Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
KomradeX
Oct 29, 2011

lol

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

genericnick
Dec 26, 2012


Lmao, no wonder the Americans are so hype about everyone sending leopards. Oh no, Putler is lusting for Warsaw, we have no tanks and the Germans could maybe start producing new ones in three years? Now where to send all that money??

stephenthinkpad
Jan 2, 2020
New Leopard 2 is shaping up to be the longest indiegogo delay.

Palladium
May 8, 2012

Very Good
✔️✔️✔️✔️
where's wet_goods and his chinese deindustrialization memes

Regarde Aduck
Oct 19, 2012

c l o u d k i t t e n
Grimey Drawer
does this mean they can't build their potential replacement the KF51 either? Trying to figure out if this was just a half baked plan to force a shift to the new tank or if it's just them having no idea what's going on

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

Regarde Aduck posted:

does this mean they can't build their potential replacement the KF51 either? Trying to figure out if this was just a half baked plan to force a shift to the new tank or if it's just them having no idea what's going on

The KF51 uses a Leopard 2 hull/engine, so I guess there is a good question of what is going on.

Ardennes has issued a correction as of 09:30 on May 22, 2023

Zeppelin Insanity
Oct 28, 2009

Wahnsinn
Einfach
Wahnsinn

Regarde Aduck posted:

does this mean they can't build their potential replacement the KF51 either? Trying to figure out if this was just a half baked plan to force a shift to the new tank or if it's just them having no idea what's going on

The KF51 is expo bait. It's not a serious suggestion for a replacement. It's just there to make people give Rheinmetall money.

The vast majority of new stuff that gets announced is never intended for production. You could think of it as a kind of industry propaganda.

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

Zeppelin Insanity posted:

The KF51 is expo bait. It's not a serious suggestion for a replacement. It's just there to make people give Rheinmetall money.

The vast majority of new stuff that gets announced is never intended for production. You could think of it as a kind of industry propaganda.

Well, there probably has to be some type of replacement of the Leo 2 at some point, the question is if the KF51 is actually a good one. It has some issues.

Clever Moniker
Oct 29, 2007




Frosted Flake posted:

In the shadowy past of Terra, before the ascension of the Omnissiah and the founding of the sacred Mechanicus, the might of the armaments industry lay not in the hands of sprawling interstellar corporations but within the firm grip of the nation-states themselves. It was a time steeped in mystic lore, when individual nations guided their destinies, mastering the tools of war and industry, not at the behest of disembodied, profit-hungry shareholders, but in service of the state, the populace, and the dire demands of survival and sovereignty.

In the age known as the "Cold War", Western Europe's lands were overseen by nations that held the arcane keys to their own armamentariums. Each nation's war-forges and manufactoria hummed with industrious might, a glorious symphony of strategic machination and national pride. There was no divine machine spirit, no blessed forge worlds guided by the mechanical wisdom of the Adeptus Mechanicus. Instead, mortal men and women, leaders of nations and ministers of state, made the critical decisions that shaped the creation of deadly armaments.

The sanctum of the national industry was a hallowed ground, each country boasting its own formidable arsenals, its own enigmatic methods. This was a time before the age of monolithic multinationals, before the rise of entities such as General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, or BAE. Back then, nations were the masters of their own destiny, guided by an innate sense of strategic necessity rather than the relentless pursuit of profit. This approach, driven by national self-interest, became lost in time, replaced by a colder, impersonal system that serves not the citizens of nations but the silent, insatiable shareholders.

The armaments conjured by these nations were not mere tools but symbols of their sovereignty. Every weapon forged, every tank built, every missile assembled was a testament to the country's survival instinct and industrial might, an emblem of a nation's determination to remain master of its own destiny.

Now, in the Age of the Imperium, we gaze back at this lost epoch with a sense of bewildering wonder. This age of state-controlled armament creation, of national war-forge sovereignty, seems as enigmatic and unreachable as the holy relics of the Dark Age of Technology. In an era of immense interstellar corporations, where profit margins can outweigh the survival of worlds, this past age of state-guided armament production feels like an arcane, mystic world lost to the mists of time.

Real hurthling!
Sep 11, 2001




should have ended on the in the nightmare future there is only war line

Tankbuster
Oct 1, 2021

Frosted Flake posted:

In the shadowy past of Terra, before the ascension of the Omnissiah and the founding of the sacred Mechanicus, the might of the armaments industry lay not in the hands of sprawling interstellar corporations but within the firm grip of the nation-states themselves. It was a time steeped in mystic lore, when individual nations guided their destinies, mastering the tools of war and industry, not at the behest of disembodied, profit-hungry shareholders, but in service of the state, the populace, and the dire demands of survival and sovereignty.

In the age known as the "Cold War", Western Europe's lands were overseen by nations that held the arcane keys to their own armamentariums. Each nation's war-forges and manufactoria hummed with industrious might, a glorious symphony of strategic machination and national pride. There was no divine machine spirit, no blessed forge worlds guided by the mechanical wisdom of the Adeptus Mechanicus. Instead, mortal men and women, leaders of nations and ministers of state, made the critical decisions that shaped the creation of deadly armaments.

The sanctum of the national industry was a hallowed ground, each country boasting its own formidable arsenals, its own enigmatic methods. This was a time before the age of monolithic multinationals, before the rise of entities such as General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, or BAE. Back then, nations were the masters of their own destiny, guided by an innate sense of strategic necessity rather than the relentless pursuit of profit. This approach, driven by national self-interest, became lost in time, replaced by a colder, impersonal system that serves not the citizens of nations but the silent, insatiable shareholders.

The armaments conjured by these nations were not mere tools but symbols of their sovereignty. Every weapon forged, every tank built, every missile assembled was a testament to the country's survival instinct and industrial might, an emblem of a nation's determination to remain master of its own destiny.

Now, in the Age of the Imperium, we gaze back at this lost epoch with a sense of bewildering wonder. This age of state-controlled armament creation, of national war-forge sovereignty, seems as enigmatic and unreachable as the holy relics of the Dark Age of Technology. In an era of immense interstellar corporations, where profit margins can outweigh the survival of worlds, this past age of state-guided armament production feels like an arcane, mystic world lost to the mists of time.

Cerebral Bore
Apr 21, 2010


Fun Shoe

Ardennes posted:

Well, there probably has to be some type of replacement of the Leo 2 at some point, the question is if the KF51 is actually a good one. It has some issues.

at this rate that replacement will be whatever hand-me-downs that they can get from someone with a real industrial base

Danann
Aug 4, 2013

https://twitter.com/60Minutes/status/1660423908091211776

holy poo poo lmao

KomradeX
Oct 29, 2011

lol, lmao even

Palladium
May 8, 2012

Very Good
✔️✔️✔️✔️
don't even ask about the launchers

Turtle Sandbox
Dec 31, 2007

by Fluffdaddy
Chinese cheap poo poo military hardware can't compete with artisan bespoke high end elite military hardware.

Someday it will cost a mil and then you will see how good they are!

stephenthinkpad
Jan 2, 2020
The instagram friendly tattooed barista of MANPADS.

Mister Bates
Aug 4, 2010
as history has repeatedly shown us, the side that can manufacture and deploy large quantities of good-enough weapons and keep them consistently supplied with ammunition and spare parts will nearly always lose against the side that instead produces very small quantities of extremely expensive bespoke wonder weapons

(lol one of the things they're short of is even literally a German tank, it's like poetry, it rhymes)

Delta-Wye
Sep 29, 2005

Mister Bates posted:

as history has repeatedly shown us, the side that can manufacture and deploy large quantities of good-enough weapons and keep them consistently supplied with ammunition and spare parts will nearly always lose against the side that instead produces very small quantities of extremely expensive bespoke wonder weapons

(lol one of the things they're short of is even literally a German tank, it's like poetry, it rhymes)

literally waiting for more tanks before marching into kursk for what will certainly be an amazing victory

Delta-Wye
Sep 29, 2005
The Germans delayed the offensive while they tried to build up their forces and waited for new weapons,[38][39][40] giving the Red Army time to construct a series of deep defensive belts[41] and establish a large reserve force for counter-offensives.[42]

tyool 2023, the red army is back to digging holes in the same places

the nazis wait for tanks

its so stupid, you couldn't make it up and be taken seriously

Slavvy
Dec 11, 2012

Just another sign the writers have checked out and are now just making GBS threads out lazy garbage to keep history moving along

Animal-Mother
Feb 14, 2012

RABBIT RABBIT
RABBIT RABBIT

Turtle Sandbox posted:

Chinese cheap poo poo military hardware can't compete with artisan bespoke high end elite military hardware.

Someday it will cost a mil and then you will see how good they are!

COLD PRESSED STINGER MISSILES? YES PLEASE!

Iriscoral
Apr 9, 2023

为人民服务


Turtle Sandbox posted:

Chinese cheap poo poo military hardware can't compete with artisan bespoke high end elite military hardware.

Someday it will cost a mil and then you will see how good they are!

Oh boy, just for fun lemme show some comparisons

Type 055 vs DDG(X) - 888 million vs 3.4 billion USD (est, expected to go higher)

Type 052DL vs Arleigh Burke Flight II/III - 537 million vs 1.8 billion++ USD (technically unfair because Burkes have 2000 tons more mass and the Flight IIIs get the Ticoderogas' BMD capabilities but still)

J-20 vs F-35A - 120 million vs 110 million - direct buying costs, does not include maintainance

I can't find hard numbers for the Type 003, the future Type 095/6 submarines, or any of the missiles shot off by the PLAN, but I'd like to note that new Flight II Harpoons cost 1.2mil each (an extended range version of an old rear end missile), the SSN(X) (Seawolf/Virginia-Class replacement) costs 7.2 billion USD and the new Columbia-Class costs a whopping 9 billion per boat.

Its important to note that none of these are in anyway so much more advanced from any of their Chinese counterparts.

https://news.usni.org/2022/11/10/ddgx-destroyer-could-cost-up-to-3-4b-a-hull-ssnx-attack-boat-up-to-7-2b-says-cbo-report

Edit: Also Zumwalts cost 8 bil per ship, though at least that could be blamed on early cancellation, somewhat. But go figure, lol

Iriscoral has issued a correction as of 05:46 on May 23, 2023

Delta-Wye
Sep 29, 2005

it's funny, because the shipbuilding capability is probably even greater than the 3x the equivalent price may lead you to believe would be feasible.



we've forgotten the game used to be taking turns sending boats to the bottom, and see who can make more faster. is it a different game now? remains to be seen

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy
The SSN(X)
The DDG(X)

These are such unimaginative names

Where's the Obama-class nuclear subs

The Trump-class battleships

The Bush-class fleet carriers

Come on, man

The F-37 Kamala

Slavvy
Dec 11, 2012

The idea of Obama class megacarrier USS Donald Trump getting wedged sideways in the Suez canal is some neuromancer poo poo and I'm down for it

strange feelings re Daisy
Aug 2, 2000

gradenko_2000 posted:

The F-37 Kamala
Lmao

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006




for a sense of comparison…

MSC ordered five containerships back in 2019 for 762 million. a new normal sized containership is 150-250 million depending on specifics built in an Asian yard. A recent big Evergreen ship 24,000 teu plus built in China half a billion to 550 million.

Three new Matson vessels (the aloha class ships) 4,000 teu each will be a billion together.

I guess what I’m saying is it’s about 50% to 100% more at a US yard.

Cerebral Bore
Apr 21, 2010


Fun Shoe
there's also the small detail that china is far an away the world's largest shipbuilding country whereas the us civilian shipbuilding industry is basically gone, so if there's ever an actual naval war with major losses on both sides china can replace those far more quickly than the us could ever hope to

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006




what is the relative and recent build quality and steel quality in current Chinese, Korean, Japanese, and US shipyards?

I’ll write about that tomorrow.

Iriscoral
Apr 9, 2023

为人民服务

gradenko_2000 posted:

The SSN(X)
The DDG(X)

These are such unimaginative names

Where's the Obama-class nuclear subs

The Trump-class battleships

The Bush-class fleet carriers

Come on, man

The F-37 Kamala
I get your point, but for the USN fundamentally naming comes only after launch of the first boat, and class names are based on said name instead. FWIW I don't really know the rationale for naming in CNO (other than specific name groups for specific ship types, like presidents for Carriers, navy-important historical figures for destroyers, and states for submarines. I don't know if the process has lobbying behind it, but I wouldn't be surprised if it did.

Meanwhile, the PLAN names its surface combatants after provinces (carriers) and cities (destroyers) respectively. Fun fact; if the city name gets chosen by the PLAN, the city government actually has to do some public outreach program for the PLAN wrt to the ship itself.

Weka
May 5, 2019

That child totally had it coming. Nobody should be able to be out at dusk except cars.

Bar Ran Dun posted:

what is the relative and recent build quality and steel quality in current Chinese, Korean, Japanese, and US shipyards?

I’ll write about that tomorrow.

Looking forward

Cerebral Bore
Apr 21, 2010


Fun Shoe

Bar Ran Dun posted:

what is the relative and recent build quality and steel quality in current Chinese, Korean, Japanese, and US shipyards?

I’ll write about that tomorrow.

well, given that china produces literally over 10 times more steel per year than the us i'd expect them to have a little more experience in the field

e: though if you lump the us together with south korea and japan they almost get to a quarter of china's output, so they might have some chances

Cerebral Bore has issued a correction as of 09:50 on May 23, 2023

stephenthinkpad
Jan 2, 2020

Iriscoral posted:


Meanwhile, the PLAN names its surface combatants after provinces (carriers) and cities (destroyers) respectively. Fun fact; if the city name gets chosen by the PLAN, the city government actually has to do some public outreach program for the PLAN wrt to the ship itself.

The cities and the provinces take care of the employment of the discharged sailors.

stephenthinkpad
Jan 2, 2020

Bar Ran Dun posted:

for a sense of comparison…

MSC ordered five containerships back in 2019 for 762 million. a new normal sized containership is 150-250 million depending on specifics built in an Asian yard. A recent big Evergreen ship 24,000 teu plus built in China half a billion to 550 million.

Three new Matson vessels (the aloha class ships) 4,000 teu each will be a billion together.

I guess what I’m saying is it’s about 50% to 100% more at a US yard.

Only 50-100% more is probably the lowest cost difference between anything produced in the US vs China.

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

The shipyard building the RCN is part of the family business that also owns the province of New Brunswick, so good things ahead for the former world's 3rd largest navy.

Hubbert
Mar 25, 2007

At a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
it's really cool watching China use the exact same playbook against the West as America once did re: the Soviet Union

strong international partnerships and ever-escalating military spending? hell yeah

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006




so for shipbuilding…

there are three countries that matter. China, Korea and Japan. China build about 45 % Japan and Korea together about that much. This is the bulk of containerships, bulk carriers, RO-ROs and handy sized multipurpose vessels.

Everybody else splits the rest mostly in niches. One country makes heavy lift ships, another makes cruise ships, another ferries, most fractions of a percentage of the world total.

There is some background on the regulation of ship building, SOLAS, flag rules, and classification societies. I’m going to assume this is known and not discuss it for now. (I know this is an incorrect assumption). that said be aware class societies do not correspond to building country. ABS, Lloyds, BV, DNV, NKK, Rina… these class societies are basically the regulatory bodies (and the ones I’ve listed excluding Rina are the ones that really matter). So US, British, German, Japan, French bodies are regulating and this is really regulating. they are they in person inspecting and approving. This is not a neo-liberal regulating scheme. this is real, close, in person over-site, with real power, regulation. other countries also have class societies but they don’t have a large percentage of vessels

most of what the big three (China, Korea, Japan) are making are essentially standardized plans that vary in size. Historically each has a reputation in the market. I’ll summarize those reputations:

The Japanese yards are generally regarded as producing the highest quality vessels. the steel is high quality, the naval architecture is high quality. The vessels life spans are relatively long. A lot of what they build are the Handy sized multipurpose vessels. their builds are almost always NKK classed. this reputation is mostly deserved, but this relative quality has declined somewhat in the last decade.

Korean yards average. they build a lot of the containership vessels and RORO ships at Samsung in Ulsan.

Chinese… for a long time the reputation was low quality steel and poor construction. this has changed dramatically in the last two decades. however it is shipyard specific. most of the newer builds are fine. One or two specific yards put out ships that rust and corrode excessively quickly (within 5 years) and every now and then things are welded poorly. but again for the most part equivalent to Korean builds.

now what does that have to do with naval ship building (post to follow)

Turtle Sandbox
Dec 31, 2007

by Fluffdaddy

Iriscoral posted:

Oh boy, just for fun lemme show some comparisons

the SSN(X) (Seawolf/Virginia-Class replacement) costs 7.2 billion USD and the new Columbia-Class costs a whopping 9 billion per boat.



Lol is the USN already replacing the Virginia class?

I was in the fourth one we built, and we still didn't have a lot compared to the various flavors of 688s still in service.

poo poo I served with a dude who went underway on our last working 637 boat, do we just not try to keep them sailing now?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

Saw an over-the-top office decoration today, wasn't sure where else to post



It's LAV ammo.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply