Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Rougey
Oct 24, 2013

Unkempt posted:

I'm just amazed they used 'Throw Your Arms Around Me' because I didn't think anyone in America knew that song.

I did a double take at that. Pub Rock isn't something you really hear outside of, well, the pub.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Martman
Nov 20, 2006

Jeremy has an amazing ability to look like he has no chin while actually having an amazing jawline at the same time

Faucet Drinker
Apr 10, 2007

I've already given my opinion on the season and such, and Claire I mostly agree on but I understand what I think they were trying to explore with Carmy's priorities. One thing that irks me though is why is he even feeling that pressured? She's a nurse right, it's a very demanding job, they even discuss how they both have hard jobs that demand a lot of time from them. So where's the pressure? You'd collectively have like 2 days a week to maybe see one another given your schedules, seems like it might be a burden if she worked PT at a coffee shop, but she's a busy accomplished medical practioner. You'd think they both be very understanding.

Chairman Capone
Dec 17, 2008

Just finished watching both seasons over the last couple weeks. Great show, and kind of surprised they dumped the second season all at once. I think I'll probably take a hot take, the s2 finale was more stressful to me than the Christmas episode.

Also, s2 finale had the most devastating text message reveal since episode 2 of Station Eleven.

biceps crimes
Apr 12, 2008


Binged this all over the past week since my coworkers won't stop talking about it. I liked S1 a lot more than S2, though the seven fishes episode was great. The new restaurant seems really uninspired to me, and too many of the character arcs were too compressed and I couldn't suspend my disbelief. Would a restaurant really pay for Marcus to go to Copenhagen, or pay for Tina's training? The cicero character seems too convenient a source for money, etc.

Also, I would go to The Beef, but I wouldn't go to The Bear. They should have paid cicero the money back and cleaned up their act at The Beef without doing a big remodel

biceps crimes fucked around with this message at 02:10 on Jul 31, 2023

FuriousGeorge
Jan 23, 2006

Ah, the simple joys of a monkey knife-fight.
Grimey Drawer
This show has taught me that the pre-requisites for fine dining apparently are:

1. A meal can only take up 1/12th the area of the plate at most.
2. Drizzle drizzled on everything.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

biceps crimes posted:

Also, I would go to The Beef, but I wouldn't go to The Bear.
The Beef is still there. So many people missed this that I don't think they did a good enough job explaining it. The sit-down section is the new stuff. The old stuff is the window.

FuriousGeorge posted:

This show has taught me that the pre-requisites for fine dining apparently are:

1. A meal can only take up 1/12th the area of the plate at most.
2. Drizzle drizzled on everything.
You're pretty much right on the money for real life with this.

Timby
Dec 23, 2006

Your mother!

biceps crimes posted:

The cicero character seems too convenient a source for money

He's a loan shark / tied in with organized crime.

This happens more often with restaurants than you'd think.

whos that broooown
Dec 10, 2009

2024 Comeback Poster of the Year

ruddiger posted:

All the research in the show went only into how abusive high end restaurant kitchens are.

Well except the staging part. If anything they portray it in a positive light.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

I don't know it's convenient that they're in debt to a mobster.

That seems decidedly inconvenient.

biceps crimes
Apr 12, 2008


LividLiquid posted:

I don't know it's convenient that they're in debt to a mobster.

That seems decidedly inconvenient.

love when the mobster is a family friend, doesn't threaten physical violence, agrees to my terms, doesn't charge interest and is genuinely supportive

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

He gets the building that's worth far more than their restaurant if they don't pay him back in full in a super unreasonable time frame, so the most important things you said don't apply even slightly.

Gorn Myson
Aug 8, 2007






They should've gone for a more realistic route and had a bank in the year 2023 approve a sizable loan to a penniless chef so he can open a new restaurant in an area where many of them are closing.

Timby
Dec 23, 2006

Your mother!

biceps crimes posted:

love when the mobster is a family friend, doesn't threaten physical violence, agrees to my terms, doesn't charge interest and is genuinely supportive

I'm just going to quote myself from earlier in the thread:

Timby posted:

It's my last point that I think is going to rear its head in a hypothetical season 3. Carmy's getting loan-sharked to hell and back by Jimmy Cicero and it is absolutely going to come back to bite him in the rear end; there's no way The Bear is going to have $500,000 in liquid cash sitting around to pay the mob back within fifteen months.

Edit: Especially because they used all $500,000 that Cicero gave them just to get the place open. Given that this show is generally pretty accurate about the realities of the restaurant business, they're going to be operating at a deficit for a few years. (A new restaurant in downtown Chicago should be ready to lose $2-3 million in its first few years.) This is going to be a primary story in season 3, I feel; it'll be a year after this season ended, with three months left to go until the note is up, and Jimmy Cicero starts threatening to bigtime Carmy out of the property for default. And it's not like Oliver Platt will be tough to get; he lives in Chicago for eight months a year because of his supporting role on Chicago Med.

They literally lose the restaurant and the property if they don't pay back an insane amount of money in a wildly unrealistic timeframe.

Phenotype
Jul 24, 2007

You must defeat Sheng Long to stand a chance.



it'll be fine

CatstropheWaitress
Nov 26, 2017

IRL do chefs just declare bankruptcy when that happens but use the prestige they build up for better jobs/better loans?

whos that broooown
Dec 10, 2009

2024 Comeback Poster of the Year

CatstropheWaitress posted:

IRL do chefs just declare bankruptcy when that happens but use the prestige they build up for better jobs/better loans?

Most chefs do not own their restaurants.

ilmucche
Mar 16, 2016

What did you say the strategy was?

LividLiquid posted:

The Beef is still there. So many people missed this that I don't think they did a good enough job explaining it. The sit-down section is the new stuff. The old stuff is the window.

They show the window a few times and I think they explained it maybe once? I suspect if they'd may head some signs around it (like I'd expect a beef window to have) it would've been more obvious

MiddleOne
Feb 17, 2011

Billionares financing prestige restaurants for clout is one of the cornerstones of the industry.

Slotducks
Oct 16, 2008

Nobody puts Phil in a corner.


FuriousGeorge posted:

This show has taught me that the pre-requisites for fine dining apparently are:

1. A meal can only take up 1/12th the area of the plate at most.
2. Drizzle drizzled on everything.

my favourite thing is they've not shown the foam-everything thing that I saw taking over fine dining again the last few years

Doltos
Dec 28, 2005

🤌🤌🤌

Timby posted:

I'm just going to quote myself from earlier in the thread:

They literally lose the restaurant and the property if they don't pay back an insane amount of money in a wildly unrealistic timeframe.

As someone who actually kept books for a semi popular restaurant

1. The restaurant would pull in about 2.2mil anually
2. Margins were about 94% after everything was paid for (food, cooks, building, maintenance, etc.)
3. The owner brought home about 125k a year
4. It was about 30% liquid cash
5. He complained about losing 20% to taxes

It would take about 5 years or less for a semi-popular highway restaurant to pay back the loan. The Bear is a walkable fine dining area. He's making that money back for his uncle in less time.

ilmucche
Mar 16, 2016

What did you say the strategy was?
I would unironically like to learn more about bookkeeping in restaurants and what a lot of them look like outside of "in the red and barely afloat, going under in 3 years"

Escobarbarian
Jun 18, 2004


Grimey Drawer
I can’t believe this dramatised television show isn’t totally realistic. I hope somebody got fired for THOSE blunders

Shabadu
Jul 18, 2003

rain dance


Well, from the country/city club world, we lose money on every event and meal we serve. We're entirely kept afloat on our exlucisvity and dues and initiation fee. It's also why we can afford to be relatively stable and keep 40 hour weeks.

Faucet Drinker
Apr 10, 2007

30% or less in food cost (Inc liquor), aim for 26% if you're mid expansion and can manage a 26% labour cost or something around there. You sell 10k in food let's hope you spent 3k or less, same principal with labour hours paid compared to time in service. If you can hit those margins you're laughing, many places struggle to get them that low and include decent food quality, consistency, and service so often you gotta figure out where you're taking the hit.

First season was limited menu and hours to help put a dent in their costs, which apparently wasn't working. The real thorn in my pawn regarding real life logistic of that restaurant is that if the first time you tried third-part ordering you accidentally left the tablet on and took on way more orders than they could possibly make (first season somewhere) that implied to me the demand for The Beef was much greater than they could supply, so I'm not sure why they would t have taken that money and dialed in the original model for a year or two. I guess they wanted.to go big or go home but based on that string of orders they should have been able to dig out of some debt

acksplode
May 17, 2004



Faucet Drinker posted:

The real thorn in my pawn regarding real life logistic of that restaurant is that if the first time you tried third-part ordering you accidentally left the tablet on and took on way more orders than they could possibly make (first season somewhere) that implied to me the demand for The Beef was much greater than they could supply, so I'm not sure why they would t have taken that money and dialed in the original model for a year or two.

IIRC that surge of demand happened because Syd gave away the fancy dish she was workshopping to a random diner after Carmy spiked it, and that diner happened to be a food critic. The subsequent glowing review pissed Carmy off bc he didn't think they were ready for that level of attention yet. It didn't necessarily reflect demand for The Beef

Faucet Drinker
Apr 10, 2007

Oh right! Thanks for clearing that up.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Shabadu posted:

Well, from the country/city club world, we lose money on every event and meal we serve. We're entirely kept afloat on our exlucisvity and dues and initiation fee. It's also why we can afford to be relatively stable and keep 40 hour weeks.
Only tangentially related, but food is a loss leader in the vast majority of bars. It only exists because most state liquor boards require you to serve a certain number of hot meals in order to sell anything stronger than beer and wine and to keep you from leaving to go get actual good food elsewhere.

The restaurant business has poo poo margins, but they make it all up selling booze, for which the margins are loving bananas.

You buy two drinks and you already paid for the whole-rear end bottle.

ilmucche
Mar 16, 2016

What did you say the strategy was?

Shabadu posted:

Well, from the country/city club world, we lose money on every event and meal we serve. We're entirely kept afloat on our exlucisvity and dues and initiation fee. It's also why we can afford to be relatively stable and keep 40 hour weeks.

Didn't realise it was full on losses for food. the place I used to work had fairly expensive meals, but I guess it depends on the model. This place was extremely rare rented out for events.

Faucet Drinker posted:

30% or less in food cost (Inc liquor), aim for 26% if you're mid expansion and can manage a 26% labour cost or something around there. You sell 10k in food let's hope you spent 3k or less, same principal with labour hours paid compared to time in service. If you can hit those margins you're laughing, many places struggle to get them that low and include decent food quality, consistency, and service so often you gotta figure out where you're taking the hit.

First season was limited menu and hours to help put a dent in their costs, which apparently wasn't working. The real thorn in my pawn regarding real life logistic of that restaurant is that if the first time you tried third-part ordering you accidentally left the tablet on and took on way more orders than they could possibly make (first season somewhere) that implied to me the demand for The Beef was much greater than they could supply, so I'm not sure why they would t have taken that money and dialed in the original model for a year or two. I guess they wanted.to go big or go home but based on that string of orders they should have been able to dig out of some debt

I thought the margins on liquor were massive and way better than food, or does that only apply to bars? If say you're at 5% profit on something how much of the 95% cost divvied up between ingredients/labour/rent/maintenance debts kind of stuff?

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

The margins on alcohol are always good.

Faucet Drinker
Apr 10, 2007

ilmucche posted:


I thought the margins on liquor were massive and way better than food, or does that only apply to bars? If say you're at 5% profit on something how much of the 95% cost divvied up between ingredients/labour/rent/maintenance debts kind of stuff?

Margins are indeed good on liquor, what I mentioned was more of a house operation. You could run lower cost on liquor and higher on food and still come in under 30%, it depends on the establishment. They typically easily cover the cost of making the drink but there's more to consider than simply liquor cost <> menu price. If I make you a cocktail I've generated several dishes, which involves labour and chemical to resolve, labour to make the drink, have prepped ingredients, etc. It's pretty much a drop in the bucket compared to the mark up, especially when compared to food service costs, but it's not simply a direct mark up and easy profits. Thank God beyond open kegs and wine bottles that stuff doesn't go bad.

Regarding the hypothetical 95% cost: yes. That's why the last 5% is the only thing considered profit. Tenant/property cost, water/hydro, ingredients, labour, chemicals, repairs, smallwares, paper goods, the variety of prep, execution, and maintenance labour. It's a lot more expensive than it seems. I manage in a fairly recent restaurant built from the ground up and due to covid and generally not hitting projection, andI rising ingredients cost our prices have had to be raised several times and at the rate we are moving it will be 21 years before the mortgage has paid for itself.

This is why so many kitchens are dirty, cause if you can operate at the same profit margins and reduce labour costs by limiting maintenance, you're seeing more revenue. Not wise ime, as the bill from that fryer fire is going to empty it right back out and then some. And don't even get me started on equipment maintenance, trades people are great but drat if they are cheap.

Faucet Drinker fucked around with this message at 22:51 on Jul 31, 2023

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

You also need to put a shitload of cash away for rainy days, 'cause all it takes is something like construction on your block or a diet fad and you're hosed for six months.

A lot of just-hanging-on bars go out of business in the period between New Years Day and St. Paddy's Day because everybody's still reeling from spending so much at the end of the year on Christmas and such and have made New Years resolutions besides and if you haven't squirreled away enough cash to operate at a huge loss for two-and-a-half months, you're hosed.

Shabadu
Jul 18, 2003

rain dance


Part of the constitution where I work locks the upcharge on wine to 2x buying price, which is Absolutely Insane. We're talking first growths for 150 a bottle insanity, all because we charge dues.

No such clause exists for the liquor we sell, so an $18 bottle of titos we get from distributors gets sold for approximately $200 worth of individual pours.

Orange Crush Rush
May 7, 2009

You don't need thumbs for revenge
I just wanna say, I find a lot of the complaints about Claire's character being unrealistic kind of funny, when a twitter search for "carmie the bear" will lead to an endless list of women saying "okay but I can fix him"
A bit one dimensional? Sure I can get that but it's still (apparently) pretty realistic lol.

Xealot
Nov 25, 2002

Showdown in the Galaxy Era.

Orange Crush Rush posted:

I just wanna say, I find a lot of the complaints about Claire's character being unrealistic kind of funny, when a twitter search for "carmie the bear" will lead to an endless list of women saying "okay but I can fix him"
A bit one dimensional? Sure I can get that but it's still (apparently) pretty realistic lol.

Yes, 100%. Most straight women don't have a direct cool-girl indie pixie love interest equivalent, they have its inverse and Carmy is that: a brooding, broken, slightly antisocial but secretly vulnerable sad boy with expectant puppy eyes who wants so badly to love someone but nobody has broken through his trauma-hardened defenses. He's Kylo Ren and Draco Malfoy and most YA vampires, the Depressive Demon Nightmare Boy, just for an older and more up-market indie consumer.

MokBa
Jun 8, 2006

If you see something suspicious, bomb it!

Oh Carm was definitely designed in a lab by a team of scientists to be as attractive to women as possible. It’s actually not weird that the supermodel doctor would fall in love with him. Most people just wish she could have more characterization while doing so. I think my main issue with the plot is I know that the show and the writers are more than capable of crafting a very interesting and well rounded character for her, but they didn’t want to tell that story this season. Hopefully she sticks around and they get that chance.

ruddiger
Jun 3, 2004

Recently watched the Rental and lmao at Lip getting type cast as the poster boy of an unhinged abuser.

Doltos
Dec 28, 2005

🤌🤌🤌

ilmucche posted:

I thought the margins on liquor were massive and way better than food, or does that only apply to bars? If say you're at 5% profit on something how much of the 95% cost divvied up between ingredients/labour/rent/maintenance debts kind of stuff?

Liquor, depending on the price point of the restaurant, is usually 3x-10x original cost all the way to whatever clubs and fine dining want to charge. So like at Applebees you expect to pay less so they charge you 6 dollars for a LIT made with bottom shelf liquor that probably cost around 2 dollars to buy wholesale. A casual dining restaurant will use the same liquor and charge 10 dollars both because they need to make up on margins that isn't available in a non corporate structure and because customers expect drinks to be more expensive.

The bar would want to get 120ish beers out of a keg. A bud light keg would run 150ish so you'd want to sell the beers for at least four dollars due to spillage/customers sending the beer back/etc.

Lease + insurance+ maintenance at the restaurant was about 200k a year. Labour was always around 30-40% depending on chef, dish, and hostess count. Food cost is about 40-50% depending on what was being sold. Dairy and fish cost the most, vegetables are just a pain in the rear end because they can come in ugly/rotten but not too expensive, meat cost a lot but could be frozen for a while, grains and soda are dirt cheap, fruits pretty expensive.

All those costs are why running a restaurant is expensive and fickle. Car traffic is way less reliable than foot traffic and since America is super spaced out with tons of competition you can have insane busy days and completely barren off days. Those off days can completely sink a business between not selling perishable food and having to buy it all over again. That's not to mention having a flexible staff that sometimes requires a lot of people working and sometimes has them sitting around doing nothing. We'd have eleven servers on a Saturday night for 50ish tables (4-5 tables is around the max you should give a waiter since it's like spinning plates) making 2.14 an hour and that ate up 200ish dollars a night. Not a lot but it's about 30k dollars a year to cover weekends and another 20kish for the week. Labor was around 700-800k a year and servers made up 10% of that, if they were paid 15 an hour they'd be costing the restaurant around 140k a year instead which would essentially be all the owner's profits. That's why paying waitstaff over the tipping method exists. People expect a burger at a casual restaurant to be around 10-13 dollars which is subsidized by the waitstaff being cheap. Food cost for paying waitstaff would go up by 10-20% to cover it which is enough to sink a business when other restaurants offer a similar product for cheaper on lesser paid waitstaff.

It's all matchsticks ready to fall down at any second but it employees a ton of people and sometimes restaurants strike it big. The true American Dream.

Doltos fucked around with this message at 04:34 on Aug 2, 2023

Vegetable
Oct 22, 2010

My takeaway from all this is I’m ripping off my favorite restaurants when I dine there without buying any drinks

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

ilmucche
Mar 16, 2016

What did you say the strategy was?

This was a really interesting post. Thanks!

I guess the thing I heard about the weekends being full is fine and expected, but it's the midweek that can sink your restaurant is true?

It sounds like restaurants are almost forced into being open (nearly) every day to avoid wasting of food

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply