Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Civilized Fishbot posted:

I wonder if the Diocese has any grounds to sue the fake priest over infringement of trademark.

A trademark violation would require some kind of specific design or IP being copied.

If they could somehow prove that the imposter damaged the Church's reputation and could quantify the amount (such as someone stopping donations or doing business with the church because they believed the priest was really affiliated with the church), then they could sue him for civil damages.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Gumball Gumption
Jan 7, 2012

Judgy Fucker posted:

No, I encountered many parents who when I called them for any reason, positive or negative, made it clear in explicit terms I was bothering them and wasting their time.

Not ninja: and this isn't about partisan politics or teaching evolution or anything. I'm not dogwhistling for "chud parents" or whatever. (lol guess that was a ninja)

Also anecdotal but there is definitely a strain of parent who think public school is a service they're buying and therefore any teaching or involvement expected of them is reacted to in a way that is similar to how I would react if a restaurant suddenly asked me to chip in with cooking my meal.

I don't think it's intentional and they get there when things are explained to them but a lot of my family are teachers and I've heard so many stories about people getting pretty much offended because it was expected for them to be involved in their kids school. And this cut across economic lines, poor schools and rich schools.

Gumball Gumption fucked around with this message at 20:42 on Jun 21, 2023

BonoMan
Feb 20, 2002

Jade Ear Joe

Velocity Raptor posted:

This was a really interesting article. I had no idea that they started changing how reading was being taught. I guess phonics is no longer a thing?
I can't help but wonder, though, what is it that happened that caused a major change in how teachers taught math and reading? Like, genuinely curious. Who saw what was being taught and decided that it was all wrong?



Phonics is definitely a thing. There's just a big battle on what method to teach. Seriously listen to Sold A Story - it's only 6 eps!

https://features.apmreports.org/sold-a-story/

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
I wonder if there is some strategist advising everyone to do this or if it is just a coincidence, but there is a weird trend in the last 48 hours of Republican presidential candidates doing "tours" of American cities that are third-world hellholes.

So far, we have:

- DeSantis
- Trump
- Ramaswamy
- Haley

All releasing videos this week where they tour some American city and describe the nightmare that has taken over all of them.

Two of them went to San Francisco, one went to Kensington, Pennsylvania, and one went to Washington, D.C.

https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1671562106649583616
https://twitter.com/VivekGRamaswamy/status/1671268029118783488

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound

VideoGameVet posted:

I gave up an executive level job at one of the larger game companies to work on curriculum based games in the 1990's. Worked with a good number of educators and researchers.

My conclusion is that US School Philosophy is basically "the beatings will continue until morale improves." My current wife was a teacher in the California system and saw the effects of Prop. 13 and seriously over crowded classrooms. Switched careers because of it.

My favorite video on education comes from Michael Moore's documentary on Europe "Who to invade next."

https://youtu.be/XQ_agxK6fLs

Finland schools. Top rated, little or no homework.

Most local governments these days, at least in red states, seem to be actively sabotaging puic schools in order to push parents into privatized options instead.

VorpalBunny
May 1, 2009

Killer Rabbit of Caerbannog
A friend is a financial advisor, and the moment the pandemic hit in 2020 and the schools started to close here in CA she had a ton of clients who are teachers come to her to sort out early retirement. They saw the writing on the wall, with remote learning and then dealing with learning loss, and bailed as soon as they could.

My Kindergartner lost the last few months of his school year, and it wasn't for a few more months that we realized how far behind he really was. We were juggling multiple kids at home and remote work and managing life in a pandemic. We were able to find an online class to work on his reading skills, but remote schooling has been hard because when kids are on computers they are usually loving around watching videos or playing games, and getting them to focus without doing the work for them was really hard. And it's been 3 years of catch up.

A lot of kids in his class have had behavioral disruptions, but it's hard to say if its more than usual. We are fortunate to be able to now supplement with in-person tutoring and we go to the library often, but we do tend to let our kids fall back on video games and online videos for entertainment. It's just such an easy parenting trap to fall into, the kids are happy and they are quiet and out of the way so we can get some poo poo done. And before you know it they've been watching Lankybox crap for hours.

Mustang
Jun 18, 2006

“We don’t really know where this goes — and I’m not sure we really care.”

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

I wonder if there is some strategist advising everyone to do this or if it is just a coincidence, but there is a weird trend in the last 48 hours of Republican presidential candidates doing "tours" of American cities that are third-world hellholes.

So far, we have:

- DeSantis
- Trump
- Ramaswamy
- Haley

All releasing videos this week where they tour some American city and describe the nightmare that has taken over all of them.

Two of them went to San Francisco, one went to Kensington, Pennsylvania, and one went to Washington, D.C.

https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1671562106649583616
https://twitter.com/VivekGRamaswamy/status/1671268029118783488

There's so many articles out there about liberals trying to understand Trump voters or whites with no college education but you never see the same thing from the right.

Just seething hatred for everything urban, and a blind eye for the poverty and substance abuse in their own backyard.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

Most local governments these days, at least in red states, seem to be actively sabotaging puic schools in order to push parents into privatized options instead.

Are most local governments doing that? I know some places are, but it is generally driven at the state level and I don't think it is anywhere near widespread enough to be "most" areas. Most local governments of major cities, even in red states, are generally not especially conservative.

Only about 9% of kids in the U.S. are in private schools and Washington D.C. (which initially was forced into it by the national congress) is the "state" with the highest percentage of private school students.

Private schools were a much bigger thing for the conservative agenda in the early 2000's, but most of them seem to have moved on to regulating public schools in different ways vs. trying to shut them down.

Papercut
Aug 24, 2005

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

I wonder if there is some strategist advising everyone to do this or if it is just a coincidence, but there is a weird trend in the last 48 hours of Republican presidential candidates doing "tours" of American cities that are third-world hellholes.

So far, we have:

- DeSantis
- Trump
- Ramaswamy
- Haley

All releasing videos this week where they tour some American city and describe the nightmare that has taken over all of them.

Two of them went to San Francisco, one went to Kensington, Pennsylvania, and one went to Washington, D.C.

https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1671562106649583616
https://twitter.com/VivekGRamaswamy/status/1671268029118783488

DeSantis' delivery is so low energy and weak, and people are casually rolling by on scooters and bicycles in the background as he says people are fleeing the area lol

Judgy Fucker
Mar 24, 2006

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Only about 9% of kids in the U.S. are in private schools and Washington D.C. (which initially was forced into it by the national congress) is the "state" with the highest percentage of private school students.

Does that figure include students enrolled in public charters?

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

Most local governments these days, at least in red states, seem to be actively sabotaging puic schools in order to push parents into privatized options instead.

Local governments--or districts, anyway--around here (Oklahoma) are trying to stop this guy from totally annihilating public education.

Posted a version of this elsewhere, but here's some niche CE that may be coming to a red state near you:

quote:

Last November Oklahoma elected this guy to be the state superintendent (make sure you see a pic of him so you, too, can see his empty, dead eyes). Here's a partial list of Walters' accomplishments in the first 5 months of his tenure:
  • Continues to remain the Executive Director of Every Kid Counts Oklahoma, a nonprofit advocating for school privatization funded by the Waltons and Charles Koch, even while serving as state superintendent and receiving a six-figure salary for the position
  • Sparked an investigation by the U.S. Department of Education over possible mishandling and fraud related to Covid relief money allocated to the Bridge the Gap program
  • Revoked the teaching licenses of two teachers who were publicly critical of a state house bill that limited teachers' ability to discuss concepts related to race and gender
  • Issued a rule that banned "pornography" and sex education materials from school libraries (the state attorney general later nullified these rules for circumventing the legislative process)
  • Has had absolutely zero contact of any kind with over 3/4s of district superintendents across the state
  • Failed to apply for more than $270 million in competitive, non-renewing federal grants
  • Referred to the OEA, The Oklahoma Education Association (the state affiliate of the NEA, one of the national teachers' unions) as a terrorist organization during a state OSDE meeting

But the real reason I'm writing this up, the proverbial last straw, was this video that was presented at yesterday's OSDE meeting. A publicly-funded propaganda video that will absolutely, unequivocally get children and teachers killed. Straight-up Nazi poo poo. It was posted to the official OSDE website briefly before being taken down, but it was up long enough to get downloaded by multiple people so now it's everywhere in Okie cyberspace.

And yeah, it's all an effort to force the total privatization of education.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Judgy Fucker posted:

Does that figure include students enrolled in public charters?

No, but it does include private charters.

Most public charters aren't really like private schools at all. Most public charters are basically just normal public schools where the student body and funding isn't determined by zip code. They generally have the same unionization status and curriculum as other public schools in the state.

The main problem with public charters is that they sometimes are run by private administrators, but public schools also do the same thing now where they hire private admin groups to run things. So, that is a potential problem with all public schools with boards who want to do that. Not that there aren't problem or bad public charters, but they are a very different thing from vouchers or private charters.

https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=55

Edit: It looks like about 7% of students attend public charter schools (in 2020), so if you wanted to include every private school and every public charter together, it would be about 16.5% of students.

https://data.publiccharters.org/dig...in%202019%2D20.

Leon Trotsky 2012 fucked around with this message at 21:24 on Jun 21, 2023

Professor Beetus
Apr 12, 2007

They can fight us
But they'll never Beetus

Mustang posted:

There's so many articles out there about liberals trying to understand Trump voters or whites with no college education but you never see the same thing from the right.

Just seething hatred for everything urban, and a blind eye for the poverty and substance abuse in their own backyard.

Yep, if they actually gave a poo poo and weren't concern trolling they'd be confronting the massive amounts of meth and fentanyl abuse that goes on in rural and rural-signifying places in America, many in their own states!

cat botherer
Jan 6, 2022

I am interested in most phases of data processing.

Professor Beetus posted:

Yep, if they actually gave a poo poo and weren't concern trolling they'd be confronting the massive amounts of meth and fentanyl abuse that goes on in rural and rural-signifying places in America, many in their own states!
Rural areas have less drug abuse and crime per square mile than the Mission District. Checkmate. :smugdog:

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

I wonder if there is some strategist advising everyone to do this or if it is just a coincidence, but there is a weird trend in the last 48 hours of Republican presidential candidates doing "tours" of American cities that are third-world hellholes.

It’s the smokescreen Republican politicians deploy to distract from them almost all living in urban areas and certainly spending their time their by choice even when not fundraising.

aBagorn
Aug 26, 2004

LMAO at "Kensington, PA"

I seriously don't understand the motivation for insinuating that this neighborhood is a city in its own right, especially when the right is primed to hate Philly for 2020 (and of course generic big city reasons) all on its own

Thaddius the Large
Jul 5, 2006

It's in the five-hole!

Mustang posted:

There's so many articles out there about liberals trying to understand Trump voters or whites with no college education but you never see the same thing from the right.

Just seething hatred for everything urban, and a blind eye for the poverty and substance abuse in their own backyard.

Peripherally related and anecdotal, but there was a hilarious interview recently on the local NPR affiliate with one of the leaders of the movement to have a bunch of rural Oregon secede and join Idaho. One of her chief reasons was that she accused the liberals of not being willing to compromise and meet Republicans halfway on issues, and that was why the conservative members of congress had walked out on the session (thereby denying quorum), and why the conservatives counties wanted to secede. Because apparently they either get absolutely everything they want or they take their ball and go home, compromise is only something for liberals to do.

Mooseontheloose
May 13, 2003

cat botherer posted:

School administrators are some of the most useless motherfuckers in America and actively make everything they touch worse. However, it looks like education departments also do a poor job of educating teachers on science-based, phonics-heavy reading methodologies ("science of reading"), with dyslexic students suffering some of the worst effects of this stupidity.


I was in ed policy for about a year and a half and the people who want to "reform" the system want some nebulous system wide system shock that will finally make everyone get 99s on Math and Reading scores. No accounting for local culture, funding, or what works, the system just needs to "change." And education schools and schools systems seem desperate for anything to gain a few extra point on standardized tests to tell them they are good.

What I am getting at here is that no one wants to acknowledge what works because funding spigots would turn off and it would disabuse certain private funders from the idea that know what they are doing with education.

Fork of Unknown Origins
Oct 21, 2005
Gotta Herd On?

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

I wonder if there is some strategist advising everyone to do this or if it is just a coincidence, but there is a weird trend in the last 48 hours of Republican presidential candidates doing "tours" of American cities that are third-world hellholes.

So far, we have:

- DeSantis
- Trump
- Ramaswamy
- Haley

All releasing videos this week where they tour some American city and describe the nightmare that has taken over all of them.

Two of them went to San Francisco, one went to Kensington, Pennsylvania, and one went to Washington, D.C.

https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1671562106649583616
https://twitter.com/VivekGRamaswamy/status/1671268029118783488

Ron, go fix Jacksonville then you can tell us how to fix SF.

fischtick
Jul 9, 2001

CORGO, THE DESTROYER

Fun Shoe

Ahh yes, Kensington. I remember the good old days, before it was the meth capital of the world (a title it got in like 1981).
...or when it was a nice place to live, as portrayed in the stunning documentary, Rocky.
...or when the entire area was run by a joint Irish/Italian organized crime ring for nearly 40 years post WWII.
Hell, the deadly Nativist Riots of 1844, where a bunch of "native" (read: got off the boat before you) folks decided that the Pope was commanding the (late to the party and thus savage and foreign) Irish Catholics to remove the Protestant version of the bible from schools, took place in Kensington. Dozens dead, churches and homes destroyed, millions (in 2023 dollars) in damages.

Four generations of my family have called it home; I left 20+ years ago and never looked back.

Willa Rogers
Mar 11, 2005

I don't believe I've seen a majority of Democrats or Dem-leaners cite healthcare costs as unaffordable since the Affordable Care Act was passed 13 years ago.



(from a new poll released by Pew)

I also don't recall healthcare costs ranking this close to inflation as a big or as a very problem:



(from the same poll)

koolkal
Oct 21, 2008

this thread maybe doesnt have room for 2 green xbox one avs
It's amusing seeing the divide on Violent Crime vs. Gun Violence.

Sir John Falstaff
Apr 13, 2010

Willa Rogers posted:

I don't believe I've seen a majority of Democrats or Dem-leaners cite healthcare costs as unaffordable since the Affordable Care Act was passed 13 years ago.



(from a new poll released by Pew)

I also don't recall healthcare costs ranking this close to inflation as a big or as a very problem:



(from the same poll)

Looks pretty similar to February's poll, really:

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2023/02/06/economy-remains-the-publics-top-policy-priority-covid-19-concerns-decline-again/

At least on healthcare (affordability of healthcare at 71 rather than 73 for Dems).

e: Bigger shift seems to be among Republicans, which went from 48 to 56--maybe that's what you're looking at?

Sir John Falstaff fucked around with this message at 22:42 on Jun 21, 2023

Oracle
Oct 9, 2004

Rappaport posted:

What a wonderful insight this was. Do you think you might have a follow-up, which I am sure you do, being a doctor in your field?

Not a doctor but sure! (since you asked so nicely)

"KQED posted:

A group of Grade 9 students in Texas who substantially outperformed their district on a statewide standardized test all had one surprising thing in common: they all were members of the school’s Dungeons & Dragons club.

A coincidence? Otherwise, how does a fantasy role-playing game produce improved test scores? The obvious explanation is that the club draws the bright kids who are already academically inclined. But many of the kids in the club at the Title I school had histories of struggling with academics.

For Kade Wells, the teacher who runs the club at Davis Ninth Grade School outside Houston, the answer is simple: “Playing Dungeons & Dragons makes you smarter.”

The declaration is bold, but the scholarly support and anecdotal evidence is compelling. Studies have shown that the highly social and collaborative nature of the popular fantasy role-playing game cultivates a range of social-emotional skills, which can lay the foundation for improved learning. In addition to these crucial soft skills, teachers and professors who have used the game also claim it directly benefits core academic competencies.

David Simkins, a professor at the Rochester Institute of Technology, is an expert on games and learning. His research indicates that role-playing games (RPGs) can boost learning and stimulate intellectual curiosity and growth.

"Dungeons & Dragons, and other narrative role playing games of its kind, provide many opportunities for learning,” said Simkins. “Participation in narrative role play can open up interests in topics such as mathematics, science, history, culture, ethics, critical reading, and media production. When D&D and its cousins are played in an inviting, encouraging, compassionate, and intellectually engaged environment, play opens the door to truly amazing possibilities for learning.”

...

It’s not difficult to see how collaborative world-building involving storytelling, decision making, invention, research, calculations, negotiation, role-play, and active spatial visualization can stimulate a developing intellect. And, despite the burnish of fantasy, invented realms are derivative, and thus applicable, to the real world.

“Geography from maps, recursive math from die rolling and adding/subtracting modifiers, philosophy, logic from the ever-present need for decision making, science in regards to the ecology of an environment, the weather, the climate of different terrains, as well as many scientific details learned from monsters, which were almost all taken from mythology or reality in one way or another,” said Wells, cataloging what his kids learn from the game.

Dungeons & Dragons is an innately multidisciplinary and multimodal experience, which is why scholars and educators like Wells tend to describe its learning benefits in terms of lists and inventories. Its implementation as an instructional tool, then, is not only fun, but also becomes a sort of curricular node with the capacity to engage students in a wide array of skills and subjects.

In one striking example, educational researcher and teacher Alexandra Carter used a student-modified version of Dungeons & Dragons as the centerpiece of a yearlong program with a Grade 3 class that combined math, reading, writing, and social studies. Many students in the class struggled with academic and behavioral challenges, but rooting their core subjects in the game produced remarkable results.

In a paper she authored recounting the experience, Carter describes a wealth of student success stories, both behavioral and academic. “I was able to see progress in all of the students,” summarizes Carter, “and was especially impressed with the work that those who struggled the most produced.”

Carter observes that a great deal of the project’s success hinged on students being motivated to learn and practice skills that applied to the game. Students often have trouble appreciating the value of what they learn in school when it is abstracted from its real-world purpose. In this case, learning was meaningful for the students because it had traction in a fantasy world that stood in as a facsimile for the real one, the central dynamic of play and a key feature of its value for development and learning.

Although Dungeons & Dragons seems better suited to teach humanities, every shield block and fireball relies on a little bit of science and lots of math.

“It may seem odd, but in a fantasy game with magic, players often have to learn about basic physics and chemistry to determine what to do," said Ian Slater who teaches at York University and runs Black Dragon Games. "Not to determine how a magic-user can shoot a lightning bolt from their fingers, but rather to determine, for example, if a suit of plate mail would be magnetized by the strike of a lightning bolt.”

Incorporating games of any sort into the curriculum generally requires that teachers create context to direct play towards the learning objectives. RPGs like Dungeons & Dragons are pliable systems that lend themselves to be creatively modified, which makes them ideal to serve diverse curricular purposes. UK educator Chris Leach, for example, reworked the game and leveraged the fantasy motif to instruct Grade 6 students on the basics of algorithms and binary, the foundation of computational thinking.

“If you are at all 'science enabled' as a DM there are ample opportunities to discuss scientific topics, even if magic bends reality in ways that science would not allow," said Slater. "Even examples of scientifically impossible magic can be used as tools to discuss what science actually does say about a subject."

With a little ingenuity, chemistry can be applied to the existing alchemy scheme; physics operates in every projectile, fall, and collision; biology lurks in the countless flora and fauna that populate the world, and the game’s engineer class is an open invitation to justify contraptions with hard science. And math is the low hanging fruit.

“Math is constant, and completely necessary to play the game,” said Wells.

D&D is fundamentally a numbers game, and players must consult charts and tables to modify their rolls of dice, and calculate everything from currency exchanges to their projected experience points. Those who want to be masters of their destiny can leverage math, especially probability and calculus, to bend the numbers in their favor.

“D&D is full of this sort of basic mathematical stuff, and players soak it up as they play," said Slater. “Indeed, since knowing how these mechanics work has direct implications for the survival of their character, players tend to learn the mathematics pretty quickly.”

There are numerous websites, forums and online calculators to assist players with mathematical assistance to further their progress. With no coaxing from parents and teachers, players are motivated to research and access these resources to optimize their play, an inevitable boon to their numeracy skills. Carter observed many of her previously demoralized students become invested in math due to the game.

Carter observed many of her previously demoralized students become invested in math due to the game.

“One student, who frequently demonstrated an apprehension towards math that translated into poor performance in class, on assignments, and during assessments, made significant progress as we worked through the project," wrote Carter. The student offered answers to questions, she writes, "and slowly transferred this confidence in math as it applied to the project into a confidence in regular math.”


See also:
Chiu, F. Y., & Hsieh, M. L. (2017). Role-Playing Game Based Assessment to Fractional
Concept in Second Grade Mathematics. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science &
Technology Education, 13(4), 1075-1083.

quote:

This study developed a set of Role-playing game (RPG), which was used to explore whether significant differences exist in academic performance and learning attitudes between RPG-based assessment and traditional lectures. This study also investigated the satisfaction of students toward the RPG scenario. Research participants included 100 second grade elementary students. The experimental results showed the different teaching methods affected the academic performance and learning attitude of second grade elementary students in fraction concepts. Learning by using RPG-based assessment can effectively improve the academic performance and learning attitudes of students. Students with high learning achievement were most satisfied with the RPG-based assessment scenarios, whereas those with low learning achievement demonstrated low levels of satisfaction. It is hoped that the innovative learning method provided by this study will help students.

Cook, M. P., Gremo, M., & Morgan, R. (2017). We’re Just Playing: The Influence of a
Modified Tabletop Role-Playing Game on ELA Students’ In-Class Reading. Simulation
& Gaming, 48(2), 199-218.

quote:

"role-playing games can be viewed from the perspective of reading and writing; in fact, Hsu and Wang (2010) stated game playing “is equivalent to reading” and game designing “is equivalent to writing” (p. 402). Reading a game “requires the same amount of attention to details as reading other texts to locate the cultural work being done” (Toscano, 2011, p. 25). Abrams and Russo (2015) found that gameplay fostered deeper understanding of traditional reading concepts, such as literary elements, plot, etc. Games extend the concept of narrative and the role of reading beyond the texts traditionally associated with classrooms and literacy instruction (Harushimana, 2008).
Gaming also offers numerous potential benefits for students in composition classrooms. In fact, games have been discussed by multiple scholars (Colby & Colby, 2008; Dickey, 2011; Juul, 2005) as meaningful components of writing instruction. Sabatino (2014) proposed the inclusion of gaming within composition instruction because they share four major areas: audience, engagement, collaboration, and problem solving. Colby and Colby (2008) posited, “gameplay becomes an important part of the invention process, helping students creatively discover problems and rhetorical solutions within the gamespace” (p. 310). Furthermore, Elkins (2015) pointed out that gaming fosters writing activities, such as storytelling and creative writing among others.
The existing literature clearly points to a variety of educational benefits associated with gameplay in the classroom. These benefits include engagement, deeper thinking about texts, active participation in narrative creation, and writing/composing through and about their own narratives. O’Brien, Lawless, and Schrader (2010), however, suggest the necessity for teachers and researchers to continue exploring the instructional affordances of gaming in the classroom."

Willa Rogers
Mar 11, 2005

Sir John Falstaff posted:

Looks pretty similar to February's poll, really:

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2023/02/06/economy-remains-the-publics-top-policy-priority-covid-19-concerns-decline-again/

At least on healthcare (affordability of healthcare at 71 rather than 73 for Dems).

Strengthening the economy/Inflation went down 5 points since February while reducing healthcare costs/making healthcare more affordable increased by 5 points for Americans' top policy priority/top problem.

But the wording was slightly different between the two polls for these questions.

Sir John Falstaff
Apr 13, 2010

Willa Rogers posted:

"Strengthening the economy" went down 5 points since February while "reducing healthcare costs/making healthcare more affordable" increased by 5 points for Americans' top policy priority/top problem.

But the wording was slightly different between the two polls for these questions.

There's an increase among Republicans, too, which may have helped bump up the overall importance. But yeah, the wording might have had something to do with it as well--"strengthening economy" seems so broad as to be almost meaningless.

Boris Galerkin
Dec 17, 2011

I don't understand why I can't harass people online. Seriously, somebody please explain why I shouldn't be allowed to stalk others on social media!

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

That article is pretty wild.

quote:

Harper attended a professional-development day at one of the district's lowest-performing elementary schools. The teachers were talking about how students should attack words in a story. When a child came to a word she didn't know, the teacher would tell her to look at the picture and guess.

The most important thing was for the child to understand the meaning of the story, not the exact words on the page. So, if a kid came to the word "horse" and said "house," the teacher would say, that's wrong. But, Harper recalls, "if the kid said 'pony,' it'd be right because pony and horse mean the same thing."

Harper was shocked. First of all, pony and horse don't mean the same thing. And what does a kid do when there aren't any pictures?

I’m a bit confused because the way this is described sounds like it perfectly makes sense to me, because it’s also how I was taught? I’m in my mid 30s. I remember being taught in grade school to use context clues whenever we come across a word we didn’t recognize. It seems like this is exactly what the quoted bit is saying to do?

pseudorandom name
May 6, 2007

Boris Galerkin posted:

I’m a bit confused because the way this is described sounds like it perfectly makes sense to me, because it’s also how I was taught? I’m in my mid 30s. I remember being taught in grade school to use context clues whenever we come across a word we didn’t recognize. It seems like this is exactly what the quoted bit is saying to do?

You use context clues to infer the meaning of the word, you don't use context clues to infer the word itself.

GlyphGryph
Jun 23, 2013

Down came the glitches and burned us in ditches and we slept after eating our dead.

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Most public charters aren't really like private schools at all. Most public charters are basically just normal public schools where the student body and funding isn't determined by zip code. They generally have the same unionization status and curriculum as other public schools in the state.

What differentiates public charters from public magnets?

Boris Galerkin posted:

I’m a bit confused because the way this is described sounds like it perfectly makes sense to me, because it’s also how I was taught? I’m in my mid 30s. I remember being taught in grade school to use context clues whenever we come across a word we didn’t recognize. It seems like this is exactly what the quoted bit is saying to do?

You use context alone? Most people use the letters to narrow the problem space, then some combination of word similarities and context to select among them or determine the meaning of what results if it doesn't match any of whats left.

GlyphGryph fucked around with this message at 23:05 on Jun 21, 2023

JoshGuitar
Oct 25, 2005

Boris Galerkin posted:

I’m a bit confused because the way this is described sounds like it perfectly makes sense to me, because it’s also how I was taught? I’m in my mid 30s. I remember being taught in grade school to use context clues whenever we come across a word we didn’t recognize. It seems like this is exactly what the quoted bit is saying to do?

I remember being taught context clues, but they were more along the lines of seeing "Bob was ambidextrous, so it didn't matter which hand he used to hold his pen" and figuring out what ambidextrous meant. I don't recall ever being told to look at the illustrations and take a wild guess. I also don't recall reading a book with illustrations on every page after about second grade.

My nieces and nephews were also taught "sight words", which I don't remember learning as a kid. Knowing 100 or so words on sight probably makes it easier to read a book containing only those specific words, but it doesn't do a thing when you see "horse" and only know "house", or even come across the plural, possessive, past tense, or other form or one of your sight words.

Boris Galerkin
Dec 17, 2011

I don't understand why I can't harass people online. Seriously, somebody please explain why I shouldn't be allowed to stalk others on social media!

pseudorandom name posted:

You use context clues to infer the meaning of the word, you don't use context clues to infer the word itself.

I don’t understand what the difference is

Boris Galerkin
Dec 17, 2011

I don't understand why I can't harass people online. Seriously, somebody please explain why I shouldn't be allowed to stalk others on social media!

JoshGuitar posted:

I remember being taught context clues, but they were more along the lines of seeing "Bob was ambidextrous, so it didn't matter which hand he used to hold his pen" and figuring out what ambidextrous meant. I don't recall ever being told to look at the illustrations and take a wild guess. I also don't recall reading a book with illustrations on every page after about second grade.

My nieces and nephews were also taught "sight words", which I don't remember learning as a kid. Knowing 100 or so words on sight probably makes it easier to read a book containing only those specific words, but it doesn't do a thing when you see "horse" and only know "house", or even come across the plural, possessive, past tense, or other form or one of your sight words.

Maybe I’m misunderstanding then. Because for me context means the words on the page and also the pictures, if any. Looking at the picture is one form of context clues, just as is reading the sentences around it and trying to infer what the meaning of the word is from those.

JoshGuitar
Oct 25, 2005

Boris Galerkin posted:

Maybe I’m misunderstanding then. Because for me context means the words on the page and also the pictures, if any. Looking at the picture is one form of context clues, just as is reading the sentences around it and trying to infer what the meaning of the word is from those.

Seeing "gleeblefitzer" and inferring the meaning from either the rest of the sentence or the illustrations is probably a valid use of context clues. With or without context clues, you can still tell what the word gleeblefitzer sounds like. You're still reading it. Seeing a sentence like "Suzie ate a bowl of soup", and having to look at the picture to tell whether they meant soup, soap, or shrimp isn't reading.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Boris Galerkin posted:

I’m a bit confused because the way this is described sounds like it perfectly makes sense to me, because it’s also how I was taught? I’m in my mid 30s. I remember being taught in grade school to use context clues whenever we come across a word we didn’t recognize. It seems like this is exactly what the quoted bit is saying to do?

As I understand it, the idea behind phonics is that kids already know what word-sounds mean, because most of their language acquisition up to that point has been listening to adults talk. They just don't know how to connect that existing knowledge to those shapes on a piece of paper. Teaching them to convert written words to sounds allows them to make use of the spoken vocabulary they already possess - they can sound out the word and see if it sounds like a word they've heard before. Context clues aren't always available, but sufficient information to convert a written word to a spoken word is always available if the word is visible (once they've sufficiently learned how to sound out English's various quirks, anyway), so it's more generally applicable.

Boris Galerkin
Dec 17, 2011

I don't understand why I can't harass people online. Seriously, somebody please explain why I shouldn't be allowed to stalk others on social media!
It seems like the confusion is that I’m thinking of a situation where the kid can read the word but doesn’t know what the word means, but the article and therefore you guys are talking about a situation where the kid can’t read the word and may or may not know what the word means?

E: vv ok yeah I think I completely misunderstood

James Garfield
May 5, 2012
Am I a manipulative abuser in real life, or do I just roleplay one on the Internet for fun? You decide!

Boris Galerkin posted:

I don’t understand what the difference is

Context clues are more advanced, you use them to learn new vocabulary when you already know how to read.

Gumball Gumption
Jan 7, 2012

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

No, but it does include private charters.

Most public charters aren't really like private schools at all. Most public charters are basically just normal public schools where the student body and funding isn't determined by zip code. They generally have the same unionization status and curriculum as other public schools in the state.

The main problem with public charters is that they sometimes are run by private administrators, but public schools also do the same thing now where they hire private admin groups to run things. So, that is a potential problem with all public schools with boards who want to do that. Not that there aren't problem or bad public charters, but they are a very different thing from vouchers or private charters.

https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=55

Edit: It looks like about 7% of students attend public charter schools (in 2020), so if you wanted to include every private school and every public charter together, it would be about 16.5% of students.

https://data.publiccharters.org/dig...in%202019%2D20.

Uh yeah this is wrong. Charter school policy and law is set at the state, local, and district levels so there is not a lot of consistency on what a charter school is. I would not assume they are meeting the same standards as a public school. I definitely would not assume they have the same unionization status. I know for a fact they are not in Massachusetts even though the public districts are unionized.

One of the points of a charter school is that they set their own curriculum. That's one of the major selling points most use.

Also no one calls them private charter vs public charter. Private charter is just called a private school and public charter is just called a charter school. You're not really being given a charter if you're a private school.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

GlyphGryph posted:

What differentiates public charters from public magnets?

The main difference is that you can have specialized curriculum/administration exemptions that normal public schools aren't always allowed to have.

Foreign language immersion, tech school, longer school day, etc.

Magnet schools also usually have some kind of application or academic requirements, whereas admission to charter schools is usually determined by lottery.

There's some other minor differences (like school board setup) and probably a few others that I am forgetting, but those are the big differences.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Gumball Gumption posted:

Uh yeah this is wrong. Charter school policy and law is set at the state, local, and district levels so there is not a lot of consistency on what a charter school is. I would not assume they are meeting the same standards as a public school. I definitely would not assume they have the same unionization status. I know for a fact they are not in Massachusetts even though the public districts are unionized.

One of the points of a charter school is that they set their own curriculum. That's one of the major selling points most use.

Also no one calls them private charter vs public charter. Private charter is just called a private school and public charter is just called a charter school. You're not really being given a charter if you're a private school.

The fact that charter school policy is set at the local and state level (and the district determines the curriculum changes via the charter) is why they are different from private schools. They are not really in the same policy category as private schools or vouchers. The charter school itself does not set its own curriculum 100% independently like a private school does. It basically gets an alternative set of administration or curriculum rules that are determined by the public at the state/local level.

Private charter school is generally a shorthand for "run by a for-profit organization and accepts private donations." Some jurisdictions regulate what type of entities can run charters and how they are funded, but others don't.

quote:

For charters, private refers to the funding sources such as private companies and individuals who can make decisions about a child’s education without community or public input. Charter schools operate under a charter, drawn up by a private group or entity. Charter schools might use the term “free private schools”, while at the same time stating that they are public schools. This can lead to confusion for parents.

quote:

Private schools can set their own admission and curriculum guidelines because they do not take taxpayer dollars. Religious and independent private schools rely heavily upon student tuition that could range anywhere from a few thousand to tens of thousands of dollars per year.

Edit: Here's a good explainer that goes over the actual practical differences between the two and is longer and more coherent than I can type on my phone right now:

quote:

Why Are Charter Schools and Private Schools Confused?

Charter schools and private schools are often lumped in the same category because they are both alternatives to traditional public schools. They’re both types of schools that provide K-12 education to students. However, there are major differences between them. Here are seven differences that separate charter schools and private schools.


1. School Funding

School funding is an especially influential component that drives a wedge between private and charter schools. Charter schools are public schools that are funded by state and federal governments. That means they’re free to attend and open to the public.

Private schools do not receive government funding. They’re funded through tuition, donations, and grants. That’s why, unlike public charters, private schools charge tuition.


2. Tuition Costs

Parents often wrongly think both private schools and charter schools charge tuition. In reality, private schools do charge tuition; charter schools don’t.

According to an EducationData report, the average cost of tuition per year at private schools is $12,350 per year. On the other hand, charter schools are legally prohibited from charging tuition. Instead, they’re completely free to attend.


3. Admission Requirements

Another major difference between charter schools and private schools is admission requirements. Private schools are often selective in their admissions process. They usually require testing or other admission requirements before your child is allowed to attend. Overall, this tends to lead to less diverse student populations at private schools because money and an advanced academic background tend to be common prerequisites for enrollment.

Charter schools are open to all students within a designated jurisdiction, and they aren’t allowed to discriminate during the admission process. In addition to being bound to discrimination laws, charter schools are legally required to admit students on an open basis. When enrollment fills up, charter schools select additional students through a lottery.

4. Religious and Political Influence

You may have noticed that many private schools are tied to churches, religious groups, or political organizations. Because they receive private funding, private schools often operate under the influence of these outside entities. That also means private schools are able to carry concepts and ideas from these types of groups into the classroom. In fact, it isn't uncommon for students at private schools to take compulsory religious courses.

On the other hand, charter schools are legally obligated to keep programs, admissions, and hiring free from religious and political influence. That means charters aren’t allowed to let these entities control what’s taught in the classroom.


5. Accountability

Because they’re funded and run differently, public charter schools and public schools are accountable for different levels of academic standards. Even though public charters generally have more flexibility in the teaching models or academic approaches than traditional public schools, they still need to uphold agreed-upon charters. In order to uphold these contracts, charter schools need to hit academic standards. They also need to follow federal education laws.

Private schools essentially operate in a vacuum. There are few standards imposed on private schools, and they aren’t required to meet academic curriculum or performance standards.


6. Student and Teacher Demographics

Charter schools and public schools also tend to serve different student populations. As a whole, charter schools serve a much more diverse group of students than private schools.

The National Center for Education Statistics (NES) found the following demographic information for the 2017-18 school year:

Sixteen percent more public charter schools served a student population that was made up of more than 50 percent black students than private schools.
Twenty-one percent more public charter schools featured a student population that was higher than 50 percent hispanic than private schools.
Seventy-two percent of private schools had a population made up of 50 percent or more white students, compared to 32 percent of public charter schools.

7. Teaching Credentials

Teacher credentials and requirements are a final—yet important—difference between private schools and public charter schools. Under California law, charter schools must hire certified instructors with a teaching credential or document that’s equal to the requirements of traditional public schools, issued by the Commission on Teacher Credentialing.

Private schools do not have these same hiring obligations. In fact, private schools are allowed to employ any teachers, regardless of whether they hold teaching credentials or not.

https://www.methodschools.org/blog/7-differences-between-charter-and-private-schools

Leon Trotsky 2012 fucked around with this message at 23:53 on Jun 21, 2023

Gumball Gumption
Jan 7, 2012

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

The fact that charter school policy is set at the local and state level (and the district determines the curriculum changes via the charter) is why they are different from private schools. They are not really in the same policy category as private schools or vouchers. The charter school itself does not set its own curriculum 100% independently like a private school does. It basically gets an alternative set of administration or curriculum rules that are determined by the public at the state/local level.

Private charter school is generally a shorthand for "run by a for-profit organization and accepts private donations." Some jurisdictions regulate what type of entities can run charters and how they are funded, but others don't.



Edit: Here's a good explainer that goes over the actual practical differences between the two and is longer and more coherent than I can type on my phone right now:

https://www.methodschools.org/blog/7-differences-between-charter-and-private-schools

Your explainer is a charter school ad.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Gumball Gumption posted:

Your explainer is a charter school ad.

It's a blog post that is laying out specific obvious legal differences. Here's a U.S. News and World Report article that says the same thing:

https://www.usnews.com/education/k12/articles/understanding-charter-schools-vs-public-schools

Do you think any of the specifics about funding differences, governing laws, or tuition in either article are false?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply