Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: weg, Toxic Mental)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
zone
Dec 6, 2016

OctaMurk posted:

scott ritter also loooves hosting douglas macgregor, who has been predicting ukraine's imminent defeat for 500 days and recently claimed that the russians destroyed 9 ukrainiam brigade hqs and killed a thousand officers as well as hundreds of NATO officers in a single night of strikes

And a few days ago he said it was over and that POCCNR destroyed the entire Ukrainian army in Zaporizhzhia. :lol:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

shadow puppet of a
Jan 10, 2007

NO TENGO SCORPIO


If you divide 500 days into discrete de-naziing three day segments then that is a spectacular number of defeats suffered by Ukraine and they should reverse-retreat into that gross nippley bit of Poland that protrudes into natural Rus lands by the Slovak border that several prominent body doubles assure you they have no interest in conquering until 2031.

HonorableTB
Dec 22, 2006


Russia fired a Tor SAM at a... Quadcopter... And missed.. Lmao

Nice look at a 9K331 missile as it zooms by though. Not sure how much the missile itself costs but the Tor system itself is $25 million per unit. The quadcopter is about $400

Sedgr
Sep 16, 2007

Neat!

Putin is a real piece of poo poo.

And he is losing.

KakerMix
Apr 8, 2004

8.2 M.P.G.
:byetankie:

Sedgr posted:

Putin is a real piece of poo poo.

And he is losing.

That's what losers do.

CommissarMega
Nov 18, 2008

THUNDERDOME LOSER
One might say he's losing his poo poo.

El Jebus
Jun 18, 2008

This avatar is paid for by "Avatars for improving Lowtax's spine by any means that doesn't result in him becoming brain dead by putting his brain into a cyborg body and/or putting him in a exosuit due to fears of the suit being hacked and crushing him during a cyberpunk future timeline" Foundation

bunnyofdoom posted:

gently caress at this point, I expect Russia to compound bad decisions by saying they need to take the fight to NATO, invade Alaska, make it down to the Yukon and have just like, a dozen pissed off drunk Canadian hunters kill them all.

They wouldn't make it through Alaska.

tiaz
Jul 1, 2004

PICK UP THAT PRESENT.


Zelensky's Zealots

El Jebus posted:

They wouldn't make it through Alaska.

They wouldn't make it to Alaska, have you seen their navy?

MrQwerty
Apr 15, 2003

LOVE IS BEAUTIFUL
(づ ̄ ³ ̄)づ♥(‘∀’●)

tiaz posted:

They wouldn't make it to Alaska, have you seen their navy?

their navy would be lucky to make it past Kodiak

El Jebus
Jun 18, 2008

This avatar is paid for by "Avatars for improving Lowtax's spine by any means that doesn't result in him becoming brain dead by putting his brain into a cyborg body and/or putting him in a exosuit due to fears of the suit being hacked and crushing him during a cyberpunk future timeline" Foundation

tiaz posted:

They wouldn't make it to Alaska, have you seen their navy?

Good point!

beer_war
Mar 10, 2005

HonorableTB posted:



Russia fired a Tor SAM at a... Quadcopter... And missed.. Lmao

Nice look at a 9K331 missile as it zooms by though. Not sure how much the missile itself costs but the Tor system itself is $25 million per unit. The quadcopter is about $400

Private Conscriptovich isn't paying for the missile. He gets a bonus for every UAV he shoots down, though.

Tarquinn
Jul 3, 2007

I know I’ve made some very poor decisions recently, but I can give you
my complete assurance that my work will be back to normal.
Hell Gem

HonorableTB posted:



Russia fired a Tor SAM at a... Quadcopter... And missed.. Lmao

Nice look at a 9K331 missile as it zooms by though. Not sure how much the missile itself costs but the Tor system itself is $25 million per unit. The quadcopter is about $400

The little missile that could not.

Drone_Fragger
May 9, 2007


beer_war posted:

Private Conscriptovich isn't paying for the missile. He gets a bonus for every UAV he shoots down, though.

Its actually very funny to me every nation withdrew all their outdated aa guns from service in lieu of AA missles, only to 10 years later need to re-develop it all when countries realised shooting a 500 dollar drone with a 250k missle isnt economically feasible.

zone
Dec 6, 2016

Drone_Fragger posted:

Its actually very funny to me every nation withdrew all their outdated aa guns from service in lieu of AA missles, only to 10 years later need to re-develop it all when countries realised shooting a 500 dollar drone with a 250k missle isnt economically feasible.

It's that, or invest even more heavily into EW systems. And while America's top of the line EW systems are certainly capable, it again comes down to cost/benefit, and those aren't an option to anyone but America in any case.

The Lone Badger
Sep 24, 2007

I honestly expect to see anti-drone lasers in a couple of decades. They're fragile enough that the power you can put out is adequate, and it makes it easy to hit.

Warbadger
Jun 17, 2006

Drone_Fragger posted:

Its actually very funny to me every nation withdrew all their outdated aa guns from service in lieu of AA missles, only to 10 years later need to re-develop it all when countries realised shooting a 500 dollar drone with a 250k missle isnt economically feasible.

Russia didn't withdraw their AA gun as the Tunguska and Pantsir both have cannons. It just turns out that a cloud of 100's of contact fused 30mm rounds isn't a great option either. Neither is a radar/fire control system meant to shoot down full sized fixed wing or helicopters.

Most of the new generation of gun based shorad is about taking a lower rate of fire cannon and giving it a really good sensor suite, smart ammo, and fire control system. Usually in a comparatively light package.

spankmeister
Jun 15, 2008






The Lone Badger posted:

I honestly expect to see anti-drone lasers in a couple of decades. They're fragile enough that the power you can put out is adequate, and it makes it easy to hit.

Agreed but like a decade max.

Zero VGS
Aug 16, 2002
ASK ME ABOUT HOW HUMAN LIVES THAT MADE VIDEO GAME CONTROLLERS ARE WORTH MORE
Lipstick Apathy

TulliusCicero posted:

:lol:

This is loving Russian Trump speak, holy poo poo

PUTIN: Did you say "Putin?"

tiaz
Jul 1, 2004

PICK UP THAT PRESENT.


Zelensky's Zealots

spankmeister posted:

Agreed but like a decade max.

Yeah, prototypes already exist and you can find ads for them on youtube. On the back of this conflict I'm sure those programs will be well funded even if it just winds up being for FOB/airbase defense and poo poo like that rather than trench network #43572.

Gomez Chamberlain
Mar 22, 2005

Subakh ul kuhar!

XYZAB posted:

Seeing that exploded ordnance view makes me wonder why they couldn't also mount a sidewinder to the tip of the vertical stabilizer just like they do at the tip of each wing.

I can answer this. It’s because it’s a very bad idea when you have such a large angle occluded by the firing aircraft. Also, it’s a lot of drag. The tip-launched sidewinders get clear quicker than a further-back rail and it would absolutely gently caress your corner speeds if not smack into the bubble canopy, killing you without even detonating.

Big advantage of the Viper is its ability to pull G’s because of the pilot’s more reclined position. You can pull 8G’s in a Viper much easier than you can in an F-15 or an F/A-18 because of the reclined seat. It’s a fantastic plane. Not that ACM is a feature of this war at all but the Viper loving rules.

aniviron
Sep 11, 2014

Gomez Chamberlain posted:

Big advantage of the Viper is its ability to pull G’s because of the pilot’s more reclined position. You can pull 8G’s in a Viper much easier than you can in an F-15 or an F/A-18 because of the reclined seat. It’s a fantastic plane. Not that ACM is a feature of this war at all but the Viper loving rules.

Stressful viewing, but you can watch an F-16 pilot evade SAMs in the gulf. Anecdotes and all, but this was without chaff, apparently.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUjX1RntqVw

Bluemillion
Aug 18, 2008

I got your dispensers
right here

HonorableTB posted:



Russia fired a Tor SAM at a... Quadcopter... And missed.. Lmao

Nice look at a 9K331 missile as it zooms by though. Not sure how much the missile itself costs but the Tor system itself is $25 million per unit. The quadcopter is about $400

How much does the HIMARS rocket launched at the confirmed air defense location cost?

zone
Dec 6, 2016

Bluemillion posted:

How much does the HIMARS rocket launched at the confirmed air defense location cost?

I think each missile cost about 20-25k.

Scarodactyl
Oct 22, 2015


tiaz posted:

Yeah, prototypes already exist and you can find ads for them on youtube.
Let's see
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6FbUiiwutQ
Yup

zone
Dec 6, 2016


CannonFodder
Jan 26, 2001

Passion’s Wrench

Der Kyhe posted:

There is nothing inherently wrong on giving out "whatever you have left in the armory", especially if its automatic or semi-auto, if you have nothing else to give to your third line infantry patrolling supply routes and other secondary locations. But we are talking about Russia, the country famous for AK assault rifles that every anarchist, pirate, guerrilla, rebel, or cartel enforcer seems to have at least one always around.

So the Russian government has been pouring untold amount of money to setting up their fake countries, and cannot even get them some rusted AK-47's from the late-40's early 50's stock. No, they are the ones dishing the Lend Lease-rejects or stuff that no-one wanted to buy at the black market. This raises the question of how they are going to arm their troops in case they do actually start mobilization, if they run out of assault rifles around "half a million served"?

I earlier said that they will never run out of 50's and 60's gear in general because no-one with money to buy something didn't want to buy them, but its starting to look like I am wrong about that.
They would be better off selling the lend lease Thompsons to collectors and using that money to buy back stuff from the countries aligned with the USSR. Even with the black market taking a severe cut of the profits it would at least be something the army would know how to use and would likely have the ammo for.

Like where are they getting the .45 caliber imperial unit ammo to use in a Tommy? I guess they could retool an ammo manufacturing plant to make them but that just means less 7.62 being made.



edit: I guess you already talked about it, but I just wanted to chime in and say how dumb it all is.

CannonFodder fucked around with this message at 09:03 on Jul 14, 2023

boofhead
Feb 18, 2021


Prigozhin seized the nuclear sub fleet while everyone was watching the march on Moscow. he's already half colonised Antarctica with his all-male army of convict settlers, and 200 years from now their parthenogenetic descendants will make the internet so thoroughly unpleasant that the whole world unanimously decides to switch it off and go back to reading shampoo labels on the shitter

NihilCredo
Jun 6, 2011

iram omni possibili modo preme:
plus una illa te diffamabit, quam multæ virtutes commendabunt

Warbadger posted:

Russia didn't withdraw their AA gun as the Tunguska and Pantsir both have cannons. It just turns out that a cloud of 100's of contact fused 30mm rounds isn't a great option either. Neither is a radar/fire control system meant to shoot down full sized fixed wing or helicopters.

Most of the new generation of gun based shorad is about taking a lower rate of fire cannon and giving it a really good sensor suite, smart ammo, and fire control system. Usually in a comparatively light package.

Wouldn't going back to old-style timed fuzes be quite effective against drones? Much like early 20th century aircraft, they are slow, fragile, and fly at low altitude, so I would guess they can be taken down by airbursts pretty well? The fancy sensor suite you mentioned will be needed to spot and target the drat thing, but the ammunition ought to be as cheap as possible.

I guess if Raytheon actually puts into production that laser-based system of theirs, that would be the winner. Surely it'll be expensive as hell to buy and maintain, but it ought to shoot down swarms of even Mavics for a negligible marginal cost.

/armchair

CannonFodder
Jan 26, 2001

Passion’s Wrench

bunnyofdoom posted:

gently caress at this point, I expect Russia to compound bad decisions by saying they need to take the fight to NATO, invade Alaska, make it down to the Yukon and have just like, a dozen pissed off drunk Canadian hunters kill them all.
They would never make it to the Yukon.


The moose would destroy them.


Yes moose is the plural of moose so I could say the moose army but perhaps it's just one at this rate.

CannonFodder
Jan 26, 2001

Passion’s Wrench

The Lone Badger posted:

I honestly expect to see anti-drone lasers in a couple of decades. They're fragile enough that the power you can put out is adequate, and it makes it easy to hit.
I think what makes the new paradigm of small quadcopters used as recon drones and occasional "drop a grenade" drone so effective is that it is difficult to detect and then precisely locate them. Now, once that hurdle has been passed, and the anti-quad-copter-drone laser operator could properly put the laser on target, then yeah it would work.

And I know that top scientists in the US MIC are getting paid bank to figure this out. However, when a grunt-proof system of this arrives, it would still be super expensive, much like using a $250k missile to take out a $400 drone and miss because the operator did the "wait wait wait MOVE" tactic.

Warbadger
Jun 17, 2006

NihilCredo posted:

Wouldn't going back to old-style timed fuzes be quite effective against drones? Much like early 20th century aircraft, they are slow, fragile, and fly at low altitude, so I would guess they can be taken down by airbursts pretty well? The fancy sensor suite you mentioned will be needed to spot and target the drat thing, but the ammunition ought to be as cheap as possible.

I guess if Raytheon actually puts into production that laser-based system of theirs, that would be the winner. Surely it'll be expensive as hell to buy and maintain, but it ought to shoot down swarms of even Mavics for a negligible marginal cost.

/armchair

Timed fuses programmed as they're fired seems to be the preferred way - so not far off from what you're suggesting.

Tigey
Apr 6, 2015

I assume that in addition to land-based AA/SAM/EW systems (which while no doubt effective, involve placing an expensive, manned vehicle in harms way), militaries are also looking at the option of anti-drone drones.

We've already seen a few videos of quadcopters awkwardly ramming each other and the like, but I have to imagine more specialised designs are being conceived.

CommissarMega
Nov 18, 2008

THUNDERDOME LOSER

Personally, I also wonder about how many naval crewmen ended up being drafted for the war.

Tigey
Apr 6, 2015

The Russian Naval Infantry were used extensively during some of the more intense battles in mid-late 2022 (I can't remember exactly where), and if I remember were some of their most effective units at the time.

And with much of the fleet effectively useless in the conflict (other than for taking occasional missile potshots, due to Ukraine ASMs in the Black Sea, and Turkey controlling the Straits), I would definitely image they are scraping whatever manpower they can from naval ships and bases, like they are from their various garrison and border military units across Russia.

beer_war
Mar 10, 2005

https://twitter.com/maxseddon/status/1679761541174902786?s=20

Putin is a real piece of poo poo.

Toxic Mental
Jun 1, 2019

“Leftist” tank enjoyers now going to have to do a whole new corkscrew when they pretzel themselves into explaining how Russia is denazifying and should definitely win this war.

“Can’t wait for Russia to win and absorb The Ukraine and implement these GREAT policies like [looks at article] criminalizing being trans.

[shifty eyes] hey what’s that over there?”

Toxic Mental fucked around with this message at 11:18 on Jul 14, 2023

Rust Martialis
May 8, 2007

At night, Bavovnyatko quietly comes to the occupiers’ bases, depots, airfields, oil refineries and other places full of flammable items and starts playing with fire there

Toxic Mental posted:

“Leftist” tank enjoyers now going to have to do a whole new corkscrew when they pretzel themselves into explaining how Russia is denazifying and should definitely win this war.

I think you'll find it will be managed without problem - the ability to cancel out anything Russia does with the infinite power of "Amerikkka bad" is still untested.

Toxic Mental
Jun 1, 2019

We are fully prepared to accommodate anyone who is about to have a genuine “…Are we the baddies?” moment btw

It’s okay to admit you were wrong and join us on the side of Good

Tigey
Apr 6, 2015

Toxic Mental posted:

“Leftist” tank enjoyers now going to have to do a whole new corkscrew when they pretzel themselves into explaining how Russia is denazifying and should definitely win this war.

“Can’t wait for Russia to win and absorb The Ukraine and implement these GREAT policies like [looks at article] criminalizing being trans.

[shifty eyes] hey what’s that over there?”

Yeah, 'denazifying' by adopting similar tactics to the nazis - in that during a losing war they massively ramp up the victimisation and persecution of an already heavily marginalised and vulnerable segment of their own population - primarily due to the fact that the West is perceived to 'care' about that group.

At 'best', its a horrifyingly cynical attempt to try to exert some kind of pressure or leverage by 'hostage taking', and maybe get some kind of concessions. And at worst, its an act of sheer malice and spite - directing their impotent rage at their own weakness and inability to win militarily toward an innocent group that has nothing to do with the war.

gently caress Putin and everyone who supports him.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

a pipe smoking dog
Jan 25, 2010

"haha, dogs can't smoke!"

Toxic Mental posted:

“Leftist” tank enjoyers now going to have to do a whole new corkscrew when they pretzel themselves into explaining how Russia is denazifying and should definitely win this war.

“Can’t wait for Russia to win and absorb The Ukraine and implement these GREAT policies like [looks at article] criminalizing being trans.

[shifty eyes] hey what’s that over there?”

Ah but you see senior Azov commander @hitler88 also hates trans people so who is to say if Russia is good or bad.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply