everyone who was in the room. The vibe is so goddamn weird, like a big city bus terminal late at night after a sporting event.

Cops flood in at the 35 minute mark and bring the torpid event to an end.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCL4TyqbNZw

James Garfield
May 5, 2012
Am I a manipulative abuser in real life, or do I just roleplay one on the Internet for fun? You decide!

Fister Roboto posted:

First of all, youre going to need to provide more evidence for this claim beyond just a vague appeal to "human nature." Second, you're still ignoring the critical difference that I pointed out, which is that the ultra wealthy dont have to deal with the consequences of their greed. Third, youre continuing to conflate two different concepts - the desire to have a more comfortable life, and the desire to have literally all the money in the world. There is a gulf of difference between what the vast majority of people want, and having hundreds of billions of dollars and still wanting more.

Like, i for one would be perfectly satisfied with a couple million bucks. But maybe im some kind of freak who defies human nature :shrug:

Are the workers at a worker owned coal mine going to decide that their income isn't worth the negative externalities of coal mining and shut it down without government intervention? If yes, can you provide one example of that happening in the real world?

Randalor
Sep 4, 2011



Meatball posted:

All this talk about the 14th makes me think that the dems believe the Republicans are going to shoot the hostage and default on the debt.

Either that, or calling their "bluff"/reminding them that there are options outside of their horrible bill.

Skex
Feb 22, 2012

The great thing about the thousands of slaughtered Palestinian children is that they can't pull away when you fondle them or sniff their hair.

That's a Biden success story.

Meatball posted:

All this talk about the 14th makes me think that the dems believe the Republicans are going to shoot the hostage and default on the debt.

Why wouldn't they?
The Republicans have been doing everything they can to cause economic and social disruption, whether it's undermining the regulatory state, or intentionally running deficits by cutting taxes while refusing to budge on military spending.

It's what they, create problems to complain and campaign on then do everything in their power to exacerbate and prevent anyone else from addressing said problem.

They spent decades flooding the streets with guns which naturally results in more gun related crimes and sows a general sense of dread and hopelessness. The ultimate goal of which is to scare enough people that they accept authoritarianism just to bring an end to the chaos.

A global financial crisis caused by them torpedoing the full faith and credit of the United States of America would result in a disruption that would work to the benefit of authoritians worldwide.

In fact I'd argue that the reason why they made sure that their bill is a non-starter for the Democratic Senate or President is because default was always the goal. So yeah it's a more that reasonable to be concerned that the Republicans do plan on shooting the hostage so that they can then campaign on the chaos it caused.

Fister Roboto
Feb 21, 2008

James Garfield posted:

Are the workers at a worker owned coal mine going to decide that their income isn't worth the negative externalities of coal mining and shut it down without government intervention? If yes, can you provide one example of that happening in the real world?

Who said anything about there being no government intervention? I already said that there were many different democratic means to deal with this issue.

James Garfield
May 5, 2012
Am I a manipulative abuser in real life, or do I just roleplay one on the Internet for fun? You decide!

Fister Roboto posted:

Who said anything about there being no government intervention? I already said that there were many different democratic means to deal with this issue.

Right, because that problem is the same regardless of who owns the mine. Having workers own the mine doesn't mean there isn't an incentive for the mine to produce as much coal as possible, the workers also choose more money for themselves over social consciousness.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Skex posted:

Why wouldn't they?
The Republicans have been doing everything they can to cause economic and social disruption, whether it's undermining the regulatory state, or intentionally running deficits by cutting taxes while refusing to budge on military spending.

It's what they, create problems to complain and campaign on then do everything in their power to exacerbate and prevent anyone else from addressing said problem.

They spent decades flooding the streets with guns which naturally results in more gun related crimes and sows a general sense of dread and hopelessness. The ultimate goal of which is to scare enough people that they accept authoritarianism just to bring an end to the chaos.

A global financial crisis caused by them torpedoing the full faith and credit of the United States of America would result in a disruption that would work to the benefit of authoritians worldwide.

In fact I'd argue that the reason why they made sure that their bill is a non-starter for the Democratic Senate or President is because default was always the goal. So yeah it's a more that reasonable to be concerned that the Republicans do plan on shooting the hostage so that they can then campaign on the chaos it caused.

I don't think any of them legitimately want default as an outcome in and of itself. They want unpopular spending and tax policies and those are difficult to implement unless you have large majorities in congress and control of all three branches of government. They just think that surely nobody else is going to be crazy enough to let them shoot the hostage, so they can get what they want without any cost.

It has only worked once in 12 years, but it did sort of work that one time and there is no actual cost to trying again (and likely a significant cost for them politically if they don't at least try).

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

FizFashizzle
Mar 30, 2005







They’re going to take all eight of his passports, right?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply