Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
kronix
Jul 1, 2004

Ernie Muppari posted:

really the problem is that we're all just deeply sinful and don't have enough faith in the holy process to vote every sunday and donate when the collection email gets passed around

What do you think the French would be doing if their government nakedly attacked students like this?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



People who go into a car dealership and tell the car salesperson that they are going to buy the car no matter what before any negotiations have taken place are terrible negotiators.

They already have your peaceful participation in society. They already have your vote. They already have your donations. You have already given them away for free to prove that you are a moral citizen.

Why should they listen to your demands. You have no influence. You have no power as far as they are concerned. You have already given that up to prove that you better than non-voters and chuds.

There Bias Two
Jan 13, 2009
I'm not a good person

Jon Pod Van Damm posted:

People who go into a car dealership and tell the car salesperson that they are going to buy the car no matter what before any negotiations have taken place are terrible negotiators.

They already have your peaceful participation in society. They already have your vote. They already have your donations. You have already given them away for free to prove that you are a moral citizen.

Why should they listen to your demands. You have no influence. You have no power as far as they are concerned. You have already given that up to prove that you better than non-voters and chuds.

This is a terrible analogy because it implies that the person going into the car dealership has the option to walk away. The car dealership knows that the person you're going to get a ride home with instead is high on meth and likely to drive you right off a bridge.

FilthyImp
Sep 30, 2002

Anime Deviant
Hillary's loss sure did push the Dems further left. Yes, all the support for AOC and similar upstart firebrands. Bernie 2020

World War Mammories
Aug 25, 2006


There Bias Two posted:

This is a terrible analogy because it implies that the person going into the car dealership has the option to walk away. The car dealership knows that the person you're going to get a ride home with instead is high on meth and likely to drive you right off a bridge.

what if you walked or took the bus or called an uber

anyway for this situation I agree with lawrence o’donnell
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqRNnIMDkUY

Serious_Cyclone
Oct 25, 2017

I appreciate your patience, this is a tricky maneuver

kronix posted:

Loans were always starting again, it was already announced Biden “gave” that away so Republicans could wave it around so we could pass the debt ceiling.

While I agree with most of what you've said, I'll point out that this concession was part of a deal that included the House agreeing to not trim budgets beyond FY2022 spending limits, which the House has already reversed course on. So as far as I'm aware, this deal is defunct with the exception of the debt limit increase and Biden cannot reasonably be held to any concession he made to get the bill passed. If anything, he should feel an obligation to claw all of his concessions back immediately.

spacetoaster
Feb 10, 2014

hot cocoa on the couch posted:

biden is workong harder than ever. every day he wakes up and battles republicans bitterly and viciously for the rights of the American People. and you all trash talk him? hes literally done everything he can. hes used every tool in his arsenal to do what he totally wanted to do for students, and that is cancel a small portion of their debt. and guess what? hes still going to find a way to do it, even though you ungrateful fucks dont desrrve it. that's how hard joe biden works defending the American Working Man and Student, and you spit in his face. you all disgust me

Amen.

Biden's doing the best he can.

HonorableTB
Dec 22, 2006

Serious_Cyclone posted:

While I agree with most of what you've said, I'll point out that this concession was part of a deal that included the House agreeing to not trim budgets beyond FY2022 spending limits, which the House has already reversed course on. So as far as I'm aware, this deal is defunct with the exception of the debt limit increase and Biden cannot reasonably be held to any concession he made to get the bill passed. If anything, he should feel an obligation to claw all of his concessions back immediately.

Sorry jack that would go against :decorum: and backtracking on your word is what Republicans do and hey fat, when they go low we go high, vote blue!

Serious_Cyclone
Oct 25, 2017

I appreciate your patience, this is a tricky maneuver

HonorableTB posted:

Sorry jack that would go against :decorum: and backtracking on your word is what Republicans do and hey fat, when they go low we go high, vote blue!

Yeah, it's another component of "there's no reason to blame Biden for things that he didn't do when there are plenty of things to blame him for that he actually did, right here, right this second". There isn't much the President can do about an untethered SCOTUS operating as a rogue agency that doesn't fall into ":byodood: just dictator it!" territory, but if Biden has EO authority over the student loan pause then there's nothing stopping him from keeping the pause going at-least until the budget has been finalized and it is clear that the House kept up its end of the bargain. And not doing that is a bonafide failure of the administration.

Turkey Farts
Jan 4, 2013

He wanted people back in repayment at the height of the pandemic when everyone was lucky to make rent. It's no surprise that the majority of borrowers are now being herded back into the stable.

HonorableTB
Dec 22, 2006
just let it all collapse already, what comes next has to be better than this poo poo

if not then oh well i'll be dead and it wont matter, still a net improvement over this hell

Neito
Feb 18, 2009

😌Finally, an avatar the describes my love of tech❤️‍💻, my love of anime💖🎎, and why I'll never see a real girl 🙆‍♀️naked😭.

There's at least the murmurs of organizing for a mass default strike. Not sure how I feel about that; not morally, I think it's a morally justified and good idea at this point, but pragmatically it's a huge risk, in that if it accomplishes nothing a large portion of people are going to gently caress themselves over. Very Prisoner's Dilema.

HonorableTB
Dec 22, 2006

Neito posted:

There's at least the murmurs of organizing for a mass default strike. Not sure how I feel about that; not morally, I think it's a morally justified and good idea at this point, but pragmatically it's a huge risk, in that if it accomplishes nothing a large portion of people are going to gently caress themselves over. Very Prisoner's Dilema.

meh, if you're hosed anyway might as well do what you can to take the system with you. the thing about pragmatism is that it is only applicable when people have something to lose

rally
Nov 19, 2002

yospos
Lol at the idea of defaulting on my debt in hopes everyone else is stupid enough to do the same thing AND it would have any impact whatsoever.

Raldikuk
Apr 7, 2006

I'm bad with money and I want that meatball!

Neito posted:

There's at least the murmurs of organizing for a mass default strike. Not sure how I feel about that; not morally, I think it's a morally justified and good idea at this point, but pragmatically it's a huge risk, in that if it accomplishes nothing a large portion of people are going to gently caress themselves over. Very Prisoner's Dilema.

With the new SAVE plans coming through why not. Sure all that interest will accrue but it isn't like we are paying these dumb things off just waiting for 20 years of payments. Not that it would do anything because the government will continue to pay servicers but they do get less per loan once it hits delinquency.....

HonorableTB
Dec 22, 2006

Raldikuk posted:

With the new SAVE plans coming through why not. Sure all that interest will accrue but it isn't like we are paying these dumb things off just waiting for 20 years of payments. Not that it would do anything because the government will continue to pay servicers but they do get less per loan once it hits delinquency.....

Lol I've been paying on student loans for ten years, I'm only halfway there to the 20 year forgiveness... Assuming it actually works and I'm eligible and isn't repealed and the government actually honors it and and and

Cpt_Obvious
Jun 18, 2007

look, guys, I just got off the phone with Joe Biden and he has promised to write a strongly worded editorial in the New York Times.

He is doing all he can.

ScRoTo TuRbOtUrD
Jan 21, 2007

I paid my student loans off and i also live in a turbomansion

MSB3000
Jul 30, 2008

HonorableTB posted:

just let it all collapse already, what comes next has to be better than this poo poo

if not then oh well i'll be dead and it wont matter, still a net improvement over this hell

Anyone who thinks a total collapse would quickly lead to something better and not INSTANT fascism is naive. Please.

Uneducated masses, aka most people, turn to fascism when things get dire, because fascism provides easy answers to scary problems, and lets people ignore that social and national problems are very complicated and without easy solutions, actually.

For all the many and severe problems we experience today, it can always be way worse. The transformation to something better has to use what we have now as a foundation.

Maed
Aug 23, 2006


MSB3000 posted:

Anyone who thinks a total collapse would quickly lead to something better and not INSTANT fascism is naive. Please.

Uneducated masses, aka most people, turn to fascism when things get dire, because fascism provides easy answers to scary problems, and lets people ignore that social and national problems are very complicated and without easy solutions, actually.

For all the many and severe problems we experience today, it can always be way worse. The transformation to something better has to use what we have now as a foundation.

drat you really really hate poor people, what did they ever do to you?

HonorableTB
Dec 22, 2006

MSB3000 posted:

Anyone who thinks a total collapse would quickly lead to something better and not INSTANT fascism is naive. Please.

Uneducated masses, aka most people, turn to fascism when things get dire, because fascism provides easy answers to scary problems, and lets people ignore that social and national problems are very complicated and without easy solutions, actually.

For all the many and severe problems we experience today, it can always be way worse. The transformation to something better has to use what we have now as a foundation.

Idk if you've noticed or not but things don't need to collapse entirely to lead to fascism because, uh, fascism is already on the rise everywhere.

Raiad
Feb 1, 2005

Without the law, there wouldn't be lawyers.


collapsing will lead to fascism, participating in democracy in a way that includes more than a single choice will lead to fascism, continuing on our current path and electing democrats to lead our fascism-inclined system will lead to fascism...

maybe that's really just what america is all about

I. M. Gei
Jun 26, 2005

CHIEFS

BITCH



Isn't Mexico also super fascist?

LanceHunter
Nov 12, 2016

Beautiful People Club


Maed posted:

drat you really really hate poor people, what did they ever do to you?

drat you must really hate poor people to automatically equate uneducated with poor, particularly when the uneducated people who are turning hardest to fascism are often middle class.

buglord
Jul 31, 2010

Cheating at a raffle? I sentence you to 1 year in jail! No! Two years! Three! Four! Five years! Ah! Ah! Ah! Ah!

Buglord
Cross posting my question from the other thread since this one seems to be active.

Phone posting so sorry for the lack of formatting

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing...loan-borrowers/

“Forgive loan balances after 10 years of payments, instead of 20 years, for borrowers with original loan balances of $12,000 or less. The Department estimates that this reform will allow nearly all community college borrowers to be debt-free within 10 years”

So does this mean, no matter how low I bring down my balance (15k currently), I’ll never get my loans automatically forgiven based on time because they were above 12k at some point? My first federal loan was dispensed in 2014, last in 2017, so I’m curious what it all means, or if I’m being too hopeful here.

HonorableTB
Dec 22, 2006

LanceHunter posted:

drat you must really hate poor people to automatically equate uneducated with poor, particularly when the uneducated people who are turning hardest to fascism are often middle class.

are you not aware that level of education is second only to race as one of the most influential factors in determining income and earnings potential or

Raiad
Feb 1, 2005

Without the law, there wouldn't be lawyers.


whole lotta people just thoughtlessly equating certification bullshit from borderline (and frequently just plain) white supremacist institutions with education and knowledge up in this place

KIT HAGS
Jun 5, 2007
Stay sweet
I’ve been trying to read through articles but some either don’t mention graduate loans or only indicate that the low income part is not applicable to graduate loans. Will grad loans be impacted by the repayment plans? I think I remember reading that what counts as discretionary income will change but my eyes are glazing over at this point.

MSB3000
Jul 30, 2008

HonorableTB posted:

Idk if you've noticed or not but things don't need to collapse entirely to lead to fascism because, uh, fascism is already on the rise everywhere.

Not really what I said, but okay: fascism could come quickly, slowly, or not at all. If a collapse happens tomorrow, we'd see full fascism by the end of the day. The fact it's coming slowly is better than it coming quickly; fascism is inherently unstable and the longer it takes to come the less powerful it's going to be overall. Fascists naturally eat each other, just look at Trump and DeSantis.

Don't get me wrong, I 100% think things need to change drastically and soon. But wishing for a collapse is just wishing for fascism.

Edit: Oh, and I'm not convinced a fascist future is a certainty anyway. Honestly that's just doomer-brained hopeless stupidity.

MSB3000 fucked around with this message at 05:45 on Jul 4, 2023

Animal-Mother
Feb 14, 2012

RABBIT RABBIT
RABBIT RABBIT

MSB3000 posted:

Uneducated masses, aka most people, turn to fascism when things get dire

Not historically. Or currently. Fascism is capitalism's panicked reaction to socialism.

Literally A Person
Jan 1, 1970

Smugworth Wuz Here
Student loans? Pfft.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

KIT HAGS posted:

I’ve been trying to read through articles but some either don’t mention graduate loans or only indicate that the low income part is not applicable to graduate loans. Will grad loans be impacted by the repayment plans? I think I remember reading that what counts as discretionary income will change but my eyes are glazing over at this point.

Grad loans get all the new benefits of the IDR plans (new minimum of 225% FPL/Roughly $34k as "mandatory income" that doesn't count towards your discretionary count, the excess interest being covered, etc.), but grad loans don't get the new cap of 5% of discretionary income and are capped at 10%. If you have both grad and undergrad loans, then they do a weighted average for discretionary income percentage.

Ex:

- You have 50% undergrad and 50% grad = 7.5% of discretionary income.

- You have 90% undergrad and 10% grad = 5.1% of discretionary income.

The Slack Lagoon
Jun 17, 2008



Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Grad loans get all the new benefits of the IDR plans (new minimum of 225% FPL/Roughly $34k as "mandatory income" that doesn't count towards your discretionary count, the excess interest being covered, etc.), but grad loans don't get the new cap of 5% of discretionary income and are capped at 10%. If you have both grad and undergrad loans, then they do a weighted average for discretionary income percentage.

Ex:

- You have 50% undergrad and 50% grad = 7.5% of discretionary income.

- You have 90% undergrad and 10% grad = 5.1% of discretionary income.

What if you've consolidated grad and undergrad loans?

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

The Slack Lagoon posted:

What if you've consolidated grad and undergrad loans?

It's a weighted average of the loan balances when you consolidated.

Cpt_Obvious
Jun 18, 2007

I'm going to loan the weight of my nuts into your mouth.

No. 6
Jun 30, 2002

Another win for never completing university

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
They just finalized the IDR rules and added some new details about how it works.

Here's the new fact sheet with the information on the finalized rules. The payment stuff is all the same, but there are a lot of new things regarding how they calculate payments, new plans for the DoE to automatically enroll people who miss payments into IDR plans instead of defaulting, the DoE implementing a new program to automatically check your income each year and not require you to re-certify every year, and some other things.

https://www2.ed.gov/policy/highered/reg/hearulemaking/2021/idrfactsheetfinal.pdf

The new IDR plan is officially called the "SAVE Plan" and is fully replacing the existing REPAYE plan. They are also phasing out existing income-based repayment plans to eventually have everyone with income-based repayment plans on the new IDR/SAVE plan.

Important bits:

quote:

Today, the U.S. Department of Education (Department) released final regulations on its new income-driven repayment (IDR) plan, which will provide student loan borrowers with the most affordable repayment plan ever. The SAVE plan will cut payments on undergraduate loans in half compared to other IDR plans, ensure that borrowers never see their balance grow as long as they keep up with their required payments, and protect more of a borrower’s income for basic needs. Under the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) plan, a single borrower who makes less than $15 an hour will not have to make any payments. Borrowers earning above that amount would save more than $1,000 a year on their payments compared to other IDR plans.

The SAVE plan, which is available to student borrowers with a Direct Loan in good standing, will replace the existing Revised Pay-As-You-Earn (REPAYE) plan which is the most generous existing IDR plan for most borrowers. Borrowers who are already on the REPAYE plan will be automatically enrolled in the SAVE plan and see their payments automatically adjust with no action on their part. While the Department makes this transition, borrowers may see the names REPAYE and SAVE used interchangeably. Borrowers can sign up for the SAVE/REPAYE plan today by visiting StudentAid.gov/IDR. By law, the regulations will go fully into effect on July 1, 2024. But the Department will implement three critical benefits this summer before the student loan payment pause ends:

• The amount of income protected from payments on the SAVE plan will rise from 150 percent to 225 percent of the Federal poverty guidelines (FPL). This change means a single borrower who earns less than $32,805 a year ($67,500 for a family of four) will not have to make payments. As a result, we estimate that more than 1 million additional low-income borrowers will qualify for a $0 payment, including 400,000 who are already enrolled on the REPAYE plan and will see this benefit applied automatically. This will allow them to focus on food, rent, and other basic needs instead of loan payments. Borrowers not eligible for a $0 payment will save at least $1,000 a year compared to the current REPAYE plan. A single borrower would save $91 a month on payments ($1,080 a year), while a family of four would save $187 ($2,244 a year).

• The Department will stop charging any monthly interest not covered by the borrower’s payment on the SAVE plan. As a result, borrowers who pay what they owe on this plan will no longer see their loans grow due to unpaid interest. We estimate that 70 percent of borrowers who were on IDR plan before the payment pause would stand to benefit from this change.

• Married borrowers who file their taxes separately will no longer be required to include their spouse’s income in their payment calculation for SAVE. These borrowers will also have their spouse excluded from their family size when calculating IDR payments, simplifying the choice of repayment plan for borrowers. 2 Borrowers will see the following additional benefits that reduce monthly and lifetime payments when the SAVE plan is fully implemented next July:

• Payments on undergraduate loans will be cut in half (from 10% to 5% of incomes above 225% of FPL). Borrowers who have undergraduate and graduate loans will pay a weighted average of between 5% and 10% of their income based upon the original principal balances of their loans.2 For example, a single undergraduate borrower making $50,000 a year would see their payments fall a further $72 a month, bringing their total reduction on the SAVE plan to $163 a month.

• Borrowers whose original principal balances were $12,000 or less will receive forgiveness after 120 payments (the equivalent of 10 years in repayment), with an additional 12 payments added for each additional $1,000 borrowed above that level, up to a maximum of 20 or 25 years. Current IDR plans require all borrowers, even those who only attended school for a single term, to repay their loans for at least 20 or 25 years before receiving forgiveness of any outstanding balance. This change will make IDR a more attractive option for borrowers who would otherwise struggle the most to repay their loans, including those with low balances and those who left college before completing their program. Additionally, the final rule will make it easier for borrowers to navigate repayment by eliminating common pitfalls to forgiveness and protecting at risk borrowers. This includes the following changes, which will take effect when the rule is fully implemented:

• Borrowers who go 75 days without making a payment will be automatically enrolled in the SAVE plan if they have previously provided approval for the disclosure of their Federal tax information to the Department.

• Borrowers in default will gain access to the existing income-based repayment (IBR) plan, allowing them to access lower payments and accumulate progress toward forgiveness while they work to exit default. Borrowers in default who provide income information that shows they would have had a $0 payment at the time of default will be automatically moved to good standing, allowing them to access the SAVE plan.

• Borrowers will receive credit toward forgiveness on certain deferments including those related to unemployment, cancer treatment, and military service. Going forward, borrowers will also receive credit for certain forbearances such as those related to natural disasters. This will eliminate many common pitfalls that can make it harder for borrowers to successfully navigate repayment.

• Borrowers who end up in a deferment or forbearance that is not counted toward forgiveness (other than in-school deferment) will have up to three years to make additional payments based upon their current IDR payment to receive credit toward forgiveness for those periods.

• Borrowers will receive credit for payments made prior to a consolidation based upon a weighted average of the principal balances in the loans being consolidated rather than having their progress toward forgiveness reset.

quote:

Estimated effects of the SAVE Plan

The benefits of the SAVE plan will be particularly critical for low- and middle-income borrowers, community college students, and borrowers who work in public service. Overall, the Department estimates3 that the plan will have the following effects for future cohorts of borrowers compared to the existing REPAYE plan:

• Borrowers will see their total payments per dollar borrowed fall by 40%.

• Borrowers with the lowest projected lifetime earnings will see payments per dollar borrowed fall by 83%, while those in the top would only see a 5% reduction.

• A typical graduate of a four-year public university will save nearly $2,000 a year.

• A first-year teacher with a bachelor’s degree will see a two-third reduction in total payments, saving more than $17,000, while pursuing Public Service Loan Forgiveness.

• 85% of community college borrowers will be debt-free within 10 years.

• On average, Black, Hispanic, American Indian and Alaska Native borrowers will see their total lifetime payments per dollar borrowed cut in half.

quote:

For undergraduate loans, cut in half the amount that borrowers have to pay each month from 10% to 5% of discretionary income.

Raise the amount of income that is considered non-discretionary income and therefore is protected from repayment, guaranteeing that no borrower earning under 225% of the federal poverty level—about the annual equivalent of a $15 minimum wage for a single borrower—will have to make a monthly payment.

Forgive loan balances after 10 years of payments, instead of 20 years, for borrowers with original loan balances of $12,000 or less. The Department of Education estimates that this reform will allow nearly all community college borrowers to be debt-free within 10 years.

Cover the borrower’s unpaid monthly interest, so that unlike other existing income-driven repayment plans, no borrower’s loan balance will grow as long as they make their monthly payments—even when that monthly payment is $0 because their income is low.

quote:

These reforms would simplify loan repayment and deliver significant savings to low- and middle-income borrowers. For example:

A typical single construction worker (making $38,000 a year) with a construction management credential would pay only $31 a month, compared to the $147 they pay now under the most recent income-driven repayment plan, for annual savings of nearly $1,400.

A typical single public school teacher with an undergraduate degree (making $44,000 a year) would pay only $56 a month on their loans, compared to the $197 they pay now under the most recent income-driven repayment plan, for annual savings of nearly $1,700.

A typical nurse (making $77,000 a year) who is married with two kids would pay only $61 a month on their undergraduate loans, compared to the $295 they pay now under the most recent income-driven repayment plan, for annual savings of more than $2,800.

quote:

For each of these borrowers, their balances would not grow as long as they are making their monthly payments, and their remaining debt would be forgiven after they make the required number of qualifying payments.

Further, the Department of Education will make it easier for borrowers who enroll in this new plan to stay enrolled. Starting in the summer of 2023, borrowers will be able to allow the Department of Education to automatically pull their income information year after year, avoiding the hassle of needing to recertify their income annually.

skooma512
Feb 8, 2012

You couldn't grok my race car, but you dug the roadside blur.

Raiad posted:

collapsing will lead to fascism, participating in democracy in a way that includes more than a single choice will lead to fascism, continuing on our current path and electing democrats to lead our fascism-inclined system will lead to fascism...

maybe that's really just what america is all about

Yup, fascism is a reaction to socialism, and the US fully took up the mantle of reaction from Nazi Germany after WW2. If geopolitics didn't intervene, the US would have happily been fascist itself. It had de jure apartheid until 1965 and US troops demanded apartheid be in effect in random UK pubs because they were there now, spreading freedom and democracy. Korematsu is still on the books and I fully expect that should China and the US go to war, I will be going into a camp, and I'm not even Chinese. When the Kent State shooting happened, the national guard enjoyed a 70-80% approval rating for their actions.

JackBandit
Jun 6, 2011
The IDR plan sounds great. The thing about IDR being calculated only on one spouse’s income if you file separately is nice because my wife is going for PSLF and (relatedly) makes a low salary, while I’ll just be paying off my loans regularly.

If we file separately for that, should we put our kids as dependents on her return? I’ll ask an accountant, just curious if anyone has any guesses.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

hot cocoa on the couch
Dec 8, 2009

are we really gonna let leon get away with posting about anotehr student loan thing......

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply