|
lol
|
# ? May 22, 2023 03:41 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 19:12 |
|
Danann posted:https://twitter.com/intercosmonaut/status/1660084256645828608 Lmao, no wonder the Americans are so hype about everyone sending leopards. Oh no, Putler is lusting for Warsaw, we have no tanks and the Germans could maybe start producing new ones in three years? Now where to send all that money??
|
# ? May 22, 2023 08:51 |
|
New Leopard 2 is shaping up to be the longest indiegogo delay.
|
# ? May 22, 2023 08:55 |
|
where's wet_goods and his chinese deindustrialization memes
|
# ? May 22, 2023 08:59 |
|
does this mean they can't build their potential replacement the KF51 either? Trying to figure out if this was just a half baked plan to force a shift to the new tank or if it's just them having no idea what's going on
|
# ? May 22, 2023 09:05 |
|
Regarde Aduck posted:does this mean they can't build their potential replacement the KF51 either? Trying to figure out if this was just a half baked plan to force a shift to the new tank or if it's just them having no idea what's going on The KF51 uses a Leopard 2 hull/engine, so I guess there is a good question of what is going on. Ardennes has issued a correction as of 09:30 on May 22, 2023 |
# ? May 22, 2023 09:27 |
|
Regarde Aduck posted:does this mean they can't build their potential replacement the KF51 either? Trying to figure out if this was just a half baked plan to force a shift to the new tank or if it's just them having no idea what's going on The KF51 is expo bait. It's not a serious suggestion for a replacement. It's just there to make people give Rheinmetall money. The vast majority of new stuff that gets announced is never intended for production. You could think of it as a kind of industry propaganda.
|
# ? May 22, 2023 15:32 |
|
Zeppelin Insanity posted:The KF51 is expo bait. It's not a serious suggestion for a replacement. It's just there to make people give Rheinmetall money. Well, there probably has to be some type of replacement of the Leo 2 at some point, the question is if the KF51 is actually a good one. It has some issues.
|
# ? May 22, 2023 15:48 |
|
Frosted Flake posted:In the shadowy past of Terra, before the ascension of the Omnissiah and the founding of the sacred Mechanicus, the might of the armaments industry lay not in the hands of sprawling interstellar corporations but within the firm grip of the nation-states themselves. It was a time steeped in mystic lore, when individual nations guided their destinies, mastering the tools of war and industry, not at the behest of disembodied, profit-hungry shareholders, but in service of the state, the populace, and the dire demands of survival and sovereignty.
|
# ? May 22, 2023 16:20 |
|
should have ended on the in the nightmare future there is only war line
|
# ? May 22, 2023 16:36 |
|
Frosted Flake posted:In the shadowy past of Terra, before the ascension of the Omnissiah and the founding of the sacred Mechanicus, the might of the armaments industry lay not in the hands of sprawling interstellar corporations but within the firm grip of the nation-states themselves. It was a time steeped in mystic lore, when individual nations guided their destinies, mastering the tools of war and industry, not at the behest of disembodied, profit-hungry shareholders, but in service of the state, the populace, and the dire demands of survival and sovereignty.
|
# ? May 22, 2023 16:36 |
|
Ardennes posted:Well, there probably has to be some type of replacement of the Leo 2 at some point, the question is if the KF51 is actually a good one. It has some issues. at this rate that replacement will be whatever hand-me-downs that they can get from someone with a real industrial base
|
# ? May 22, 2023 17:26 |
|
https://twitter.com/60Minutes/status/1660423908091211776 holy poo poo lmao
|
# ? May 22, 2023 18:49 |
|
lol, lmao even
|
# ? May 22, 2023 20:03 |
|
don't even ask about the launchers
|
# ? May 22, 2023 20:05 |
|
Chinese cheap poo poo military hardware can't compete with artisan bespoke high end elite military hardware. Someday it will cost a mil and then you will see how good they are!
|
# ? May 22, 2023 20:15 |
|
The instagram friendly tattooed barista of MANPADS.
|
# ? May 22, 2023 20:30 |
|
as history has repeatedly shown us, the side that can manufacture and deploy large quantities of good-enough weapons and keep them consistently supplied with ammunition and spare parts will nearly always lose against the side that instead produces very small quantities of extremely expensive bespoke wonder weapons (lol one of the things they're short of is even literally a German tank, it's like poetry, it rhymes)
|
# ? May 22, 2023 22:38 |
Mister Bates posted:as history has repeatedly shown us, the side that can manufacture and deploy large quantities of good-enough weapons and keep them consistently supplied with ammunition and spare parts will nearly always lose against the side that instead produces very small quantities of extremely expensive bespoke wonder weapons literally waiting for more tanks before marching into kursk for what will certainly be an amazing victory
|
|
# ? May 22, 2023 22:42 |
The Germans delayed the offensive while they tried to build up their forces and waited for new weapons,[38][39][40] giving the Red Army time to construct a series of deep defensive belts[41] and establish a large reserve force for counter-offensives.[42] tyool 2023, the red army is back to digging holes in the same places the nazis wait for tanks its so stupid, you couldn't make it up and be taken seriously
|
|
# ? May 22, 2023 22:44 |
Just another sign the writers have checked out and are now just making GBS threads out lazy garbage to keep history moving along
|
|
# ? May 23, 2023 00:50 |
|
Turtle Sandbox posted:Chinese cheap poo poo military hardware can't compete with artisan bespoke high end elite military hardware. COLD PRESSED STINGER MISSILES? YES PLEASE!
|
# ? May 23, 2023 04:16 |
|
Danann posted:https://twitter.com/60Minutes/status/1660423908091211776 Turtle Sandbox posted:Chinese cheap poo poo military hardware can't compete with artisan bespoke high end elite military hardware. Oh boy, just for fun lemme show some comparisons Type 055 vs DDG(X) - 888 million vs 3.4 billion USD (est, expected to go higher) Type 052DL vs Arleigh Burke Flight II/III - 537 million vs 1.8 billion++ USD (technically unfair because Burkes have 2000 tons more mass and the Flight IIIs get the Ticoderogas' BMD capabilities but still) J-20 vs F-35A - 120 million vs 110 million - direct buying costs, does not include maintainance I can't find hard numbers for the Type 003, the future Type 095/6 submarines, or any of the missiles shot off by the PLAN, but I'd like to note that new Flight II Harpoons cost 1.2mil each (an extended range version of an old rear end missile), the SSN(X) (Seawolf/Virginia-Class replacement) costs 7.2 billion USD and the new Columbia-Class costs a whopping 9 billion per boat. Its important to note that none of these are in anyway so much more advanced from any of their Chinese counterparts. https://news.usni.org/2022/11/10/ddgx-destroyer-could-cost-up-to-3-4b-a-hull-ssnx-attack-boat-up-to-7-2b-says-cbo-report Edit: Also Zumwalts cost 8 bil per ship, though at least that could be blamed on early cancellation, somewhat. But go figure, lol Iriscoral has issued a correction as of 05:46 on May 23, 2023 |
# ? May 23, 2023 05:39 |
it's funny, because the shipbuilding capability is probably even greater than the 3x the equivalent price may lead you to believe would be feasible. we've forgotten the game used to be taking turns sending boats to the bottom, and see who can make more faster. is it a different game now? remains to be seen
|
|
# ? May 23, 2023 06:01 |
|
The SSN(X) The DDG(X) These are such unimaginative names Where's the Obama-class nuclear subs The Trump-class battleships The Bush-class fleet carriers Come on, man The F-37 Kamala
|
# ? May 23, 2023 06:19 |
The idea of Obama class megacarrier USS Donald Trump getting wedged sideways in the Suez canal is some neuromancer poo poo and I'm down for it
|
|
# ? May 23, 2023 06:23 |
|
gradenko_2000 posted:The F-37 Kamala
|
# ? May 23, 2023 06:31 |
|
for a sense of comparison… MSC ordered five containerships back in 2019 for 762 million. a new normal sized containership is 150-250 million depending on specifics built in an Asian yard. A recent big Evergreen ship 24,000 teu plus built in China half a billion to 550 million. Three new Matson vessels (the aloha class ships) 4,000 teu each will be a billion together. I guess what I’m saying is it’s about 50% to 100% more at a US yard.
|
# ? May 23, 2023 06:55 |
|
there's also the small detail that china is far an away the world's largest shipbuilding country whereas the us civilian shipbuilding industry is basically gone, so if there's ever an actual naval war with major losses on both sides china can replace those far more quickly than the us could ever hope to
|
# ? May 23, 2023 07:09 |
|
what is the relative and recent build quality and steel quality in current Chinese, Korean, Japanese, and US shipyards? I’ll write about that tomorrow.
|
# ? May 23, 2023 07:19 |
|
gradenko_2000 posted:The SSN(X) Meanwhile, the PLAN names its surface combatants after provinces (carriers) and cities (destroyers) respectively. Fun fact; if the city name gets chosen by the PLAN, the city government actually has to do some public outreach program for the PLAN wrt to the ship itself.
|
# ? May 23, 2023 07:54 |
|
Bar Ran Dun posted:what is the relative and recent build quality and steel quality in current Chinese, Korean, Japanese, and US shipyards? Looking forward
|
# ? May 23, 2023 09:02 |
|
Bar Ran Dun posted:what is the relative and recent build quality and steel quality in current Chinese, Korean, Japanese, and US shipyards? well, given that china produces literally over 10 times more steel per year than the us i'd expect them to have a little more experience in the field e: though if you lump the us together with south korea and japan they almost get to a quarter of china's output, so they might have some chances Cerebral Bore has issued a correction as of 09:50 on May 23, 2023 |
# ? May 23, 2023 09:44 |
|
Iriscoral posted:
The cities and the provinces take care of the employment of the discharged sailors.
|
# ? May 23, 2023 10:09 |
|
Bar Ran Dun posted:for a sense of comparison… Only 50-100% more is probably the lowest cost difference between anything produced in the US vs China.
|
# ? May 23, 2023 10:11 |
|
The shipyard building the RCN is part of the family business that also owns the province of New Brunswick, so good things ahead for the former world's 3rd largest navy.
|
# ? May 23, 2023 13:31 |
|
it's really cool watching China use the exact same playbook against the West as America once did re: the Soviet Union strong international partnerships and ever-escalating military spending? hell yeah
|
# ? May 23, 2023 15:50 |
|
so for shipbuilding… there are three countries that matter. China, Korea and Japan. China build about 45 % Japan and Korea together about that much. This is the bulk of containerships, bulk carriers, RO-ROs and handy sized multipurpose vessels. Everybody else splits the rest mostly in niches. One country makes heavy lift ships, another makes cruise ships, another ferries, most fractions of a percentage of the world total. There is some background on the regulation of ship building, SOLAS, flag rules, and classification societies. I’m going to assume this is known and not discuss it for now. (I know this is an incorrect assumption). that said be aware class societies do not correspond to building country. ABS, Lloyds, BV, DNV, NKK, Rina… these class societies are basically the regulatory bodies (and the ones I’ve listed excluding Rina are the ones that really matter). So US, British, German, Japan, French bodies are regulating and this is really regulating. they are they in person inspecting and approving. This is not a neo-liberal regulating scheme. this is real, close, in person over-site, with real power, regulation. other countries also have class societies but they don’t have a large percentage of vessels most of what the big three (China, Korea, Japan) are making are essentially standardized plans that vary in size. Historically each has a reputation in the market. I’ll summarize those reputations: The Japanese yards are generally regarded as producing the highest quality vessels. the steel is high quality, the naval architecture is high quality. The vessels life spans are relatively long. A lot of what they build are the Handy sized multipurpose vessels. their builds are almost always NKK classed. this reputation is mostly deserved, but this relative quality has declined somewhat in the last decade. Korean yards average. they build a lot of the containership vessels and RORO ships at Samsung in Ulsan. Chinese… for a long time the reputation was low quality steel and poor construction. this has changed dramatically in the last two decades. however it is shipyard specific. most of the newer builds are fine. One or two specific yards put out ships that rust and corrode excessively quickly (within 5 years) and every now and then things are welded poorly. but again for the most part equivalent to Korean builds. now what does that have to do with naval ship building (post to follow)
|
# ? May 23, 2023 19:42 |
|
Iriscoral posted:Oh boy, just for fun lemme show some comparisons Lol is the USN already replacing the Virginia class? I was in the fourth one we built, and we still didn't have a lot compared to the various flavors of 688s still in service. poo poo I served with a dude who went underway on our last working 637 boat, do we just not try to keep them sailing now?
|
# ? May 23, 2023 19:57 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 19:12 |
|
Saw an over-the-top office decoration today, wasn't sure where else to post It's LAV ammo.
|
# ? May 23, 2023 20:17 |