Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: fatherboxx)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
fatherboxx
Mar 25, 2013

Neither Kinzhal incerceptions nor successful hits have been confirmed

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

FuturePastNow
May 19, 2014


Reminds me of the 1991 stuff where Patriot missiles would intercept Scuds but the warhead would keep falling and blow up something random on the ground. Missiles can be surprisingly large and hits aren't always "clean" so flaming and exploding debris rains down, and it can look like the missile got through and hit something even if it really didn't.

Nitrox
Jul 5, 2002

fatherboxx posted:

Neither Kinzhal incerceptions nor successful hits have been confirmed

Military expert on ФБК YouTube show recently claimed that Kinzhal is closely related to Iskander or whatever other missile and is very easy to misidentify from broken scrap alone.

I don't know how true that is, but Kinzhal missiles are the latest and greatest Russian Boogeyman buzzword of the week, so there is obvious propaganda value in making unsubstantiated claims. Right next to that 600 downed aircraft figure. Take it with a grain of salt

Djarum
Apr 1, 2004

by vyelkin

cr0y posted:

If that AD kill rate is anywhere near accurate that is absurdly good.

Ship em another patriot system now :toot:

The Patriot has always been known to be very, very good. It is why there has always been a lot of pushback from certain nations when they are bought/given.

The only thing that is better is AEGIS, which is significantly more expensive and not mobile on land. Though I think when/if Russia is pushed out of Ukraine the US will likely build a Aegis Ashore site or two within Ukraine as a part of their long term deployment strategy, much like how they did in Poland.

Randarkman
Jul 18, 2011

Dwesa posted:

And known fan of churches, Stalin


I mean, during WWII Stalin ended the official repression of the Church and tens of thousands of churches were reopened and rebuilt across the USSR, as it was enlisted on the side of the communist party in the war. This policy also largely did not revert after the war either.

Besides the modern Russian communist party* is generally pretty close with the orthodox church far as I understand. Things aren't really as simple as you'd believe in this case.

*Both the modern communist party and the one in the old soviet union also were pretty drat conservative/regressive on lots of social issues, like gender and sexuality.

EasilyConfused
Nov 21, 2009


one strong toad

Randarkman posted:

*Both the modern communist party and the one in the old soviet union also were pretty drat conservative/regressive on lots of social issues, like gender and sexuality.

In theory the Soviet Communist Party was highly progressive on women's issues. In practice, it just meant women could work in addition to being solely responsible for raising children, cooking, cleaning, etc..

Ynglaur
Oct 9, 2013

The Malta Conference, anyone?

Nitrox posted:

Military expert on ФБК YouTube show recently claimed that Kinzhal is closely related to Iskander or whatever other missile and is very easy to misidentify from broken scrap alone.

I don't know how true that is, but Kinzhal missiles are the latest and greatest Russian Boogeyman buzzword of the week, so there is obvious propaganda value in making unsubstantiated claims. Right next to that 600 downed aircraft figure. Take it with a grain of salt

My understanding is that the Kinzhal is an Iskander with a different first stage, and design changes to allow it to be launched from an aircraft rather than the ground. Basically, it uses the carrying aircraft's velocity to give it a boost and push it into "hypersonic" speeds (i.e. faster than Mach 5). It's unclear from OSINT if it's Mach 5 only in higher elevations or if it maintains that speed as it descends to lower elevations. Either way, it's fast, but doesn't seem to have the evasive abilities of e.g. Storm Shadow, or certain modern anti-ship missiles.

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018
Russia claiming they killed a Patriot.

But they wouldn't just go and lie like that

EmployeeOfTheMonth
Jul 28, 2005
It's the positive attitude that does it

Failed Imagineer posted:

Russia claiming they killed a Patriot.

But they wouldn't just go and lie like that

I guess it could well be true if they swarmed it with missles. How would we find out?

poor waif
Apr 8, 2007
Kaboom

Failed Imagineer posted:

Russia claiming they killed a Patriot.

But they wouldn't just go and lie like that

What does it mean to kill a patriot? Is it a launcher, the radar system, or all the launchers and the radar and the command module? Seems unlikely that they would get the lot in a single barrage.

Kammat
Feb 9, 2008
Odd Person
How did they manage to fit it through the window and over the balcony in the first place?

DandyLion
Jun 24, 2010
disrespectul Deciever

Kammat posted:

How did they manage to fit it through the window and over the balcony in the first place?

The threw the window/balcony up and around the missile (like tossing a paper towel roll around a pen), thus instantly killing the missile in a horrible accident.

FuturePastNow
May 19, 2014


I mean, they may have hit it. I'm sure they've fired a lot of missiles at it. It's kind of technically mobile but unlike the HIMARS it can't just fire a shot and run away. We'll just send Ukraine another one if necessary

Edgar Allen Ho
Apr 3, 2017

by sebmojo
It would be easier to believe if Russia specified which “it” they meant, bc the whole shebang is definitely not hit.

Libluini
May 18, 2012

I gravitated towards the Greens, eventually even joining the party itself.

The Linke is a party I grudgingly accept exists, but I've learned enough about DDR-history I can't bring myself to trust a party that was once the SED, a party leading the corrupt state apparatus ...
Grimey Drawer

Edgar Allen Ho posted:

It would be easier to believe if Russia specified which “it” they meant, bc the whole shebang is definitely not hit.

a patriot-system has eight launchers, so that would only be possible if some of those hits "skipped" straight into multiple launchers, as that are more launchers than the observed hits

edit:

OK, I've found a second source claiming PATRIOT-batteries have 6 launchers instead of 8. So apparently, the number of launchers can vary, but since I don't think Ukraine got PATRIOTs with abnormally low numbers of launchers, that's still too many to destroy in a single strike.

Libluini fucked around with this message at 16:23 on May 16, 2023

Doccers
Aug 15, 2000


Patron Saint of Chickencheese

FuturePastNow posted:

I mean, they may have hit it. I'm sure they've fired a lot of missiles at it. It's kind of technically mobile but unlike the HIMARS it can't just fire a shot and run away. We'll just send Ukraine another one if necessary

Obviously, they destroyed the Missiles. :smug:

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006




OperaMouse posted:

Isn't there are also an aspect with the extremely atheistic communist regime, so being religious refers to prefer the tsarist era over the communist era?

“Orthodoxy, Autocracy, and Nationality” were explicitly what the Tsar was all about.

Pablo Bluth
Sep 7, 2007

I've made a huge mistake.
Some details about the new UK drones starting to leak out but it's still quite vague.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/05/15/britain-send-ukraine-suicide-drones-twice-the-range-himars/

cr0y
Mar 24, 2005



They destroyed the patriot (missiles) by slamming their own cruise missiles into them.

cr0y
Mar 24, 2005



Pablo Bluth posted:

Some details about the new UK drones starting to leak out but it's still quite vague.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/05/15/britain-send-ukraine-suicide-drones-twice-the-range-himars/

So this sounds like something brand new? I never knew about switchblades until this conflict so I wouldn't be surprised if some new weapon gets unveiled.

Charliegrs
Aug 10, 2009
We can send all the patriot launchers to Ukraine that we want. The bigger question is how many missiles can be sent? It seems like Ukraine is already launching a lot of them I wonder how long it will be before they run out. And I wonder how many are built every year? Probably not a whole lot.

Paladinus
Jan 11, 2014

heyHEYYYY!!!

Edgar Allen Ho posted:

It would be easier to believe if Russia specified which “it” they meant, bc the whole shebang is definitely not hit.

The official reports says it was a 'US-made Patriot anti-aircraft missile system'.

Edgar Allen Ho
Apr 3, 2017

by sebmojo

Paladinus posted:

The official reports says it was a 'US-made Patriot anti-aircraft missile system'.

A system is multiple dispersed targets tho

Djarum
Apr 1, 2004

by vyelkin

Charliegrs posted:

We can send all the patriot launchers to Ukraine that we want. The bigger question is how many missiles can be sent? It seems like Ukraine is already launching a lot of them I wonder how long it will be before they run out. And I wonder how many are built every year? Probably not a whole lot.

They have been making Patriot missiles since the early 80s and there are tens of thousands produced. The actual missiles themselves are very cheap and fast to produce by Raytheon. It was one of the main goals of the project originally as the US envisioned in a hot war with the Soviets that there would be waves of bombers and missiles raining in regularly. They wanted to be able to make and replenish supply of the missiles quickly and cheaply.

Russia would run out of things to put in the sky before you would run out of Patriot missiles.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

Charliegrs posted:

We can send all the patriot launchers to Ukraine that we want. The bigger question is how many missiles can be sent? It seems like Ukraine is already launching a lot of them I wonder how long it will be before they run out. And I wonder how many are built every year? Probably not a whole lot.

Probably a lot more than S-300 missiles are made outside Russia.

Spikey Willow
Feb 26, 2008

This kills the Patriot

fatherboxx
Mar 25, 2013

So there is this

https://twitter.com/MarquardtA/status/1658508441134981120?t=QGjyiVGXjIpBrC0JraSFRA&s=19

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

Just post the article instead of some random tweet.

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/05/16/politics/patriot-missile-damage-ukraine/index.html

quote:

Another US official said it is possible that the missile barrage hit one of the Patriot battery’s several components. A complete Patriot battery has six major components: generators, a radar set, a control station, antennas, a launcher station and interceptor missiles. The components operate together to fire a Patriot missile and successfully guide it to its target.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009
The only conclusion I can get from that article is that US defense officials talk too much.

Charliegrs
Aug 10, 2009
So I did a little internet searching to get some number for how many patriot missiles are available. It seems like public info suggests quite a bit, like 10,000. But drat they're expensive, like 2-4 million a piece. But even crazier is apparently the full launcher setup for a patriot with all the command and radar equipment is over a billion a piece. And we only have something like 15 of them in total. So yeah if Russia takes one sure we can just "send another" but apparently we don't have many and a billion dollar loss is nothing to scoff at even if it's just US military krustybucks.

Herstory Begins Now
Aug 5, 2003
SOME REALLY TEDIOUS DUMB SHIT THAT SUCKS ASS TO READ ->>
no way it's a billion dollar loss unless they totaled the entire system, which seems unlikely. in any event, every missile sent at it is a missile not sent into a Ukrainian barracks or training ground or command post or staging area or armor repair depot or civilian building, so even if it's costly it's soaking up a lot of limited russian resources.

Bremen
Jul 20, 2006

Our God..... is an awesome God

Charliegrs posted:

So I did a little internet searching to get some number for how many patriot missiles are available. It seems like public info suggests quite a bit, like 10,000. But drat they're expensive, like 2-4 million a piece. But even crazier is apparently the full launcher setup for a patriot with all the command and radar equipment is over a billion a piece. And we only have something like 15 of them in total. So yeah if Russia takes one sure we can just "send another" but apparently we don't have many and a billion dollar loss is nothing to scoff at even if it's just US military krustybucks.

I assume that if they just took out the radar or generators or whatever they can replace that without having to shell out for a complete system.

That there's even a hint the Ukrainians might be able to repair it makes me wonder if it's not even that bad, like a missile just hit nearby and there was some damage but not complete destruction.

Moon Slayer
Jun 19, 2007

If they even "took out" anything.

Libluini
May 18, 2012

I gravitated towards the Greens, eventually even joining the party itself.

The Linke is a party I grudgingly accept exists, but I've learned enough about DDR-history I can't bring myself to trust a party that was once the SED, a party leading the corrupt state apparatus ...
Grimey Drawer

Bremen posted:

That there's even a hint the Ukrainians might be able to repair it makes me wonder if it's not even that bad, like a missile just hit nearby and there was some damage but not complete destruction.

Moon Slayer posted:

If they even "took out" anything.

Yeah, that official quoted above said "it is possible, that" it was damaged. Typical politician talk. This is just chasing rumors until some real info shows up.

Rad Russian
Aug 15, 2007

Soviet Power Supreme!
"whether it can be repaired or should be pulled back" can mean they hit one of the more important control pieces, which are a one-off, and not one of the many launchers. Also not sure why they'd ever want to confirm anything like this for Russia as that would tell them that the Patriot is offline.

Obviously expected some AA pieces will be lost in mass targeted attacks. Hopefully, they can have Ratheon ship specific replacement components that get damaged.

Even better if they're lying to trick Russia into thinking that the Patriot is offline.

Rad Russian fucked around with this message at 19:35 on May 16, 2023

fatherboxx
Mar 25, 2013

Russian military intelligence is surely awful but I dont think they fish for hit confirmations and damage reports on twitter

Lum_
Jun 5, 2006
There are considerably more than 15 Patriot batteries deployed globally. Yes, they're expensive, but the US also has a trillion dollar military budget. The US currently has 15 battalions (each battalion has 4 to 5 Patriot batteries) and are budgeted to add more, and Europe, Israel, and Asia also have their own.

Lum_ fucked around with this message at 19:35 on May 16, 2023

PittTheElder
Feb 13, 2012

:geno: Yes, it's like a lava lamp.

Also is it one of those accounting things where a massive development cost is being amortized over a low unit production count? Implying that if you wanted to build more the incremental cost would be far lower (assuming of course you can still source the electronics at all)?

Ynglaur
Oct 9, 2013

The Malta Conference, anyone?

PittTheElder posted:

Also is it one of those accounting things where a massive development cost is being amortized over a low unit production count? Implying that if you wanted to build more the incremental cost would be far lower (assuming of course you can still source the electronics at all)?

Simple answer: yes. Sometimes they even include lifetime training costs in the total capability cost, which can double-count labor costs of you're not careful. I know enough of this to be thankful I'm not an accountant.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

Moon Slayer posted:

If they even "took out" anything.

Radars can be incredibly fickle and sensitive and it wouldn't surprise me if something was damaged even by a shot down missile falling to ground and exploding close enough. But that kind of damage would probably be easy to fix, even though in due time the battery would be out of order.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply