Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Crows Turn Off
Jan 7, 2008


drat, that's so far away.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010
At least it's before the election.

So...is this likely?
https://twitter.com/hugolowell/status/1682367307807444992

BigBallChunkyTime
Nov 25, 2011

Kyle Schwarber: World Series hero, Beefy Lad, better than you.

Illegal Hen
Is it normal to have a case be that far away?

gregday
May 23, 2003

drat, a former president facing charges of espionage, racketeering, and (possibly) insurrection / seditious conspiracy all at once.

gregday
May 23, 2003

I just realized it would be very, very funny given the timing of these charges and trials, that the later ones could use his history of criminal activity (with the other cases that got convictions just earlier) as a sentencing enhancement.

The Bible
May 8, 2010

Charlz Guybon posted:

At least it's before the election.

It's close enough that they'll be able to stall it out until the RNC, and the GOP will stall it out from there until after the election.

Trump gets the date he wants, and Cannon gets to pretend she didn't just hand it to him.

Ynglaur
Oct 9, 2013

The Malta Conference, anyone?
The RNC convention is in mid-July next year, fwiw.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

BigBallChunkyTime posted:

Is it normal to have a case be that far away?

It's not unusual for a case of this size, especially when it involves classified evidence. In fact, it fits right into the "8-12 months" prediction Paracaidas made a few pages ago:

Paracaidas posted:

The government is pushing for an earlier trial date so that Trump's team have to try and postpone particular steps with particular reasons instead of the generalized objections to the concept of a trial itself we saw in their most recent filing. Knowing that Trump badly wants to delay, they're pushing that date to be earlier with the recognition that even an impartial judge will be able to justify weeks of slip in the schedule.

While the case is uncommon (in ways that both push for and pull against an earlier date), the gap between indictment and resolution (plea or verdict) is commonly 8-12 months and the March timeframe sits squarely in that range.

Grater
Jul 11, 2001
Might seem like a nice guy, but cross me once...
My guess is cannon set the may date, expecting that the shithead will have clinched the nomination. Then she’ll toss the case for bullshit political reasons like a nominated candidate can’t be prosecuted (I’m sure she’ll use the barr memo logic as justification).

BDawg
May 19, 2004

In Full Stereo Symphony

The Bible posted:

It's close enough that they'll be able to stall it out until the RNC, and the GOP will stall it out from there until after the election.

Trump gets the date he wants, and Cannon gets to pretend she didn't just hand it to him.

My understanding as a non-expert who listens to podcasts is that federal trials don't get frequently delayed once a date is established, unless charges are significantly amended or co-defendants are added.

Judges will give the attorney more time if they request it, but not if it risks the trial date.

Uglycat
Dec 4, 2000
MORE INDISPUTABLE PROOF I AM BAD AT POSTING
---------------->
Crimes of moral turpitude

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Grater posted:

My guess is cannon set the may date, expecting that the shithead will have clinched the nomination. Then she’ll toss the case for bullshit political reasons like a nominated candidate can’t be prosecuted (I’m sure she’ll use the barr memo logic as justification).

I don't want to be mean here, but there's absolutely no legal basis for this to happen, nor is there any actual basis to think Cannon would pull something this egregiously illegal (seriously, it's several orders of magnitude beyond the special master thing), nor is there any reason to think that Cannon particularly favors Trump over other GOP candidates. There's absolutely nothing at all suggesting that any of this might possibly happen, and there's no real way that it could happen.

I think it would be nice if we could watch what's actually happening, instead of responding to every instance of Cannon doing normal reasonable judge things by inventing a new conspiracy theory explaining how it's just a super extra double secret 11th-dimensional-chess move to protect Trump. What's the point in following the trial if you've already decided what the result is going to be?

Tayter Swift
Nov 18, 2002

Pillbug
I hear Cannon has reinstated Trump as president and also ruled we now own Finland?!?

projecthalaxy
Dec 27, 2008

Yes hello it is I Kurt's Secret Son


Tayter Swift posted:

also ruled we now own Finland?!?

The DarkCrawler doctrine...

PhantomOfTheCopier
Aug 13, 2008

Pikabooze!
The prosecution offered a date that would have provided 4mo of preparation. The trial date offers at least 9mo. Both dates are within the realm of "reasonable", but it's not "conspiracy" to observe that the chosen date offers more than double the preparation time in a case where a good deal of the evidence was available to the defense when they participated in the special master review last year.

V-Men
Aug 15, 2001

Don't it make your dick bust concrete to be in the same room with two noble, selfless public servants.

Main Paineframe posted:

I don't want to be mean here, but there's absolutely no legal basis for this to happen, nor is there any actual basis to think Cannon would pull something this egregiously illegal (seriously, it's several orders of magnitude beyond the special master thing), nor is there any reason to think that Cannon particularly favors Trump over other GOP candidates. There's absolutely nothing at all suggesting that any of this might possibly happen, and there's no real way that it could happen.

I think it would be nice if we could watch what's actually happening, instead of responding to every instance of Cannon doing normal reasonable judge things by inventing a new conspiracy theory explaining how it's just a super extra double secret 11th-dimensional-chess move to protect Trump. What's the point in following the trial if you've already decided what the result is going to be?

On the one hand, yes, I think you're right, but on the other hand, yes, Cannon literally created her own legal doctrine and authority to impose orders even though had both no jurisdiction and authority to do. And I'm not sure if she's ever said anything to make me think the order from the Eleventh Circuit humbled her in any way.

Kammat
Feb 9, 2008
Odd Person
What's the primary schedule look like? That might still be the thick of it, and if he has to be present for the trial it's gonna make campaigning impossible.

Looks like almost everyone is done in March/April so he might have things locked up by then.

ben shapino
Nov 22, 2020

Tayter Swift posted:

I hear Cannon has reinstated Trump as president and also ruled we now own Finland?!?

Last I heard, Cannon did a big ol derp yet again

Tayter Swift
Nov 18, 2002

Pillbug
The last two trials I did jury duty for (murder & attempted murder) took place two years after arraignment so I dunno, I know she's a hack who should not be on this bench but a May date doesn't seem that outlandish to me in a vacuum.

PhantomOfTheCopier
Aug 13, 2008

Pikabooze!
Speaking figuratively and in a decidedly-not-legalistic manner, (today would be an awesome day for a GJ indictment and) it seems appropriate for every right wing post, including T himself, to now complain that Cannon is a source of "election interference". Arguably if there is such a thing, it would be lessened by having a guilty verdict and prison sentence today. An acquittal on October 15, 2024, given no other changes, would be equivalent to "emails 2016" interference. Given the timing of primaries, it's more interfering the farther it is from today.

I'm not complaining about "interference", but if you want to do so, I think you need to complain that Cannon didn't schedule it for December.

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound

Tayter Swift posted:

The last two trials I did jury duty for (murder & attempted murder) took place two years after arraignment so I dunno, I know she's a hack who should not be on this bench but a May date doesn't seem that outlandish to me in a vacuum.

Federal stuff is supposed to move faster but yeah it isn't unreasonable.

SpeakSlow
May 17, 2004

by Fluffdaddy

VideoGameVet posted:

Hillary was born in 1947. Bill took office in 1993. So she was 46.

Yeah possible and maybe not with Bill.

Then there are the daughters.

Or loving Socks, the rake.

Caros
May 14, 2008

I for one, support this trial date. Trump will have clinched the nomination by May, at that point, assuming conviction, you have two comedy options:

1. Republicans nominate a convicted felon at their convention.

2. Trump is convicted and the convention becomes a clusterfuck.

PhantomOfTheCopier
Aug 13, 2008

Pikabooze!
The actual question is, Just how many convictions will T have by the convention, and how many by November?

Whatever the answer, you can be assured that the Rs will be running a clown show.

(Apologies to respectable clowns, Red Skelton, etc)

Tayter Swift
Nov 18, 2002

Pillbug
GOP convention tagline: "Donald Trump: A man who stands by his convictions"

Caros
May 14, 2008

PhantomOfTheCopier posted:

The actual question is, Just how many convictions will T have by the convention, and how many by November?

Whatever the answer, you can be assured that the Rs will be running a clown show.

(Apologies to respectable clowns, Red Skelton, etc)

So far it looks like more suing in Dec for being. Rapist, porn star hush money in March, storing classified s secrets in a bathroom for may and then some. Light racketeering/insurrection anywhere from June to after the election.

Guest2553
Aug 3, 2012


Tayter Swift posted:

Thread title tagline: "Trump Legal Troubles: A man who stands by his convictions"

CapnAndy
Feb 27, 2004

Some teeth long for ripping, gleaming wet from black dog gums. So you keep your eyes closed at the end. You don't want to see such a mouth up close. before the bite, before its oblivion in the goring of your soft parts, the speckled lips will curl back in a whinny of excitement. You just know it.
May seems... fine.

Moving it to St. Pierce is maybe not great, though? It's redder there.

Caros
May 14, 2008

CapnAndy posted:

May seems... fine.

Moving it to St. Pierce is maybe not great, though? It's redder there.

It is worth mentioning that May is likely as early as we can get in part because of the other trials. The three stooges effect of all his crimes means that they can't have say, a March trial date, because he needs to be in NYC for a different criminal trial.

Grater
Jul 11, 2001
Might seem like a nice guy, but cross me once...

Main Paineframe posted:

I don't want to be mean here, but there's absolutely no legal basis for this to happen, nor is there any actual basis to think Cannon would pull something

No worries on the meanness, this is serious internet business after all.

Honestly, post was meant tongue in cheek but I posted it because I do have a legit question about her ability to interfere. I thought there were still legal avenues for her to shitcan the case. I have also seen nothing to indicate that she won’t try to pull something, and I’m not in the headspace to give benefit of the doubt to a group of people who literally tried to tear down the government.

But thank you for the reply, I sincerely hope you are right and I’m a big dumb idiot.

Nervous
Jan 25, 2005

Why, hello, my little slice of pecan pie.

Caros posted:

It is worth mentioning that May is likely as early as we can get in part because of the other trials. The three stooges effect of all his crimes means that they can't have say, a March trial date, because he needs to be in NYC for a different criminal trial.

May the rest of his misbegotten life be nothing but prison cells and court dates.

Deteriorata
Feb 6, 2005

Trump’s legal team continues effort to disqualify Georgia DA as possible state indictments loom

quote:


Former President Donald Trump’s legal team in Georgia is continuing its efforts to disqualify Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis from pursuing her 2020 election interference investigation, as possible indictments in the state loom.

In a new, 650-page filing in the Superior Court of Fulton County, Trump’s lawyers stepped up attacks on Willis, a Democrat. CNN has previously reported that Willis is considering bringing racketeering and conspiracy charges in connection with Trump and his allies’ efforts to overturn the 2020 election in Georgia. The district attorney’s office declined to comment.

In the filing, Trump’s lawyers argue that due to Willis’ “conflict of interest” as a political candidate, she should not be allowed to continue to pursue the case.

“The District Attorney personally retweeted requests for followers and campaign donations which referenced her prosecution of this investigation,” Trump’s attorneys argued in the lengthy petition.

Trump’s Georgia legal team filed a petition last week, asking the court to throw out the evidence collected during investigation, to disqualify Willis and to remove Judge Robert McBurney from presiding over the case.

Earlier this week, the Georgia Supreme Court dismissed a similar bid from Trump.

The Georgia Supreme Court said in a five-page opinion that Trump hadn’t demonstrated the “extraordinary circumstances” that would require their intervention to block state prosecutors from ever using that material in any future criminal or civil proceedings.

Additionally, an Atlanta Judicial Circuit judge has ordered Fulton County Superior Court judges, including McBurney, to recuse themselves from overseeing attempts by Trump to essentially shut down the Fulton County criminal probe.

The circuit judge ordered that the judges in Georgia’s 7th District, which covers northwest Georgia, will now preside over the Trump vs. Willis petition. The order invited the newly appointed judges to arrange a courtroom in Fulton County “if necessary,” so it is still unclear where any future hearings on the case will be held.

Willis has indicated she plans to announce charges in August.

I'm sure this one will get the same thoughtful consideration as the last one.

davecrazy
Nov 25, 2004

I'm an insufferable shitposter who does not deserve to root for such a good team. Also, this is what Matt Harvey thinks of me and my garbage posting.
Trumps trials are the Mr. Burns can’t get sick meme.

Independence
Jul 12, 2006

The Wriggler
I have a question: Can he fire his legal team, say, a week prior to the trial and try and delay that way?

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

Caros posted:

It is worth mentioning that May is likely as early as we can get in part because of the other trials. The three stooges effect of all his crimes means that they can't have say, a March trial date, because he needs to be in NYC for a different criminal trial.

Different lawyers are involved aren't they? Why couldn't the trails happen at the same time?

smackfu
Jun 7, 2004

I don’t think they can literally schedule two trials at the same time because you have the right to attend your criminal trial.

Kavros
May 18, 2011

sleep sleep sleep
fly fly post post
sleep sleep sleep

davecrazy posted:

Trumps trials are the Mr. Burns can’t get sick meme.

"See, you are actually being charged with, ah, every single crime at once."

"You mean, I'm charged with racketeering?"

"yes."

"Insurrectionary sedition?"

"yes."

"Transporting dentures across state lines?"

"A, .. little bit, yes!"

Lammasu
May 8, 2019

lawful Good Monster

smackfu posted:

I don’t think they can literally schedule two trials at the same time because you have the right to attend your criminal trial.
What if he does some whacky sitcom shenanigans where he tries to attend both at once?

Caros
May 14, 2008

Charlz Guybon posted:

Different lawyers are involved aren't they? Why couldn't the trails happen at the same time?

As others said, right to attend.

Theoretically he could waive that, but given it is in his best interest to delay as many of these as possible (his plan really does seem to be 'win office and never leave') I don't see why he would. Even as an option I'm not sure the state would bite as it opens up an avenue for appeal.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010
This is the first I'd heard about Giuliani and Graham being charged on this.

https://twitter.com/tomiahonen/status/1682402416300376065

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply