Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
AlternateNu
May 5, 2005

ドーナツダメ!

bulletsponge13 posted:

Am I the only one who doubts Russian nuke capabilities?

No. But the risk calculus doesn't allow us to operationalize those doubts.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Infidelicious
Apr 9, 2013

Jarmak posted:

There's nothing about MAD that says an attack on troops playing extraterritorial imperial gently caress gently caress games necessitates a nuclear response.

So you're saying that soviet submarines sinking a few carriers in the gulf of Tonkin in 1968 would've been a great idea since MAD doesn't cover that?

Jarmak
Jan 24, 2005

Infidelicious posted:

So you're saying that soviet submarines sinking a few carriers in the gulf of Tonkin in 1968 would've been a great idea since MAD doesn't cover that?

No that's not what I loving said was it.

Hyrax Attack!
Jan 13, 2009

We demand to be taken seriously

Carth Dookie posted:

The lesson should be that nevermind "what if meltdown" but the fact that they are a huge loving target in any terrorist action or war and a huge national vulnerability so really don't build them unless you have no other option.

I’ve seen that same argument against building a space elevator. Not that it’s the only thing holding that up.

Der Kyhe
Jun 25, 2008

bulletsponge13 posted:

Am I the only one who doubts Russian nuke capabilities?

Absolutely not, it most definitely isn't the reported six to eight thousand usable warheads between the different delivery platforms. My guesstimate right now is its probably "few hundred of warheads that work" dwindling down. But its not zero and nobody wants to find out who guessed closest to the real number.

A.o.D.
Jan 15, 2006
All cards are bad because they have counters, all infrastructure is bad because they're a target.

Just Another Lurker
May 1, 2009

bulletsponge13 posted:

Am I the only one who doubts Russian nuke capabilities?

If it requires maintenance then doubts should be added as standard.

The actual nuclear material degrades and gives a lower yield over time and i think it's either tritium or deuterium that has to be kept up to spec on the weapons as well... not even considering the actual rocket & propellent. :ughh:

M_Gargantua
Oct 16, 2006

STOMP'N ON INTO THE POWERLINES

Exciting Lemon

A.o.D. posted:

All cards are bad because they have counters, all infrastructure is bad because they're a target.

All people are bad because they think!

Humbug Scoolbus
Apr 25, 2008

The scarlet letter was her passport into regions where other women dared not tread. Shame, Despair, Solitude! These had been her teachers, stern and wild ones, and they had made her strong, but taught her much amiss.
Clapping Larry

Icon Of Sin posted:

Nuclear fire won’t be enough to cleanse the taint that curses the land where Fayetteville and Jacksonville, NC both sit :smith:

:hf:

Crab Dad
Dec 28, 2002

behold i have tempered and refined thee, but not as silver; as CRAB


Cimber posted:

That map is pretty drat old. For example, they have the Burlington VT area targeted in a limited engagement to take out Plattsburgh Air Force Base. Which closed in 1995 and is now a civilian facility.

A civilian facility.
Sounds the average Russian target.

SlowBloke
Aug 14, 2017

Crab Dad posted:

A civilian facility.
Sounds the average Russian target.

If you put a cross or a white flag on the roof, they will alpha strike it and avoid every other military targets.

in a well actually
Jan 26, 2011

dude, you gotta end it on the rhyme

The thing I don’t get about that map is that the counter-force (2k) strike doesn’t have many of the cold war SAC B-52 bases.

I think the counter value triangle icons are just population centers.

Lovely Joe Stalin
Jun 12, 2007

Our Lovely Wang

Murgos posted:

Nope. We all stopped what we were doing and watched it on TV.

I don’t know about you but my first reaction was, “why aren’t there more cops? Surely a couple of hours is enough time to mobilize a few thousand cops from DC and the surrounding areas with APCs and riot control equipment.” Because you know it’s something they had plans for.

Which is pretty much what happened. 4-5 hours after it started there were swat teams cuffing the worst offenders and ushering the lookie-loos out.

There wasn’t a need to take immediate action by the population at large because it was handled.

Not that I can predict what would have happened had it gone on another day with MAGA tanks rolling into the capitol area. But there were no MAGA tanks, no apaches taking hits trying to slow a convoy of RVs and dualies rolling coal up I-95 and so we can save that for next November.

The UK's a shithole of apathy when it comes to politics, but when parliament was closed by the government with the clear intent of unconstitutionally bypassing parliamentary supremacy there were protests all over the country immediately and from all social demographics, in the middle of a work day. From the Socialist Workers to City of London bankers. People didn't wait to see what was next or how it was playing out, they immediately went to the streets to say no.
The crowds could have taken Downing Street if they'd wanted to. Which is what you need when you see a coup on TV. People on the streets showing mass support for the rule of law and constitutional authority.

At the Capital the mob were literally one wrong turn from making it to the Vice President and Senators while the DC NG troops were held back by sympathetic/complicit Generals. That it fizzled out is much more to do with poor planning and luck rather than timely response by the proper authorities.

The comparison is a little apples and oranges, but at its core I think it's sound. Having immediate popular protests would have been useful had the plotters been a little bit more competent, because it motivates and reinforces the will of those within the military/police who can resist to do so. It's an action that can be taken by normal people to delay or prevent a fait accompli victory for the plotters. And in the event that the coup fails it functions as a statement to future plots that people will not take it quietly.


Fivemarks posted:

I, for one, don't particularly believe that the Russian Nuclear Stockpile is in a usable state. I think its high time that we stop letting the threat of nuclear war be used to justify "We should let Putin/tinpot dictator of the week do what he wants and do whatever genocide they want."

While having doubts about the operational viability of the RF nuclear stockpile as a whole is somewhat rational and reasonable given the state of the rest of their military, your opinion is one that you shouldn't share with adults in real life. Because people will look at you the same way they look at a kid who thinks Naruto running is real. It will be awkward.

Infidelicious
Apr 9, 2013

You're debating that the function of mad is not to make any direct conflict risk reward calculus unacceptable.


When it's the entire point.

Sentinel
Jan 1, 2009

High Tech
Low Life


At this point we can assume the dead hand is powered by a rusty car battery and operated by one of those little drippy birds.

psydude
Apr 1, 2008

Lovely Joe Stalin posted:

The UK's a shithole of apathy when it comes to politics, but when parliament was closed by the government with the clear intent of unconstitutionally bypassing parliamentary supremacy there were protests all over the country immediately and from all social demographics, in the middle of a work day. From the Socialist Workers to City of London bankers. People didn't wait to see what was next or how it was playing out, they immediately went to the streets to say no.
The crowds could have taken Downing Street if they'd wanted to. Which is what you need when you see a coup on TV. People on the streets showing mass support for the rule of law and constitutional authority.

At the Capital the mob were literally one wrong turn from making it to the Vice President and Senators while the DC NG troops were held back by sympathetic/complicit Generals. That it fizzled out is much more to do with poor planning and luck rather than timely response by the proper authorities.

The comparison is a little apples and oranges, but at its core I think it's sound. Having immediate popular protests would have been useful had the plotters been a little bit more competent, because it motivates and reinforces the will of those within the military/police who can resist to do so. It's an action that can be taken by normal people to delay or prevent a fait accompli victory for the plotters. And in the event that the coup fails it functions as a statement to future plots that people will not take it quietly..

This is wrong. It didn't make international news, but there were banners and signs hanging all over the DC area telling Trump to get the gently caress out. Like literally one on I-95 in MD said "GET THE gently caress OUT, LOSER". If Trump had tried to stay in office - whether by just refusing to leave or by pulling some alternate elector poo poo - people would have absolutely flooded DC and massively dwarfed the number of J6 insurrections. Everyone that I knew at the time was already planning to drop everything they were doing and go. And I'm not just talking about politically involved people. I'm talking about folks who had never been at a protest or even really paid attention to much beyond checking their Google News feed.

But Congress certified the election and Trump left office.

psydude fucked around with this message at 16:34 on Jul 3, 2023

lightpole
Jun 4, 2004
I think that MBAs are useful, in case you are looking for an answer to the question of "Is lightpole a total fucking idiot".

Lovely Joe Stalin posted:

The UK's a shithole of apathy when it comes to politics, but when parliament was closed by the government with the clear intent of unconstitutionally bypassing parliamentary supremacy there were protests all over the country immediately and from all social demographics, in the middle of a work day. From the Socialist Workers to City of London bankers. People didn't wait to see what was next or how it was playing out, they immediately went to the streets to say no.
The crowds could have taken Downing Street if they'd wanted to. Which is what you need when you see a coup on TV. People on the streets showing mass support for the rule of law and constitutional authority.

At the Capital the mob were literally one wrong turn from making it to the Vice President and Senators while the DC NG troops were held back by sympathetic/complicit Generals. That it fizzled out is much more to do with poor planning and luck rather than timely response by the proper authorities.

The comparison is a little apples and oranges, but at its core I think it's sound. Having immediate popular protests would have been useful had the plotters been a little bit more competent, because it motivates and reinforces the will of those within the military/police who can resist to do so. It's an action that can be taken by normal people to delay or prevent a fait accompli victory for the plotters. And in the event that the coup fails it functions as a statement to future plots that people will not take it quietly.

While having doubts about the operational viability of the RF nuclear stockpile as a whole is somewhat rational and reasonable given the state of the rest of their military, your opinion is one that you shouldn't share with adults in real life. Because people will look at you the same way they look at a kid who thinks Naruto running is real. It will be awkward.

Many organizations discouraged counter protests on J6 due to false flag fears and told people to stay home.

Fivemarks
Feb 21, 2015

Lovely Joe Stalin posted:

While having doubts about the operational viability of the RF nuclear stockpile as a whole is somewhat rational and reasonable given the state of the rest of their military, your opinion is one that you shouldn't share with adults in real life. Because people will look at you the same way they look at a kid who thinks Naruto running is real. It will be awkward.

Let the world die in a pyre of nuclear hellfire, if that is what it takes to do the right thing. If modern civilization requires that we sit back and let genocides and war crimes happen because "We can't stop them because the perpetrator might throw a nuclear temper tantrum," then modern civilization deserves to die.

Wasabi the J
Jan 23, 2008

MOM WAS RIGHT

Fivemarks posted:

Let the world die in a pyre of nuclear hellfire, if that is what it takes to do the right thing. If modern civilization requires that we sit back and let genocides and war crimes happen because "We can't stop them because the perpetrator might throw a nuclear temper tantrum," then modern civilization deserves to die.

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

Fivemarks posted:

Let the world die in a pyre of nuclear hellfire, if that is what it takes to do the right thing. If modern civilization requires that we sit back and let genocides and war crimes happen because "We can't stop them because the perpetrator might throw a nuclear temper tantrum," then modern civilization deserves to die.

The X-man cometh
Nov 1, 2009
That map spares college towns like Bloomington Indiana, State College Pennsylvania, and Oxford Mississippi.

What kind of civilization would emerge from a bunch of academics surrounded by toxic nuclear waste?

Lum_
Jun 5, 2006
Russian doctrine explicitly states that nuclear weapons will be used if Russian territory is invaded by a foreign power.

Any NATO intervention (air defense suppression for example) is by default an invasion of Russia by a foreign power.

Whether or not you think such a nuclear exchange can be restricted to Ukraine for more than ten minutes depends on your confidence in decision makers to make rational decisions under extreme stress very quickly.

There's actually a VR simulation that was developed that shows exactly what stress that entails:

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/dec/14/vr-game-simulating-nuclear-attack-tests-decision-making-skills

quote:

As soon as I took a seat, a voice in my headset started to tell me the situation. Early warning sensors had detected the launch of 299 missiles in Russia which were thought, with high confidence, to be heading for the US mainland and most likely, the intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) silos in the north-west. An estimated 2 million Americans would be killed. While this was being explained, another voice – this time a secret service officer – was telling me helicopters were on the way to evacuate me.

I struggled to understand all the details because the siren was still going on. It took me a few minutes to remember I was the commander-in-chief and could order it to be turned off. It was silenced immediately but I could not be sure I had not missed a vital nuance.

A general from strategic command appeared on one of the screens in front of me and told me I did not have much time to make a decision and to keep an eye on the digital clock on the conference table. It said I had 12 minutes, 44 seconds left.

“If you don’t make a decision before the clock hits zero, we will lose our entire ICBM force,” the general said, in a voice that implied I had already let the nation down.

pygmy tyrant
Nov 25, 2005

*not a small business owner

in a well actually posted:

The thing I don’t get about that map is that the counter-force (2k) strike doesn’t have many of the cold war SAC B-52 bases.

I think the counter value triangle icons are just population centers.

iirc that countervalue target group also includes major river crossings, ports and dams, it's just that a lot of those are conveniently colocated with population centers.

e: plus it's hard to tell what those triangles are centered on when they're bigger than Rhode Island

pygmy tyrant fucked around with this message at 17:35 on Jul 3, 2023

in a well actually
Jan 26, 2011

dude, you gotta end it on the rhyme

The X-man cometh posted:

That map spares college towns like Bloomington Indiana, State College Pennsylvania, and Oxford Mississippi.

What kind of civilization would emerge from a bunch of academics surrounded by toxic nuclear waste?

Well, if it’s a high value target list it is clear why they’re not targeted.

Cugel the Clever
Apr 5, 2009
I LOVE AMERICA AND CAPITALISM DESPITE BEING POOR AS FUCK. I WILL NEVER RETIRE BUT HERE'S ANOTHER 200$ FOR UKRAINE, SLAVA

Fivemarks posted:

Let the world die in a pyre of nuclear hellfire, if that is what it takes to do the right thing. If modern civilization requires that we sit back and let genocides and war crimes happen because "We can't stop them because the perpetrator might throw a nuclear temper tantrum," then modern civilization deserves to die.

fknlo
Jul 6, 2009


Fun Shoe
That map doesn't even have Whiteman AFB on it. Even if it was put out before the B-2's were there it had an ICBM command wing at it and there were silos all around central Missouri so it would have 100% been a target.

Dolash
Oct 23, 2008

aNYWAY,
tHAT'S REALLY ALL THERE IS,
tO REPORT ON THE SUBJECT,
oF ME GETTING HURT,


Fivemarks posted:

Let the world die in a pyre of nuclear hellfire, if that is what it takes to do the right thing.

This is a joke, right?

Spoggerific
May 28, 2009
Hasn't that map been posted in the current events thread before and people determined it was just a list of population centers and maybe a couple of military bases sprinkled in?

Fivemarks
Feb 21, 2015

Dolash posted:

This is a joke, right?

Not in the slightest. Why would you think "Do the right thing, regardless of the consequences" is a joke?

Dolash
Oct 23, 2008

aNYWAY,
tHAT'S REALLY ALL THERE IS,
tO REPORT ON THE SUBJECT,
oF ME GETTING HURT,


Fivemarks posted:

Not in the slightest. Why would you think "Do the right thing, regardless of the consequences" is a joke?

Probably because if the right thing knowingly leads to the destruction of the entire world, it's inherently not the right thing? Try explaining to the vast majority of people around the world just trying to get by that because of events very far from them that they have no power over and barely any knowledge of, they all need to die.

Lemniscate Blue
Apr 21, 2006

Here we go again.

Fivemarks
Feb 21, 2015

Dolash posted:

Probably because if the right thing knowingly leads to the destruction of the entire world, it's inherently not the right thing? Try explaining to the vast majority of people around the world just trying to get by that because of events very far from them that they have no power over and barely any knowledge of, they all need to die.

Right or wrong isn't determined by popularity.

Dolash
Oct 23, 2008

aNYWAY,
tHAT'S REALLY ALL THERE IS,
tO REPORT ON THE SUBJECT,
oF ME GETTING HURT,


Fivemarks posted:

Right or wrong isn't determined by popularity.

It was mainly meant as an exercise to help you imagine the vast majority of people out there uninvolved in the conflict who'd be killed by the decision. Deciding to put yourself or people you represent into harm's way for the right thing is very different than deciding to involve everyone, everywhere, mainly as collateral damage.

Midjack
Dec 24, 2007



Crab Dad posted:

A civilian facility.
Sounds the average Russian target.

If it still has a nice big runway suitable for bombers or executive transports it probably gets a RV or two flipped at it.

shame on an IGA
Apr 8, 2005

Qtotonibudinibudet posted:

bonus is that they take out florida too!



love how the threat modellers for the 2000 warhead scenario had already run out of obvious targets and just went "uhhhh... mark all the big power plants and IDK just dump the other 1200 on the silo fields"

Rust Martialis
May 8, 2007

At night, Bavovnyatko quietly comes to the occupiers’ bases, depots, airfields, oil refineries and other places full of flammable items and starts playing with fire there

Midjack posted:

If it still has a nice big runway suitable for bombers or executive transports it probably gets a RV or two flipped at it.

Intercontinental Ballistic Winnebagos

Raerlynn
Oct 28, 2007

Sorry I'm late, I'm afraid I got lost on the path of life.

Fivemarks posted:

Right or wrong isn't determined by popularity.

Let me help you here:

It's very kind of you to unilaterally decide that billions of people uninvolved in this conflict should perish to satisfy your moral purity test.

Morality isn't an absolute.

Raerlynn fucked around with this message at 19:03 on Jul 3, 2023

Comrade Blyatlov
Aug 4, 2007


should have picked four fingers





Dolash posted:

It was mainly meant as an exercise to help you imagine the vast majority of people out there uninvolved in the conflict who'd be killed by the decision. Deciding to put yourself or people you represent into harm's way for the right thing is very different than deciding to involve everyone, everywhere, mainly as collateral damage.

Hail SS-18 Satan, may his passing cleanse the earth

M_Gargantua
Oct 16, 2006

STOMP'N ON INTO THE POWERLINES

Exciting Lemon
If you accept that we can't fight Russia because they have nuclear weapons than you are both a coward and a fool. If you don't stop them then the whole international order falls apart. This has already been a nightmare for nuclear disarmament efforts.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Fivemarks
Feb 21, 2015
Its better to stand with your principles and support Ukraine, rather than give them up because a jumped up schoolyard bully is threatening you.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply