|
Vertical Lime posted:https://twitter.com/Variety/status/1656015796618027009 Keaton's gonna disintegrate live on camera trying to replicate his performance from the first film and its gonna look amazing the whole time
|
# ? May 10, 2023 15:56 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 18:54 |
|
should have gotten alex brightman from the stellar beetlejuice musical that just left broadway
|
# ? May 10, 2023 16:19 |
|
Asterite34 posted:Didn't Finding Nemo more or less perfect shooting CG stuff that looks like it's properly underwater? What, where all those guys busy? Couldn't email over some notes or something? Anything? The default job of VFX artists is to make something look realistic - usually when something deviates drastically from realism it's because either the director wanted it to look a certain way (because reality is too unimpressive or ugly), or because the live-action elements were filmed in a way that doesn't support realism. For this movie, I'd guess the latter. Human skin secretes oils which makes it shiny, but because that shininess comes from skin being slightly wet, it disappears when people are fully submerged underwater. But because they didn't actually film the actress performing underwater, she's still got a natural human-skin sheen. So when it came time to put her in the environment, it looks like they had to make her immediate surroundings look less water-like so that specular sheen wouldn't be as out of place. With something like Finding Nemo and Avatar, you don't have to worry about that as much because all the characters are either CG and don't have integration problems, or are actually filmed underwater because they're not also singing.
|
# ? May 10, 2023 16:32 |
|
Barry Convex posted:Looks flat and lifeless compared to the original, and it’s trying to do some cartoon physics stuff that doesn’t work at all with the overall approach of quasi-realism; more stylized direction might be able to sell the idea that a little crab could pull a full-sized mermaid to a stop, but that’s not what Marshall et al are doing here Thanks I hate it.
|
# ? May 10, 2023 18:28 |
|
Watching that my brain has a very difficult time believing there was one speck of live-action footage in that.
|
# ? May 10, 2023 20:16 |
|
Lid posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5RLVSnMARQQ This was the regal mystery film May 1st and it was stupid, but in a fun way. Really dumb, just crazy stupid type of movie, but the kind that is fun for stupids to watch. The older couple next to me kept being shocked at each twist and talking to each other in delight. "Wow what a great movie!!" they said at the end.
|
# ? May 10, 2023 21:24 |
|
feedmyleg posted:Watching that my brain has a very difficult time believing there was one speck of live-action footage in that. Yeah once you do the hair in CG so it’s floaty, might as well do the whole head, etc.
|
# ? May 10, 2023 22:43 |
|
So many dogshit people had such a visceral negative reaction to the announcement of this movie that it actually pains me to say that that clip looks like absolute rear end. The CG just looks really bad, and clashes with the live actress it's passing over or behind. Ouch!
|
# ? May 10, 2023 22:56 |
|
It’ll all get blamed on diversity, rather than them making an unimaginative rehash with a bunch of technical problems.
|
# ? May 10, 2023 23:22 |
|
Don't worry, it will make a billion just like the terrible Lion King remake.
|
# ? May 11, 2023 00:48 |
|
I'm genuinely curious about who even watched the Lion King remake - was that domestic or worldwide gross?
|
# ? May 11, 2023 01:45 |
|
https://twitter.com/BlakeRobPerry/status/1654324120912293890?t=2_d-nF8X0xa9JVC7h-8xyw&s=19
|
# ? May 11, 2023 02:46 |
|
Lid posted:https://twitter.com/BlakeRobPerry/status/1654324120912293890?t=2_d-nF8X0xa9JVC7h-8xyw&s=19 The closest we get to live action remake of this episode, which even features Bumblebee as Autobot field leader. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcQuQ_lhsKE It also did the aquatic Meso-American civilization thing decades before Black Panther 2.
|
# ? May 11, 2023 02:52 |
|
MechanicalTomPetty posted:I'm genuinely curious about who even watched the Lion King remake - was that domestic or worldwide gross? Finding out that the Aladdin redo also crossed the billion dollar threshold was the one that suprised me.
|
# ? May 11, 2023 08:12 |
|
The Disney remakes are pretty much 'minimum viable product' and make bank mostly from nostalgia bucks. Even if the people watching them never think about them again, Disney has their money.
|
# ? May 11, 2023 09:01 |
|
dr_rat posted:This is just because demons, Aliens, and Ghosts like messing with people when they have sleep paralysis obviously. This is actually what Jehovah's Witnesses literally believe. I once had elders from my congregation explain to me, that not only are demons very real (and give examples of real life demon things that hosed me up for a long time; weird that when a trusted authority figure abuses that position of trust to spread false information to a trusting and sensitive kid, the results are bad). They also explained to me that things like schizophrenia and other severe mental disorders are actually things demons do to humans, because they like to torment us. Sleep paralysis also isn't real, and it's just demons paralyzing you while they torment you. And also ghost sightings, aliens and drat near every other hot topic of the day.
|
# ? May 11, 2023 09:09 |
|
I just knew a god drat demon made me step on that stray bit of lego on the floor when I was going to the toilet last night. Stupid git.
|
# ? May 11, 2023 09:13 |
|
Ghost Leviathan posted:The Disney remakes are pretty much 'minimum viable product' and make bank mostly from nostalgia bucks. Even if the people watching them never think about them again, Disney has their money. Even that surprises me. My wife and I are peak target group for nostalgia attacks like that, and we have three children. I like to make fun of how lovely all these remakes look but her reaction to them is downright vitriolic. We haven't let our children watch a single one of them. I imagine my wife is not alone in her violent rejection of those movies, so where are the billion dollars coming from?
|
# ? May 11, 2023 09:16 |
|
The people who watch the good doctor weekly
|
# ? May 11, 2023 09:18 |
|
Grendels Dad posted:Even that surprises me. My wife and I are peak target group for nostalgia attacks like that, and we have three children. I like to make fun of how lovely all these remakes look but her reaction to them is downright vitriolic. We haven't let our children watch a single one of them. I imagine my wife is not alone in her violent rejection of those movies, so where are the billion dollars coming from? Normal people probably?
|
# ? May 11, 2023 09:39 |
|
Frantically trying to restrain my wife in the theater when the Disney trailers start and she goes to the Dark Place
|
# ? May 11, 2023 09:51 |
|
who are these parents taking their kids to see disney content? Like where even are they
|
# ? May 11, 2023 09:53 |
|
Diz…nee?
|
# ? May 11, 2023 10:06 |
|
Pope Corky the IX posted:Diz…nee? He means the Gisnep Corporation
|
# ? May 11, 2023 10:15 |
|
Alan Smithee posted:who are these parents taking their kids to see disney content? Like where even are they Like, Disney content is practically the default things parents bring their kids to for several generations already. Nickelodeon and Youtube lessened their influence somewhat but not by much.
|
# ? May 11, 2023 10:17 |
|
Grendels Dad posted:Even that surprises me. My wife and I are peak target group for nostalgia attacks like that, and we have three children. I like to make fun of how lovely all these remakes look but her reaction to them is downright vitriolic. We haven't let our children watch a single one of them. I imagine my wife is not alone in her violent rejection of those movies, so where are the billion dollars coming from? My buddy and his family love the live action remakes. He could not stop talking about how cool Lion King was after they saw it. He's not even a huge Disney guy at all. He n his wife for whatever reason, just really enjoy these remakes and take their kids each time. It's weird to me but they are clearly not alone.
|
# ? May 11, 2023 14:59 |
|
I get that there are people out there who like this stuff, I just find it hard to believe there's enough out there to sustain a billion-dollar franchise.
|
# ? May 11, 2023 15:38 |
|
MechanicalTomPetty posted:I get that there are people out there who like this stuff, I just find it hard to believe there's enough out there to sustain a billion-dollar franchise. there are millions of parents out there in need of something to shut their brats up for a while and this is the only game in town
|
# ? May 11, 2023 16:14 |
|
Do any of the live-action remakes... not necessarily improve on the original, but do anything interesting or innovative with them instead of just adding a ton of CGI? I guess maybe The Jungle Book, but I also admittedly don't really remember the original that well.
|
# ? May 11, 2023 16:47 |
|
They pretend that animals don't have genitalia or buttholes.
|
# ? May 11, 2023 16:51 |
Chairman Capone posted:Do any of the live-action remakes... not necessarily improve on the original, but do anything interesting or innovative with them instead of just adding a ton of CGI? From what I gather, they tend to make some characters hornier, and occasionally gayer but in a way where it's easily ignored/edited out for foreign markets.
|
|
# ? May 11, 2023 16:51 |
|
I enjoy the live action remakes mostly for the costume design. I think it's just fun to see the animated characters that I grew up with translated to live action in that stylized way.
|
# ? May 11, 2023 16:51 |
|
Chairman Capone posted:Do any of the live-action remakes... not necessarily improve on the original, but do anything interesting or innovative with them instead of just adding a ton of CGI? Jungle Book was just the original with a little added violence. The only thing I remember really liking was Christopher Walken performing King Louie's song and cutting Scarlet Johansson's song to save money but still including it in the credits.
|
# ? May 11, 2023 16:55 |
|
to be honest these live action remakes look about the same as a lot of these outright hideous MCU movies and those have plenty of defenders on this very forum and those do okay moneywise too so I, like, "get" if even if I have zero desire to watch myself.
|
# ? May 11, 2023 17:02 |
|
The Mulan movie systemically removed every bit of comedy and whimsy I guess because foreign movies don't have those, but looking at the numbers, it seems to have lost a lot of money. 200 million budget and 70 million box office seems...bad.
|
# ? May 11, 2023 17:04 |
|
I’m pretty sure the Mulan remake was a failure yes
|
# ? May 11, 2023 17:06 |
|
Pope Corky the IX posted:They pretend that animals don't have genitalia or buttholes. There wasn't a lot of either in the original cartoons either tbf
|
# ? May 11, 2023 17:08 |
|
And it was a crime then too.
|
# ? May 11, 2023 17:11 |
|
Pope Corky the IX posted:And it was a crime then too. I still can't believe they took the Cats Butthole Cut from us
|
# ? May 11, 2023 17:18 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 18:54 |
|
Failed Imagineer posted:I still can't believe they took the Cats Butthole Cut from us It was a massive commercial and critical failure for a reason.
|
# ? May 11, 2023 17:41 |